{"id":683,"date":"2014-02-12T23:30:23","date_gmt":"2014-02-12T23:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/?p=683"},"modified":"2014-02-13T09:48:43","modified_gmt":"2014-02-13T09:48:43","slug":"tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/","title":{"rendered":"Tobacco industry claims \u201cplain\u201d packs won\u2019t work based on weak evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Most studies lack policy relevance; and relevant research lacks key indicators of quality, including peer review<\/p>\n<p>A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products doi:10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-003757<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bmjopen.bmj.com\/content\/4\/2\/e003757.full\">Tobacco companies lack strong, relevant evidence to support their claims that standardised (plain) packaging of tobacco products in the UK won\u2019t work<\/a>, finds research published in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bmjopen.bmj.com\/\">BMJ Open<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The aim of plain packaging, with no logos, brand imagery, symbols, or promotional text, is to restrict the already limited opportunities that transnational tobacco companies have to market their products, and deter people from starting smoking.<\/p>\n<p>Australia adopted plain packaging for tobacco products in 2012, the same year that the Department of Health in England held a public consultation on similar plans. The Department then said it wanted to wait for more evidence of the likely impact on tobacco consumption before adopting the policy.<\/p>\n<p>It has since commissioned an independent review of evidence relating to unbranded and standardised packaging, which is due to report this spring.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers analysed evidence cited in submissions made to the Department of Health\u2019s consultation on plain packaging by the UK\u2019s four largest transnational tobacco companies: Imperial Tobacco; Japan Tobacco International; Philip Morris Ltd; and British American Tobacco.<\/p>\n<p>The four companies submitted lengthy consultation responses &#8211; 1521 pages in total, of which 328 comprised their main responses and 1193 provided supplementary material.<\/p>\n<p>In these submissions, the companies rejected the conclusions of a systematic review, commissioned by the Department of Health, that there was \u201cstrong evidence\u201d that plain packaging would reduce the appeal of tobacco products and increase the prominence of health warnings.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, they argued that there is no evidence that plain packaging would reduce smoking prevalence or deter people from starting to smoke.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers looked at the volume, relevance (subject matter) and quality (as measured by independence from industry, and peer review) of the evidence cited by the companies and compared it with the evidence from the systematic review.<\/p>\n<p>Seventy seven out of 143 pieces of evidence were used to promote the companies\u2019 claim that plain packs \u201cwon\u2019t work\u201d. Of these, only 17 (22%) addressed standardised packaging, 14 of which were linked to industry. None was published in peer reviewed journals &#8211; a key hallmark of quality.<\/p>\n<p>Compared with the evidence in the systematic review, relevant evidence cited by the tobacco industry was of significantly lower quality.<\/p>\n<p>Across all 77 documents, evidence linked to industry was significantly less likely to have been published in a peer reviewed journal than the independent evidence cited by them.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWith few exceptions, evidence cited by [transnational companies] to promote their claim that standardised packaging \u2018won\u2019t work\u2019 lacks either policy relevance or key indicators of quality,\u201d conclude the authors.<!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Most studies lack policy relevance; and relevant research lacks key indicators of quality, including peer review A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products doi:10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-003757 Tobacco companies lack strong, relevant evidence to support their claims that standardised (plain) packaging of [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":226,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[511],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-in-the-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tobacco industry claims \u201cplain\u201d packs won\u2019t work based on weak evidence - BMJ Open<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tobacco industry claims \u201cplain\u201d packs won\u2019t work based on weak evidence - BMJ Open\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Most studies lack policy relevance; and relevant research lacks key indicators of quality, including peer review A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products doi:10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-003757 Tobacco companies lack strong, relevant evidence to support their claims that standardised (plain) packaging of [...]Read More...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"BMJ Open\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-02-12T23:30:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-13T09:48:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/2014\\\/02\\\/12\\\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/2014\\\/02\\\/12\\\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"Tobacco industry claims \u201cplain\u201d packs won\u2019t work based on weak evidence\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-02-12T23:30:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-13T09:48:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/2014\\\/02\\\/12\\\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":469,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"In the news\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/2014\\\/02\\\/12\\\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/2014\\\/02\\\/12\\\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/2014\\\/02\\\/12\\\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tobacco industry claims \u201cplain\u201d packs won\u2019t work based on weak evidence - BMJ Open\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-02-12T23:30:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-13T09:48:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/2014\\\/02\\\/12\\\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/2014\\\/02\\\/12\\\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/2014\\\/02\\\/12\\\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tobacco industry claims \u201cplain\u201d packs won\u2019t work based on weak evidence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/\",\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"description\":\"The official blog BMJ Open; a place to discuss medical research and discover the Editor&#039;s monthly top picks.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/blog-logo-bmjopen.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/blog-logo-bmjopen.png\",\"width\":183,\"height\":34,\"caption\":\"BMJ Open\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmjopen\\\/author\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tobacco industry claims \u201cplain\u201d packs won\u2019t work based on weak evidence - BMJ Open","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tobacco industry claims \u201cplain\u201d packs won\u2019t work based on weak evidence - BMJ Open","og_description":"Most studies lack policy relevance; and relevant research lacks key indicators of quality, including peer review A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products doi:10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-003757 Tobacco companies lack strong, relevant evidence to support their claims that standardised (plain) packaging of [...]Read More...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/","og_site_name":"BMJ Open","article_published_time":"2014-02-12T23:30:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-13T09:48:43+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"Tobacco industry claims \u201cplain\u201d packs won\u2019t work based on weak evidence","datePublished":"2014-02-12T23:30:23+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-13T09:48:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/"},"wordCount":469,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/#organization"},"articleSection":["In the news"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/","name":"Tobacco industry claims \u201cplain\u201d packs won\u2019t work based on weak evidence - BMJ Open","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-02-12T23:30:23+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-13T09:48:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/02\/12\/tobacco-industry-claims-plain-packs-wont-work-based-on-weak-evidence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tobacco industry claims \u201cplain\u201d packs won\u2019t work based on weak evidence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/","name":"BMJ Open","description":"The official blog BMJ Open; a place to discuss medical research and discover the Editor&#039;s monthly top picks.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/#organization","name":"BMJ Open","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/files\/2017\/10\/blog-logo-bmjopen.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/files\/2017\/10\/blog-logo-bmjopen.png","width":183,"height":34,"caption":"BMJ Open"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/author\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/683","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/226"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=683"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/683\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}