{"id":179,"date":"2009-09-07T10:36:26","date_gmt":"2009-09-07T09:36:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?p=179"},"modified":"2009-09-11T19:53:25","modified_gmt":"2009-09-11T18:53:25","slug":"and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/","title":{"rendered":"And Justice (and Healthcare) for All"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A convicted double murderer has <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/uk\/8234065.stm\">won the right to have cosmetic surgery to remove a birthmark<\/a> on the NHS.\u00a0 Good.\u00a0 Predictably, the foaming-at-the-mouth brigade is having a field day with this in the comments section of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-1210705\/Double-murderer-serving-life-wins-high-court-battle-birthmark-removed-makes-self-conscious.html\"><em>Daily Fail<\/em>&#8216;s coverage<\/a>.\u00a0 Equally predictably, they&#8217;re wrong.<\/p>\n<p>The reason is straightforwardly to do with considerations of rights and justice.\u00a0 I&#8217;m going to assume &#8211; fairly safely, I think &#8211; that the nub of the criticism is that being a convicted murderer means you lose the entitlement to certain social rights and benefits.\u00a0 (Indeed, I&#8217;ve overheard many people at the bar saying things along the lines that, if you break the law, you lose all human rights &#8211; and it was only because I was busy serving other people that I could restrain myself from saying something withering in reply.)<\/p>\n<p>The loss of rights claim is easily put to bed. <!--more--> If there is such a thing as a human right, you <em>can&#8217;t<\/em> lose it.\u00a0 For sure, a murderer might have violated another&#8217;s right to life, but he doesn&#8217;t thereby lose his own.\u00a0 If there&#8217;s such a thing as a human right, and if the removal of birthmarks is covered by the concept of a human right, and if a person is human, then he is entitled to have the birthmark removed.\u00a0 It really is that simple.<\/p>\n<p>The other line of objection is that it&#8217;s unjust, therefore wrong, for public money to be spent on benefiting someone who has harmed the public.\u00a0 However, even here, the objection rests on a pretty basic misunderstanding.<\/p>\n<p>For sure, we want our health provision to be just, but there&#8217;s at least two ways in which you could understand that.\u00a0 One kind of justice is what we might call &#8220;penal&#8221; justice &#8211; the kind that doles out the proper punishment for violations of just laws.\u00a0 The other is &#8220;social&#8221; justice, and is much looser &#8211; it deals with the way in which we distribute resources, respond to competing claims, aid those in need, and so on.\u00a0 I&#8217;m not sure whether these categories are the sort of thing that full-blown philosophers would use, but they&#8217;ll do for the moment.\u00a0 Justice in healthcare clearly belongs to the latter category: it&#8217;s not the doctor&#8217;s job to punish people for violations of the law, any more than it&#8217;s yours or mine\u00a0(unless you&#8217;re a lawmaker of judge).\u00a0 It is his job to make sure that he allocates his time and resources in a defencible manner &#8211; noting, of course, that public expenditure is a justice consideration as well, given that it&#8217;s unjust to tax people to\u00a0pay for healthcare more heavily than is warranted.<\/p>\n<p>So, to this extent, the justice of providing the treatment, in terms of whether it&#8217;s money well spent, is separable from any question concerning the identity or biography of the person on whom it&#8217;s spent. \u00a0That is to say: if there&#8217;s a medical need for a procedure, and if the resources are there, then it should be the sort of thing that we&#8217;d consider providing, in just the same way as we&#8217;d consider providing a vaccination or a splint for a broken leg. \u00a0(I consider similar themes in a short paper I&#8217;ve got coming out in the <em>Americal Journal of Bioethics<\/em> later this year.)\u00a0 And while there might be a case to be made for &#8220;self-inflicted&#8221; illness pushing someone down any waiting list that might exist &#8211; so, for example, an alcoholic might possibly have to make way for others for\u00a0a liver transplant if there are others in need &#8211; it&#8217;s not at all clear how a murderer with a birthmark would bend to the same analysis.\u00a0 It&#8217;s not as if being a murderer and having a birthmark are in any way related &#8211; and so it&#8217;s odd that being a murderer should be wheeled in when we&#8217;re considering whether or not to remove a birthmark.<\/p>\n<p>That is to say, the only real question is one of whether the prisoner has a case that the removal of the birthmark is medically warranted. \u00a0If it is, he should be treated as any other person; if not &#8211; well, he should be treated like any other person in that case as well.<\/p>\n<p>I appreciate that there&#8217;s an intuitive distaste that some people feel about prisoners getting treatment like this on the NHS, but it&#8217;s ill-founded. \u00a0The proper punishment for murder, we&#8217;ve decided, is the deprivation of liberty, which invariably means a long stretch in prison. \u00a0In some cases, it means never being released from that prison. \u00a0In most cases, it means that release comes after a good many years, and even then only conditionally. \u00a0(A life sentence really does mean life, irrespective of what the <em>Daily Fail<\/em> might try to tell you.) \u00a0It doesn&#8217;t &#8211; and, in my view there&#8217;s no way that it defensibly could &#8211; mean depriving a person of the medical care that we&#8217;d happily provide to people on the outside world.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s not flying in the face of justice; it&#8217;s guaranteeing it.<!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A convicted double murderer has won the right to have cosmetic surgery to remove a birthmark on the NHS.\u00a0 Good.