Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Richard Lehman’s weekly review of medical journals

Richard Lehman’s journal review—18 November 2013

November 18, 2013

NEJM 14 Nov 2013 Vol 369 1880 As the Affordable Care Act splutters into action in the USA, JAMA devotes a whole issue to discussing the problems of healthcare in […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals, US healthcare0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—11 November 2013

November 11, 2013

NEJM  7 Nov 2013  Vol 369 1783   When you’ve already tried dasatinib and nilotinib, should your thoughts be turning to ponatinib? In case you’re wondering what I’m talking about, these […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—4 November 2013

November 4, 2013

JAMA Intern Med  28 Oct 2013  Vol 173 1770    There is very little in the journals this week: JAMA is taking a week off and even JAMA Intern Med has […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals3 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—28 October 2013

October 28, 2013

NEJM 24 Oct 2013 Vol 369 1577 Two years ago I unexpectedly found myself in the USA amongst good and great people who were determined to open up hidden data […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—21 October 2013

October 21, 2013

NEJM  17 Oct 2013  Vol 369 1491   “Tiotropium (Spiriva, Boehringer Ingelheim), a long-acting inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator, improves lung function, quality of life, and exercise endurance and reduces exacerbations in patients […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—14 October 2013

October 14, 2013

NEJM  10 Oct 2013  Vol 369 1395   It’s been known for at least four thousand years that the heart has two ventricles, but what they actually did was a source […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals3 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—7 October 2013

October 7, 2013

NEJM  3 Oct 2013  Vol 369 1295   The human birth canal, it has often been observed, is not particularly well designed for the passage of one baby, let alone two. […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals1 Comment

Richard Lehman’s journal review—30 September 2013

September 30, 2013

NEJM  26 Sep 2013  Vol 369 1195   Gosh, I feel vulnerable. The opening paper in this week’s New England Journal is about sources of C difficile infection in “healthcare settings […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals1 Comment

Richard Lehman’s journal review—23 September 2013

September 23, 2013

NEJM 19 Sep 2013 Vol 369 1106 I’m starting with the second paper about colonic cancer screening in this week’s New England Journal of Medicine, because it takes us to […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals, South Asia, US healthcare0 Comments

Richard Lehman’s journal review—16 September 2013

September 16, 2013

NEJM  29 Aug-12 Sep 2013  Vol 369 799   When comparing a new fixed-dose anticoagulant with conventional warfarin based anticoagulation, what do you look for? Thrombotic events, death, major bleeding? Yes, […]

More…

Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals0 Comments
  • «Previous page
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • »Next page
  • 69

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Paul Garner: on his recovery from long covid
  • Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective”…
  • “So, why medicine? Why do you want to be a doctor?”

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.