{"id":3718,"date":"2020-03-30T21:09:53","date_gmt":"2020-03-30T20:09:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?p=3718"},"modified":"2020-03-30T21:09:53","modified_gmt":"2020-03-30T20:09:53","slug":"what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/","title":{"rendered":"What can contraceptive justice teach us about coronavirus?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By Arianne Shahvisi<\/p>\n<p>A disease sweeps through the population, and is transmitted between people through ordinary social interaction. One group of people are particularly vulnerable, and infection has very serious consequences for them. Another group is able to transmit the disease, but has little risk of being harmed by it. Measures can be taken by individuals to stem the spread of the disease, but they are burdensome, and most people would rather not undertake them. Which group should be required to take measures to minimise harm?<\/p>\n<p>My moral intuition is that the group that has little or no risk of being harmed\u2014the \u201ctransmitters\u201d\u2014should be solely or chiefly responsible for undertaking measures to protect those most at risk\u2014the potential \u201csufferers.\u201d While one might argue that this puts an unfair burden on the transmitters, the potential cost to the sufferers is so high that it is justifiable to impose such a burden. Further, potential sufferers should not have to shoulder both the risk of infection <em>and<\/em> the burden of protecting against it.<\/p>\n<p>That is the gist of my most recent research article. You\u2019d be forgiven for assuming it\u2019s about coronavirus. It isn\u2019t. (I\u2019m not so quick at thinking or writing as to have got around to that yet.) No, it\u2019s a paper about contraceptive responsibility, but there are some uncanny parallels that are worth noting. In what follows, I\u2019ll first summarise a couple of the arguments I make in this research article, and then reflect on what this might teach us about coronavirus.<\/p>\n<p>Unwanted pregnancy is a lot like an infectious disease. It\u2019s transmitted through a normal social activity\u2014penis-in-vagina sex\u2014and causes nine months of serious physical disruption to a woman\u2019s life, including risks of diabetes, bleeding, back pain, cramp, tiredness, digestive issues, urinary incontinence, deep vein thrombosis, headaches, high blood pressure, indigestion, nausea, haemorrhoids, varicose veins, sleeplessness, mental health issues, and mortality. In short, unwanted pregnancy is harmful. Further, it only affects one population group (women) but is transmitted by another group (men).<\/p>\n<p>Contraceptive methods can be used to protect against unwanted pregnancy, but they are burdensome and sex-asymmetric. Contraception is burdensome because it\u2019s costly, since in many contexts it isn\u2019t free, and the associated medical appointments take time and planning, and can be uncomfortable. Most forms of contraception also come with serious side effects, and abortions can be medically serious and are still widely stigmatised. These costs are particularly morally concerning because they\u2019re sex-asymmetric. As a society, we tend to think that taking responsibility for the consequences of sex is a woman\u2019s job. Eleven contraceptives act on the female body, while just two act on the male body, and women take the lead in acquiring contraception and ensuring it is used in 91% of cases.<\/p>\n<p>The central claim of my paper is that since women are at risk of unwanted pregnancy when they engage in penis-in-vagina sex, men should be the ones to take measures to ensure that they cannot cause unwanted pregnancies. That way, the risks and burdens of sex are more evenly shared between partners. Instead of thinking of women as being vulnerable to pregnancy, we should think of men as carrying serious risks that they must act to minimise.<\/p>\n<p>To see why this makes sense, imagine that you\u2019re about to join a hypothetical society, but you don\u2019t know whether you\u2019ll end up as a man or a woman, or what kind of sex you\u2019ll prefer. In our current society, if you end up as a woman who prefers penis-in-vagina sex, you not only face the risk of unwanted pregnancy, you\u2019re also expected to shoulder the burden of protecting against it. If you end up as a man who prefers penis-in-vagina sex, you face no risk of pregnancy, and there\u2019s no expectation that you contracept. Ending up as a man seems like a much better option. Instead, consider a society in which women are still at risk of unwanted pregnancy, but don\u2019t have to worry about protecting against it, while men are not at risk of pregnancy, but are expected to take on the burden of protecting against it.\u00a0 In such a society, your odds are better: it wouldn\u2019t matter quite so much if you ended up as a man or a woman. Things seem fairer.<\/p>\n<p>In the present context, this means that men should acquire and use condoms, or offer to contribute to the costs of their partners\u2019 birth control method. Many men prefer not to use condoms, and rely on their partners to have taken care of contraception. This has to change.<\/p>\n<p>In the near future, it\u2019s quite likely that long-acting reversible contraceptives will be developed which operate on the male body to render semen harmless. These methods look set to be highly effective, and once they\u2019re approved, men should use them to ensure that PIV sex is optimally unlikely to harm women. Ultimately, this should become the standard form of contraception.<\/p>\n<p>The arguments made within my paper focus on contraception and unwanted pregnancy, but ultimately they\u2019re arguments about the fairest way to share health-related burdens. What might they teach us about coronavirus?<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s return to the initial example of the transmitters and the potential sufferers. In this case, the transmitters are young people and those with no underlying medical conditions; the potential sufferers are older people and those with particular underlying medical conditions. Taking protective measures is onerous. Just as some people don\u2019t like wearing condoms, others don\u2019t like having to stay at home and limit their social lives. Tough.<\/p>\n<p>The arguments just made indicate that living with the risk of being harmed or killed by coronavirus is burden enough. Older people and those with underlying medical conditions should be asked to give up as little as possible. They should not be made to feel faulty or deficient; others should think of themselves as dangerous, and should be following the latest public health advice as to how to avoid causing harm. These measures should fall disproportionately on one group because the risks fall disproportionately on the other. It will be burdensome, but that\u2019s what justice demands.