{"id":3325,"date":"2022-03-31T10:00:49","date_gmt":"2022-03-31T09:00:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325"},"modified":"2022-03-04T10:58:54","modified_gmt":"2022-03-04T09:58:54","slug":"talking-it-better-conversations-and-normative-complexity-in-healthcare-improvement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/2022\/03\/31\/talking-it-better-conversations-and-normative-complexity-in-healthcare-improvement\/","title":{"rendered":"Talking it Better: Conversations and Normative Complexity in Healthcare Improvement"},"content":{"rendered":"

Article Summary by Alan Cribb<\/strong><\/p>\n

No doubt everyone would agree that conversations are valuable. Amongst other things they are one of the ways we can attend to, appreciate and learn from one another. This, of course, is relevant to practical activities like healthcare improvement. Healthcare improvement typically involves technical or formally specified processes working alongside various social processes. Conversations might be said to both make up a sub-set of these processes and to \u2018oil the wheels\u2019 that enable others. In this article we acknowledge this general account of the relevance of conversations to improvement but, in addition, focus in on a specific contribution which, we suggest, makes them especially valuable.<\/p>\n

In a nutshell our argument is that conversations play a crucial role in managing what we call the \u2018normative complexity\u2019 of healthcare improvement. Improvement, we argue, involves managing more than one kind of complexity and some forms of complexity have had more attention in the improvement literature than others. Notably there has been quite a lot of explicit attention given to the complexity of deciding what to do or \u2018what works\u2019 in improvement\u2014which, in this paper, we describe using the shorthand \u2018explanatory complexity\u2019. In this context authors tend to write about healthcare being bound up in \u2018complex systems\u2019 such that it is difficult to draw clear and tidy lines between \u2018Intervention A\u2019 and \u2018Desired Result B\u2019. This crude summary reflects an important set of challenges but the challenges we are most interested are different from (although overlap with) them.<\/p>\n

We suggest that it is equally important to recognise the complexities that attach to answering the question \u201cwhat should count<\/em> as working?\u2019 or, more plainly, \u2018what is an improvement?\u2019 or \u2018what is better?\u2019. Aspects of normative complexity do feature in the improvement literature, and some quite prominently, but the theoretical and epistemic problems generated by normative complexity are rarely the focus of sustained attention. For example, there is prominent practical consideration given to the notion that good quality healthcare has different \u2018dimensions\u2019, that there are different perspectives on what counts as \u2018good\u2019 from different stakeholders and also to some issues in the \u2018ethics of improvement\u2019 that invite the question of whether the \u2018improvement cure\u2019 is always worth taking. These concerns, alongside other complexities\u2014such as, for example, the question of how responsibility for improvement can and should best be \u2018divided up\u2019\u2014considerably complicate the process of deciding what improvers should be doing. In short there is no clear and tidy story to tell either about \u2018what works \u2018or about \u2018what should count<\/em> as working\u2019 and these two sets of problems intersect.<\/p>\n

By definition there are no simple answers here. But our suggestion is that conversations can and do contribute significantly to negotiating normative complexity. This is because conversations are suited to keeping open a range of normative possibilities whilst bringing separate voices together, because they both enable and respond to the emergence of new possibilities and, most fundamentally, because they can help to create the organisational conditions for empathy and moral imagination.<\/p>\n

Read the full article on the Medical Humanities journal website<\/strong><\/a>.<\/h5>\n

 <\/p>\n

Alan Cribb co-directs the Centre for Public Policy, King\u2019s College London, a group focussed on strengthening the way applied philosophy, sociology and inter-disciplinary scholarship can contribute to understanding experiences of, and engage in contestations about, policy enactments. The Centre takes an approach to the analysis of policy that is both critical and practically oriented and has a particular interest in questions of social justice and ethics. Alan is currently working with Vikki Entwistle and Polly Mitchell<\/em>\u2014along with collaborators from healthcare improvement research, policy and practice\u2014on a Wellcome Trust funded project on philosophy and healthcare quality improvement.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Article Summary by Alan Cribb No doubt everyone would agree that conversations are valuable. Amongst other things they are one of the ways we can attend to, appreciate and learn from one another. This, of course, is relevant to practical activities like healthcare improvement. Healthcare improvement typically involves technical or formally specified processes working alongside […]<\/p>\n

