<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>BMJ &#187; Richard Lehman&#8217;s weekly review of medical journals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/category/richard-lehmans-weekly-review-of-medical-journals/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj</link>
	<description>Just another blogs.bmj.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9; </copyright>
		<managingEditor>webmaster@bmj.com ()</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@bmj.com()</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Just another blogs.bmj.com weblog</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>webmaster@bmj.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://blogs.bmj.com/themes/bmjgroup/images/blog-images/BMJ_200x200.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman’s journal blog, 23 June 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/23/richard-lehman%e2%80%99s-journal-blog-23-june-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/23/richard-lehman%e2%80%99s-journal-blog-23-june-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Richard fancied a change, so is currently blogging on BMJ Group&#8217;s new professional networking site for doctors, doc2doc. You can read his weekly journal watch blog there.  This week he turns his attention to gene gnomes, finds the Lancet a bit waffly and the New England Journal of Medicine in self congratulatory mode. To comment on his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" /> Richard fancied a change, so is currently blogging on BMJ Group&#8217;s new professional networking site for doctors, <a title="doc2doc" href="http://www.doc2doc.bmj.com" target="_blank">doc2doc</a>. You can read his weekly journal watch <a title="doc2doc" href="http://doc2doc.bmj.com/blogs.html?plckBlogId=Blog:15d27772-5908-4452-9411-8eef67833d66&amp;plckController=Blog&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;userId=15d27772-5908-4452-9411-8eef67833d66&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3a15d27772-5908-4452-9411-8eef67833d66Post%3a11bd20a4-5b3e-45c6-a2af-19c0ce09985d&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest" target="_blank">blog</a> there.  This week he turns his attention to gene gnomes, finds the <a title="The Lancet" href="http://www.thelancet.com" target="_blank">Lancet</a> a bit waffly and the <a title="NEJM" href="http://www.nejm.org" target="_blank">New England Journal of Medicine</a> in self congratulatory mode. To comment on his blog, you will need to login or register.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/23/richard-lehman%e2%80%99s-journal-blog-23-june-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman’s journal blog, 17 June 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/17/richard-lehman%e2%80%99s-journal-blog-17-june-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/17/richard-lehman%e2%80%99s-journal-blog-17-june-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Richard is in Prufrockian mood as he picks out items of interest in the latest major medical journals. As well as quoting T S Eliot, he also pens his own ditty about a zika virus outbreak on the island of Yap.
JAMA 10 Jun 2009 Vol 301
Lipoprotein (a) is present in atherosclerotic arteries but not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" /> Richard is in Prufrockian mood as he picks out items of interest in the latest major medical journals. As well as quoting T S Eliot, he also pens his own ditty about a zika virus outbreak on the island of Yap.<span id="more-716"></span></p>
<p><strong>JAMA 10 Jun 2009 Vol 301</strong><br />
Lipoprotein (a) is present in atherosclerotic arteries but not healthy ones, and it is a perfect candidate for causing plaque, since it contains both cholesterol and a prothrombotic glycoprotein (apolipoprotein [a]).</p>
<p>However, it is very difficult to study its association with myocardial infarction; and since we have no tolerable drugs which reduce LPA, such an association has no obvious practical consequences anyway.</p>
<p>So I was strongly inclined to pass over this <a title="JAMA study" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/22/2331" target="_blank">Danish study</a>, but I’m glad that I didn’t. It is quite an intellectual tour de force as well as a logistic feat, combining three types of study within the population of Copenhagen, and it shows how the deft use of genomics can obviate the need for a randomised controlled trial.</p>
<p>The key element here is mendelian randomisation, the reshuffling of genetic material which happens each time we make a baby. I won’t go into further detail here, but if you are interested in such cutting edge stuff, I would strongly recommend a look at this paper and its accompanying editorial (p.2386).</p>
<p><a title="Cardia computerised tomography" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/22/2340" target="_blank">Cardiac computerised tomography</a> exposes patients to large amounts of radiation for large sums of money and often negligible clinical benefit. In the USA, you can apparently get it done in &#8220;small community hospitals&#8221;, which were lumped together with larger centres in this exceedingly unsophisticated before-and-after study.</p>
