{"id":43734,"date":"2018-12-18T12:38:38","date_gmt":"2018-12-18T11:38:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/?p=43734"},"modified":"2019-01-04T12:54:41","modified_gmt":"2019-01-04T11:54:41","slug":"when-you-have-health-you-have-everything-how-we-can-improve-access-to-healthcare-for-people-seeking-and-refused-asylum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2018\/12\/18\/when-you-have-health-you-have-everything-how-we-can-improve-access-to-healthcare-for-people-seeking-and-refused-asylum\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cWhen you have health, you have everything\u201d\u2014how we can improve access to healthcare for people seeking and refused asylum"},"content":{"rendered":"

The right to highest attainable physical and mental health is a universal human right that applies to everyone, regardless of immigration status. But sadly, in practice, many people face obstacles to receiving even basic healthcare.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Equality and Human Rights Commision\u2014with support from Doctors of the World\u2014recently <\/span>explored<\/span><\/a> what using health services was like for those who are or have been in the asylum process in Britain. While we heard some really positive examples of medical staff showing empathy and compassion, we also identified a number of problems that need to be addressed urgently. <\/span><\/p>\n

Some of these were fundamental problems with the entire system. The NHS charging policy in England has made healthcare unaffordable for many people who have been refused asylum. Many of those we spoke to were concerned that they may be arrested, detained, or deported as a result of their data being shared with the Home Office. Only people refused asylum in England are eligible to be charged for healthcare and data sharing for immigration purposes should be limited. However, we found that the fear of this was felt by a much wider group. We have <\/span>therefore called for the government<\/span><\/a> to make immigration proceedings and healthcare services completely separate and to exempt people who have been in the asylum process from charging in England, in line with the rest of the UK.<\/span><\/p>\n

There is also a huge amount of confusion among individuals and healthcare professionals about who is eligible for free healthcare. This sometimes results in patients incorrectly being refused GP registration. Healthcare charging regulations are being applied inconsistently. For example, one individual who tried to register with a GP was told \u201cWe don\u2019t accept refugees and asylum seekers that is our policy\u2019\u201d. Eligibility checks should never delay treatment and it\u2019s crucial that healthcare providers address these discrepancies by increasing knowledge of healthcare entitlements among clinical and non-clinical staff and ensure checks are carried out in a non-discriminatory way. <\/span><\/p>\n

We also found that information provided to asylum seekers is sometimes inaccurate or in a language or format they don\u2019t understand, meaning that many individuals are unaware of their rights or how to assert them. One woman who had undergone female genital mutilation as a child experienced challenges in understanding the complexities of her pregnancy and the specific healthcare she would need due to the language barrier. To overcome this information deficit we want healthcare providers to provide clear and accessible information to people about their rights and proactively provide professional interpreters.<\/span><\/p>\n

We know that many positive practices already exist, and that many people are already following human rights based principles. To build on these we\u2019re asking all healthcare service providers and commissioners to consider the following questions:<\/span><\/p>\n