Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Richard Lehman’s weekly review of medical journals

Richard Lehman’s journal review—29 June 2015

June 29, 2015

NEJM 25 June 2015  Vol 372 2533  The research articles in this week’s print NEJM are all about arcane stuff I’ve covered previously. The Clinical Practice article takes us back […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journalsresearch0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—22 June 2015

June 22, 2015

NEJM 18 June 2015 Vol 372 2387 For the first time in years, I actually handled a new printed copy of the NEJM last night. What a suave production it […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—15 June 2015

June 15, 2015

NEJM 11 June 2015 Vol 372 2307 Here at last is a study that shows some benefit from out of hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. It’s not a randomised trial, since that […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—8 June 2015

June 8, 2015

NEJM 4 Jun 2015 Vol 372 2185 If you are the sort of exciting doctor who looks after adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure, here is just the article you […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—1 June 2015

June 1, 2015

NEJM 28 May 2015 Vol 372 2087 Now that the NEJM has flagged up its position on conflicts of interest, it’s definitely a case of caveat lector—looking hard at what […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—26 May 2015

May 26, 2015

NEJM 21 May 2015 Vol 372 2064 The NEJM has the highest reputation of any medical journal, so it’s impossible not to feel dismay when it lets its standards slip […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals2 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—18 May 2015

May 18, 2015

NEJM 14 May 2015 Vol 372 1887 Something strange seems to be going on in the New England Journal of Medicine. This week it publishes two trials of gene therapy […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—11 May 2015

May 11, 2015

NEJM 7 May 2015 Vol 372 1860 This week the NEJM is offering everyone a free lunch, in the form of an open access article and editorial on the theme […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals1 Comment

Richard Lehman’s weekly journal review—5 May 2015

May 5, 2015

NEJM 30 April 2015 Vol 372 1684 “Virtual Visits—Confronting the Challenges of Telemedicine” is a Perspective piece which starts full of optimism about the potential of telemedicine and then switches […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals1 Comment

Richard Lehman’s weekly journal review—27 April 2015

April 27, 2015

NEJM 23 Apr 2015 Vol 372 Last week, dear friends, we kicked off with alirocumab and evolocumab. This week it’s the turn of nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab. It’s driving me […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals2 Comments
  • «Previous page
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • »Next page
  • 69

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Elizabeth Romer: Changing the way we talk about…
  • Paul Garner: on his recovery from long covid
  • Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective”…

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.