Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Tag: peer review

Amy Price and Marilyn Mann on the pros of patient peer review

June 23, 2015

        Without peer review The BMJ could not survive. The journal uses reviewers to help assess the quality and usefulness of about 8000 papers per year. In […]

More…

Patient and public perspectivespatients, peer review1 Comment

Richard Smith: More on the uselessness of peer review

November 17, 2011

I know I’m becoming a bore with all this raving against prepublication peer review, but like all true bores I’m charging on regardless. And I’m fired up by the experience […]

More…

Richard Smithjournals, peer review6 Comments

Richard Smith: A woeful tale of the uselessness of peer review

November 11, 2011

Let me tell you a sad tale of wasted time and effort that illustrates clearly for me why it’s time to abandon prepublication peer review. It’s the tale of an […]

More…

Richard Smithjournals, peer review14 Comments

Liz Wager: Are journal editors like used car salesmen?

May 12, 2011

Yesterday, I gave evidence to a UK parliamentary inquiry into peer review (as did Fiona Godlee). (The session can be viewed here) Before the session I tried to think of […]

More…

Liz Wagerpeer review6 Comments

Elizabeth Loder: Who gets to be an author?

March 14, 2011

Elizabeth Loder reports on a panel discussion held at the International Publication Planning Association meeting in St  Louis, Missouri. […]

More…

Editors at largeauthorship, blogging, ghost writing, ICMJE, peer review, publication ethics1 Comment

Andrew Burd: Naughty editor, bad editor

February 28, 2011

I have been the human guardian of both cats and dogs over the years. I cannot call myself either a cat person or a dog person. They have such different […]

More…

Uncategorizedjournalology, peer review, research papers, social media13 Comments

Richard Smith: Twitter to replace peer review?

January 26, 2011

An interesting article in Nature gives what may be a glimpse of the future of scientific discourse by telling stories of how social media have done a much better and […]

More…

Richard Smithpeer review, social media, twitter8 Comments

Liz Wager on stem cell scientists’ criticisms of peer review

February 2, 2010

Stem cell researchers from some major international institutions have written an open letter to journal editors complaining that they have received unreasonable and obstructive reviews (Euro Stem Cell) […]

More…

Liz WagerLiz Wager, peer review, Stem-cell1 Comment

Siddhartha Yadav on optimism in South Asia for health research

June 11, 2009

Last week was a research-filled week for me. Two biomedical papers to review in the early part of the week and the South Asian Forum for Health Research (SAFHeR) meeting […]

More…

Siddhartha YadavNepal, peer review, South Asia3 Comments

Liz Wager: If comment is cheap why is peer review so expensive?

April 16, 2009

As you know (since you are reading this), I blog, albeit sporadically. I do not Tweet (yet) but I’m fascinated by the frenzy of twittering and the explosion of opportunities […]

More…

Liz Wagerdoc2doc, peer review, twitter10 Comments
  • 1
  • »Next page
  • 2

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Paul Garner: on his recovery from long covid
  • Comparative twin study: Access to healthcare…
  • Time to assume that health research is fraudulent…

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.