{"id":50207,"date":"2021-05-06T17:57:49","date_gmt":"2021-05-06T16:57:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/?p=50207"},"modified":"2021-05-11T10:40:42","modified_gmt":"2021-05-11T09:40:42","slug":"putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/","title":{"rendered":"Putting risks into context: covid-19 vaccines and blood clots"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The media around the world have been desperate to help put the risks of blood clots following a covid-19 vaccination into some sort of context. It\u2019s a familiar issue: every time someone gives consent for treatment, we need to try to communicate risks, sometimes very small ones. So, how can we do it?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Firstly, we need to think about what a \u201crisk\u201d is. As risk communicator Paul Slovic has long pointed out, a \u201crisk\u201d is not a number<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">a percentage or probability<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">it\u2019s a subjective feeling.<sup>1,2 <\/sup>That feeling is influenced by two major factors: the likelihood of the event happening, and the impact of that event.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The importance of the impact of the event is obvious: you would feel very differently if someone told you there was a 1 in 10 chance that that you might get a headache for a few days than if someone told you there was a 1 in 10 chance that you might die. It\u2019s also clear that these impacts are very personal<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">the impact of having to self-isolate for 10 days, for example, will vary hugely between people depending on their caring responsibilities and professional circumstances.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you imagine that the subjective concept of a particular risk is based on the feelings you have about the impact on you if it happened, moderated by the probability of it happening, you perhaps get a different perspective on how to help put a risk in context. The usual rush to look up a series of events with a similar probability<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">although easy enough to do, makes little sense. How does my feeling about the chances of winning a lottery in any way help me put a chance of death into perspective, just because the probability element is the same? The emotional component, the very heart of the feeling of the risk, is completely different.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Even if the impact is nominally similar<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">say, you\u2019re comparing different causes of death<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">then still our psychological responses can be very different. It\u2019s perfectly natural to feel different about dying during an operation compared with dying from cancer or from dying in an accident. There are many factors that are known to affect our feelings about a type of event, such as our perceptions of control, of understanding of the cause, familiarity etc, all adding up to different degrees of concern.<sup>2<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, giving people a series of events which feel very different and only have a likelihood in common<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">often done to \u201cput that risk in context\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">seems doomed to be unhelpful. You are giving people apples and oranges to compare. That is not helpful context. Helpful context would be giving people two events that feel the same and differ only by probability. That allows people to compare their feelings about the two and assess the \u201cdifference in feeling\u201d caused by the \u201cdifference in probability\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">i.e. doing the job of translating objective probability to subjective feeling that we are trying to do in risk communication.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The task, then, is to find two events that feel approximately the same to people. And it\u2019s a tricky task, especially given how personal the feeling about an impact can be. My heuristic now, if you want to help people weigh up things<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">to make a decision<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">is to think about what would make sense if you were to say \u201con the one hand\u2026and on the other.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The ideal scenario is to be able to give meaningful comparisons with exactly the same risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">such as a person\u2019s risk of death from a disease with and without a treatment. This comparison carries a bonus advantage: it is not only helpful in terms of putting the risk in context, it also ticks a second important box of good risk communication: giving people information that is directly related to the decision they are making. It answers the question \u201cwhat would happen if I choose to have this treatment versus if I choose not to have it?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">An example of using this kind of comparison is a graphic we at the Winton Centre produced for the U.K.\u2019s national broadcast from the government\u2019s scientific advisors about covid-19 vaccinations, where we illustrated the same risk (being hospitalised with covid-19) for people who were either fully vaccinated or not vaccinated (over the same time period of four weeks).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_50208\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-50208\" style=\"width: 817px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-50208\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"817\" height=\"451\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image1.png 1800w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image1-300x166.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image1-1024x565.png 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image1-768x424.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image1-1536x848.png 1536w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image1-640x353.png 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 817px) 100vw, 817px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-50208\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><em>A graphic made by the Winton Centre for Risk &amp; Evidence Communication for the UK national broadcast discussing the possible effects of vaccination on covid-19 hospitalisation.