{"id":3101,"date":"2016-11-22T16:40:29","date_gmt":"2016-11-22T15:40:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?p=3101"},"modified":"2016-11-22T16:51:34","modified_gmt":"2016-11-22T15:51:34","slug":"are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/","title":{"rendered":"Are Single Men in the UK Entitled to have a Baby using Fertility Treatment?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em><strong>Guest post by\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><strong><em>Atina Krajewska, Rachel Cahill-O\u2019Callaghan, and Melanie Fellowes <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The World Health Organisation is currently considering a change in the definition of infertility according to which,<span style=\"color: #0000ff\"> <a style=\"color: #0000ff\" href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/2016\/10\/19\/single-men-will-get-the-right-to-start-a-family-under-new-defini\/\">it has been reported<\/a><\/span>, &#8220;single men and women without medical issues [would] be classed as &#8216;infertile&#8217;, if they do not have children but want to become a parent.&#8221; \u00a0Although the WHO has not to date officially confirmed these reports, the possible changes have been considered controversial and provoked heated responses in<span style=\"color: #0000ff\"> <a style=\"color: #0000ff\" href=\"http:\/\/europe.newsweek.com\/single-people-who-struggle-find-sexual-partner-considered-infertile-512404\">other<\/a><\/span> UK <span style=\"color: #0000ff\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/programmes\/b07z3z98\">media<\/a><\/span>. \u00a0One of the main <span style=\"color: #0000ff\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff\" href=\"http:\/\/www.newstatesman.com\/politics\/feminism\/2016\/10\/no-single-men-do-not-have-right-reproduce\">points of contention<\/a><\/span> was the possibility of opening fertility treatment to single men. \u00a0Before we engage in discussions about the new WHO standards concerning fertility treatment, which \u2013 it should be stressed \u2013 have not yet been officially announced or adopted, it is important to shed some light on the legal situation of single men in the UK, who wish to become single fathers using fertility treatment. \u00a0 This entry is aiming to exactly that.\u00a0 (In respect of single women, see <span style=\"color: #0000ff\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff\" href=\"http:\/\/medlaw.oxfordjournals.org\/content\/early\/2015\/08\/02\/medlaw.fwv031.short\">this<\/a><\/span>.)<\/p>\n<p>A single man wishing to have a child will have to use a surrogate and will either use the surrogate\u2019s ovum and his sperm, or she will carry an embryo created by his sperm and a donated egg. \u00a0The HFE Act 1990 (as amended by the HFEA 2008) and the Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 will therefore be the two most relevant pieces of legislation governing the area. \u00a0Neither of these Acts expressly mentions single men as a separate class of patients.<\/p>\n<p>The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 has never prevented single persons from accessing ARTs. \u00a0The Act and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority\u2019s 8<sup>th<\/sup> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hfea.gov.uk\/code.html\">Code of Practice<\/a> refers to a &#8220;woman&#8221;, a &#8220;couple&#8221;, and an &#8220;individual&#8221;, and the latter opens up the possibility for single men to access treatment. \u00a0Consequently, should they be adopted, the new WHO guidelines would not affect the fundamental principles of the HFE Act 1990 (2008), which does not engage with questions of rationing and access to publicly funded treatment. \u00a0It is also unlikely that it could affect the interpretation of these provisions of the Act that may be seen as creating invisible obstacles for single persons.\u00a0 (More <a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1468-2230.2010.00790.x\/full\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1467-9566.12078\/full\">here<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>A\u00a0look at the 2008 HFE Act suggests that the legal position of single men is arguably weaker than that of single women (excluding women using surrogacy, who seem to constitute the most vulnerable and least protected group of patients). \u00a0The amended version of s 13 (5) of the HFE Act 2008, which replaced \u201cthe need for a father\u201d with the \u201cneed for supporting parenting\u201d in the welfare of the child assessment, refers only to a woman and is now silent about the man. \u00a0This change was rightly welcomed as enhancing equality and promoting alternative family structures in the context of ARTs. \u00a0However, it has paradoxically weakened the position of single men. \u00a0A surrogate woman who gives birth to a child would be recognised as a legal mother under the HFE Act and would only need to show evidence of a supportive network of family and friends. \u00a0At the same time, the wording of s 13(5) weakens the claims of single men wishing to become parents by accessing fertility treatment.<\/p>\n<p>The biggest challenge single men face in this context is the establishment of legal parenthood. \u00a0Interestingly, the only situation in which a single man could be regarded as the legal father of the child would occur when he is the biological father, the surrogate mother is unmarried and not in a civil partnership, and no one chooses otherwise.\u00a0 (This rule is inferred from s 42, 43, and 44 HFE Act 2008, although none of these provisions mentions single men.) \u00a0The realities of surrogacy will rarely allow for such a set of circumstances to occur. \u00a0On top of this, the single male might also struggle to satisfy the requirement under s. 54(8) HFEA 2008 that no money or other benefit has been given or received for surrogacy, as the majority of arrangements will involve third parties who are not family members, and will usually involve a financial component. \u00a0This is one of the reasons why most surrogacy arrangements involving single men will take place abroad. \u00a0In these cases, the single man whose child was born as a result of a surrogacy arrangement through IVF\/IUI will have to apply for a parental order or adoption.