By Doug McConnell, Matthew Broome, and Julian Savulescu.
In our paper, “Making psychiatry moral again”, we aim to develop and justify a practical ethical guide for psychiatric involvement in patient moral growth. Ultimately we land on the view that psychiatrists should help patients express their own moral values by default but move to address the content of those moral values in the small subset of cases where the patient’s moral views are sufficiently inaccurate or underdeveloped.
Those who are interested in how we got that position can see our argument in the paper but here we’ll say something about what motivated us to write this paper.
We had been using the late Steve Pearce and Hanna Pickard’s 2010 paper, “The Moral Content of Psychiatric Treatment”, in teaching the MSt in Practical Ethics at Oxford. In that paper, they argue that moral norm breaking is casually and constitutively linked to some instances of mental illness and that psychiatry routinely works by improving patient morality. We had been interested to see the strong reactions some of the students had against the idea that psychiatrists should have any involvement in patient morality. This view, incidentally, was shared by at least one psychiatrist when our paper was presented at the 16th World Congress of Bioethics in Basel.
Given the reaction that the Pearce and Pickard paper tended to generate, we were surprised to see that it hadn’t attracted any fierce rebuttals. In fact, we found that the literature dealing explicitly with psychiatry and patient moral values was sparse. Moral language tended to be absent or replaced with (ostensibly) morally neutral language, such as discussion of risk management. It seems as if psychiatrists have been reluctant to publish their views one way or the other on the intersection of psychiatry and patient morality.
So we were encouraged to write our paper, both to articulate the objections that people might have to psychiatric involvement in patient morality, and to advance Pearce and Pickard’s core observation that, in many cases, psychiatry does and should work by addressing patient morality. It’s our view that psychiatry would be more effective if it was explicit in its interactions with patient morality and, given that current psychiatric practice does (implicitly) engage with patient morality, it would be better if psychiatry was transparent about this moral aspect of practice.
Paper title: Making psychiatry moral again: The role of psychiatry in patient moral development OPEN ACCESS
Author(s) (do not include qualifications): Doug McConnell (University of Oxford), Matthew Broome, (University of Birmingham), and Julian Savulescu (University of Oxford).
Competing interests: None
Social media accounts of post author(s): @matthewrbroome @IMH_UoB