{"id":1396,"date":"2010-03-26T09:59:50","date_gmt":"2010-03-26T08:59:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/?p=1396"},"modified":"2010-03-26T09:59:50","modified_gmt":"2010-03-26T08:59:50","slug":"richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/","title":{"rendered":"Richard Smith: Is the NHS three times better than in 1979?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"RichardReading the accounts in the BMJ of how various doctors and mangers would make savings in the NHS, I thought back to a series based on the same idea that I edited when I first arrived at the BMJ in 1979. Then I thought that in 1979 the cost of the NHS was about \u00a335 billion in today\u2019s prices whereas now it\u2019s well over \u00a3100 billion. What have we got for that near tripling in spend in less than a professional life time? Has it been worth it?<\/p>\n

\u00a0My suspicion is that any doctor practising in 1979 will immediately answer \u201cno\u201d to that last question. Things weren\u2019t so bad. Indeed, for many doctors they were much better. Patients were grateful. There was much less bureaucratic hassle. This was long before Bristol and Shipman, and doctors were still seen as part of the solution rather than part of the problem. There was camaraderie, black humour, lots of alcohol, and plenty of casual sex in that pre-AIDS era. It\u2019s all well captured in the Houseman\u2019s Tale by Colin Douglas, who now writes the prime minister\u2019s speeches.<\/p>\n

\u00a0Oddly I think that most patients would also answer \u201cno.\u201d You could see your GP almost anytime, and he (they were mostly he\u2019s then) would smile, reassure you, and send you home with a bottle. He would also come and see you at night. You might have had to wait for operations, but once you got into hospital it was rather jolly. Lots of patients were not very sick and so had time to chat and bring each other tea. The nurses were attentive and tucked you up in bed at night. You didn\u2019t perhaps live as long, but death was more familiar, less scary.<\/p>\n

\u00a0This must, of course, be an old man thinking back to a golden age that probably wasn\u2019t golden at all. But what have we got for that tripling in spend?<\/p>\n

\u00a0Certainly we have a lot more people. In 1979 there were about 40 000 doctors and dentists in the whole NHS (it was one NHS in those days) but now there are 122 000 doctors (not dentists) in the English NHS alone. Nurses have increased less dramatically\u2014from 300 000 in the whole NHS in 1979 to 400 000 in the English NHS now. In particular we have many more specialists. Cardiologists were exotic creatures when I was a junior doctor; now they\u2019re a dime a dozen, all busy putting catheters in all day long.<\/p>\n

\u00a0There aren\u2019t more buildings and beds. Indeed, there are many fewer. The huge mental hospitals have been turned into luxury flats, and some of the sleepy community hospitals have become GP surgeries, although a remarkable number have managed to survive\u2014kept alive by (probably misplaced) local affection. But the hospitals we do have are bristling with machines that didn\u2019t exist in 1979. The first CT scanners appeared in the 70s and nobody where I worked knew how to read the resulting scans. In many cities in Britain you were lucky to be dialysed if you were diabetic or over 60.<\/p>\n

So we have lots of people, specialists, machines, tests, activity, and interventions, and we know that inflation in medical costs far outstrips general inflation. But does the extra spend produce value? This is perhaps an unanswerable question, but one answer must be \u201cOf course it does, otherwise countries would not be willing to pay so much\u2014and every country that can afford it has seen the same kind of increase in spend.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u00a0But that answer doesn\u2019t satisfy me. The same argument that says that you can\u2019t have a proper market in health care because people don\u2019t have good information on the value of what they are paying for seems to me to apply at a national level. I fret that people think they are paying to ease suffering and fend off death, but I fear that they are paying for a more existential kind of suffering and for a prolonged period of unhealthy life. Life expectancy may have increased since 1979, but I\u2019m skeptical that much of that increase comes from health care. My bias is that public health improvements are increasing healthy life span and health care unhealthy life span.<\/p>\n

Of course there is no going back. If we were to go back to a 1979\u00a0 spend the massive national debt would be cleared in a few years\u2014but for having to pay redundancy and unemployment benefit to 80 000 doctors and 100 000 nurses. But the thought of sacking so many health professionals is clearly ludicrous.<\/p>\n

\u00a0But it\u2019s amusing to read what an unnamed paediatrician said to me in an unsigned article in 1979: \u201cDoctors have tended to work in the past as if the NHS had access to a bottomless pit of resources. This attitude cannot continue any longer: we must recognise that resources are finite and we must take decisions about how those resources can best be used.\u201d (1)<\/a> Or, he might have said, we can spend three times as much on the NHS. People would have thought him crazy.<\/p>\n

