{"id":3728,"date":"2020-03-28T11:12:46","date_gmt":"2020-03-28T10:12:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?p=3728"},"modified":"2020-03-28T11:14:53","modified_gmt":"2020-03-28T10:14:53","slug":"highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/","title":{"rendered":"Highest German court defends the constitutional right to (assisted) suicide"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Ruth Horn.<\/p>\n

On 26th April 2020, the German Constitutional Court overturned a law of 2015 prohibiting \u2018any business-like assisted suicide\u2019.\u00a0 This included any potentially recurring suicide assistance that might be provided, with or without commercial interests, by a doctor, nurse, relative or member of a right-to-die organisation. Although suicide and therefore also assisted suicide are not a criminal offense in Germany, a person providing another person with a lethal drug could be found guilty of an offence under the law on drugs, and a doctor providing suicide assistance could be sued for medical negligence. The 2015 ban of \u2018business-like\u2019 suicide was an attempt to respond to the ambiguity in law that has led, in the past, to a series of events where individuals or right-to-die organisations tried to test the limits and establish organised suicide assistance.<\/p>\n

A number of plaintiffs including patients, palliative doctors, lawyers and right-to-die organisations brought the case before the highest Court, complaining that the 2015 law could criminalise ethically and socially accepted standards in medical practice (e.g. use of high doses of pain treatment and withdrawing treatment), and violate the right to dignity and self-determination. The Court\u2019s ruling<\/a> confirmed that the ban of \u2018business-like assisted suicide\u2019 is unconstitutional because \u2018[t]he right to a self-determined death involves the liberty to take one\u2019s own life. The individual\u2019s decision to end his\/her own existence according to his\/her understanding of quality of life and meaning of his\/her own existence ought initially to be respected by the State and society as the act of autonomous self-determination. [\u2026] The autonomous determination of [the ending of] one\u2019s own life is the direct expression of the idea of free personal development that is intrinsic to human dignity.\u2019<\/p>\n

The high priority given to respecting autonomy, dignity and free personal development echoes the first principles of the German constitution as well as the influence of the recent German history, i.e. the practices of Nazi doctors that led to the establishment of the ethical principles fixed in the Nuremberg Code. Nevertheless, the rejection of the ban of \u2018any form of business-like assisted suicide\u2019 raises important ethical questions about the autonomous nature of the suicide where the assistance involves commercial interests or leads to uncontrolled provision. In order to protect the autonomous character of suicide and guarantee good ethical practice, a regulatory framework needs to be in place, which is the focus of my recent paper<\/a> for the Journal of Medical Ethics.<\/p>\n

Paper title: <\/strong>The right to a self-determined death as expression of the right to freedom of personal development: The German Constitutional Court takes a clear stand on assisted suicide<\/a><\/p>\n

Author: <\/strong>Ruth Horn<\/p>\n

Affiliations:\u00a0<\/strong>The Ethox Centre; Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford.<\/p>\n

Competing interests<\/strong>: None<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Ruth Horn. On 26th April 2020, the German Constitutional Court overturned a law of 2015 prohibiting \u2018any business-like assisted suicide\u2019.\u00a0 This included any potentially recurring suicide assistance that might be provided, with or without commercial interests, by a doctor, nurse, relative or member of a right-to-die organisation. Although suicide and therefore also assisted suicide […]<\/p>\n

Read More…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":354,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8050,8060,7988],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3728","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-death-and-or-dying","category-euthanasia","category-regulation-and-regulators"],"yoast_head":"\nHighest German court defends the constitutional right to (assisted) suicide - Journal of Medical Ethics blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Highest German court defends the constitutional right to (assisted) suicide - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By Ruth Horn. On 26th April 2020, the German Constitutional Court overturned a law of 2015 prohibiting \u2018any business-like assisted suicide\u2019.\u00a0 This included any potentially recurring suicide assistance that might be provided, with or without commercial interests, by a doctor, nurse, relative or member of a right-to-die organisation. Although suicide and therefore also assisted suicide [...]Read More...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-03-28T10:12:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-03-28T10:14:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hazem Zohny\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hazem Zohny\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/28\\\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/28\\\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hazem Zohny\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35\"},\"headline\":\"Highest German court defends the constitutional right to (assisted) suicide\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-03-28T10:12:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-03-28T10:14:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/28\\\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":474,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"death and\\\/or dying\",\"Euthanasia\",\"Regulation and Regulators\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/28\\\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/28\\\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/28\\\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\\\/\",\"name\":\"Highest German court defends the constitutional right to (assisted) suicide - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-03-28T10:12:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-03-28T10:14:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/28\\\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/28\\\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/28\\\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Highest German court defends the constitutional right to (assisted) suicide\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"description\":\"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"width\":200,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35\",\"name\":\"Hazem Zohny\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hazem Zohny\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk\\\/people\\\/dr-hazem-zohny\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/author\\\/zohnyh\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Highest German court defends the constitutional right to (assisted) suicide - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Highest German court defends the constitutional right to (assisted) suicide - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","og_description":"By Ruth Horn. On 26th April 2020, the German Constitutional Court overturned a law of 2015 prohibiting \u2018any business-like assisted suicide\u2019.\u00a0 This included any potentially recurring suicide assistance that might be provided, with or without commercial interests, by a doctor, nurse, relative or member of a right-to-die organisation. Although suicide and therefore also assisted suicide [...]Read More...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/","og_site_name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","article_published_time":"2020-03-28T10:12:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-03-28T10:14:53+00:00","author":"Hazem Zohny","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hazem Zohny","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/"},"author":{"name":"Hazem Zohny","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35"},"headline":"Highest German court defends the constitutional right to (assisted) suicide","datePublished":"2020-03-28T10:12:46+00:00","dateModified":"2020-03-28T10:14:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/"},"wordCount":474,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"articleSection":["death and\/or dying","Euthanasia","Regulation and Regulators"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/","name":"Highest German court defends the constitutional right to (assisted) suicide - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-03-28T10:12:46+00:00","dateModified":"2020-03-28T10:14:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/28\/highest-german-court-defends-the-constitutional-right-to-assisted-suicide\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Highest German court defends the constitutional right to (assisted) suicide"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","description":"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","width":200,"height":50,"caption":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/e73152f6aa4e164c7d625d77cf4fed35","name":"Hazem Zohny","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d1bd322d5ff8e6f31a624003143903d0ba7346af8cdb1fd6b5e95924b92ece1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hazem Zohny"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk\/people\/dr-hazem-zohny"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/author\/zohnyh\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/354"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3728"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3728\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}