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">As well as simply giving the numbers, the graphic aims to help people compare them \u201cat a glance\u201d by illustrating them in such a way as to allow an easy visual comparison of one side versus the other.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Not all situations lend themselves to comparing \u201cwithin the risk\u201d though. For example, when the news broke that a specific kind of blood clot was possibly causally related to the Oxford\/Astra-Zeneca vaccine against covid-19, there was a need to illustrate the statistics. The chances of having this very specific kind of blood clot without a triggering event is<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">as far as I know<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">essentially zero. So a comparison between the chance of having this event with and without the vaccine is not helpful. On top of this, the decision that people will be making (both individuals and policy-makers) will not be entirely based on the possibility of harm from the vaccine, but a weighing up of the potential harms and the potential benefits.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This scenario, then, leads to a less-ideal solution in terms of finding a useful comparator risk: finding something that \u201cfeels close\u201d in terms of impact<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">something else that would make sense for \u201con the other hand.\u201d In fact, there was a way of combining a comparator risk that felt equivalent to the harms from blood clots which also answered the issue of illustrating the potential benefits of vaccination.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Using the same visual format to allow at-a-glance weighing-up, we chose to illustrate the potential benefit in terms of \u201cICU admissions due to covid-19 prevented\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">a risk which we felt likely to be equivalent in terms of \u201cfeeling\u201d to the risk of the potential harms, shown on the opposite side<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">the specific blood clots thought to be related to the vaccinations, which can be fatal or cause long-term disability.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_50210\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-50210\" style=\"width: 883px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image3.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-50210\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"883\" height=\"495\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image3.png 1764w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image3-300x168.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image3-1024x575.png 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image3-768x431.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image3-1536x862.png 1536w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image3-640x359.png 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 883px) 100vw, 883px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-50210\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><em>One of three graphics made by the Winton Centre for Risk &amp; Evidence communication for the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Authority in the UK and used in the national broadcast about the potential risks of specific blood clots as a reaction to the Astra-Zeneca vaccine. The accompanying script made it clear that on top of the benefits illustrated were other prevented infections, hospitalisations and transmission. Other graphics showed different virus exposure levels.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Of course there are subtleties to this graphic<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">we had to choose a fixed time point (16 weeks) to visualise the potential benefits over, as they continue to accrue over the lifetime of the vaccine\u2019s protection, and we produced three versions illustrating different levels of exposure to the virus, which would affect the level of the potential benefits as well.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On top of that, we had to make clear verbally that the prevention of ICU admissions were far from the only benefits of the vaccine. For every one ICU admission prevented there would be many, many hospital admissions, cases of long covid, and transmissions of the virus to others that had also been prevented in the vaccinated group.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Many people found this choice of comparison (and visualisation) helpful and thought it provided an appropriate context for the numbers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">What about attempts to put the statistics in context in other ways, such as comparing other forms of serious harm with similar probabilities?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">There\u2019s no empirical evidence in this specific example (yet), but my suggestion is that they are less useful to the audience in supporting their decision-making. Past attempts to illustrate the chances of a particular event, such as an environmental disaster or a health risk, by comparing to other, perhaps more familiar events with known likelihoods or annual death rates, have often been attempted. Often their intention is to try to persuade people that a risk should be acceptable to them because other risks which are similar in likelihood are. These attempts have often<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">if not always<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">failed (for a summary, see chapter 5 of reference 3).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">However, there is one other important form of context that is important to bear in mind, and that is making the denominator explicit<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">making it very obvious that all of the numbers being presented are \u201cout of 100,000.