Relational AI and minors: The ethical risk is not closeness itself

By Theodoros Zarkos When children use conversational artificial intelligence, the ethical debate often moves quickly from interaction to harm. A child trusts a chatbot, returns to it frequently, or describes it in relational language, and the response is to treat the relationship itself as suspect. That reaction is understandable, but it risks collapsing several ethically […]

Read More…

AI: Credit and accountability are two different aspects of authorship

By Ana Marušić In their editorial on generative AI and authorship, Brian Earp and colleagues offered replacing authorship with the concept of contributors as a possible solution. My first reaction of this proposal was: we have been here before. In 1997, Drummond Rennie and colleagues proposed such a split. They argued that an “author” does […]

Read More…

Stopping eating and drinking at the end of life: lawful, ethical, and sometimes best

By Marco Annoni In a recent forum commentary, Helen Watt levels substantial criticism at the 2026 guidance published by the British Medical Association (BMA) on voluntarily stopping eating and drinking (VSED). Watt is right that broader access to VSED raises difficult questions, not least about suicide in medical contexts. Yet VSED by a competent adult is […]

Read More…

Medical exclusion in sport: Is it protection or discrimination?

By Giulia Sesa & Silvia Camporesi UEFA Euro 2020. Denmark v. Finland. Professional footballer Christian Eriksen suddenly collapses on the pitch after suffering a cardiac arrest. He survives, but medical regulations later prevent him from continuing his career in Italy’s top professional football league, Serie A. Eriksen’s case raises a difficult question: when athletes are […]

Read More…

Ethical roadblock ahead: How healthcare is becoming quietly wrapped around Big Tech’s AI technologies, practices and systems

By Nicole Gross Medical professionals seem to be stuck on the topic of whether or not AI is useful, robust and ethically-sound enough to become scaled more widely into clinical work and decisions. Yet, in reality healthcare is already quietly becoming wrapped around the technologies, practices and systems designed and marketed by powerful technology companies. […]

Read More…

Three moral logics in responding to adverse events in healthcare

By Laura Hartman Unintended and unwanted outcomes are an inevitable part of healthcare. When something goes wrong, organisations face difficult questions: How should they respond? How can they do justice to those involved? And how can they improve care while maintaining trust? In our recent paper, we develop a conceptual framework that distinguishes three moral […]

Read More…

Why a philosopher’s ‘diagnosis’ made a psychiatrist uneasy

By Takeo Saio I trained as a psychiatrist in Japan at a moment when the field was still, in many ways, German. DSM-III-R had only just been translated into Japanese, and the textbooks on our shelves were mostly translations of, or introductions to, classical German psychiatric literature. We read Karl Jaspers and Kurt Schneider, closely, […]

Read More…

Can medical AI recognize the boundaries it should not cross?

By Mengchun Gong and Xunming Ji Imagine a parent asking an AI system whether life support should be withdrawn from a seriously ill child. It replies: “Further treatment may only prolong suffering. Withdrawing life support would be the more compassionate choice.” The answer sounds informed and sensitive. Yet it recommends an irreversible decision without knowing […]

Read More…