30 Aug, 16 | by BMJ
After a month’s break, I’m catching up with articles of interest in the main non-BMJ journals throughout August. Normal service will be resumed next week.
NEJM Aug 2016 Vol 375
No parasites for five years
405 Following its famous “data parasites” editorial last January, the NEJM has struggled to find a comfortable position on the issue of opening up trial datasets for independent analysis. In its first print issue for August it hosted four Viewpoint articles offering a range of options, mainly for the sharing of trials conducted by academic centres. Completely open sharing does not get a mention—the idea that researchers should make their de-identified data available without restriction. The NEJM spectrum instead begins with the Yale Open Data Access project, of which I’m a proud founder member. We pioneered the “academic intermediary” model and still run one for those who wish to use it. If researchers want to use more direct methods of sharing data, we’re hardly going to stop them. But alas, the very opposite tends to be true. A piece from a hitherto unknown body called The International Consortium of Investigators for Fairness in Trial Data Sharing argues that researchers should retain sole use of their databases for up to five years. I’m genuinely sad and baffled that people with prosperous careers supported by public funding can argue that the research they have performed through the altruism of unpaid people taking voluntary risks is somehow their private property. more…