Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Richard Lehman’s weekly review of medical journals

Richard Lehman’s journal review—18 April 2016

April 18, 2016

NEJM 14 April 2016 Vol 374 Fixing spinal stenosis 1413 Magnetic resonance imaging was like magic when it first appeared. Suddenly structures in the back that could only be guessed […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals1 Comment

Richard Lehman’s journal review—11 April 2016

April 11, 2016

NEJM 7 April 2016 Vol 374 Prebirth steroids and baby lungs 1311 Most of you will be familiar with the logo of the Cochrane Collaboration, consisting of a blue circle […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—4 April 2016

April 4, 2016

NEJM 31 Mar 2016 Vol 374 Going Dutch with Lyme 1209 When you open a journal with New England in its name and read about Lyme disease, you somehow don’t […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals4 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—29 March 2016

March 29, 2016

NEJM 24 Mar 2016 Vol 374 Flinty problem, leaden response 1101 John Snow, the arch-hero of epidemiology, died in 1858 a disappointed man. It was only after he had died […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals1 Comment

Richard Lehman’s journal review—21 March 2016

March 21, 2016

NEJM 17 Mar 2016 Vol 374 Unnecessary pessary 1044 “This randomized trial showed that placement of a pessary in girls and women who were pregnant with singletons and who had […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—14 March 2016

March 14, 2016

NEJM 10 Mar 2016 Vol 374 Treating malaria in pregnancy 913 Here’s a tonic for those of us who lie abed with thoughts about the stupidity of the world and […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—7 March 2016

March 7, 2016

NEJM  3 Mar 2016  Vol 374 Inducing for better outcomes? 813 This useful British trial was done with the ultimate aim of reducing stillbirth, which tends to happen more in […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—29 February 2016

February 29, 2016

NEJM 25 Feb 2016 Vol 374 Aspirin with your cabbage? 728   Most people who undergo coronary artery surgery take aspirin. Nobody knew whether they should carry on or stop when […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—22 February 2016

February 22, 2016

NEJM 18 Feb 2016 Vol 374 Testosterone, lust and rage 611 When the great poet WB Yeats reached the age of 67, he noticed a certain waning of his powers […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals2 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—15 February 2016

February 15, 2016

NEJM  11 Feb 2016  Vol 374 The decline of Alzheimer’s 523    Let’s start off on a happy note, and think about dementia. On Saturday morning the BBC News website ran […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments
  • «Previous page
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • »Next page
  • 69

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Time to assume that health research is fraudulent…
  • Richard Smith: Learning about alcohol problems from…
  • Richard Smith: Learning from Canada about assisted dying

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.