Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Search Results for: james raftery NICE

James Raftery on a greater role for industry in NICE’s cost per QALY?

March 2, 2009

In December 2008 the Department of Health in England published the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme.  It describes how  the scheme will operate for at least five years from 2009. The previous scheme was […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogsNICE, pharmaceutical pricing, QUALYs1 Comment

James Raftery: Who should be first in line for a covid-19 vaccine? Assessing effectiveness and cost effectiveness 

November 17, 2020

If the UK’s planned distribution of a vaccine for covid-19 is to win widespread support it should be both clinically and cost effective. One dilemma is between prioritizing those at […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs0 Comments

Tara Lamont: What can we learn from NICE?

March 3, 2020

NICE has come of age. At 21, it is a national treasure. But like other national treasures, from Alan Bennett to Grayson Perry, we forget how subversive and challenging they […]

More…

NHS0 Comments

James Raftery: A more fundamental review of QALYs is needed

April 17, 2018

Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) have become common in research, partly due to being used by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). A long running effort to update […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs0 Comments

James Raftery: Ever higher cancer drug prices—driven by US policies and genetic sequencing

July 1, 2015

The high prices charged by companies for cancer drugs has led to lots of speculation, but very little explanation. The most interesting attempt to explain these high prices has been […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogsCancer, cancer drugs, NICE0 Comments

James Raftery: Cancer drug prices and olaparib

June 4, 2015

NICE’s provisional rejection of Astra Zeneca’s olaparib (Lynparza) for a genetic subset (BRCA1/2 gene mutation) of ovarian cancers has several themes which have not been commented on. One is that […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs1 Comment

James Raftery: Sofosbuvir for hepatitis C—moving to country specific prices

August 20, 2014

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has provisionally approved sofosbuvir (brand name Sovaldi) for the treatment of hepatitis C, a decision that has surprised some commentators given its high […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs4 Comments

James Raftery: Should the NHS use the new meningitis B vaccine?

March 28, 2014

The argument over whether the NHS should fund Bexsero, the new meningitis B vaccine from Novartis, raises a global issue about the price of the new vaccine, as well as […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs0 Comments

James Raftery: Value based pricing—equality effects and ways forward

February 14, 2013

This blog reports on the third workshop held by the Department of Health on the methods being planned for value based pricing, due to start in January 2014. Previous workshops […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs0 Comments

James Raftery: QALYs and value based pricing

December 21, 2012

This blog reports on a workshop held by the Department of Health on 28 November 2012 under Chatham House rules, that is the discussion can be reported but not attributed. […]

More…

James Raftery's NICE blogs, NHS0 Comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • »Next page
  • 4

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Paul Garner: on his recovery from long covid
  • Jeffrey Aronson: When I use a word . . . Fingerprints
  • Time to assume that health research is fraudulent…

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.