1 Special correspondent. If I was forced to cut\u2026Consultant Paediatrician. BMJ 1979; ii: 1570-1.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Reading the accounts in the BMJ of how various doctors and mangers would make savings in the NHS, I thought back to a series based on the same idea that […]<\/p>\n

More…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":66,"featured_media":38364,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[955],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1396","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-richard-smith"],"yoast_head":"\nRichard Smith: Is the NHS three times better than in 1979? - The BMJ<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Richard Smith: Is the NHS three times better than in 1979? - The BMJ\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Reading the accounts in the BMJ of how various doctors and mangers would make savings in the NHS, I thought back to a series based on the same idea that [...]More...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The BMJ\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bmjdotcom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-26T08:59:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2017\/02\/Richard-Smith.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"540\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"350\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"julietwalker\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@bmj_latest\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@bmj_latest\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"julietwalker\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"julietwalker\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/373707d32533c2cbca204980b8cd3493\"},\"headline\":\"Richard Smith: Is the NHS three times better than in 1979?\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-26T08:59:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":863,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/Richard-Smith.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Richard Smith\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/\",\"name\":\"Richard Smith: Is the NHS three times better than in 1979? - The BMJ\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/Richard-Smith.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-26T08:59:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/Richard-Smith.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/Richard-Smith.jpg\",\"width\":540,\"height\":350},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/2010\\\/03\\\/26\\\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Richard Smith: Is the NHS three times better than in 1979?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/\",\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"description\":\"Helping doctors make better decisions.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/The-BMJ-logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/files\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/The-BMJ-logo.jpg\",\"width\":852,\"height\":568,\"caption\":\"The BMJ\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/bmjdotcom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/bmj_latest\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/373707d32533c2cbca204980b8cd3493\",\"name\":\"julietwalker\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34f10b717c81464cc7a2879c84cd30078f63b5a901e12905a02abd9d1ea9ec90?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34f10b717c81464cc7a2879c84cd30078f63b5a901e12905a02abd9d1ea9ec90?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34f10b717c81464cc7a2879c84cd30078f63b5a901e12905a02abd9d1ea9ec90?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"julietwalker\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.bmj.com\\\/bmj\\\/author\\\/julietwalker\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Richard Smith: Is the NHS three times better than in 1979? - The BMJ","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Richard Smith: Is the NHS three times better than in 1979? - The BMJ","og_description":"Reading the accounts in the BMJ of how various doctors and mangers would make savings in the NHS, I thought back to a series based on the same idea that [...]More...","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/","og_site_name":"The BMJ","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bmjdotcom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-26T08:59:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":540,"height":350,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2017\/02\/Richard-Smith.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"julietwalker","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@bmj_latest","twitter_site":"@bmj_latest","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"julietwalker","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/"},"author":{"name":"julietwalker","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#\/schema\/person\/373707d32533c2cbca204980b8cd3493"},"headline":"Richard Smith: Is the NHS three times better than in 1979?","datePublished":"2010-03-26T08:59:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/"},"wordCount":863,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2017\/02\/Richard-Smith.jpg","articleSection":["Richard Smith"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/","name":"Richard Smith: Is the NHS three times better than in 1979? - The BMJ","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2017\/02\/Richard-Smith.jpg","datePublished":"2010-03-26T08:59:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2017\/02\/Richard-Smith.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2017\/02\/Richard-Smith.jpg","width":540,"height":350},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2010\/03\/26\/richard-smith-is-the-nhs-three-times-better-than-in-1979\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Richard Smith: Is the NHS three times better than in 1979?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/","name":"The BMJ","description":"Helping doctors make better decisions.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#organization","name":"The BMJ","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2018\/05\/The-BMJ-logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/files\/2018\/05\/The-BMJ-logo.jpg","width":852,"height":568,"caption":"The BMJ"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bmjdotcom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/bmj_latest"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/#\/schema\/person\/373707d32533c2cbca204980b8cd3493","name":"julietwalker","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34f10b717c81464cc7a2879c84cd30078f63b5a901e12905a02abd9d1ea9ec90?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34f10b717c81464cc7a2879c84cd30078f63b5a901e12905a02abd9d1ea9ec90?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34f10b717c81464cc7a2879c84cd30078f63b5a901e12905a02abd9d1ea9ec90?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"julietwalker"},"url":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/author\/julietwalker\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1396","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/66"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1396"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1396\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/38364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}