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Paper title: <\/strong>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/content\/early\/2020\/03\/26\/medethics-2019-105800\">Towards responsible ejaculations: the moral imperative for male contraceptive responsibility<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Author(s): <\/strong>Arianne Shahvisi<\/p>\n<p><strong>Affiliations: <\/strong>Senior Lecturer in Ethics, Brighton and Sussex Medical School<\/p>\n<p><strong>Competing interests: <\/strong>None declared<!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Arianne Shahvisi A disease sweeps through the population, and is transmitted between people through ordinary social interaction. One group of people are particularly vulnerable, and infection has very serious consequences for them. Another group is able to transmit the disease, but has little risk of being harmed by it. Measures can be taken by [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":353,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2022,8063],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3718","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reproduction","category-sex"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>What can contraceptive justice teach us about coronavirus? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What can contraceptive justice teach us about coronavirus? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By Arianne Shahvisi A disease sweeps through the population, and is transmitted between people through ordinary social interaction. One group of people are particularly vulnerable, and infection has very serious consequences for them. Another group is able to transmit the disease, but has little risk of being harmed by it. Measures can be taken by [...]Read More...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-03-30T20:09:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mike King\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Mike King\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/30\\\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/30\\\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Mike King\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b107957622bc42b2097d15e5e02a112c\"},\"headline\":\"What can contraceptive justice teach us about coronavirus?\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-03-30T20:09:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/30\\\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1080,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Reproduction\",\"sex\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/30\\\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/30\\\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/30\\\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\\\/\",\"name\":\"What can contraceptive justice teach us about coronavirus? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-03-30T20:09:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/30\\\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/30\\\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/30\\\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What can contraceptive justice teach us about coronavirus?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"description\":\"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"width\":200,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b107957622bc42b2097d15e5e02a112c\",\"name\":\"Mike King\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Mike King\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.otago.ac.nz\\\/bioethics\\\/people\\\/academic\\\/profile\\\/index.html?id=774\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/author\\\/mking\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What can contraceptive justice teach us about coronavirus? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What can contraceptive justice teach us about coronavirus? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","og_description":"By Arianne Shahvisi A disease sweeps through the population, and is transmitted between people through ordinary social interaction. One group of people are particularly vulnerable, and infection has very serious consequences for them. Another group is able to transmit the disease, but has little risk of being harmed by it. Measures can be taken by [...]Read More...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/","og_site_name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","article_published_time":"2020-03-30T20:09:53+00:00","author":"Mike King","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Mike King","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/"},"author":{"name":"Mike King","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/b107957622bc42b2097d15e5e02a112c"},"headline":"What can contraceptive justice teach us about coronavirus?","datePublished":"2020-03-30T20:09:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/"},"wordCount":1080,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Reproduction","sex"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/","name":"What can contraceptive justice teach us about coronavirus? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-03-30T20:09:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2020\/03\/30\/what-can-contraceptive-justice-teach-us-about-coronavirus\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What can contraceptive justice teach us about coronavirus?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","description":"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","width":200,"height":50,"caption":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/b107957622bc42b2097d15e5e02a112c","name":"Mike King","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Mike King"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.otago.ac.nz\/bioethics\/people\/academic\/profile\/index.html?id=774"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/author\/mking\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3718","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/353"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3718"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3718\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}