3 Jul, 15 | by Arun Krishnan, Web Editor
Infectious diseases of the nervous system are an evolving and extremely interesting area of neurology. There always seems to be a new infection on the horizon and this means that neurologists constantly need to stay up-to-date on how these infections present clinically. Importantly, many are treatable and this means that you have to be on the ball to ensure that patients can receive early treatment with a reduction in long-term disability.
In this issue of JNNP, Misra et al from Lucknow in India have presented a comprehensive analysis of patients admitted to their institution in 2012-2013 who had been diagnosed with Scrub Typhus, a condition transmitted by a rickettsial organism that is usually spread by ticks, lice and fleas http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/86/7/761.abstract. There are certain areas of the world where this organism is endemic, including India, Pakistan, Russia, Japan and Australia.
Amazingly, the authors identified 38 cases in this short period of time and have provided a wonderful overview of how these patients present. Meningitis and encephalitis are common presentations with patients often experiencing headache, fever and disorientation. The condition can also be life-threatening and some patients in this series were admitted to intensive care units with lung involvement or kidney failure. The most important aspect of this paper is that ~90% had a good response to antibiotic treatment with doxycycline. As suggested by the authors, scrub typhus should be included in a list of conditions that can cause encephalopathy with fever, particularly in patients who live in or who have travelled to areas where this condition is endemic.
15 Jun, 15 | by Arun Krishnan, Web Editor
Over the weekend, the Sydney Morning Herald wrote of the ‘heavy cost’ of obesity to the Australian health system http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/the-heavy-cost-of-obesity-and-how-nsw-health-workers-are-responding-20150613-ghmxbu.html . The article featured a quote that “the new normal is to be overweight or obese”. The epidemic of obesity has presented major health challenges that are not just faced by the developed world but which are now increasingly also becoming part of the health dilemmas facing developing countries.
There are groups of obese patients however who do not seem to encounter the health problems that one might expect and these patients have been called the ‘obese well’ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23491523 The reasons for why these people remain free of health problems remains unclear although a number of theories have been put forward including reduced inflammatory mediators in this group of patients. Accordingly, the possibility that anti-inflammatory drugs may improve outcomes such as glucose control and diabetes risk is an ongoing area of research.
In the current issue of JNNP, Kim and colleagues from Seoul have demonstrated that mild-moderate elevations of body mass index (BMI) are associated with reduced stroke severity http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/86/7/743.abstract . This backs up previous studies that have shown lower risk of mortality in obese patients who suffer haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke. The importance of these observations is that it lays the foundation for further studies that may be able to address why this group is relatively protected from severe long-term disability. This will help in drilling down on the potential ways of improving outcomes in all stroke patients, regardless of BMI.
3 Jun, 15 | by Arun Krishnan, Web Editor
For most clinicians, having to tell a patient that they have motor neuron disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a difficult and challenging dilemma. In the community, it is one of the few remaining conditions that are inseparably linked with severe physical disability resulting in loss of independence and eventually loss of life. On a more optimistic note, the pace of research in this field provides hope for a cure or at the least for treatments that may slow the progression of the condition.
ALS was first described by Jean-Martin Charcot, the father of modern Neurology and in the current issue of JNNP, Turner and Swash http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/86/6/667.abstract chart the historical journey that commenced with Charcot’s initial descriptions of the condition, which largely remain true and accurate to the present day. In addition, the authors have also managed to provide a state-of-the-art review of where we are at in terms of genetic contributions to this condition and provide a thorough analysis on the potential cause of ALS.
In addition to the obvious question of who is likely to develop ALS, they also touch on another intriguing question of whether there are individuals who are likely to never develop ALS.
In short, this is a highly recommended review.
22 May, 15 | by Arun Krishnan, Web Editor
It has been a decade now since Barry Marshall and Robin Warren from the University of Western Australia (UWA) were awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for discovering the link between Helicobacter Pylori (H.pylori) and the development of peptic ulcers. Famously, their discovery involved Marshall ingesting the bacteria himself in order to prove his hypothesis. In keeping with very many Nobel Prize winners, the duo had to contend with fierce opposition from colleagues within the medical fraternity who simply refused to believe that there was any suggestion that ulcers could be due to infectious organisms.
