Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Tag: research

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 14 November 2011

November 14, 2011

JAMA  9 Nov 2011  Vol 306 1983   Replumbing the brain through a hole in the skull is an idea that sounds straight out of the heroic days of kill-or-cure surgery. […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch2 Comments

Mike Clarke: Assessing the impact of participating in research – the need for core outcomes?

November 10, 2011

The COMET Initiative is making it easier for people to develop, identify, and use core outcome sets to improve the potential impact of research findings on healthcare practice, health, and wellbeing. […]

More…

Guest writersresearch1 Comment

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 17 October 2011

October 17, 2011

JAMA   12 Oct 2011  Vol 306 1549    It has been a bad week for vitamin supplements. Worst hit, as usual, has been vitamin E. The SELECT trial began collecting 35 […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 3 October 2011

October 3, 2011

JAMA  28 Sep 2011  Vol 306 1329    Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation reduces left ventricular load and improves outcomes in animal models of myocardial infarction. But in previous small human studies of […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch3 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 26 September 2011

September 26, 2011

JAMA  21 Sep 2011  Vol 306 1205   I don’t know why spammers have me down as so interested in imitation Rolex watches and erectile function: neither is particularly true. But […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch0 Comments

Research highlights blog – 23 September 2011

September 23, 2011

“Research highlights” is a weekly round-up of research papers appearing in the print BMJ. We start off with this week’s research questions, before providing more detail on some individual research […]

More…

Uncategorizedresearch0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 19 September 2011

September 19, 2011

JAMA  14 Sep 2011  Vol 306 1089   In medicine, always expect the counterintuitive. For some time it has been known that removing more lymph nodes at the time of bowel […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch0 Comments

Gaurav Gulsin, Sachin Gupta, Mostafa El Dafrawi: Read it and weep

September 14, 2011

In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on keeping up to date with the current scientific literature. To practise evidence based medicine, we have to constantly read and […]

More…

Studentspublishing, research2 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 12 September 2011

September 12, 2011

JAMA  7 Sep 2011  Vol 306 952   This is a themed issue on Medical Education, a domain where giant forces compete for the minds of highly selected young people, and […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch3 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 5 September 2011

September 5, 2011

NEJM  1 Sep 2011  Vol 365 787    Studies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest require heroic feats of organization and generally provide survival-to-discharge rates around 7%. In this randomized trial, the research […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch0 Comments
  • «Previous page
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • »Next page
  • 9

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Time to assume that health research is fraudulent…
  • Paul Garner: on his recovery from long covid
  • The ripples of trauma caused by severe pain during…

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.