Before, and after.

In the world of non-randomised studies there are a bucketload of variants, a common one that we see if the ‘before and after study’. This is, on the face of it, a sensible approach. Do your ‘thing’, then change stuff, do the ‘other thing’. Monitor something important you hope to change, and then if it […]

Read More…

Moving onwards

Not transition this time, but the whole focus of academia. Do we need to shift the everyday focus of research from universities producing complex lab science to every heath care provider being both an intelligent consumer and local producer of relevant research? For instance: which the following spend the greatest proportion of revenue on R&D […]

Read More…

Don’t Forget the Bubbles – new paediatric website

Today saw the launch of Don’t Forget the Bubbles, a new paediatric website.  The aim of DFTB is to get more people involved in delivering high quality online education – it’s a collaborative, free, open access (FOAM) resource. The taster content available already gives you an idea of what’s to come.  There are useful quick […]

Read More…

Where does EBM go without E?

I’ve recently been working with lots of folk who manage children with disability and long-term conditions (LTC), a massive group of heterogenously named conditions with sometime similar and sometimes different problems. The teams working with them are passionate and committed and frequently want to use research. Then they go looking for it. […]

Read More…

StatsMiniBlog: Propensity scores

Propensity scores are used mainly in observational studies assessing treatments as a way of balancing out measured variations in who received a treatment and who didn’t. In most observational studies, there are things which will have pushed the doc into prescribing the medicine in question, or the surgeon to take the knife to that patient […]

Read More…

StatsMiniBlog: Bootstrapping

As mentioned in previous posts, part of the joys of playing with numbers is in making inferences about how the future will be. This is often why you’re looking for a confidence interval, showing (sort of) where the truth lies with 95% certainty. How you build these CI is interesting. One way is to assume […]

Read More…

July #ADC_JC – long-term effects antenatal steroids (ASTECS-2)

Our #ADC_JC in July discussed a paper by Stutchfield et al about the long-term consequences of antenatal steroids for elective c-sections (ASTECS-2).  We were delighted to have Peter Stutchfield join the chat. Alan Grayson, who was moderating the twitter chat, has put together a storify summarising the discussion and you can view it here. Follow […]

Read More…