A decade on, the multiple sclerosis (MS) research group from UWA have collaborated with Barry Marshall to investigate the possible connections between H.pylori and MS development. In a paper that appears in this month’s issue of JNNP, the authors have explored the ‘hygiene hypothesis’ in MS http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/86/6/603.abstract . This hypothesis contends that exposure to infections early in life are able to potentially reduce development of allergic and immune disease later in life through priming of the immune system. In their paper, the authors provide evidence that evidence of exposure to H.pylori is lower in MS patients than in controls. They also demonstrate that female MS patients who have evidence of previous exposure to H.pylori have lower rates of disability than those who do not. In terms of future research, the authors suggest that it would be important to work out why this relationship is only noted female patients and not in male patients.
4 May, 15 | by Arun Krishnan, Web Editor
One of the most common concerns that I hear as a clinician from MS patients concerns their ability to organise and look after their lives. MS patients who have even the most mild degrees of physical disability report an alarmingly significant effect of the illness of their ability to multi-task and to just get things done in the course of a day. Due to the rapid rate of progress in developing new drugs for MS, we don’t see the levels of physical disability that we used to compared to patients who developed the condition in decades past. Yet, regardless of which medication an MS patient is taking, almost all report fatigue and some difficulty with decision making. The difficulty as a clinician is diagnosing this as there are no simple bedside tests to assess you go about making the sorts of daily decisions that one needs to as a functioning adult. Treatments? Don’t go there, there is simply nothing out there for this problem.
For any disease, you can’t really develop treatments that work without a very detailed knowledge of the mechanism that cause that disease. That’s my lead-in for telling MS patients that there is little I can offer them for any type of cognitive change that they may experience. Fortunately, Muhlert and colleagues http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/86/5/530.abstract have provided an interesting paper in the current issue of JNNP which provides the first evidence that changes in decision-making in MS patients are related to changes in specific parts of the brain’s grey and white matter. These are the studies that we need to make headway into a very prevalent issue for MS patients and their families.
20 Apr, 15 | by Arun Krishnan, Web Editor
Headache. Common, painful, frustrating, exhausting- and that’s just what the neurologist feels when a headache patient walks in the room. The patients themselves are often at their wits end as headache, whatever the cause, is often functional incapacitating and can really ruin quality of life. Of all the headache types that are seen in neurology, medication-overuse headache (MOH) can be particularly challenging. The condition typically occurs in patients who take frequent large quantities of acute headache treatments, including over-the –counter drugs. The problem here is that these patients often are taking these tablets for another headache condition such as migraine. After taking large amounts of these acute treatments over long periods of time, their migraine symptoms often tend to morph with MOH symptoms and it can be very hard to tell the two apart. Getting patients to cut down on these meds is hard. How do keep patients on the straight and narrow, when as a neurologist, you only see them infrequently?
The answer: involve the GP! In this issue of JNNP, Kristoffersen and colleagues from Norway did just that http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/86/5/505.abstract . They undertook a randomised study in which they asked GPs to undergo further training in how to reduce consumption of drugs related to MOH. Patients were randomised to standard care or to the intervention. The study was successful in that allocation to the intervention improved outcomes in patients with MOH.
MOH is a very common problem and this paper sets out a simple intervention that could make a big difference to the care of these patients.
7 Apr, 15 | by Steve Vucic, Web Editor
Low grade gliomas are associated with a higher frequency of seizures. While antieplipetic medications are utilized to reduced seizure frequency, in this issue of JNNP temozolomide was also associated with a a significant reduction in seizure frequency. Perhaps temozolomide should be added to therapy of LGGs with intractable seizures.