Read More…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":345,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15028],"tags":[15044],"class_list":["post-3325","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-journal-announcements","tag-research"],"yoast_head":"\nTalking it Better: Conversations and Normative Complexity in Healthcare Improvement - Medical Humanities<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"'We suggest that it is equally important to recognise the complexities that attach to answering the question \u201cwhat should count as working?\u2019 or, more plainly, \u2018what is an improvement?\u2019 or \u2018what is better?\u2019.'\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Talking it Better: Conversations and Normative Complexity in Healthcare Improvement - Medical Humanities\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"'We suggest that it is equally important to recognise the complexities that attach to answering the question \u201cwhat should count as working?\u2019 or, more plainly, \u2018what is an improvement?\u2019 or \u2018what is better?\u2019.'\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Medical Humanities\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-03-31T09:00:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Chris Pak\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Chris Pak\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/?p=3325#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/?p=3325\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Chris Pak\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0e11c1a9a0f1f9f2aa898a719652c44c\"},\"headline\":\"Talking it Better: Conversations and Normative Complexity in Healthcare Improvement\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-31T09:00:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/?p=3325\"},\"wordCount\":622,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"research\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Journal Announcements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/?p=3325#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/?p=3325\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/?p=3325\",\"name\":\"Talking it Better: Conversations and Normative Complexity in Healthcare Improvement - Medical Humanities\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-31T09:00:49+00:00\",\"description\":\"'We suggest that it is equally important to recognise the complexities that attach to answering the question \u201cwhat should count as working?\u2019 or, more plainly, \u2018what is an improvement?\u2019 or \u2018what is better?\u2019.'\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/?p=3325#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/?p=3325\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/?p=3325#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Talking it Better: Conversations and Normative Complexity in Healthcare Improvement\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/\",\"name\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"description\":\"Providing a space for scholarly intervention into the conversation around medicine, as practice and philosophy, as it engages with humanities and arts.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/blog-logo-mh.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/blog-logo-mh.png\",\"width\":300,\"height\":34,\"caption\":\"Medical Humanities\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0e11c1a9a0f1f9f2aa898a719652c44c\",\"name\":\"Chris Pak\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d8e2081fcdeea32c307cbbb99bfceffaf5bd08d12c3d5e1b155798facd9674a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d8e2081fcdeea32c307cbbb99bfceffaf5bd08d12c3d5e1b155798facd9674a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d8e2081fcdeea32c307cbbb99bfceffaf5bd08d12c3d5e1b155798facd9674a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Chris Pak\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/blog-team\\\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-humanities\\\/author\\\/chrispak\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Talking it Better: Conversations and Normative Complexity in Healthcare Improvement - Medical Humanities","description":"'We suggest that it is equally important to recognise the complexities that attach to answering the question \u201cwhat should count as working?\u2019 or, more plainly, \u2018what is an improvement?\u2019 or \u2018what is better?\u2019.'","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Talking it Better: Conversations and Normative Complexity in Healthcare Improvement - Medical Humanities","og_description":"'We suggest that it is equally important to recognise the complexities that attach to answering the question \u201cwhat should count as working?\u2019 or, more plainly, \u2018what is an improvement?\u2019 or \u2018what is better?\u2019.'","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325","og_site_name":"Medical Humanities","article_published_time":"2022-03-31T09:00:49+00:00","author":"Chris Pak","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Chris Pak","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325"},"author":{"name":"Chris Pak","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/#\/schema\/person\/0e11c1a9a0f1f9f2aa898a719652c44c"},"headline":"Talking it Better: Conversations and Normative Complexity in Healthcare Improvement","datePublished":"2022-03-31T09:00:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325"},"wordCount":622,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/#organization"},"keywords":["research"],"articleSection":["Journal Announcements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325","name":"Talking it Better: Conversations and Normative Complexity in Healthcare Improvement - Medical Humanities","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-03-31T09:00:49+00:00","description":"'We suggest that it is equally important to recognise the complexities that attach to answering the question \u201cwhat should count as working?\u2019 or, more plainly, \u2018what is an improvement?\u2019 or \u2018what is better?\u2019.'","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?p=3325#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Talking it Better: Conversations and Normative Complexity in Healthcare Improvement"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/","name":"Medical Humanities","description":"Providing a space for scholarly intervention into the conversation around medicine, as practice and philosophy, as it engages with humanities and arts.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/#organization","name":"Medical Humanities","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/files\/2017\/10\/blog-logo-mh.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/files\/2017\/10\/blog-logo-mh.png","width":300,"height":34,"caption":"Medical Humanities"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/#\/schema\/person\/0e11c1a9a0f1f9f2aa898a719652c44c","name":"Chris Pak","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d8e2081fcdeea32c307cbbb99bfceffaf5bd08d12c3d5e1b155798facd9674a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d8e2081fcdeea32c307cbbb99bfceffaf5bd08d12c3d5e1b155798facd9674a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d8e2081fcdeea32c307cbbb99bfceffaf5bd08d12c3d5e1b155798facd9674a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Chris Pak"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/blog-team\/"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/author\/chrispak\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3325","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/345"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3325"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3325\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-humanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}