{"id":3596,"date":"2019-10-22T04:05:22","date_gmt":"2019-10-22T03:05:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?p=3596"},"modified":"2019-10-22T04:23:22","modified_gmt":"2019-10-22T03:23:22","slug":"is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/","title":{"rendered":"Is the “serious” factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers"},"content":{"rendered":"

By I\u00f1igo de Miguel Beriain<\/p>\n

Is the \u201cserious\u201d factor in germline modification relevant? This seems a relevant question in the germline gene editing debate. Of course, at first glance, one tends to choose an affirmative answer immediately. It seems common sense to think that sophisticated technology should be used only when we are faced with significant pathologies. This is precisely the hypothesis that underlies most of the literature on this subject. This includes, of course, Kleiderman, Ravitsky, and Knoppers’ paper [free to read here<\/a> – Eds.], which inspired me to reflect on this subject.<\/p>\n

Once I examined the issues at stake, I concluded that this hypothesis is wrong. In fact, my article argues that if there comes a time when the use of genetic editing techniques involves minimal risk, we would have to use them for a wide range of pathologies. Moreover, this range would not necessarily include some of the most serious ones. There are several reasons why I think this is true:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. In the case of some severe pathologies, such as monogenic diseases, we could continue to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis to prevent human beings from being born with them. This would eliminate the need for genetic editing.<\/li>\n
  2. On the other hand, gene editing technologies could be used to modify genes in the case of polygenic diseases that may not be very serious, but that hinder our lives.<\/li>\n
  3. Finally, editing could be used to modify our genes in a way that decreases the likelihood of developing certain pathologies. Think, for example, of the possibility of altering the BRCAs genes.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Therefore, I conclude in my paper that the \u201cserious\u201d factor should not play an essential role in gene editing, provided that the risks involved in these technologies are acceptable. Furthermore, I argue that if the level of risk were high, it would not be well understood why we would have to edit human embryos instead of continuing to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis to discard embryos suffering severe pathologies. Therefore, my conclusion is that, whatever the level of risk, the “serious factor” should not play an essential role in the discussion on the applicability of genetic editing techniques.<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Paper title:<\/strong> Is the \u201cserious\u201d factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers<\/a><\/p>\n

    Author:<\/strong> I\u00f1igo de Miguel Beriain<\/p>\n

    Affiliations:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    University of the Basque Country. Leioa Bizkaia. Spain<\/p>\n

    IKERBASQUE. Basque Foundation for Science. Bilbao. Spain<\/p>\n

    Competing interests:\u00a0<\/strong>None declared<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    By I\u00f1igo de Miguel Beriain Is the \u201cserious\u201d factor in germline modification relevant? This seems a relevant question in the germline gene editing debate. Of course, at first glance, one tends to choose an affirmative answer immediately. It seems common sense to think that sophisticated technology should be used only when we are faced with […]<\/p>\n

    Read More…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":353,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8046,2147,8048,2022],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3596","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gene-editing","category-genetic-jiggerypokery","category-genetics","category-reproduction"],"yoast_head":"\nIs the "serious" factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers - Journal of Medical Ethics blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Is the "serious" factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By I\u00f1igo de Miguel Beriain Is the \u201cserious\u201d factor in germline modification relevant? This seems a relevant question in the germline gene editing debate. Of course, at first glance, one tends to choose an affirmative answer immediately. It seems common sense to think that sophisticated technology should be used only when we are faced with [...]Read More...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-22T03:05:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-10-22T03:23:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mike King\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Mike King\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/22\\\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/22\\\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Mike King\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b107957622bc42b2097d15e5e02a112c\"},\"headline\":\"Is the “serious” factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-22T03:05:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-22T03:23:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/22\\\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":420,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gene editing\",\"Genetic jiggerypokery\",\"Genetics\",\"Reproduction\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/22\\\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/22\\\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/22\\\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\\\/\",\"name\":\"Is the \\\"serious\\\" factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-22T03:05:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-22T03:23:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/22\\\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/22\\\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/22\\\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Is the “serious” factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"description\":\"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"width\":200,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b107957622bc42b2097d15e5e02a112c\",\"name\":\"Mike King\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Mike King\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.otago.ac.nz\\\/bioethics\\\/people\\\/academic\\\/profile\\\/index.html?id=774\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/author\\\/mking\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Is the \"serious\" factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Is the \"serious\" factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","og_description":"By I\u00f1igo de Miguel Beriain Is the \u201cserious\u201d factor in germline modification relevant? This seems a relevant question in the germline gene editing debate. Of course, at first glance, one tends to choose an affirmative answer immediately. It seems common sense to think that sophisticated technology should be used only when we are faced with [...]Read More...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/","og_site_name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","article_published_time":"2019-10-22T03:05:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-10-22T03:23:22+00:00","author":"Mike King","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Mike King","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/"},"author":{"name":"Mike King","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/b107957622bc42b2097d15e5e02a112c"},"headline":"Is the “serious” factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers","datePublished":"2019-10-22T03:05:22+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-22T03:23:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/"},"wordCount":420,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gene editing","Genetic jiggerypokery","Genetics","Reproduction"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/","name":"Is the \"serious\" factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-22T03:05:22+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-22T03:23:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2019\/10\/22\/is-the-serious-factor-in-germline-modification-really-relevant-a-response-to-kleiderman-ravitsky-and-knoppers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Is the “serious” factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","description":"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","width":200,"height":50,"caption":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/b107957622bc42b2097d15e5e02a112c","name":"Mike King","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8caa7ddd85361ccfd46160d9dd41e9ff9aadde6fd8379b80c066d095d69f9f7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Mike King"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.otago.ac.nz\/bioethics\/people\/academic\/profile\/index.html?id=774"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/author\/mking\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3596","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/353"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3596"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3596\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3596"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3596"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}