You don't need to be signed in to read BMJ Group Blogs, but you can register here to receive updates about other BMJ Group products and services via our Group site.

Joe Collier: How spells and trances aid learning

24 Aug, 09 | by BMJ

Professor Joe CollierOver the years I have sat through plenty of lectures that have been plain awful. There have also been those which simply glued me to my seat, where time flew by, where information just flowed in, and after which there was a glow of satisfaction. I am not sure how best to describe what happens in those really good ones, but “spellbinding”, “entrancing”, “mesmerising” come close to capturing what I feel goes on. Crucially, the state is part of a shared arrangement; as a member of an audience I have wanted to be mesmerised, as a lecturer I knew that one of my jobs was to help weave spells (and on a good day this would occur).

Everybody knows that strange things happen at the theatre or cinema, in front of the telly, or when reading (or being read) a book. There one is – enthralled, at one with the story teller(s), blanking out reality, being moved emotionally, and all by an essentially unreal world of a stage, page or screen. We are, as they say, in a state of “suspended disbelief”, and happy to go along with it. Indeed, we may want to be there expressly to escape reality.

But something akin goes on in a good lecture, in a seminar, in a tutorial, or when reading a article. Clearly it is not the classic “suspended disbelief”, because there is little to disbelieve, and, of course, one is actually in a reality. Nevertheless, as a medical student (or graduate) at a lecture, for instance, one moves into a new plane in which one is cocooned with the speaker, where others in the audience fade away, where barriers to listening and hearing are lifted, and in which the speaker’s words seem to have an immediate accord and a special relevance. In the best lectures, windows in the mind are opened as new ideas, new insights, take hold. Things are a little different in a small group but the magic can be the same; the group goes from being a set of individuals to a “team”, where, as a (good) group, you quickly resolve problems that would be difficult to do crack alone, and where the experience of the “whole” gives the session a special warm and enjoyable feeling. Somehow the two hours spent together are converted from what might have been drudgery or boredom to something energising and special.

As a lecturer/tutor I know full well that my job is to facilitate entrancement. Moreover, the first few minutes of any teaching session are critical. Members of the audience/group are sizing you up, checking you are trustworthy and deciding if they will be safe (intellectually) in your hands. Your job is to establish an accord, to show that you are confident, that you know your stuff, that you are on their side, that you can lead them through difficult terrain, and that you can deliver (and then, go on to deliver clearly, interestingly, logically and on their terms). There will be occasions where all your skills are needed to establish these credentials, as when running a seminar with people who just do not want to be there. There are also times when all one needs to do is speak (just before exams a student audience will “‘eat out of your hands”). But generally there is work to be done.

During any lecture levels of entrancement fluctuate – sustaining a spell for a whole hour is well nigh impossible and some variation in intensity may actually help. It is also worth remembering that members of the audience will join the trance at different times and it is important to give the talk an overall ‘shape’ to take this into account, so starting at the more superficial, then moving to the more profound and then out again by the time of the final conclusion.  Once within the talk, I again try to move up and down through levels of intensity so going from the most demanding, as when giving detailed information or explaining complicated concepts, to levels in which I might simply summarise, offer generalisations, give context or possibly make asides. Apart from giving respite to those in the audience who are still “gripped”, this movement also allows those who have drifted away to be brought back into the spell.

For those who doubt that entrancement goes on (and I believe it is a component in any decent lecture), perhaps the best evidence of its existence comes from a common enough experience – something happens to cause the spell to be broken. A fire alarm in the middle of a lecture is a killer; a ringing mobile phone is very troublesome, an inappropriate/rude (perhaps highly personal) comment in a small group seminar can totally throw one. But there are also events originating from the speaker that can suddenly bring a spell to halt. I know from my own experience how the trance has been broken (how I have lost the audience) when the wrong ‘slide’ appeared on the screen, when I suddenly realised that I  had used an argument that was flawed or an example that did not work or I had made a error of fact. Then the question is how to “get the audience back” Whatever the cause, my solution has been to stop, openly recognise the jolt, and then go back and restart the talk, making a correction if needs be, from where I was when the spell still held. Sometimes, however, there is no remedy, as for example when, for one reason or another a member (or members) of a group, are determined to disrupt.

I expect we all know that our best teachers have the capacity to mesmerise, and conversely that the majority of any audience or group have an interest in being caught up in the “spell”.  We also know how spells can be broken and recognise those occasions where colleagues have been out to undermine the process. Despite their being universal, these key components of teaching and learning seem to be little discussed. If it is true that spells and trances offer a way of enhancing teaching and learning, which I think they do (spell-binding lectures are certainly those we all want to go to), then surely they should receive more attention.

Joe Collier is emeritus professor of medicines policy at St George’s, University of London

By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to these terms and conditions
  • Mrs J

    I think it is very hard to be a good lecturer. There are certain things that can be learnt such as how to present slides appropriately, or how to prepare the environment and make sure the sound is working or that place is well lit and so on. However, some people just don’t seem to know how to “throw a spell” at the audience. Is it because they did not try or is it something that everyone has to discover for themselves? Is it something that can be learnt? Maybe some of us are born to be good lecturers. Surely everyone has better or worst days and everyone makes mistakes once in a while, but in my experience good lecturers were constantly giving mesmerizing lectures. What is the trick?

  • http://imail.sgul.ac.uk joe collier

    Mrs J. I believe that with training and desire almost anyone can be a good lecturer, and in time most will be able to weave spells. For the most part the two key requirements are the desire to lecture well and the fortune to have someone good from whom you can learn the necessary skills. Joe Collier

  • Anuj

    good lecturer??That reminds me of some of my school teachers.
    I think a good lecturer is the one who genuinely is interested in the subject,understands the topic,well prepared,passonate,has sense of humour, no stage phobia & is able to explain & teach the topic.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
BMJ blogs homepage

BMJ.com

Helping doctors make better decisions. Visit site



Creative Comms logo

Latest from BMJ.com

Latest from BMJ.com

Latest from BMJ.com podcasts

Latest from BMJ.com podcasts

Blogs linking here

Blogs linking here