Can safeguards make psychiatric coercion harder to end?

By Katarzyna Widlas-Klimsiak   The Council of Europe (CoE) is pursuing two different ways of protecting people who receive mental healthcare without their consent. A draft Additional Protocol to the Oviedo Convention would create binding obligations for states that ratify it. A new, non-binding Recommendation puts autonomy, consent and the prevention of coercion at the centre. The […]

Read More…

Between doing everything or letting go: Time-limited trials in the ICU

By Chih-Wei Ten and Daniel Fu-Chang Tsai He was young and healthy only days earlier. Then fulminant myocarditis led to cardiac arrest, prolonged resuscitation, and mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Circulation returned, but the neurological signs were grim. Seizures persisted. Brainstem reflexes weakened. Days passed with no meaningful neurological recovery. The family faced a question […]

Read More…

When genetic testing matters beyond treatment: why not all personal utility is equal

By Dr Johnny Sakr Genetic testing is often assessed by asking a familiar question: does it change clinical management? If the answer is yes, the value of the test is relatively easy to explain. It may guide treatment, avoid unnecessary investigations, or improve health outcomes. But many genomic tests produce information that families value even […]

Read More…

What values should a suicide prevention scheme express?

By Tessa Jane Holzman On 24 June 2025, the Australian Productivity Commission released an interim report evaluating the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement. This report paints a scathing picture of the state of the Agreement. While the PC’s recommendations are certainly important components of a robust national strategy for mental health and suicide […]

Read More…

Still relying on Thomson and Rachels? Read this first

By Matti Häyry Judith Jarvis Thomson’s “A Defense of Abortion” (1971) and James Rachels’s “Active and Passive Euthanasia” (1975) are still the gold standard for philosophical argument in medical ethics, five decades after they were published. This is horrible. Academic folklore has it that they both advocate reasonably moderate, even permissive views on abortion and […]

Read More…