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>However, here too, recent case law revealed &#8220;legal vulnerabilities&#8221; of single men. \u00a0(See <em>Re Z (a child) (HFEAct: parental order) <\/em>[2015] 3 FCR 586 and <em>Re Z (A child) (No 2)<\/em> [2016] EWHC 1191 (Fam) on this.)\u00a0 Section 54(1) of the HFEAct 2008, setting out the principles concerning parental orders, makes it clear that a claim for a parental order has to be made by two people. \u00a0This implies a couple, whether heterosexual or same-sex, and appears to exclude single men from being able to apply for the transfer of parenthood after having used a surrogacy arrangement in cases where the surrogate is in a recognised relationship, or if the birth of the child occurred abroad.* \u00a0This issue was raised most recently in the case of <em>Re Z (A Child) (No 2). <\/em><\/p>\n<p>The issue before the court was whether parental orders set out in the HFE Act 2008 should be available for single parents, and whether they violate human rights. \u00a0The President of the High Court Family Division held that the current position of section 54 (1) and (2) of the HFEA 2008 was incompatible with the human rights as guaranteed by Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 ECHR. As observed by Lord Munby, the concept of what a couple is has changed over the years, but it has always been clear that one person cannot apply for a parental order. \u00a0The difference between adoption orders and parental orders indicates a very clear difference of policy, which Parliament thought it right to draw in 1990 and again in 2008.<\/p>\n<p>Although the court did not have to discuss the right or the eligibility criteria to access fertility treatment by single persons, the case does demonstrate that, although access to fertility treatment (including surrogacy) is not formally prohibited, in practice the provisions concerning parenthood enshrined in the HFE Act can produce exclusionary effects against single men. \u00a0If single men are aware of this considerable obstacle to obtaining a parental order then they will be discouraged from pursuing access to ARTs.<\/p>\n<p>The case of <em>Re B v C (Surrogacy: Adoption) <\/em>illustrates further problems inherent in an application for adoption of the child, the only possible option for the single man who wishes to obtain parental rights over his biological offspring.\u00a0 (More details <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ibanet.org\/Article\/Detail.aspx?ArticleUid=517031ab-d506-44de-8c99-06a9eccc5448\">here<\/a>.)\u00a0 In this case, B\u2019s sperm and a donor egg had been implanted into his mother, C. \u00a0 C was married to D (B\u2019s father). \u00a0When the child was born, C was regarded as the legal mother of child under s. 33(1) HFEA 2008, and D was the child\u2019s legal father under s. 35(1). \u00a0B wished to apply for adoption, as he was ineligible for parental orders (as a single man). \u00a0The court examined the provisions of the Adoption and Children Act 2002, in particular whether a criminal offence had been committed by undertaking a private adoption, prohibited by s. 92 ACA 2002. \u00a0The father of the child was exonerated on the basis of s. 92(3) and (4), which holds that an offence is not committed if the prospective adopters are parents, relatives or guardians of the child. \u00a0In this case, B, the biological father of the child, was in fact also its legal brother and consequently a \u2018relative\u2019 within s.144 of the ACA 2002. \u00a0If B had not been a relative (i.e. brother or uncle) then it is possible that B, C and D would have been guilty of offences under the Act. \u00a0B was only the child\u2019s brother in the eyes of law because B\u2019s mother agreed to act as a surrogate for his baby \u2013 see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bionews.org.uk\/page_507198.asp\">this<\/a> for more. \u00a0 The only other legally acceptable option would be to use a single man\u2019s sister as a surrogate. \u00a0It is difficult to imagine many situations of this kind occurring in future.<\/p>\n<p>This situation is clearly unsatisfactory and undesirable. \u00a0As demonstrated by the recent case law and this analysis, the current legal framework violates human rights of single men, preventing them from acquiring a legal recognition of the biological\/genetic relationship with their offspring. \u00a0It is thus clear that the British legal system has started to acknowledge the rights of single men in fertility treatment independently of the WHO, which \u2013 at least in the UK \u2013 should be seen more falling within the changing paradigm rather than bringing one. \u00a0These issues are conceptually and practically distinct from questions concerning public funding and rationing, which is a topic for a different post. \u00a0The fact that the number of single men remains small does not mean it can and should be ignored. \u00a0In fact, it could be argued that the numbers remain small precisely because of the legal obstacles and ambiguities engrained in the legal and regulatory framework governing fertility treatment. \u00a0The courts have refrained from providing Parliament with any directions or guidance with regard to the necessary amendments that would bring the law into line with the ECHR. \u00a0As a result, further discussions about the best way of resolving the above inconsistencies are vital.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Upcoming workshop<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>These and other pressing questions over the Legal Status of Single Persons in Fertility Treatment in the UK will be discussed at a <span style=\"color: #0000ff\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sheffield.ac.uk\/law\/research\/conferences\/fertility\">workshop held in London on the 7<sup>th<\/sup> of December 2016 at the British Academy<\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0 \u00a0The workshop intends to generate further discussions between academic lawyers and other stakeholders about problems emerging in this area of law and medical\u00a0practice.\u00a0 It aims to present the preliminary findings of a BA\/ Leverhulme Trust Small Research Project currently carried out between Sheffield Law School and Cardiff School of Law and Politics and highlights avenues for further research.\u00a0\u00a0 There is still a limited number of spaces left for those involved or interested in this area of theory and practice.