Response: Let’s work together to explore the evidence base for all preclinical research methodologies

  In response to: Drug discovery and preclinical drug development – have animal studies really failed? By Pandora Pound and Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga A case of the ‘straw man’? We came across this blog in BMJ Open Science by chance this week. The blog, entitled ‘Drug discovery and preclinical drug development – have animal studies really […]

Read More…

Making research more useful: minimal reporting standards for life scientists

By Malcolm Macleod (@Maclomaclee) As researchers, we hope that our research findings are useful – that they inform future research, or lead to changes in policy or practice. Different research designs provide different levels of proof, with experimental evidence generally providing better evidence than observational studies. Even within research designs, there are factors which might […]

Read More…

Why standardisation threatens reproducibility

BMJ Open Science encourages a number of initiatives to help the work that we publish be reproducible such as pre-submission manuscript checking, encouraging reporting guidelines, and asking authors to report the strengths and limitations of their experiments. However, reproducibility should also be considered at the study design stage. A recent study1 based on extensive preclinical data […]

Read More…