Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Search Results for: richard lehman blog

Richard Lehman’s journal review—2 April 2013

April 2, 2013

JAMA  27 Mar 2013  Vol 309 1241    Have you ever heard of someone who’s recently had a heart attack going off and having 40 infusions of disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, ascorbate, […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—25 March 2013

March 25, 2013

JAMA  20 Mar 2013  Vol 309 1125    Is aliskiren a good drug for heart failure? Despite the negative result of this Novartis-funded trial (ASTRONAUT), I think the answer is probably […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—18 March 2013

March 18, 2013

JAMA  13 Mar 2013  Vol 309 997   Obstructive sleep apnoea is very, very common. In the preamble to this Australian study, a third of the adult population is accused of […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—11 March 2013

March 11, 2013

JAMA  6 Mar 2013  Vol 309 887   The Greek for belt is zoster, while the Latin for girdle is cingulum. Add Greek for creeping (or snake) and you get herpes […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—4 March 2013

March 4, 2013

JAMA  27 Feb 2013  Vol 781 781    Heart failure divides into two broad classes: the first is caused by damage to the myocardium and is associated with reduction in the […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—25 February 2013

February 25, 2013

JAMA  20 Feb 2013  Vol 309 689    Long back in the last century, I was a hysterectomy robot. This was the lowest form of life in a London teaching hospital […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—18 February 2013

February 18, 2013

 JAMA  13 Feb 2013  Vol 309 559    Last week I had a go at the editors of the NEJM and The Lancet  for publishing misleadingly reported pharma funded trials, in […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals2 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—11 February 2013

February 11, 2013

JAMA  6 Feb 2013  Vol 309 453    Stone the crows, a great little study from Oz that will change your practice at a stroke. They recruited 212 patients with intermittent […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals1 Comment

Richard Lehman’s journal review—4 February 2013

February 4, 2013

JAMA Intern Med  28 Jan 2013  Vol 173 93    One of the chief glories of this journal (formerly called the Archives) lies in the articles labelled LESS IS MORE, which […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals, US healthcare0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—28 January 2013

January 28, 2013

JAMA  23-30 Jan 2013  Vol 309 355    From time to time I like to shock my GP colleagues by saying that the most important part of any health system is […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments
  • «Previous page
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • »Next page
  • 40

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Elizabeth Romer: Changing the way we talk about…
  • Paul Garner: on his recovery from long covid
  • Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective”…

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.