{"id":4329,"date":"2022-09-05T15:10:21","date_gmt":"2022-09-05T14:10:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?p=4329"},"modified":"2022-09-05T15:10:21","modified_gmt":"2022-09-05T14:10:21","slug":"why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/","title":{"rendered":"Why trusted research environments are not about trust"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Paige Fitzsimmons.<\/p>\n

In April 2022 the UK Department of Health and Social Care published \u2018Better, broader, safer: using health data for research and analysis<\/a>\u2019. This report, which has come to be known as the \u2018Goldacre Review\u2019, recommends the use of Trusted Research Environments (TREs) to facilitate the building of public trust in health data sharing activities in the UK.<\/p>\n

The TRE model is a viable method to mitigate concerns in the data sharing space and because of their utility TREs have been implemented by many of the UK\u2019s health data initiatives including Genomics England<\/a>, Our Future Health<\/a> and HDR UK<\/a> prior to this report. The Goldacre Review and its recommendations around TREs will have broad policy implications across the NHS and perhaps more broadly across the UK and internationally.<\/p>\n

TREs provide approved researchers with remote access to health data via a virtual desktop. These are controlled environments from which researchers are only able to export aggregate analysis results, never individual level results, after approval from data custodians. The analogy of a reference library rather than a lending library is often drawn, where a TRE acts much like a reference library with the information, or data in the case of TREs, being accessed under supervision but never leaving that supervised environment.<\/p>\n

One of the main objectives of the TRE is to provide increased data security and protection through increased oversight and regulation. The Goldacre Review suggests that this additional security will respond to public concerns surrounding health data misuse. Ultimately, the Review claims, this will work to build public trust by providing assurances with regards to research conduct and data access.<\/p>\n

Calls for increased public trust in general are not uncommon, and they continue to provoke change in the ways organisations accessing and using data operate. However, given the nature of trust, we argue in our recent article \u2018Trust and the Goldacre Review: Why Trusted Research Environments are Not About Trust<\/a>\u2019 that TREs are not, in fact, about trust at all.<\/p>\n

While philosophers have not yet agreed upon a single account of trust, there are consistent elements which are fundamental across all proposed accounts. Trust is an attitude we have towards others and it is something which is placed in those we deem to be, or hope to be, trustworthy. For trust to be appropriate we must have a level of expectation about the competence and willingness of those we are trusting. These expectations, and the potential for them to be let down or betrayed, result in a level of vulnerability which is necessary for trust to exist.<\/p>\n

We argue that the increased security measures and oversight activities offered by the TRE model work to reduce vulnerability and in doing so, reduce the need for trust in this context. Rather, we rely on TREs to function as they have stated they will, and on the regulations in place to prevent them from doing otherwise. Without vulnerability to misuse there is little need for trust in this context.<\/p>\n

Overall, we think TREs are a good idea. We believe they offer solutions to many of the challenges raised in the complicated landscape of data sharing and, in particular, that they go some way to addressing overly burdensome governance procedures. Addressing these challenges through increased security and oversight may even result in members of the public being more comfortable sharing their data. We do, however, think that consideration must be given to the language which is used in this context.<\/p>\n

Using \u2018trust\u2019 as a descriptor here, could result in expectation setting which goes beyond the regulatory or technical boundaries of the TRE and opens the door to feelings of betrayal should these expectations not be met. The name \u2018Trusted Research Environment\u2019 invokes feelings associated with close relationships, relationships which are built on future expectations of the trusted party to act in a way one trusts them to, and not strictly within the boundaries of the TRE.<\/p>\n

The use of TREs may ultimately help to increase public trust, but this trust will not be directed at the research environment, but rather the whole system, of which TREs are only one piece. Increased security within organisations, and oversight of their data sharing activities, may lead people to trust the system which collects, shares and governs the use patient data for research.<\/p>\n

Given all of this, we suggest that the way forward is by using a more suitable name for this sort of environment, such as \u2018Secure Research Environment\u2019. This proposed shift in language is not simply about semantics, as it will help to set appropriate expectations regarding the capacity of the research environment \u2013 a secure environment which reduces vulnerabilities in health data sharing activity.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Paper title<\/strong>: Trust and the Goldacre Review: Why Trusted Research Environments are Not About Trust<\/a><\/p>\n

Authors:<\/strong> Mackenzie Graham1,2, Mark Sheehan2,5, Paige Fitzsimmons2, Richard Milne3,4<\/p>\n

Affiliations:<\/strong><\/p>\n

1 Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford<\/p>\n

2 Ethox Centre, University of Oxford<\/p>\n

3 Engagement and Society, Wellcome Connecting Science, Cambridge, United Kingdom<\/p>\n

4 Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge<\/p>\n

5 Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals Trust<\/p>\n

Competing interests<\/strong>: None<\/p>\n

Social media accounts of post author<\/strong>: @Fitz_Paige<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Paige Fitzsimmons. In April 2022 the UK Department of Health and Social Care published \u2018Better, broader, safer: using health data for research and analysis\u2019. This report, which has come to be known as the \u2018Goldacre Review\u2019, recommends the use of Trusted Research Environments (TREs) to facilitate the building of public trust in health data […]<\/p>\n

Read More…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":354,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[397],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4329","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-ethics"],"yoast_head":"\nWhy trusted research environments are not about trust - Journal of Medical Ethics blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why trusted research environments are not about trust - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By Paige Fitzsimmons. In April 2022 the UK Department of Health and Social Care published \u2018Better, broader, safer: using health data for research and analysis\u2019. This report, which has come to be known as the \u2018Goldacre Review\u2019, recommends the use of Trusted Research Environments (TREs) to facilitate the building of public trust in health data [...]Read More...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-09-05T14:10:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hazem Zohny\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hazem Zohny\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/05\\\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/05\\\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hazem Zohny\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35\"},\"headline\":\"Why trusted research environments are not about trust\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-05T14:10:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/05\\\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":870,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Research Ethics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/05\\\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/05\\\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/05\\\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\\\/\",\"name\":\"Why trusted research environments are not about trust - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-05T14:10:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/05\\\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/05\\\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/05\\\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why trusted research environments are not about trust\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"description\":\"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"width\":200,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35\",\"name\":\"Hazem Zohny\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hazem Zohny\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk\\\/people\\\/dr-hazem-zohny\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/author\\\/zohnyh\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why trusted research environments are not about trust - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why trusted research environments are not about trust - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","og_description":"By Paige Fitzsimmons. In April 2022 the UK Department of Health and Social Care published \u2018Better, broader, safer: using health data for research and analysis\u2019. This report, which has come to be known as the \u2018Goldacre Review\u2019, recommends the use of Trusted Research Environments (TREs) to facilitate the building of public trust in health data [...]Read More...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/","og_site_name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","article_published_time":"2022-09-05T14:10:21+00:00","author":"Hazem Zohny","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hazem Zohny","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/"},"author":{"name":"Hazem Zohny","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35"},"headline":"Why trusted research environments are not about trust","datePublished":"2022-09-05T14:10:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/"},"wordCount":870,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Research Ethics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/","name":"Why trusted research environments are not about trust - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-09-05T14:10:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2022\/09\/05\/why-trusted-research-environments-are-not-about-trust\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why trusted research environments are not about trust"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","description":"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","width":200,"height":50,"caption":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35","name":"Hazem Zohny","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hazem Zohny"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk\/people\/dr-hazem-zohny"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/author\/zohnyh\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/354"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4329"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4329\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4329"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}