Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Richard Lehman’s weekly review of medical journals

Plant of the Week: Lilium regale

July 2, 2007

Oscar Wilde adored lilies. He gave them away extravagantly, and he would wear a gilded lily in preference even to a green carnation. His contemporaries picture him as a vast, […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

JAMA 20 Jun 2007 Vol 297

June 24, 2007

Fans of The Rational Clinical Examination, once the best series in any medical journal, are having their patience tested a bit of late. Does This Patient Have Erythema Migrans? is […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

NEJM 21 Jun 2007 Vol 356

June 24, 2007

Dracunculiasis is a most ornamental word, but the little dragon to which it refers – the guinea worm – is a horrible parasite which, thanks to a lot of humble […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals1 Comment

BMJ 23 Jun 2007 Vol 334

June 24, 2007

Sciatica is a clinical diagnosis which is usually easy to make but hard to manage. This worthy Dutch review can find no evidence that any form of analgesia works, and […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Lancet 23 Jun 2007 Vol 369

June 24, 2007

Diastolic dysfunction is a diabolically dysfunctional subject: scarcely any two accounts agree, and the very mention of it can cause British cardiologists to foam at the mouth. […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Ann Intern Med 19 Jun 2007 Vol 146

June 24, 2007

Even before the virtual demise of hormone replacement therapy, soy was promoted as a “natural” alternative on the basis that Japanese women eat a lot of it and allegedly don’t […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

JAMA 13 Jun 2007 Vol 297

June 17, 2007

Do you pay attention to the haematocrit? In case you’d forgotten, it should lie between 39% and 54%, and in case you thought it’s a waste of time, here is […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

NEJM 14 Jun 2007 Vol 356

June 17, 2007

This meta-analysis of rosiglitazone and cardiovascular events appeared on the NEJM website some weeks ago, and few readers with an interest in diabetes can have failed to read something or […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

BMJ 16 Jun 2007 Vol 334

June 17, 2007

Diagnostic studies are abundant, but I continue to be amazed that senior researchers often write about things like “specificity” and “sensitivity” as if they are not context-dependent. […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Lancet 16 Jun 2007 Vol 334

June 17, 2007

In the stories of Russia 120 years ago, by Turgenev, Chekhov and Tolstoy, there is a recurring scene: the landowner or his bailiff meets a crowd of discontented peasants and […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments
  • «Previous page
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • »Next page
  • 69

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Elizabeth Romer: Changing the way we talk about…
  • Paul Garner: on his recovery from long covid
  • Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective”…

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.