{"id":4360,"date":"2022-12-28T12:16:15","date_gmt":"2022-12-28T11:16:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?p=4360"},"modified":"2022-12-28T12:18:51","modified_gmt":"2022-12-28T11:18:51","slug":"how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/","title":{"rendered":"How much information is enough? It should be your choice!"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Sophie Ludewigs, Jonas Narchi, Lukas Kiefer and Eva C. Winkler.<\/p>\n

It is rare to return from a visit at the doctor\u2019s office or a clinic and feel informed to a satisfactory degree. In many cases, one will either feel completely overwhelmed by the amount of medical information and the professional lingo used, or, on the other hand, left with lots of open questions about the procedure and its possible outcomes. To a certain degree, that is to be expected: Patients\u2019 informational and decision-making preferences differ significantly. While some patients want to know even the smallest detail, others prefer to know as little as possible and would like to leave the medical decision in the (hopefully) capable hands of the physician. So why shouldn\u2019t the informed consent process mirror these differing preferences? In our recent article<\/a>, we argue that informed consent should be rethought in light of the individual patient\u2019s preferences and the unique physician-patient relationship of trust. We call this fiduciary informed consent<\/em>.<\/p>\n

The physician-patient relationship has been considered fiduciary in nature ever since Beauchamps\u2019 and Childress\u2019 famous account of medical ethics. Yet, the fiduciary nature has never been grounded in an ethical foundation, thus making it difficult to derive normative consequences from it. Everyone agrees that the physician-patient relationship is fiduciary, but it remains unclear what exactly that means and why it is the case.<\/p>\n

Drawing on the phenomenological accounts of mutual trust and obligation by L\u00e9vinas and L\u00f8gstrup, we have developed an ethical fiduciary theory and combined it with theories of informed consent. As a result, we propose an ethical fiduciary theory that allows physician and patient to jointly determine the physician\u2019s role on a spectrum from, what we call, the \u201cfiduciary as advisor\u201d to \u201cfiduciary as agent\u201d. If the patient prefers an active role, the physician serves primarily as an advisor, providing the necessary information to enable the patient\u2019s decision-making. If the patient desires a more reliant role, the physician becomes more of an agent, not only providing information, but also offering concrete suggestions.<\/p>\n

Conceptualizing informed consent in a fiduciary framework, thus, simultaneously allows for a greater and lesser degree of delegation. Given this choice, the fiduciary concept empowers patients to decide for themselves to what extent they want to exercise their autonomous decision-making capacity and whether they want to delegate certain parts of the decision to the physician.<\/p>\n

Simply put: The best way to make sure that a patient is sufficiently informed and gives an informed consent that actually deserves to be called \u201cinformed\u201d and \u201cconsent\u201d is to ask them how much they want to know about a treatment. Such personalized or, in our terminology, fiduciary informed consent<\/em> is not merely an abstract theory. It changes the informed consent process profoundly.<\/p>\n

First, we propose the introduction of a preliminary conversation where the patient\u2019s values and preferences are assessed. The preliminary conversation is designed as a brief high-level discussion that first establishes the treatment relationship. It should convey the importance that personal preferences bear on medical decision-making and provide an opportunity for the patient to share such preferences and values with their physician.<\/p>\n

In a second step, the consent interview and material must be adapted to the patient\u2019s individual needs. To achieve this, the consent interview should distinguish between decisions about ends and means and highlight all value-laden decisions. Obviously, the patient must be informed about the ends of a treatment and possibly choose between different ends, such as quality of life vs. length of life. While such decisions are highly dependent on individual values, the employed means are often less value-dependent and can be delegated more easily. But as the example of blood transfusions illustrates, there can indeed be medical means that touch on a patient\u2019s \u2013 in this case religious \u2013 values. The fiduciary theory honors the patient\u2019s autonomy and thus forbids the delegation of any decision that is dependent on the patient\u2019s values, even in cases where the patient prefers to know as little as necessary.<\/p>\n

