<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Nailing one&#8217;s Colours to the Mast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2010/09/13/on-nailing-ones-colours-to-the-mast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2010/09/13/on-nailing-ones-colours-to-the-mast/</link>
	<description>Journal of Medical Ethics blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 03:49:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Tayler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2010/09/13/on-nailing-ones-colours-to-the-mast/#comment-2760</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Tayler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/?p=605#comment-2760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“…We wouldn’t accept that in any other field, so it’s not clear why we should accept it here.” It is clear why we should not accept it in ethics. You may disagree with the explanations, but you cannot say they are not “clear.” It certainly has nothing to do with the “liking of an answer that’s important.”]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“…We wouldn’t accept that in any other field, so it’s not clear why we should accept it here.” It is clear why we should not accept it in ethics. You may disagree with the explanations, but you cannot say they are not “clear.” It certainly has nothing to do with the “liking of an answer that’s important.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