\u00a0 Predictably, the foaming-at-the-mouth brigade is having a field day with this in the comments section of the Daily Fail&#8216;s coverage.\u00a0 Equally predictably, they&#8217;re wrong. The reason is straightforwardly to do with considerations of rights and [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[511,475,1266,472],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-179","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-in-the-news","category-politics","category-shameless-self-publicity","category-thinking-aloud"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>And Justice (and Healthcare) for All - Journal of Medical Ethics blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"And Justice (and Healthcare) for All - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A convicted double murderer has won the right to have cosmetic surgery to remove a birthmark on the NHS.\u00a0 Good.\u00a0 Predictably, the foaming-at-the-mouth brigade is having a field day with this in the comments section of the Daily Fail&#8216;s coverage.\u00a0 Equally predictably, they&#8217;re wrong. The reason is straightforwardly to do with considerations of rights and [...]Read More...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-07T09:36:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2009-09-11T18:53:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"BMJ\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"BMJ\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2009\\\/09\\\/07\\\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2009\\\/09\\\/07\\\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"BMJ\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ba3da426ed20e8f1d933ca367d8216fe\"},\"headline\":\"And Justice (and Healthcare) for All\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-07T09:36:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2009-09-11T18:53:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2009\\\/09\\\/07\\\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":876,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"In the News\",\"Politics\",\"Shameless self-publicity\",\"Thinking Aloud\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2009\\\/09\\\/07\\\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2009\\\/09\\\/07\\\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2009\\\/09\\\/07\\\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\\\/\",\"name\":\"And Justice (and Healthcare) for All - Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-07T09:36:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2009-09-11T18:53:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2009\\\/09\\\/07\\\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2009\\\/09\\\/07\\\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/2009\\\/09\\\/07\\\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"And Justice (and Healthcare) for All\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"description\":\"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/files\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/jme-logo.png\",\"width\":200,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ba3da426ed20e8f1d933ca367d8216fe\",\"name\":\"BMJ\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"BMJ\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/medical-ethics\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"And Justice (and Healthcare) for All - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"And Justice (and Healthcare) for All - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","og_description":"A convicted double murderer has won the right to have cosmetic surgery to remove a birthmark on the NHS.\u00a0 Good.\u00a0 Predictably, the foaming-at-the-mouth brigade is having a field day with this in the comments section of the Daily Fail&#8216;s coverage.\u00a0 Equally predictably, they&#8217;re wrong. The reason is straightforwardly to do with considerations of rights and [...]Read More...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/","og_site_name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","article_published_time":"2009-09-07T09:36:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2009-09-11T18:53:25+00:00","author":"BMJ","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"BMJ","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/"},"author":{"name":"BMJ","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/ba3da426ed20e8f1d933ca367d8216fe"},"headline":"And Justice (and Healthcare) for All","datePublished":"2009-09-07T09:36:26+00:00","dateModified":"2009-09-11T18:53:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/"},"wordCount":876,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"articleSection":["In the News","Politics","Shameless self-publicity","Thinking Aloud"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/","name":"And Justice (and Healthcare) for All - Journal of Medical Ethics blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-07T09:36:26+00:00","dateModified":"2009-09-11T18:53:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/07\/and-justice-and-healthcare-for-all\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"And Justice (and Healthcare) for All"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","description":"A blog to discuss the ethics of medicine in its many guises and formats.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#organization","name":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/files\/2026\/04\/jme-logo.png","width":200,"height":50,"caption":"Journal of Medical Ethics blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/#\/schema\/person\/ba3da426ed20e8f1d933ca367d8216fe","name":"BMJ","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b4d8f39281bcae118348a1c027347b8e53b82d42520e774a8b50dd9a6ac6c01d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"BMJ"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/"],"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=179"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=179"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}