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It\u2019s well known (and we\u2019ve demonstrated in the context of covid risk specifically<sup>4<\/sup>) that presenting a number \u201cout of 100\u201d creates a different impression of the risk from presenting a number \u201cout of 1000\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">possibly because of a phenomenon known as \u201cdenominator neglect\u201d, whereby it\u2019s very easy for us all to forget the other side of the coin<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">the number of people who do <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">not<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> suffer a harm or gain a benefit (the opposite \u201cframing\u201d). The classic way to avoid this problem is to use what is known as an \u201cicon array\u2019 which is an array of icons representing the total number in the group being considered, and colouring them differently to represent the likely distribution of different outcomes within that group. With 100,000 in a group, this becomes very difficult to do, but can give a very different perspective on numbers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Doing this visually helps put numbers into context rather neutrally, avoiding the psychological impacts of introducing another risk as a comparator. In the absence of a visual comparison, a verbal comparator such as \u201cin a football stadium full of people\u201d may be a useful alternative for those familiar with the comparator<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2014<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">although again empirical evidence is scarce.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_50209\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-50209\" style=\"width: 812px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image2.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-50209\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"812\" height=\"459\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image2.png 1924w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image2-300x170.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image2-1024x579.png 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image2-768x434.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image2-1536x869.png 1536w, https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/image2-640x362.png 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 812px) 100vw, 812px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-50209\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><em>A draft graphic made by the Winton Centre for Risk &amp; Evidence Communication whilst experimenting with formats for the UK national broadcast about vaccination effects.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Generally, then, when we\u2019re trying to help people understand a risk and give it context, the main thing to bear in mind is keeping comparison risks as similar in terms of their \u2018feeling\u2019 (impact) as possible &#8211; regardless of their likelihood. Predicting what will feel similar to an individual is difficult, of course, which is probably why many jump to match the probability instead.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Where possible, compare a single individual\u2019s risk of the same thing happening under different circumstances (e.g. \u201cthe chances of someone like you developing heart disease with and without this intervention\u201d).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">If this isn\u2019t possible, compare two different individuals\u2019 risks of the same thing happening (e.g. \u2018the chances of someone with the gene alteration that you have developing breast cancer compared to someone of the same age without that gene alteration\u2019).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">If this isn\u2019t possible, then try to find a risk that \u201cfeels\u201d comparable (e.g. \u201cthe chances of someone like you developing this serious blood clot versus the chances of someone like you being admitted to ICU with covid-19\u201d).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">And always bear in mind what decisions your audiences might be making, and hence what comparisons are most salient to them. Present the numbers in such a way as to best help them consider \u201con the one hand\u201d and \u201con the other\u201d and weigh them up.<\/span><\/p>\n<div><i><b><span class=\"il\">Alexandra<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"il\">Freeman<\/span><\/b>, Executive Director, Winton Centre for Risk &amp; Evidence Communication, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge.<\/i><\/div>\n<div><i>\u00a0<\/i><\/div>\n<div><em><strong>Competing interests<\/strong>: None declared.<\/em><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. 2004 Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality. <i>Risk Anal.<\/i> (doi:10.1111\/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x)<\/li>\n<li>Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. 1981 Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications. <i>Proc. R. Soc. London. A. Math. Phys. Sci.<\/i> 376, 17\u201334. (doi:10.1098\/rspa.1981.0073)<\/li>\n<li>Kasperson RE, Stallen PJM. 1991 <i>Communicating risks to the public<\/i>. 1st Editio. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (doi:10.1007\/978-94-009-1952-5)<\/li>\n<li>Freeman ALJ, Kerr J, Recchia G, Schneider CR, Lawrence ACE, Finikarides L, Luoni G, Dryhurst S, Spiegelhalter DJ. 2020 Communicating personalised risks from COVID-19: guidelines from an empirical study. <i style=\"font-size: 1rem\">medRxiv<\/i> (doi:10.1101\/2020.10.05.20206961)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The media around the world have been desperate to help put the risks of blood clots following a covid-19 vaccination into some sort of context. It\u2019s a familiar issue: every [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/\">More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":421,"featured_media":50212,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[223],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-guest-bloggers"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Putting risks into context: covid-19 vaccines and blood clots - The BMJ<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Putting risks into context: covid-19 vaccines and blood clots - The BMJ\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The media around the world have been desperate to help put the risks of blood clots following a covid-19 vaccination into some sort of context. It\u2019s a familiar issue: every [...]More...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The BMJ\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bmjdotcom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-05-06T16:57:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-05-11T09:40:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/covid-19_vaccine_uk.