<p>Before these centres participated in the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium in Michigan, they used twice the dose of X-rays that they did afterwards. But if you really need to know how furred-up your coronary arteries are, and want much smaller doses of radiation, it’s best to wait for the arrival of prospectively triggered sequential scanning in your area, or even better, single heartbeat acquisitions.</p>
<p>Most of my readers, I know, do not rush about putting in central venous lines and intubating people and doing all sorts of exciting televisual things that result in pools of blood on the hospital floor. But one or two do, and for your sakes I mention this useful <a title="corticosteroids" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/22/2362" target="_blank">systematic review</a> of corticosteroids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. Heroic doses are not required: I will merely quote the conclusion – “Corticosteroid therapy has been used in varied doses for sepsis and related syndromes for more than 50 years, with no clear benefit on mortality. Since 1998, studies have consistently used prolonged low-dose corticosteroid therapy, and analysis of this subgroup suggests a beneficial drug effect on short-term mortality.”</p>
<p><strong>NEJM 11 Jun 2009 Vol 360</strong></p>
<p>Like so many diabetic trials, <a title="diabetic trials" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/24/2503" target="_blank">this one</a> tries to do a bit too much with its painstakingly assembled cohort of patients (2368 in all), but I do think it sends out an important message about the management of type 2 diabetes with stable coronary heart disease. Do as you like. Treat them with insulin provision – either by injecting it directly or by flogging the beta-cells with a sulfonylurea – or else try insulin sensitization, by metformin or a glitazone: it will make no difference to outcomes. Similarly, choose revascularization or medical management: again, it will make no difference. The only subgroup which fared appreciably better consisted of those for whom coronary artery bypass grafting was &#8220;deemed the preferred method of revascularization&#8221;. Note that patients with left main coronary artery disease were excluded from this trial, called BARI-2D.</p>
<p>Wow: could this be <a title="trial" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/24/2516" target="_blank">a trial</a> which gives a clear message about the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer? The headline message is that if the chosen initial treatment is external-beam radiotherapy, then survival will be improved if androgen suppression is continued for three years rather than six months. This was an important fact to establish, since androgen suppression has a lot of unwelcome side-effects. However, the effect size is modest and the statistics only just reach significance.</p>
<p>Here is what you wanted to hear: a large <a title="database study" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/24/2528" target="_blank">database study</a> from Israel confirms earlier observational evidence that metoclopramide in early pregnancy is not associated with adverse fetal outcomes. There were more than 78 000 controls to compare with 3458 cases where mothers had been prescribed metoclopramide in the first trimester, and there were no significant differences in fetal anomalies, preterm delivery, birth weight, or perinatal death.</p>
<p><a title="Zika" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/24/2536" target="_blank">Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island!</a> Avoid Micronesians! Actually, the first statement is true, but the second is false, because although the inhabitants of Yap are Micronesians, it’s their mosquitoes and not themselves that are thought to transmit this virus. Micronesia is the name given to a cluster of 607 Pacific islands, and the mystery here is how this rare virus ever got there. The previous 14 reported cases were from Africa and Asia, whereas Yap Island in the middle of nowhere can now claim 49 confirmed and 59 probable cases. The traditional money of the Yapese consists of carved stones up to 4m in diameter: no change given; stop yapping. Fortunately for them, Zika is no deadly killer plague virus, but something that causes conjunctivitis, rash, fever and arthralgia for a few days.</p>
<p>The Island of Yap<br />
Is a speck on the map:<br />
But it’s slightly easier<br />
To detect Micronesia.<br />
A virus called Zika<br />
Made some Islanders sicker,<br />
But they all got better,<br />
And there’s an end to the metter:<br />
Let’s twist no knicker<br />
For a virus called Zika.<br />
<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Lancet 13 Jun 2009 Vol 373</strong></p>
