You don't need to be signed in to read BMJ Blogs, but you can register here to receive updates about other BMJ products and services via our site.

Primary care corner with Dr. Geoff Modest: Just say water

3 Feb, 14 | by EBM

the boston globe today had an interesting article on artificial sweeteners (see http://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2014/01/27/are-calorie-sweeteners-safe/B56kqUuKVJwcEfcWx2PmhO/story.html?s_campaign=email_BG_TodaysHeadline). deborah kotz quotes some studies and interviews several people (including walt willett at harvard school of public health, who does lots of nutrition studies). their points:

 

–more than 12% of children now drink artificially-sweetened beverages (twice the rate of 15 yrs ago)

–manufacturers have changed: in 2007 16 of them agreed to decrease calories to stem the obesity epidemic — by 2012 selling 6.4 trillion fewer calories

 

but,…

–johns hopkins study: dietary surveys of 12K americans found that overweight people drinking diet beverages (vs sugar-sweetened ones) consumed 88 more cal/day. obese americans consumed 194 additional calories.  ?? if these drinks using extremely sweet but artificial sweeteners (200-600x sweeter than sugar) reinforce cravings for sweets?

–Marion Nestle (NYU nutrition professor, and, hopefully not tied to the Nestle Corporation) suggests using sugar as sweetener, but in moderation

–Walt Willett thinks these sweeteners are so strong that they distort taste preferences, decreasing the sweet taste of natural foods, like apples and carrots

–recent study in Diabetes Care journal (see  DOI: 10.2337/dc12-2221) looked at 17 obese pts (BMI 42) who had not used non-nutritive sweeteners before and were insulin-sensitive, gave them a 5-h oral glucose tolerance test preceded by consuming sucralose or water (cross-over design), and found that pre-ingestion of sucralose led to a 14% increased peak glucose after the glucose load, a 20% increase in insulin area under the curve, a 22% increase in peak insulin, a 7% decrease in insulin clearance, and a 23% decrease in insulin sensitivity.

 

and, to boot, there are lingering concerns about the safety of these sweeteners: animals with tumors (leukemia and lymphoma in rats) assoc with high doses of aspartame, sucralose altering the gut flora. we don’t have any longterm human data on the myriad of artificial sweeteners on the market, though the FDA states that they “have been well studies and have a reasonable certainty of no harm to consumers under their conditions of intended uses”

 

my sense (and practice) had been in the past to promote diet drinks as an alternative, but has evolved to “just say water”, which has worked surprisingly well with my patients.  assuming that the water is not polluted.

 

geoff

By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to these terms and conditions
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
EBM blog homepage

Evidence-Based Medicine blog

Analysis and discussion of developments in Evidence-Based Medicine Visit site



Creative Comms logo

Latest from Evidence-Based Medicine

Latest from EBM