You don't need to be signed in to read BMJ Group Blogs, but you can register here to receive updates about other BMJ Group products and services via our Group site.

Early atherosclerosis declines in autopsy study

1 Jan, 13 | by Alistair Lindsay

In 1953 a report from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology reported a 77% prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis among US soldiers killed in the Korean War. This revolutionary study demonstrated that atherosclerosis was present in a large number of young patients without clinical evidence of heart disease. A new study aimed to estimate the current prevalence of coronary and aortic atherosclerosis in the US armed forces, to assess the impact of risk factor reduction and lifestyle measures.

This was a cross-sectional study of all US service members who died of combat or unintentional injuries between October 2001 and August 2011. Coronary atherosclerosis severity was classified as: minimal (fatty streaking only), moderate (10%-49% luminal narrowing of 1 or more vessels), and severe (>49% narrowing of 1 or more vessels).

Of the 3832 service members included, the mean age was 25.9 years and 98.3% were male. 8.5% showed evidence of any coronary atherosclerosis, and severe coronary atherosclerosis was found in only 2.3%. Those with atherosclerosis were significantly older than those without (30.5 years vs. 25.3 years; P<.001), and a greater prevalence of dyslipidaemia, hypertension, and obesity was noted.

Conclusions:

This study suggests that the prevalence of early atherosclerosis in the modern era may be lower than in previous decades. However, it is not clear how the findings of this military study extend to the general population, particular given the recent rise in rates of diabetes and obesity.

• Webber BJ, Seguin PG, Burnett DG et al. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Autopsy-Determined Atherosclerosis Among US Service Members, 2001-2011. JAMA 2012;308:2577-2583.

By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to these terms and conditions
  • kidmugsy

    “to assess the impact of risk factor reduction and lifestyle measures”: to pretend that one can know that the existence of a reduction implies the cause(s) of the reduction is pretty poor logic.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Highlighted articles from non-cardiological journals relevant to cardiology.

Heart

An international peer review journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Visit site

Latest from Heart

Latest from Heart

Latest Cardiology jobs

Cardiology jobs

Cardiology Masterclasses

Cardiology Masterclasses