<p>EURODIAB has capital letters like an acronym, but surely it’s just an abbreviation. Anyway, it does what it says on the tin: here it reports that alarming numbers of Eurochildren are getting diab. It’s called a <a title="multicentre study" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60568-7/abstract" target="_blank">multicentre prospective registration study</a> and the good thing is that ascertainment rates are higher than 90%, so it’s pretty reliable. Less reliable, perhaps, is its estimate that new cases of type 1 diabetes in children under 5 will double in Europe by 2020. Let’s hope that between now and then, a vaccine to prevent the disease will be developed.</p>
<p>If you are going to do a proper randomised trial of something, you need to do a proper literature review first; best of all, do a meta-analysis. By the time you have done that, and filled out the funding bid forms, you will probably have lost the will to live; or at any rate the will to do the study. But never mind. If you persevere, you can publish the meta-analysis and your own RCT as a single paper, like these British investigators of <a title="progesterone" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60947-8/abstract" target="_blank">progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy</a>. Progesterone does not prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies; it does not prevent adverse outcomes either, which is a subtly different question. The acronym of the trial is STOPPIT. Do not prescribe progesterone for twin pregnancies; do not come up with silly acronyms. Stoppit at once.</p>
<p>For an account of the life of James Parkinson, man of God, ardent child-beater and author of An Essay on the Shaking Palsy, you will have to go to a Lancet of some years back for an excellent piece by Druin Burch. For an account of the shaking palsy itself, this <a title="seminar on Parkinsons disease" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60492-X/abstract" target="_blank">seminar on Parkinson’s disease</a> is worth reading for a wealth of useful information, though the three professors who write it seem a little unconnected with the shop floor.</p>
<p>The most characteristic feature, without which the diagnosis cannot be made, is bradykinesia: slowness of initiation of voluntary movement with progressive reduction in speed or amplitude of repetitive actions. Since the diagnosis is entirely clinical, you might as well try and elicit the right signs.</p>
<p>If you love airports and can drop everything at a moment’s notice to get free flights to all sorts of exotic destinations, then flight medicine is the thing for you, and pays handsomely, according to a colleague I was talking to a while back. This nice practical <a title="review" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60209-9/abstract" target="_blank">review</a> goes into the medical issues associated with commercial flights and is of interest to all of us who get put on the spot by patients who wish to travel by air and ask us for advice. It’s probably a bit basic for hardened flight medics who are sent out to accompany those taken ill abroad.</p>
<p><strong>BMJ 13 Jun 2009 Vol 338</strong></p>
<p>Only ten years ago, the words &#8220;stroke&#8221; and &#8220;TIA&#8221; (not a real word, but never mind) induced a sort of sad shrug in most British doctors. Now stroke medicine is a specialty in its own right and alone among medical conditions, stroke demands &#8220;hyperacute&#8221; care (see p.1419): 999 ambulance, immediate scan, thrombolysis, wham, bang. TIA demands a clinic appointment the same week, carotid ultrasound, and carotid endarterectomy within two weeks if there is a suitable lesion, according to the <a title="NICE guideline" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/jun04_1/b1847" target="_blank">NICE guideline</a>. How does real life in our dear NHS compare? According to this <a title="study bmj" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/jun04_1/b1847" target="_blank">study</a>, achievement is about 20% and there are no figures for how many strokes occur in the 80% of patients who have to wait longer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/jun04_1/b2083">http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/jun04_1/b2083</a></p>
<p>Do you dare to do a <a title="TYM for Alzheimers" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_3/b2030" target="_blank">TYM?</a> I am old, I am old, and I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled, but I am not sure I can bear to find out. People are so kind when I forget their names. It is great fun to go to places for the first time and then be told I have been there before. I think I have just the right amount of Alzheimer’s. No need for a baseline score, thanks. If you feel differently, visit the website and do the self-administered cognitive screening test. It is almost certain to be the instrument of choice from now on, however much people quibble about its predictive characteristics, because it performs better than the MMSE and is available without copyright restrictions (see the Lancet comment piece, Taxing Your Memory, p.2009).</p>
