Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Richard Lehman’s weekly review of medical journals

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 26 September 2011

September 26, 2011

JAMA  21 Sep 2011  Vol 306 1205   I don’t know why spammers have me down as so interested in imitation Rolex watches and erectile function: neither is particularly true. But […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 19 September 2011

September 19, 2011

JAMA  14 Sep 2011  Vol 306 1089   In medicine, always expect the counterintuitive. For some time it has been known that removing more lymph nodes at the time of bowel […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 12 September 2011

September 12, 2011

JAMA  7 Sep 2011  Vol 306 952   This is a themed issue on Medical Education, a domain where giant forces compete for the minds of highly selected young people, and […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch3 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 5 September 2011

September 5, 2011

NEJM  1 Sep 2011  Vol 365 787    Studies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest require heroic feats of organization and generally provide survival-to-discharge rates around 7%. In this randomized trial, the research […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 30 August 2011

August 30, 2011

JAMA  24-31 Aug 2011  Vol 306 840   Every GP knows that some patients who are admitted to hospital come out without their usual medication and take this as an indication […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch1 Comment

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 23 August 2011

August 22, 2011

JAMA  17 Aug 2011  Vol 306 711   Randomized controlled trials of new interventions have become something of a rarity in JAMA of late, so I was interested to see this […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals1 Comment

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 15 August 2011

August 15, 2011

Arch Intern Med  8/22 Aug 2011  Vol 171 The order in which I place these journals does not reflect merit, but dates back to 1998 when I first made some […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals3 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 8 August 2011

August 8, 2011

JAMA  3 Aug 2011  Vol 306 493    This issue of JAMA is devoted to war and violence, things that most of us have not experienced. Those who do experience them, […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 1 August 2011

August 1, 2011

JAMA 27 July 2011 Vol 306 The management of early invasive breast cancer has evolved gradually though improved understanding of its natural history together with improved deployment of chemotherapy and […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalscritical appraisal, general medical journals, research reporting0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 25 July 2011

July 25, 2011

JAMA  20 July 2011  Vol 306 277   As I try to write, much of America lies torpid in a heat wave approaching 40 degrees centigrade. This issue of JAMA, like […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch1 Comment
  • «Previous page
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • »Next page
  • 69

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Edward Christopher: How can medical students avoid…
  • Paul Garner: on his recovery from long covid
  • Time to assume that health research is fraudulent…

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.