You don't need to be signed in to read BMJ Group Blogs, but you can register here to receive updates about other BMJ Group products and services via our Group site.

Richard Smith: Teaching is stand-up comedy

9 May, 12 | by BMJ Group

Richard Smith Teaching, it seems to me,  is much the same as stand-up comedy. One is much scarier than the other, but which is the scariest depends on who you are. I was left thinking about the connection after a recent bad experience of teaching. I do a lot of teaching these days, most of it unpaid and most of it to medical students and doctors, and I enjoy it. William Butler Yeats famously said (although quite possibly he didn’t) that “Education is not the filling of a pail but the lighting of a fire,” and that’s very much my philosophy—from my own experience.

 Turned on by a teacher, I’ll do the work myself, scavenging for learning like a starving dog. In contrast, trying to teach anything to people who don’t want to learn is miserable, explaining why teaching can be draining.

In one of our madder moments when I was editor of the BMJ we banned the word “education”: instead we insisted on “learning.” Education, we thought, is top down, authoritarian, almost fascist—forcing information into people. Learning, in contrast, is bottom up, uncoerced, inspiring, a magical journey.

For me it thus follows that teaching is a branch of entertainment. Boredom in a classroom kills everything, like poison gas. But it’s a very hard thing to entertain for eight hours a day. Many comics do only 10 minutes at a time, using well honed material that they know will get laughs. 

Even so, my brother (a successful stand-up comedian for over 30 years) tells me, you’ll sometimes flop. All audiences, he has learnt, are different. One night the audience will laugh from start to finish. The next night, in response to the same material, the they will not utter even a titter. For a comic it’s a ghastly experience, and that’s the point when many quit.

Even though I’ve had no training, my teaching mostly seems to be acceptable. I try never to lecture for more than 10 minutes at a time, and I constantly ask the students to talk to each other and come up with ideas. My thinking is that they know most of what I have to teach them, and it’s a matter of coaxing the ideas out of them.

Because of the kinds of things I teach (leadership, getting published, publication ethics) I usually begin by saying “There are no right answers” and “There are no stupid questions.” I’m also an advocate of “All teach, all learn,” knowing that there will be much more knowledge in the room than is in my head.

So I’m very “right on,” and I try hard not to be boring. But sometimes it doesn’t work, and it hurts me. I feel I’ve let down my students. And medical students, I’ve discovered, are much harder to teach than doctors. Many doctors expect little. They are grateful for “a bit of peace” and a day away from seeing patients.

Whereas medical students are fed up with being talked at, sitting in rows, listening to some dope trying to teach them something that doesn’t interest them. They’d rather be putting up drips, riding around in ambulances, cutting up a corpse, or defibrillating somebody. They want action not talk.

With this writing I’m trying to console myself after my recent bad experience, and I think I’ve succeeded. Like a comic after a bad gig I’m determined to go on, but a few more bad experiences could finish my enthusiasm for teaching.

Richard Smith was the editor of the BMJ until 2004 and is director of the United Health Group’s chronic disease initiative.

By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to these terms and conditions
  • dflevine

    As a rule I
    never have anything to do with blogging but the title of yours caught my eye
    so, for you, Richard I’ll make an exception.(to paraphrase Groucho).  You report that one of your teaching sessions
    bombed and now you might lose enthusiasm. Because you’re probably not such a
    bad bloke I’d like to offer you some words of consolation as that’s what you
    claim to be seeking. Some of the answers might actually be in your blog. You
    say you enjoy teaching and do a lot of it but have had no training.  There were certainly many good (and bad)
    medical teachers long before formal teacher training for doctors, but over the last
    30-40 years a lot of people have worked very hard to put medical teaching on
    some sort of professional footing.  Why
    not do some training and develop your skills and resilience? Peer review, appraisal
    and formal feedback from students can be scary but perhaps they might all help
    to cope with what seem like bad sessions. 
    All teachers have them.

    Perhaps it’s
    time to stop using mantras as substitutes for a solid grounding in teaching
    medical students.  These maxims do have a
    place in specific contexts but are of little use when applied
    indiscriminately.  Please tell us you
    have ditched your ‘mad’ notion of education being ‘… a sort of fascism.’  You can hardly use that word as an insult
    whilst banning the word education.

    Teaching
    should include laughter and fun but they aren’t enough; neither is being ‘right
    on’. So, sorry Richard, teaching doesn’t really equate with stand-up; at least
    not if you want to keep your enthusiasm. 
    Good luck! 

     

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
BMJ blogs homepage

BMJ.com

Helping doctors make better decisions. Visit site



Creative Comms logo

Latest from BMJ.com

Latest from BMJ.com

Latest from BMJ.com podcasts

Latest from BMJ.com podcasts

Blogs linking here

Blogs linking here