<p>Another quick pointer for readers who spill blood on hospital floors: a nice little (longer on the website) <a title="major trauma article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/jun05_1/b1778" target="_blank">piece</a> by some Army doctors about damage control resuscitation for patients with major trauma. Carry on, Major; and good luck.</p>
<p><strong>Archives of Internal Medicine 8 Jun 2009 Vol 169</strong></p>
<p>I like the Archives for its wide range of topics, but this week’s is full of weak studies from which I have plucked this one merely for personal interest. If you sleep badly, your blood pressure is more likely to rise. This is one of many studies under the umbrella of CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) which has followed a cohort of 5115 from 1985. In 2002 it invited some of them to participate in this study: they had to be normotensive and non-pregnant. The upshot is that if you sleep badly – as assessed by various questions and three nights of actigraphy – your BP is more likely to go up. The authors even claim that this explains the difference in BP between blacks and whites in their cohort, and that measures to improve sleep may help hypertension. Cognitive behavioural therapy for everything, say I.</p>
<p><strong>Plant of the Week: Paeonia “Garden Treasure”</strong></p>
<p>The genetic modification of plants is the basis of civilisation. Sumer was founded on the breeding of wheat, and China on the breeding of rice. We don’t know how exactly which garden flowers the Sumerians bred five thousand years ago – the names are mostly obscure – but we do know that the Chinese have been breeding peonies for at least 1,600 years.</p>
<p>When they were first brought to Europe, they caused a sensation, especially in France, where new kinds were bred soon after their arrival. These were from the two basic categories of peony, the herbaceous kind and the so-called tree peonies, which are really just moderate sized sprawling shrubs. Both sorts abound in the colours pink and white and purple and red, but yellow has always been rare, confined to a few tree peonies and a couple of herbaceous species which are unsuitable for hybridizing.</p>
<p>The French breeders took this as a challenge. They tried to interbreed yellow tree peonies with various herbaceous varieties, but ended up declaring that this was impossible. They concentrated instead on producing a number of hybrids between the tree species lutea and the various tree peonies arriving in shipments from China and Japan. Some of these yellow-flowered Lemoine tree hybrids are becoming available again, and they are exquisite, especially &#8220;L’Espérance&#8221; and &#8220;Argosy.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the USA and Japan, one or two peony breeders challenged the French orthodoxy that you couldn’t get a tree to mate with a herbaceous peony. With enormous patience and a huge failure rate, they produced a tiny number of viable offspring. Here were slightly woody low plants with flowers of beautiful clear yellows, often with central flashes of crimson. When one of them, called Bartzella, first came on sale in 1998, it was offered at $1,000.</p>
<p>&#8220;Garden Treasure&#8221;” came soon after, and was judged by the very picky American Peony Society to be even better than Bartzella. Now it has begun to arrive in England. We saw it in flower at Wisley less than a fortnight ago, blazing with beauty from 100 metres away, and bought one last week in Shropshire for £80. A lot for a plant? Not really. Once in the ground, it will flower for 50 years or more. Admittedly for only one week of the year. But what a thing to look forward to! Worth the price of a nice meal for two, any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/17/richard-lehman%e2%80%99s-journal-blog-17-june-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 8 June 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/08/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-8-june-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/08/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-8-june-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>julietwalker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[modern intensive neonatal care]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[QOF for diabetes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tuberculosis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Newborn babies feature in Richard&#8217;s blog this week, as he finds out how extremely premature babies fare with modern neonatal care, and how a baby&#8217;s weight in its first three months can affect its weight in the future. Tuberculosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are among the other things that Richard tells us about, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" /></p>