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"540\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"350\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"jross\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@bmj_latest\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@bmj_latest\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"jross\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"jross\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/766ed77df8a01ae100b1c9a785e4fd19\"},\"headline\":\"Putting risks into context: covid-19 vaccines and blood clots\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-05-06T16:57:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-05-11T09:40:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2031,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/covid-19_vaccine_uk.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Guest writers\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/\",\"name\":\"Putting risks into context: covid-19 vaccines and blood clots - The BMJ\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/covid-19_vaccine_uk.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-05-06T16:57:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-05-11T09:40:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/covid-19_vaccine_uk.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/covid-19_vaccine_uk.jpg\",\"width\":540,\"height\":350,\"caption\":\"2EAEDB4 Silja Mai (right), Immunisation Nurse, and Health Care Assistant Jo Bristow (centre), who is a furloughed cabin manager at easyJet, prepare Ron Mees, aged 69, to receive the Oxford\\\/Astra Zeneca Covid-19 vaccine, during a mass vaccination of members of the public at Robertson House, Stevenage. Picture date: Tuesday February 9, 2021.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/06\\\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Putting risks into context: covid-19 vaccines and blood clots\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/\",\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"description\":\"Helping doctors make better decisions.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/The-BMJ-logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/The-BMJ-logo.jpg\",\"width\":852,\"height\":568,\"caption\":\"The BMJ\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/bmjdotcom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/bmj_latest\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/766ed77df8a01ae100b1c9a785e4fd19\",\"name\":\"jross\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7764aac4b6785a9559e107ca22df71813c2c9048cdbb4fbc34dbb068bc9d8f9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7764aac4b6785a9559e107ca22df71813c2c9048cdbb4fbc34dbb068bc9d8f9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7764aac4b6785a9559e107ca22df71813c2c9048cdbb4fbc34dbb068bc9d8f9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"jross\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/author\\\/jross\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Putting risks into context: covid-19 vaccines and blood clots - The BMJ","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Putting risks into context: covid-19 vaccines and blood clots - The BMJ","og_description":"The media around the world have been desperate to help put the risks of blood clots following a covid-19 vaccination into some sort of context. It\u2019s a familiar issue: every [...]More...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/","og_site_name":"The BMJ","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bmjdotcom\/","article_published_time":"2021-05-06T16:57:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-05-11T09:40:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":540,"height":350,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/covid-19_vaccine_uk.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"jross","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@bmj_latest","twitter_site":"@bmj_latest","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"jross","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/"},"author":{"name":"jross","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#\/schema\/person\/766ed77df8a01ae100b1c9a785e4fd19"},"headline":"Putting risks into context: covid-19 vaccines and blood clots","datePublished":"2021-05-06T16:57:49+00:00","dateModified":"2021-05-11T09:40:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/"},"wordCount":2031,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/covid-19_vaccine_uk.jpg","articleSection":["Guest writers"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/","name":"Putting risks into context: covid-19 vaccines and blood clots - The BMJ","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/covid-19_vaccine_uk.jpg","datePublished":"2021-05-06T16:57:49+00:00","dateModified":"2021-05-11T09:40:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/covid-19_vaccine_uk.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2021\/05\/covid-19_vaccine_uk.jpg","width":540,"height":350,"caption":"2EAEDB4 Silja Mai (right), Immunisation Nurse, and Health Care Assistant Jo Bristow (centre), who is a furloughed cabin manager at easyJet, prepare Ron Mees, aged 69, to receive the Oxford\/Astra Zeneca Covid-19 vaccine, during a mass vaccination of members of the public at Robertson House, Stevenage. Picture date: Tuesday February 9, 2021."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/05\/06\/putting-risks-into-context-covid-19-vaccines-and-blood-clots\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Putting risks into context: covid-19 vaccines and blood clots"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/","name":"The BMJ","description":"Helping doctors make better decisions.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#organization","name":"The BMJ","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2018\/05\/The-BMJ-logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2018\/05\/The-BMJ-logo.jpg","width":852,"height":568,"caption":"The BMJ"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bmjdotcom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/bmj_latest"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#\/schema\/person\/766ed77df8a01ae100b1c9a785e4fd19","name":"jross","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7764aac4b6785a9559e107ca22df71813c2c9048cdbb4fbc34dbb068bc9d8f9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7764aac4b6785a9559e107ca22df71813c2c9048cdbb4fbc34dbb068bc9d8f9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7764aac4b6785a9559e107ca22df71813c2c9048cdbb4fbc34dbb068bc9d8f9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"jross"},"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/author\/jross\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/421"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50207"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50207\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50212"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}