The reorganization of the consent interview should reflect how important information is and how much of it can(not) be left out. Similarly, the written consent material should be reorganized into three distinct sections, the first section containing basic information about ends; the second highlighting value-laden decisions about means and the third listing value-neutral decisions about means, stating information about their risks (beginning with the most common and severe risks).<\/p>\n

These changes to the informed consent process guarantee that the extent to which patients are willing to entrust their responsibility to the physician remains their choice. They also open up the way to rethink other areas of medical ethics in light of the fiduciary nature of the physician-patient-relationship.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Paper title:<\/strong> The ethics of the fiduciary relationship between patient and physician: the case of informed consent<\/a><\/p>\n

Authors: <\/strong>Sophie Ludewigs1<\/sup>, Jonas Narchi2<\/sup>, Lukas Kiefer2<\/sup>, Eva C. Winkler2<\/sup><\/p>\n

*Jonas Narchi and Sophie Ludewigs contributed equally to the manuscript as first authors.<\/p>\n

Affiliations: <\/strong><\/p>\n

1<\/sup> Institute for German and European Corporate and Business Law, Faculty of Law, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.<\/p>\n

2<\/sup> Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.<\/p>\n

Competing interests:<\/strong> None<\/p>\n

Social media accounts of post author(s): <\/strong>@EWinklerTME<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Sophie Ludewigs, Jonas Narchi, Lukas Kiefer and Eva C. Winkler. It is rare to return from a visit at the doctor\u2019s office or a clinic and feel informed to a satisfactory degree. In many cases, one will either feel completely overwhelmed by the amount of medical information and the professional lingo used, or, on […]<\/p>\n

Read More…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":354,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8053,8057],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4360","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-consent","category-medical-ethics"],"yoast_head":"\nHow much information is enough? It should be your choice! - Journal of Medical Ethics blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How much information is enough? It should be your choice! - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By Sophie Ludewigs, Jonas Narchi, Lukas Kiefer and Eva C. Winkler. It is rare to return from a visit at the doctor\u2019s office or a clinic and feel informed to a satisfactory degree. In many cases, one will either feel completely overwhelmed by the amount of medical information and the professional lingo used, or, on [...]Read More...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-28T11:16:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-28T11:18:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hazem Zohny\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hazem Zohny\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/28\\\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/28\\\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hazem Zohny\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35\"},\"headline\":\"How much information is enough? It should be your choice!\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-28T11:16:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-28T11:18:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/28\\\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":889,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"consent\",\"Medical ethics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/28\\\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/28\\\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/28\\\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\\\/\",\"name\":\"How much information is enough? It should be your choice! - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-28T11:16:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-28T11:18:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/28\\\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/28\\\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/28\\\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How much information is enough? It should be your choice!\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"description\":\"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"width\":200,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35\",\"name\":\"Hazem Zohny\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hazem Zohny\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk\\\/people\\\/dr-hazem-zohny\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/author\\\/zohnyh\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How much information is enough? It should be your choice! - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How much information is enough? It should be your choice! - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","og_description":"By Sophie Ludewigs, Jonas Narchi, Lukas Kiefer and Eva C. Winkler. It is rare to return from a visit at the doctor\u2019s office or a clinic and feel informed to a satisfactory degree. In many cases, one will either feel completely overwhelmed by the amount of medical information and the professional lingo used, or, on [...]Read More...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/","og_site_name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","article_published_time":"2022-12-28T11:16:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-28T11:18:51+00:00","author":"Hazem Zohny","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hazem Zohny","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/"},"author":{"name":"Hazem Zohny","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35"},"headline":"How much information is enough? It should be your choice!","datePublished":"2022-12-28T11:16:15+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-28T11:18:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/"},"wordCount":889,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"articleSection":["consent","Medical ethics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/","name":"How much information is enough? It should be your choice! - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-12-28T11:16:15+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-28T11:18:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/12\/28\/how-much-information-is-enough-it-should-be-your-choice\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How much information is enough? It should be your choice!"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","description":"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","width":200,"height":50,"caption":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35","name":"Hazem Zohny","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hazem Zohny"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk\/people\/dr-hazem-zohny"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/author\/zohnyh\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4360","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/354"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4360"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4360\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}