<p>Newborn babies feature in Richard&#8217;s blog this week, as he finds out how extremely premature babies fare with modern neonatal care, and how a baby&#8217;s weight in its first three months can affect its weight in the future. Tuberculosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are among the other things that Richard tells us about, as well, of course, as recommending a plant of the week.<span id="more-704"></span></p>
<p><strong>JAMA  3 Jun 2009  Vol 301</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Depression is both an inherited trait and a learnt behaviour, and for centuries it was quite prized in the young, as a disincentive to frivolous behaviour and a sign of a religious or philosophical disposition. As Oliver Edwards said to the notoriously depressive Samuel Johnson around 1760, “You are a philosopher, Dr Johnson. I have tried too in my time to be a philosopher; but, I don&#8217;t know how, cheerfulness was always breaking in.”  The adolescent children of depressive parents are at high risk of developing depression, and <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/21/2215">this interesting study</a> sought to discover if that can be prevented by teaching cheerfulness – i.e. cognitive therapy. The comparator was our false friend “usual care”, but at least the investigators here apologize for that in their commentary section. What they find is that CB works well in preventing depression in these vulnerable youths unless a parent has active depressive illness, in which case it avails little.</p>
<p>Extremely premature birth is defined as birth before 27 weeks’ gestation. <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/21/2225">This Swedish study</a> shows how these tiny babies fare with modern intensive neonatal care. Survival at 22 weeks is almost 10%, rising to 85% at 26 weeks.</p>
<p>Babies who get fat in the first three months of life are more likely to become fat, insulin resistant young adults with bad lipid profiles. So it would seem (with wide confidence intervals) from <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/21/2234">this Dutch cohort</a> of 217 healthy participants now aged 18 to 24 years. It may be that this is a risk factor which is modifiable by giving babies less food than they demand, but it would be a tough study to carry out and we would need to wait about 60 years for some hard outcomes. So my advice to mothers and health visitors would be: don’t weigh babies without good reason, and feed them when they are hungry.</p>
<p><strong>NEJM  4 Jun 2009  Vol 360<br />
</strong><br />
The arrival of a new antimicrobial drug is always an occasion for celebration, especially when it is one that was found by good old-fashioned chance and experiment rather than the sort of high tech molecular targeting which none of us could do in our garden shed. <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/23/2397">The diarylquinolone TMC207</a> was found to be active – very active indeed, in fact – against Mycobacterium tuberculosis after experiments performed on M smegmatis. So all you need are some agar plates, an incubator, and a supply of whatever it is that gives this mycobacterium its name. If this agent lives up to its early promise, it could be a valuable addition to the weaponry against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.</p>
<p>In the later nineteenth century, lean writers like Chekhov and Robert Louis Stevenson coughed up blood politely into their handkerchiefs as they travelled across Europe in railway carriages seeking a cure for their tuberculosis. As the same time, the United States of America received millions of the poor and dispossessed of Europe, many of whom had active TB. Quarantine stations began to be set up, the most famous of which was Ellis Island, where immigrants could be kept isolated for months. The word quarantine, by the way, derives from the Italian word for forty, the number of days that the seventeenth century Venetian authorities decreed a ship that might be carrying plague should wait anchored in the Lagoon. Nowadays America is a lot harder to get into, but immigrants and refugees – especially the latter – still account for more than half of the active TB in the US. <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/23/2406">The solution vigorously advocated in this paper</a> is overseas screening (and treatment) by designated local doctors before entry to the States. It certainly works, but there are no data about what happened to the refugees while they were forced to postpone their flight to freedom.</p>
<p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is, well, chronic, obstructive (partly, anyway), and pulmonary. You tell people to stop smoking, immunize them against influenza and pneumococcus, and give them mucolytics, bronchodilators and antibiotics as required. It’s the fourth commonest cause of death in industrialized nations and might get to number 3 if current tobacco promotion policies prevail. It’s hard to say anything else useful about COPD, <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/360/23/2445">but this article</a> on its immunology at least says things that are interesting. It goes in detail through all the damaging things that build up in smokers’ phlegm and also speculates on why many smokers nonetheless manage to avoid getting COPD – it may all depend on T-cell regulation.</p>
