1.0Journal of Medical Ethics bloghttps://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethicsBMJhttps://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/author/admin/rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Nc1GhyunvW"><a href="https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2010/07/15/procedural-proportionality-of-ethical-review/">Procedural Proportionality of Ethical Review</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2010/07/15/procedural-proportionality-of-ethical-review/embed/#?secret=Nc1GhyunvW" width="600" height="338" title="“Procedural Proportionality of Ethical Review” — Journal of Medical Ethics blog" data-secret="Nc1GhyunvW" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript"> /* <![CDATA[ */ /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); //# sourceURL=https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js /* ]]> */ </script> By David Hunter In an excellent paper published in the most recent edition of the Journal of Medical Ethics Gefenas et al make the point that types of research which impose similar burdens of risks and harms appear to be being regulated disproportionately at the moment in the Baltic States. [...]Read More...