Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Richard Smith

Richard Smith was the editor of The BMJ until 2004.

Richard Smith: Scientific communication is returning to its roots

July 26, 2011

A compelling piece in the Economist argues that social media are returning news to the “more vibrant, freewheeling, and discursive ways of the pre-industrial era” and that newspapers will prove […]

More…

Richard Smithinformation, newspapers, publishing, scientific publishing, social media5 Comments

Richard Smith: In the goldfish bowl with GPs—part 2

July 21, 2011

In my last blog I described my time in a goldfish bowl with some 35 GPs on a leadership course—how the process worked, and what I learnt about myself, and […]

More…

Richard Smithcommissioning, general practice0 Comments

Richard Smith: In the goldfish bowl with GPs

July 19, 2011

Two weeks ago I spent 90 minutes in a goldfish bowl with about 30 GPs. The goldfish bowl is a process to encourage reflection, and it certainly caused me to […]

More…

Richard Smithgeneral practice, private sector, public sector0 Comments

Richard Smith: A short history of patient power

July 11, 2011

I urge you to read Michael Millenson’s article on “Spock, Feminists, and the Fight for Participatory Medicine: a History.” It’s a fascinating and very readable account of how patient power […]

More…

Richard Smithparticipatory medicine, shared decision making7 Comments

Richard Smith: Will the NHS let me die of malaria?

July 4, 2011

I’m about to spend two weeks in Nigeria and need antimalarial tablets, but it seems that the NHS cannot help me. If I come back with malaria, no doubt it […]

More…

Richard Smithcommunicable disease, healthcare rationing, malaria12 Comments

Richard Smith: More on the United Nations meeting on NCDs

July 1, 2011

In September the United Nations will hold a high level meeting on the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This is only the second such meeting that the UN […]

More…

Richard Smith1 Comment

Richard Smith: How important are the “early origins of health?”

June 27, 2011

How important is what happens to you in fetal and neonatal life in determining whether you develop heart disease later in life? I found myself thinking about that question a […]

More…

Richard Smithfetal health, heart disease, maternal and neonatal health3 Comments

Richard Smith: Beware journals, especially “top” ones

June 22, 2011

Dave Sackett, the father of evidence based medicine, used to warn people against reading journals. They took up time that could be better spent and gave you fragments of evidence […]

More…

Richard Smithjournals2 Comments

Richard Smith: The NHS debate – missing most of what matters

June 21, 2011

I’ve stayed out of the NHS debate. These days I spend lots of time in countries like Bangladesh, Kenya, and Guatemala, and viewed from those countries – where health workers and […]

More…

NHS, Richard SmithNHS reforms3 Comments

Richard Smith: Prevention of diabetes – from impossible to widely available in 30 years

June 13, 2011

In the 1980s it was conventional wisdom that type 2 diabetes couldn’t be prevented, said Michael Engelgau of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, when I chatted to […]

More…

Richard SmithCDC, Diabetes, health promotion, prevention1 Comment
  • «Previous page
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • »Next page
  • 65

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Time to assume that health research is fraudulent…
  • Richard Smith: Learning about alcohol problems from…
  • Richard Smith: Learning from Canada about assisted dying

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.