<p><strong>Lancet  6 Jun 2009  Vol 373</strong></p>
<p>Gradually, if all goes well, we are going to reach a situation in which most cervical cancer is prevented by polyvalent human papillomavirus vaccination and women only need be screened twice in a lifetime. We are by no means there yet, and this <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60691-7/abstract">trial of a quadrivalent HPV vaccine</a> shows some of the difficulties. The per-protocol success rate in women aged 24-45 was 90%, but taking a more real-life intention-to-treat analysis, this falls to 31% for preventing persistent new infection within 26 months. And this study tells us nothing about the duration of immunity. For a good analysis of where we stand at the moment, read the accompanying editorial on p.1921.</p>
<p>Every month, somebody sends me a magazine called “Guidelines”, and once or twice a year (I can’t remember, because I always give it away) I get a fat little Compendium of Guidelines as well. And then there are the NICE guidelines, which form a weighty dust-covered green heap on a consulting room shelf. My computer is loaded with lots more guidelines. The practice generates its own guidelines too. When I am dying, people will treat me according to end-of-life guidelines, and at my funeral they will sing “Guide me, O thou great Jehovah”. Until that day, I will continue to rail against guidelines, which are always a mixture of evidence and “expert opinion” and are out of date before the ink is dry on their innumerable pages and appendices. This preambulatory rant leads us to <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60941-7/abstract">the study in question</a> (CLOTS trial 1), which examines the RCP and SIGN guideline recommendation that all patients suffering from immobility due to acute stroke should be made to wear thigh length graduated compression stockings. Well, they shouldn’t. These stockings increase the incidence of skin breaks, ulcers, blisters and necrosis and do nothing to reduce deep vein thrombosis after stroke.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60259-2/abstract">An excellent seminar on neurofibromatosis type 2</a> gives you a chance to know everything about it if you happen to have a patient or family with the condition – it occurs in one in 25 000 live births and is inherited as an autosomal dominant with almost 100% penetrance by the age of 60. It has a genetic locus called NF2. That’s the kind of genetics I can remember. It usually presents with hearing loss in young adulthood due to vestibular schwannoma. The other common manifestations are meningiomas and ependymomas. Enough about NF2: what are the other neurofibromatoses? There’s NF1, formerly called von Recklinghausen’s disease or peripheral neurofibromatosis – that’s the commonest kind, formally separated from NF2 only as recently as 1987. The third kind is still called schwannomatosis.</p>
<p><strong>BMJ  6 Jun 2009  Vol 338<br />
</strong><br />
Writing about cancer screening in these columns, I’ve tended to adopt the wearily sceptical tone of a GP who deals the daily burden of anxiety brought on by “abnormal” mammograms, CIN3 of the cervix, high PSAs and so forth, but I was put on my mettle last year when the greatest figure in the field, Martin Vessey FRS, wrote to chide me gently for my blindness to the population benefits of screening. Knowing that MV may be reading this, I shall try to look at <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/may29_2/b1846">this study of flexible sigmoidoscopy for the prevention of colorectal carcinoma</a> from his position as chairman of a national screening committee. What we want, of course, is to reduce the increasing mortality burden of this common cancer in the general population. There may be preventive measures – reducing red meat consumption, perhaps, or banning barbecues, or encouraging the use of NSAIDs, but these are not serious propositions for the moment. The main screening options are testing for occult blood in stool samples (the currently preferred strategy), universal one-time sigmoidoscopy, or universal one-time colonoscopy. At first sight, this Norwegian trial is a flop: “a reduction in incidence of colorectal cancer screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy could not be shown after 7 years’ follow-up.” The accompanying editorial (p.1339) on the other hand hails the trial as “suggesting that the intervention may be effective in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer”. Both ineffective and effective: it all depends on which data you choose to look at. The trial does show a definite large decrease in cancers for those who turned up for the investigation, diluted out if you look at intention-to-treat (I.e. all those invited): so if people could be persuaded to turn up in large numbers to have a tube up their bottoms, this might work. I see a difficult advertising campaign ahead.</p>
