Imaging techniques are a key component of the classification of spondyloarthritis, allowing patients to be classi- fied into distinct groups and to receive the appropriate treatment.<\/p>\n
INTRODUCTION <\/strong><\/p>\n Spondyloarthritis is an umbrella term for several conditions that share many of the same features and symptoms, including ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and reactive arthritis. Patients can also be classified as having axial or non-axial (peripheral) disease, according to which joints in their body are affected. Axial disease affects the sacroiliac joint (in the back part of the pelvis) causing back pain and stiffness. It can be diffi- cult to diagnose and classify these different diseases as they can lack distinguishing symptoms, and may develop over a long period of time. Therefore, imaging techniques that allow doctors to see inside the joints can be useful. These techniques include X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerised tomography (CT scan) and ultrasound. The authors hoped to gain a better understanding of the available literature and evidence supporting the use of various imaging techniques in spondyloarthritis in order to develop and publish recommendations for imaging in spondyloarthritis. The recommendations are intended to provide advice to doctors and patients, and to act as a measure of quality for treatment and management.<\/p>\n WHO WAS STUDIED? <\/strong><\/p>\n The recommendations are based on data from patients diagnosed with either established or suspected axial or peripheral spondyloarthritis and patients with chronic, non-inflammatory back pain as well as those with other rheumatic diseases and healthy control subjects. All patients were over the age of 18.<\/p>\n HOW WAS THE STUDY CONDUCTED? <\/strong><\/p>\n The basis of the recommendations was a systematic review, which aims to identify all the published evidence on a particular topic and draw it together into one summary. In this case a group of experts in spondyloarthritis, including both rheumatologists and radiologists, performed a systematic review on the role of imaging in diagnosis and monitoring, as well as its usefulness in predicting disease progression in spondyloarthritis. A total of 7550 references were identified, of which 158 were included in the final review. Based on the extracted evidence the experts drafted 10 recommendations for doctors to use.<\/p>\n WHAT WERE THE MAIN FINDINGS OF THE STUDY? <\/strong><\/p>\n The authors developed 10 recommendations for the use of imaging in patients with spondyloarthritis. ARE THESE FINDINGS NEW?<\/span><\/p>\n Yes \u2013 these are the first recommendations from the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) that look at the entire spectrum of spondyloarthritis disease types and evaluate the role of all commonly used imaging techniques. <\/span><\/p>\n HOW RELIABLE ARE THE FINDINGS? <\/span><\/p>\n The authors are confident that the findings are reliable and that the recommendations can be used by doctors with their patients. WHAT DO THE AUTHORS PLAN ON DOING WITH THIS INFORMATION? <\/span><\/p>\n The authors plan to make the recommendations available to both doctors and patients. It is EULAR policy to review and revise recommendations on a regular basis, so the process will be performed again to check for new data in 5 years. <\/span><\/p>\n WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR ME? <\/span><\/p>\n These recommendations provide important information about the use of imaging techniques, both in diagnosis and management, and in predicting how patients will respond to treatments, as well as monitoring how their disease may be progressing at a structural level, before any symptoms occur. Disclaimer<\/strong>: This is a summary of a scientific article written by a medical professional (\u201cthe Original Article\u201d). The Summary is written to assist non medically trained readers to understand general points of the Original Article. \u00a0It should not be relied on in any way whatsoever<\/span>, (which also means the Summary is not medical advice), and is simply supplied to aid a lay understanding of general points of the Original Article. It is supplied \u201cas is\u201d without any warranty. You should note that the Original Article (and Summary) may not be accurate as errors can occur and also may be out of date as medical science is constantly changing. \u00a0It is very important that readers not rely on the content in the Summary and consult their medical professionals for all aspects of their health care. Do not use this Summary as medical advice even if the Summary is supplied to the reader by a medical professional.<\/strong> Date summary prepared:\u00a0July 2015<\/p>\n Summary based on research article published on: 2 April 2015<\/p>\n From: Mandl, P. et al<\/em>. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis<\/em> 2015;74:1327\u20131339. doi:10.1136\/annrheumdis-2014- 206971<\/p>\n Copyright \u00a9 2015 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism. Medical professionals may print copies for their and their patients and students non commercial use. Other individuals may print a single copy for their personal, non commercial use. For other uses please contact our Rights and Licensing<\/a> Team.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Imaging techniques are a key component of the classification of spondyloarthritis, allowing patients to be classi- fied into distinct groups and to receive the appropriate treatment. INTRODUCTION Spondyloarthritis is an umbrella term for several conditions that share many of the same features and symptoms, including ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and reactive arthritis. Patients can also […]<\/p>\n
\n
\nWHAT DID THE AUTHORS HOPE TO FIND? <\/strong><\/p>\n
\n1. Axial spondyloarthritis: diagnosis
\n<\/span>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u25b8 Conventional radiography (X-ray) of the sacroiliac joints in the \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0lower back is recommended as the first imaging method. In \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 young patients and those who have not had their symptoms for \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 long, MRI may be used instead, although MRI of the spine is not \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 generally recommended for this.
\n2. Peripheral spondyloarthritis: diagnosis
\n\u25b8 Ultrasound or MRI may be used to detect symptoms of peripheral spondyloarthritis.
\n3. Axial spondyloarthritis: monitoring activity
\n\u25b8 MRI of the sacroiliac joints and\/or spine may be used to assess and monitor disease activity. The regularity of MRI depends on the clinical circumstances for each patient.
\n4. Axial spondyloarthritis: monitoring structural changes
\n\u25b8 Conventional radiography of the sacroiliac joints and\/or spine may be used to monitor structural damage and new bone formation. It should not be repeated more often than every 2 years, and MRI can be used in between if more information is needed.
\n5. Peripheral spondyloarthritis: monitoring activity
\n\u25b8 Ultrasound and MRI may be used to monitor disease activity, and certain types of ultrasound can also detect inflammation. How often this should be performed depends on each patient\u2019s clinical circumstances.
\n6. Peripheral spondyloarthritis: monitoring structural changes
\n\u25b8 Conventional radiography is recommended, although MRI and\/or ultrasound might provide additional information.
\n7. Axial spondyloarthritis: predicting outcome\/severity
\n\u25b8 In patients with ankylosing spondylitis (not non-radiographic axial spondylitis), initial conventional radiography of the lumbar and cervical spine is recommended; MRI may also be used.
\n8. Axial spondyloarthritis: predicting treatment effect
\n\u25b8 Extensive MRI inflammatory activity in the spine of patients with ankylosing spondylitis might be used as a predictor of good clinical response to certain treatments.
\n9. Spinal fracture
\n\u25b8 When spinal fracture in axial spondylitis is suspected, conventional radiography is the recommended initial imaging method. If conventional radiography is negative, a CT scan should be performed. MRI is an additional imaging method which can also provide information on soft tissue lesions.
\n10. Osteoporosis
\n\u25b8 Osteoporosis should be assessed in some patients with axial spondylitis by bone density scanning. <\/span><\/p>\n
\nFor certain research questions that the authors asked \u2013 such as those dealing with predicting disease or treatment response \u2013 the review revealed only very few studies, and thus the recommendations in this area are based more on expert opinion than is the case with other areas where more study information and data were available. <\/span><\/p>\n
\nThe information in these recommendations may enable you to influence how your disease is diagnosed by being aware of what imaging techniques are useful. Being aware of how imaging techniques are used may also help you to understand why it is important to attend regular monitoring appointments, even if you feel well. If you have any questions about imaging, you should talk to your doctor. <\/span><\/p>\n
\nPlease view our full Website Terms and Conditions<\/a>.<\/p>\n