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>*This provision will only affect those single women using surrogates. These women seem to constitute the most vulnerable and least protected group of patients. Otherwise, a single woman who have used ART will be the legal mother under s. 33(1) HFEA 2008 when she gives birth to a child created with donor sperm.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Guest post by\u00a0Atina Krajewska, Rachel Cahill-O\u2019Callaghan, and Melanie Fellowes The World Health Organisation is currently considering a change in the definition of infertility according to which, it has been reported, &#8220;single men and women without medical issues [would] be classed as &#8216;infertile&#8217;, if they do not have children but want to become a parent.&#8221; \u00a0Although [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2153,511,2148,2022],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-guest-post","category-in-the-news","category-law","category-reproduction"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Are Single Men in the UK Entitled to have a Baby using Fertility Treatment? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Are Single Men in the UK Entitled to have a Baby using Fertility Treatment? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Guest post by\u00a0Atina Krajewska, Rachel Cahill-O\u2019Callaghan, and Melanie Fellowes The World Health Organisation is currently considering a change in the definition of infertility according to which, it has been reported, &#8220;single men and women without medical issues [would] be classed as &#8216;infertile&#8217;, if they do not have children but want to become a parent.&#8221; \u00a0Although [...]Read More...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-11-22T15:40:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-22T15:51:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"BMJ\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"BMJ\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2016\\\/11\\\/22\\\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2016\\\/11\\\/22\\\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"BMJ\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ba3da426ed20e8f1d933ca367d8216fe\"},\"headline\":\"Are Single Men in the UK Entitled to have a Baby using Fertility Treatment?\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-22T15:40:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-22T15:51:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2016\\\/11\\\/22\\\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1708,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Guest Post\",\"In the News\",\"Law\",\"Reproduction\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2016\\\/11\\\/22\\\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2016\\\/11\\\/22\\\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2016\\\/11\\\/22\\\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\\\/\",\"name\":\"Are Single Men in the UK Entitled to have a Baby using Fertility Treatment? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-22T15:40:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-22T15:51:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2016\\\/11\\\/22\\\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2016\\\/11\\\/22\\\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2016\\\/11\\\/22\\\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Are Single Men in the UK Entitled to have a Baby using Fertility Treatment?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"description\":\"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"width\":200,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ba3da426ed20e8f1d933ca367d8216fe\",\"name\":\"BMJ\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"BMJ\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Are Single Men in the UK Entitled to have a Baby using Fertility Treatment? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Are Single Men in the UK Entitled to have a Baby using Fertility Treatment? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","og_description":"Guest post by\u00a0Atina Krajewska, Rachel Cahill-O\u2019Callaghan, and Melanie Fellowes The World Health Organisation is currently considering a change in the definition of infertility according to which, it has been reported, &#8220;single men and women without medical issues [would] be classed as &#8216;infertile&#8217;, if they do not have children but want to become a parent.&#8221; \u00a0Although [...]Read More...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/","og_site_name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","article_published_time":"2016-11-22T15:40:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-22T15:51:34+00:00","author":"BMJ","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"BMJ","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/"},"author":{"name":"BMJ","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/ba3da426ed20e8f1d933ca367d8216fe"},"headline":"Are Single Men in the UK Entitled to have a Baby using Fertility Treatment?","datePublished":"2016-11-22T15:40:29+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-22T15:51:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/"},"wordCount":1708,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Guest Post","In the News","Law","Reproduction"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/","name":"Are Single Men in the UK Entitled to have a Baby using Fertility Treatment? - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-11-22T15:40:29+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-22T15:51:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2016\/11\/22\/are-single-men-in-the-uk-entitled-to-have-a-baby-using-fertility-treatment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Are Single Men in the UK Entitled to have a Baby using Fertility Treatment?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","description":"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","width":200,"height":50,"caption":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/ba3da426ed20e8f1d933ca367d8216fe","name":"BMJ","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"BMJ"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3101"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3101\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}