Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Search Results for: james raftery NICE

James Raftery: NICE, obesity, and bariatric surgery

July 13, 2012

The trends on obesity are shocking. UK data on the prevalence of obesity in adults and children are provided by the National Obesity Observatory, which also shows the social gradient […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs1 Comment

James Raftery: The NHS top-up policy for drugs not recommended by NICE – challenging the limits?

July 19, 2011

A recent breakfast meeting at the Kings Fund discussed the issue of an NHS top-up policy in relation to multifocal lenses in cataract surgery. My contribution from the commissioner perspective […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs0 Comments

James Raftery: Avastin, Lucentis, and NICE

June 28, 2011

A useful update was provided at a meeting this week sponsored by the Royal National Institute for the Blind (RNIB) and Patients Involved in NICE (the National Institute for Health […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogsdrug licensing, health economics, healthcare rationing3 Comments

James Raftery: What does “value based pricing” mean for NICE?

January 5, 2011

The “value based pricing” consultation paper” makes the following relevant references to the future of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogsdrug pricing, health reform, NICE1 Comment

James Raftery: What’s happening with NICE? The cancer drugs fund and “value based pricing”

November 4, 2010

The reports that NICE is to be stripped of its powers to recommend against NHS use of drugs prompts questions about the Coalition Government’s health plans. Some indication of what […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs1 Comment

James Raftery: NICE changes its position on Alzheimer’s disease drugs

October 22, 2010

The provisional guidance from NICE on drugs for Alzheimers’ disease – donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine –  marks a dramatic shift from restricting access to those with moderate disease to  […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs1 Comment

James Raftery: NICE – the beginning of the end—or a new beginning?

May 27, 2010

The coalition programme for government states: “We will create a cancer drugs fund to enable patients to access the cancer drugs their doctors think will help them, paid for using […]

More…

Guest writers, James Raftery's NICE blogs1 Comment

James Raftery: Bypassing NICE for the sake of innovation?

August 4, 2009

Recent reports that NICE was to be bypassed by drugs which were “innovative,” with funding from a new separate budget, sent me in search of the source report – the […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs1 Comment

James Raftery: The judicial review of NICE’s appraisal of drugs for secondary treatment of osteoporosis

April 9, 2009

The report of this judgment made me laugh out loud several times. Mr Justice Holman twice describes proceedings  as “bizarre”. A key confidentiality agreement with Dr Kanis  could not be […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs0 Comments

James Raftery on NICE’s cost per QALY threshold: does the public have a view?

March 12, 2009

One approach to setting NICE’s cost per QALY threshold might be to survey the public.  In 2003 NICE and the Department of Health did just that, with a study  “assessing  […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogsNICE, Qaly0 Comments
  • «Previous page
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • »Next page

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Paul Garner: on his recovery from long covid
  • Jeffrey Aronson: When I use a word . . . Fingerprints
  • Time to assume that health research is fraudulent…

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.