{"id":118,"date":"2010-03-17T16:39:29","date_gmt":"2010-03-17T15:39:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart-journalscan\/?p=118"},"modified":"2015-11-12T13:45:25","modified_gmt":"2015-11-12T12:45:25","slug":"coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/","title":{"rendered":"Coronary calcium scoring \u2013 Not a suitable endpoint for clinical trials"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"_mcePaste\">Coronary calification is viewed as the endpoint of the atherosclerotic disease process. \u00a0As such, whether it can be used to monitor changes in response to novel and existing pharmaceutical \u00a0therapies remains unknown. \u00a0To address this question, McCullough and Chinnaiyan performed a meta-analysis of the only ten trials in which coronary artery calcium (CAC) was measured at baseline and then at least one year later.<\/div>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\">Five of the trials included patients with cardiovascular disease, while five included patients with chronic renal disease. \u00a0Both Agatston and volumetric methods were used to evaluate the amount of CAC, and various pharamaceutical interventions were tested in the ten trials. \u00a0The average annual CAC increase was 17.2% overall (16.9% for patients with cardiovascular disease and 18.4% for patients with chronic renal disease, P&lt;0.001). \u00a0However, only two trials included in the analysis were placebo controlled and the CAC progression rate in this group was 14.6%. \u00a0Of the five studies that had reported outcomes in terms of CAC progression between the treatment and the control arm, no statistically significant difference was seen in any of the studies. \u00a0Furthermore, the correlation between LDL-C change and CAC progression was found to be very weak (r=0.10, P&lt;.001).<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\">It should be noted that this is an imperfect meta-analysis; the trials included used slightly different methods to assess CAC changes to several different treatments in different populations. \u00a0Nonetheless, it emphasises that, currently, no link has been found been CAC reduction and cardiovascular outcomes.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\">Conclusions:<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\">In this meta-analysis, the 1-year change in CAC did not seem to be a suitable biomarker for assessing the impact of pharmacotherapy on the burden of coronary artery disease. \u00a0A variety of ongoing trials continue to examine the role of CAC scoring in monitoring responses to drug therapies.<\/div>\n<p><!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Coronary calification is viewed as the endpoint of the atherosclerotic disease process. \u00a0As such, whether it can be used to monitor changes in response to novel and existing pharmaceutical \u00a0therapies remains unknown. \u00a0To address this question, McCullough and Chinnaiyan performed a meta-analysis of the only ten trials in which coronary artery calcium (CAC) was measured [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":103,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[282],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-118","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cardiovascular-imaging"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Coronary calcium scoring \u2013 Not a suitable endpoint for clinical trials - Heart<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-\u2013-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Coronary calcium scoring \u2013 Not a suitable endpoint for clinical trials - Heart\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Coronary calification is viewed as the endpoint of the atherosclerotic disease process. \u00a0As such, whether it can be used to monitor changes in response to novel and existing pharmaceutical \u00a0therapies remains unknown. \u00a0To address this question, McCullough and Chinnaiyan performed a meta-analysis of the only ten trials in which coronary artery calcium (CAC) was measured [...]Read More...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-\u2013-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Heart\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-17T15:39:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-12T12:45:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/17\\\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/17\\\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"Coronary calcium scoring \u2013 Not a suitable endpoint for clinical trials\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-17T15:39:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-12T12:45:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/17\\\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":297,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Cardiovascular imaging\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/17\\\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/17\\\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/17\\\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\\\/\",\"name\":\"Coronary calcium scoring \u2013 Not a suitable endpoint for clinical trials - Heart\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-17T15:39:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-12T12:45:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/17\\\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/17\\\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/17\\\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Coronary calcium scoring \u2013 Not a suitable endpoint for clinical trials\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/\",\"name\":\"Heart\",\"description\":\"Highlighted articles from non-cardiological journals relevant to cardiology\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Heart\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/blog-logo-heart.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/blog-logo-heart.png\",\"width\":145,\"height\":34,\"caption\":\"Heart\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/heart\\\/author\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Coronary calcium scoring \u2013 Not a suitable endpoint for clinical trials - Heart","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-\u2013-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Coronary calcium scoring \u2013 Not a suitable endpoint for clinical trials - Heart","og_description":"Coronary calification is viewed as the endpoint of the atherosclerotic disease process. \u00a0As such, whether it can be used to monitor changes in response to novel and existing pharmaceutical \u00a0therapies remains unknown. \u00a0To address this question, McCullough and Chinnaiyan performed a meta-analysis of the only ten trials in which coronary artery calcium (CAC) was measured [...]Read More...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-\u2013-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/","og_site_name":"Heart","article_published_time":"2010-03-17T15:39:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-12T12:45:25+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"Coronary calcium scoring \u2013 Not a suitable endpoint for clinical trials","datePublished":"2010-03-17T15:39:29+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-12T12:45:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/"},"wordCount":297,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Cardiovascular imaging"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/","name":"Coronary calcium scoring \u2013 Not a suitable endpoint for clinical trials - Heart","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-17T15:39:29+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-12T12:45:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/2010\/03\/17\/coronary-calcium-scoring-%e2%80%93-not-a-suitable-endpoint-for-clinical-trials\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Coronary calcium scoring \u2013 Not a suitable endpoint for clinical trials"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/","name":"Heart","description":"Highlighted articles from non-cardiological journals relevant to cardiology","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/#organization","name":"Heart","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/files\/2017\/11\/blog-logo-heart.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/files\/2017\/11\/blog-logo-heart.png","width":145,"height":34,"caption":"Heart"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/author\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/103"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/heart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}