The things we don’t talk about in global health escape our attention perhaps because they don’t have a name—the unnamed subject being, in effect, a non-issue. From 3 to 7 February, a group of 19 researchers, decision-makers, and policy advocates from 12 countries gathered for a meeting at the Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Centre in Italy to give one such issue a name and place it firmly on the global health agenda. Organised by the Health Governance Hub of the Public Health Foundation of India, and the Averting Maternal Death and Disability programme at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, the meeting deliberated on the problem of posting and transfer of the health workforce (frontline staff and managers), especially in the public sector of low and middle income countries. The importance of posting and transfer cannot be overstated.

The challenge of posting and transfer

We know there are major inequities and mal-distribution of all cadres of health staff across rural and urban settings—this is particularly felt in the most remote communities where grossly insufficient human resources for health remain a challenge to achieving good health outcomes. Yet, given that staff in such postings are known to face challenges (over work, inadequate equipment, lack of career progression opportunities, being “forgotten by the system,” and access to good schools for their children and jobs for their spouse), it is not surprising that some health workers prefer to work in more comfortable urban areas and locations where they will have the opportunity of earning additional income, whether legitimately or not. They tend to avoid or reject postings and transfers that serve more disadvantaged populations, and if posted to these places, a tendency for absenteeism exists. However, beyond the challenge of supply, retention, and distribution of health workers and managers, posting and transfer could also be used as a punishment, as a favour or reward for political loyalty, or even as part of a strategic move to get an incorruptible manager or administrator out of the way. Whether policies and guidelines exist or not, it is clear that posting and transfer practices are never straightforward; the processes are channeled by power, trust (or distrust), and discretion at all levels of the health system. Important as it is, this issue of posting and transfer has hitherto been poorly discussed, analysed, and studied.

How to study posting and transfer

Given that posting and transfer in the health sector happens within entrenched systems of individual interests, patronage, and power relations, the mere act of studying posting and transfer practices has the potential to enhance transparency. Negotiations surrounding posting and transfer can be characterised by reward, retribution, or even whimsy. There is ample room for corruption in posting and transfer decision making. This may be either through direct financial gain, or more opaque interactions of clientelism or patronage. Exchange of favours may flow through kinship or social networks. These factors have the consequence of making posting and transfer difficult to study. In different settings, there are people in the system who are quite happy with the way the system works, namely those people who benefit by the status quo. Thus, researching posting and transfer requires tact and diplomacy. In addition, interventions at multiple levels to make posting and transfer more fit for purpose require a recognition that such interventions may not result in unequivocally positive outcomes, given the emergent, non-linear, and self-organising character of health systems. To gain the audience and participation of policymakers, it is important to frame posting and transfer in a non-threatening way.

Going forward with posting and transfer

Posting and transfer is likely to continue to underpin many of the challenges we currently observe in the functioning of the health workforce and service delivery. As educational systems in many countries are not producing the required levels of health workers, and many governments are not able to employ and sufficiently renumerate the optimal mix and distribution of the health workforce, the unbalanced demand-and-supply which drives the dynamics of how and where (and why) to post and transfer staff will continue. The demand for health workers and managers will only continue to increase in urban areas as global populations become increasingly urbanised, the consequence being an emergence of undesirable urban postings (e.g. slum areas) co-existing with remote rural areas which will remain underserved. Even with commensurate levels of the workforce, posting and transfer issues will still exist, because they are also about personal aspirations, value judgements, and issues of power. Naming such a pervasive issue is therefore both important and timely. Without a name, it is difficult to pin down an issue so pervasive, yet overlooked, as posting and transfer. Not only did we attempt to frame posting and transfer during the three working days we spent in Bellagio, we also sought to define strategies for research and advocacy on the issue. We look forward to seeing posting and transfer take its rightful place on the global health agenda.

Seye Abimbola was BMJ Clegg Scholar in 2007, and is currently a PhD candidate at the School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia, and a researcher at the National Primary Health Care Development Agency, Abuja, Nigeria.

Aku Kwamie is a researcher at the School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

Competing interests: All authors declare that that we have read and understood the BMJ Group policy on declaration of interests and we have no relevant interests to declare.

A longer version of this blog is available here