{"id":44440,"date":"2019-04-12T09:29:32","date_gmt":"2019-04-12T08:29:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/?p=44440"},"modified":"2019-04-23T17:09:50","modified_gmt":"2019-04-23T16:09:50","slug":"john-chisholm-an-opt-out-system-has-the-potential-to-increase-donation-rates-and-save-lives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2019\/04\/12\/john-chisholm-an-opt-out-system-has-the-potential-to-increase-donation-rates-and-save-lives\/","title":{"rendered":"John Chisholm: An opt-out system has the potential to increase donation rates and save lives"},"content":{"rendered":"

Organ donation saves lives. People die unnecessarily while on the waiting list for the organs they need in order to preserve and enhance their lives and health. There are benefits to individuals, their families, society, the National Health Service and the wider economy in promoting transplantation. That is why the British Medical Association (BMA) is committed to encouraging transplantation and to increasing the numbers of donors and of lives saved, because on average three people a day in the UK are dying waiting for an organ.<\/span><\/p>\n

The BMA strongly supports the introduction of a “soft” opt-out system for organ donation, an opt-out system with safeguards, for which we have been campaigning since 1999. [1,2] <\/span>The family would still be consulted, but dead donors\u2019 consent would be presumed unless there is evidence that they did not wish to donate. In Wales, such a system has now been in place since December 2015. [3] <\/span>In England, the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Bill has passed through Parliament, with implementation due to start in April 2020. In Scotland, a Bill is currently being debated.<\/span><\/p>\n

There have been huge advances in organ donation over the past 20 years and everyone who has contributed to this needs to be congratulated. The BMA believes that, as one part of a broader strategy, including improvements in organ donation and transplantation infrastructure, resourcing and organisation, a shift to an opt-out system will have a positive impact on donation rates. It is, of course, difficult to extrapolate from the experiences of other countries, but comparative analyses have found that an opt-out system is one of a number of factors that are positively associated with higher donation rates.<\/span><\/p>\n

Independent research evidence by the University of York,<\/span> which undertook a systematic review of the published data, showed a positive association between opt-out legislation or practice and higher rates of donation. [4] Four methodologically sound studies comparing donation rates in countries with and without opt-out found that opt-out law or practice was associated with increased donation rates; in three of the studies the increases were statistically significant. \u00a0Five methodologically sound studies comparing donation rates in a single country before and after the introduction of an opt-out law all found a consistent increase in organ donation rates following the introduction of legislation. More recent evidence reviews, for the Welsh and Scottish Governments, have reached similar conclusions. [5,6]<\/span><\/p>\n

Studies repeatedly show that most people\u201480 per cent or more\u2014support organ donation but only about 38 per cent of the UK population have registered their wish to donate on the organ donor register. [7] <\/span>Many people mean to do so but, in their busy lives, just never get around to doing so. \u00a0An opt-out system will help to overcome this problem and make it easier for those who are willing to donate\u2014but never get around to signing up to the register\u2014to have their wishes respected.<\/span><\/p>\n

The BMA also supports the principle behind an opt-out system\u2014that if people don\u2019t object to their organs being used after death, they should be used to save lives. Under an opt-out system, individuals have the same choice as in an opt-in system\u2014to donate or not to donate\u2014so individual autonomy and choice are protected and respected under this system. \u00a0It is simply the way people\u2019s views are expressed that would change. All organ donation is a gift and should be recognised as such, irrespective of the model of consent in place. Families are often comforted by knowing something good has come from their loss.<\/span><\/p>\n

Our expectation is that, under an opt-out system, organ donation would become the default position which, over time, changes cultural expectations in society and becomes the societal norm. \u00a0Thus, there would be a shift to a more positive view of organ donation, so that donation becomes seen as the natural and expected thing to do\u2014a change we would welcome.<\/span><\/p>\n

We know there is already considerable public support for opt-out. \u00a0A poll the BMA commissioned in 2017 in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland found that 65 per cent of those questioned supported such a shift. [8]<\/span><\/p>\n

However, advance and continuing publicity about the change is crucial. There should be a well-resourced, high-profile, consistent and persistent publicity campaign to enable a more informed public debate and to encourage people to make their wishes about donation known. The success of an opt-out system relies upon people knowing about their options and being able, easily and quickly, to opt out if that is their wish. This is not about forcing people into donation. It is about making it as easy as possible for an individual\u2019s willingness to donate organs after their death to be acted upon. Additionally, publicity will increase awareness about transplantation and its benefits, increase the understanding and social acceptability of organ donation, and promote discussion within families and between friends, so that there is greater awareness of individuals\u2019 wishes. The key determinative issue should be what the deceased person wanted in relation to donation. \u00a0The family\u2019s role should be to provide information to contribute to the decision, rather than to give consent themselves.<\/span><\/p>\n

The early evidence from Wales is encouraging. Only six per cent of the population has opted out of donation\u2014about the number expected, based on surveys of the public\u2019s view of organ donation. \u00a0The number of deceased donors has increased. [9] <\/span>There has been a statistically significant increase in the consent rate among brain-dead donors, when comparing Wales with England.<\/span> [10] Wales now leads the other countries of the UK in terms of donors per million population\u2014at 25.4 donors per million population. [11] <\/span>Knowledge about and support for the soft opt-out system is high amongst both the public and health professionals. A significant finding from the qualitative research with those approaching families in Wales is that more families are aware of the views of the deceased individual. [12,13] <\/span>This is a very positive effect of the publicity surrounding the introduction of opt-out. It is known that the approach to and discussions with families are easier if the family is aware of the individual\u2019s wishes. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Hopefully, similar benefits will be seen in England, and in Scotland once legislation is approved. \u00a0Publicity, education, attitudinal changes, trained specialist staff, investment in infrastructure improvements, and legislative change to an opt-out system all have the potential to increase donation rates and save lives.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n