<p>“QOF for diabetes: can Practices and Patients both be Winners?” is the title of a short lecture I shall be giving in Birmingham and London next week. Tickets are changing hands for astronomical sums. <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/may26_2/b1870">This analysis of the effect of the introduction QOF on diabetic outcomes</a> could not have come at a better time for me. The presentation is a bit obscure and the printed version omits the key table, but the message is clear: the coming of QOF slowed down the improvement in targets such as HbA1c , blood pressure and cholesterol. “The surprising and important message is that left to themselves, doctors tend to pursue good clinical practice for the benefit of their patients, while if made to jump through hoops for money, they will jump the hoops and leave it at that,” as I shall be telling my audience.</p>
<p><strong>Ann Intern Med  2 Jun 2009  Vol 150<br />
</strong><br />
How likely are you, a non-diabetic adult aged between 45 and 64, to cross the magic threshold of fasting blood sugar and become a fully paid-up type 2 diabetic? <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/150/11/741">This study validates</a> a new risk score based on glucose, waist circumference, triglycerides, maternal diabetes, black race, paternal diabetes, LDL-cholesterol, short stature, uric acid, age over 55, hypertension, rapid pulse and non-use of alcohol. It’s pretty good. Get searching your computer, download this paper (it’s free), find those high-risk patients and call them in for exercise and weight reduction before they reach 7 mmol/L fasting glucose.</p>
<p>Or should we be looking to reduce their levels of aldosterone? I’ve been interested in this hormone for many years since it became clear that it plays a key role in heart failure and resistant hypertension. <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/150/11/776">This intriguing review</a> looks at its role in the so-called metabolic syndrome as well, which is a conglomeration of risk factors often associated with the later development of diabetes. Blocking aldosterone can improve pancreatic insulin secretion, insulin-mediated glucose utilization, and endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. It looks as if we might be giving our pre-diabetic and diabetic patients a lot more spironolactone and eplerenone in the future.</p>
<p>Plant of the Week: <em><a href="http://www.plant-encyclopedia.net/2036-parahebe-catarractae.aspx">Parahebe catarractae</a></em></p>
<p>Not a shrub, not a perennial, not an alpine: this invaluable little space-filler is often described as a sub-shrub, a mass of wiry stems covered in attractive small evergreen leaves and small fragrant white flowers veined with violet throughout the summer. There are mauve-purple sorts which are best avoided. If you want something entirely trouble-free to cover an edge or tumble over a stone all year round, this is the thing. But it does need sun, and you need to lift it off the ground from time to time to destroy any infant gastropods that it might be providing asylum to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/08/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-8-june-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 31 May 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his school days, Richard says, he would often walk down Beech Hill Road in Sheffield thinking of chemical explosives, or girls, or Beethoven, but never of age, neuropathology, and dementia. It&#8217;s all of those, and much else besides, this week&#8230;.
JAMA  27 May 2009  Vol 301
Usual care is what you and I provide, and usual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" />In his school days, Richard says, he would often walk down Beech Hill Road in Sheffield thinking of chemical explosives, or girls, or Beethoven, but never of age, neuropathology, and dementia. It&#8217;s all of those, and much else besides, this week&#8230;.<span id="more-700"></span><br />
<strong>JAMA  27 May 2009  Vol 301</strong><br />
Usual care is what you and I provide, and usual care is a bummer. It&#8217;s the nickel standard against which the true gold of every new complex health intervention is measured, in this case optimised antidepressant therapy and pain self-management in primary care patients who have chronic pain and depression. With <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/20/2099" target="_blank">this study</a>, Science has established that putting these patients on a proper dose of antidepressant and giving them 6 sessions of pain self-management advice and taking a proper interest in them for 6 months thereafter provides better outcomes than usual care. Out here, in the world of the usual, our local pain service (35 km away) has just had its sessions cut and its beds taken away. Patients with depression associated with physical pain don&#8217;t have enough &#8220;caseness&#8221; to interest the community mental health team. Cognitive therapy is unavailable. Yes, usual care is a bummer.</p>