Read more at http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/86/4/366.abstract
Seizure reduction in a low-grade glioma: more than a beneficial side effect of temozolomide
24 Mar, 15 | by Arun Krishnan, Web Editor
For patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), sustained long-term disability is a problem that elicits considerable concern. There is the impact on independence and the potential burden that it may lead to for caregivers. While treatments for MS seem to multiply by the year, established disability remains the one area that is still refractory to treatment. Most of the current medications are excellent for preventing relapses but it is important to remember there is still no good evidence that these medications prevent long-term disability. The trials have not been done and it seems unlikely that they ever will be. There are global efforts directed at progressive forms of MS, such as The International Progressive MS alliance which is seeking to bring together groups of researchers who are committed to developing new methods for treating progressive MS (http://www.progressivemsalliance.org) .
The importance of such endeavours is underscored by a manuscript in this month’s issue of JNNP. Lukas et al have explored the contribution of cervical spine cord damage to the development of disability in MS http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/86/4/410.abstract . They have assessed radiological parameters in a large cohort of patients and have demonstrated that there is a change in the dimensions of the spinal cord that appears to occur in all forms of MS. These changes also predicted disease progression. Critically, the thinning of the cord occurred not only in patients with progressive MS, but also in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). A number of these RRMS patients were on treatment with immunomodulatory mechanisms and it is sobering to think that the changes in the spinal cord occurred despite the potential benefits of being on drug treatment. This study is of importance as it highlights the importance of spinal cord disease in the development of disability. The authors also make the valid point that measures of spinal cord injury need to be incorporated into MS drug trials.
16 Mar, 15 | by Arun Krishnan, Web Editor
Confusion. Agitation. Irritability. A wander around any emergency department or neurology ward will yield an abundance of observations that can fall under these categories and yet these are not all due to long waiting times or general hospital mayhem. All these symptoms are common presentations of neurological dysfunction and they are features of that syndrome that neurologists call encephalopathy, which refers to a state of altered consciousness that is typically accompanied by changes in cognition or perception. Working out why someone has encephalopathy is challenging and can take time. While some diagnoses are easier to pick, such as systemic infection, in other cases symptoms can be so non-specific that finding a unifying diagnosis can be very hard despite the wonders of modern medical technology.
In this month’s issue of JNNP, Sutter and Kaplan have published an outstanding review that addresses neuroimaging in acute encephalopathy http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/86/4/446.abstract . Their paper provides an excellent outline of changes in MRI and CT which occur in various conditions that result in encephalopathy. They have gone through common and even rare causes of encephalopathy, indulging those related to immune and infectious mechanisms, and have complied useful lists of specific changes in brain areas that are characteristically involved in each condition.
This review will prove to be a very useful resource, for neurologists, emergency specialists and general physicians, all of whom will be called upon to manage these patients at one time or another.
16 Feb, 15 | by Arun Krishnan, Web Editor
Around the world, spinal cord injury (SCI) is a common and devastating long-term complication of trauma that can result in lifelong disability or even death. There are frequent media reports of treatments that may help patients with SCI walk again and these range from new drugs, to robotic devices to new developments in stem cell research. Despite the hype, the fact remains that there are no treatments that have been proven to definitively alter outcomes in this condition.
One of the major problems with drug trials in SCI is finding a way to measure the response to the drug. Many drugs that are potentially useful may fail in clinical trials because we are not able to accurately determine which patients benefit the most. In other neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis, the ability to use biomarkers such as MRI has revolutionised our diagnostic and treatment approach, leading to significant gains for patients.
In the current issue of JNNP, Kuhle and colleagues http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/86/3/273.abstract have published a paper which demonstrates that measuring levels of neurofilaments, structural proteins that are present in neurons, may be useful in determining the degree of spinal cord injury. The exciting fact about this paper is that neurofilament levels correlated closely with acute severity of SCI and with the eventual neurological outcomes. The other benefit with this assay was that levels were measured in the blood of patients with SCI, rather than in the cerebrospinal fluid. This makes the assay for more acceptable in the clinical setting. The authors also provide some evidence that neurofilament levels may be responsive to drug treatments and in this case, they have assessed how levels vary according to treatment with minocycline, a medication that has been previously trialled in SCI.
This is a well-designed study. It represents an important step forward in diagnostic methods and treatments for SCI.