<p>Proton pump inhibitors are the nation&#8217;s favourite drugs, a cure for every discomfort around the epigastrium or oesophagus. Coleridge - or Hazlitt or Lamb or de Quincey or Leigh Hunt - one of those guys anyway - once speculated that most wars might simply be the result of a bad digestion. PPIs for World Peace! is my slogan. Flood North Korea with omeprazole. Don&#8217;t let the Dear Leader struggle on with Gaviscon and Rennies. But wait - here is a <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/20/2120" target="_blank">paper </a>confirming the dastardly suspicion that PPIs might be associated with an increased risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Never mind: nuclear war is more important.</p>
<p><strong>NEJM   28 May 2009  Vol 360</strong><br />
Although we don&#8217;t understand the natural history of oesophageal cancer exactly, at least some of it arises in areas of intestinal metaplasia at the lower end of the gullet, called Barrett&#8217;s oesophagus. In fact the accompanying <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/22/2353" target="_blank">editorial</a> claims that all oesophageal adenocarcinoma (5-year survival, 15%) arises from Barrett&#8217;s, as metaplasia becomes dysplasia and dysplasia becomes cancer. We also know that these cancers are increasing at an alarming rate - fivefold in the last three decades. So a <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/22/2277" target="_blank">trial </a>showing that radiofrequency ablation cures Barrett&#8217;s in 80% of patients at one year must be good news. It&#8217;s also good news that <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/22/2277" target="_blank">this trial</a> used sham ablation as the control. Bad news, however, that it was relatively underpowered to prove a reduction in cancer, and that radio ablation can cause strictures in 6% of patients. And screening for Barrett&#8217;s is definitely not on the agenda - it&#8217;s too common and too little of it progresses to cancer.</p>
<p>In my school days, I would often walk down Beech Hill Road in Sheffield thinking of chemical explosives, or girls, or Beethoven, but never of age, neuropathology and dementia. Alas, how things change. <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/22/2302" target="_blank">Here </a>the pathologists of Beech Hill Rd report on what they found when they sliced through 456 brains from donors aged from 69 to 103 who had taken part in an MRC study of cognitive function. The classic tangles and plaques of Alzheimer&#8217;s more frequently accompany dementia in the younger elderly than in the very aged, as you&#8217;d expect.</p>
<p>As we gaze in wonder at the fossil of our 47-million-year-old ancestor Ida the early primate, this is a good time to weigh up the pros and cons of human evolution. Big brain: probably good. Upright posture: not so sure. So many of the intractable ills we deal with every day are down to that: postnasal sinuses that drain upwards, a back that&#8217;s always giving trouble, hips and knees that degenerate, and varicose leg veins. Our big brains aren&#8217;t much help when it comes to dealing with veins with useless valves. But it seems from <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/360/22/2319" target="_blank">this very good review</a> that we have been missing something important - iliac vein obstruction. About 60% of non-symptomatic adults have non-thrombotic iliac vein obstruction at the point where it is crossed by the iliac or hypogastric artery. In symptomatic people, the percentage exceeds 90, and the answer may be - you guessed it - the placement of venous stents. Apparently these stay patent for many years and provide symptom relief in the great majority of patients with advanced venous disease.</p>
<p>Over the years I&#8217;ve been compiling a list of topics for the Easily Missed series, Addison&#8217;s disease has stayed near the top, not surprisingly. We simply don&#8217;t know how many people go into septic shock and die of it without the diagnosis ever being made: what is clear from this review is that adrenal insufficiency is difficult to study, particularly in critically ill people. It&#8217;s good to see such <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/360/22/2328" target="_blank">a first-class single author review </a>appear from Dresden, a city which suffered a brain drain in the days of the GDR because you couldn&#8217;t get West German TV reception there, and has fared even worse since due to economic migration and prejudice against &#8220;Ossies&#8221;. Anyway, read this review; and visit Dresden for its lovely situation on a bend of the Elbe, its marvellously reconstructed buildings, the Zwinger gallery full of great paintings, and the Semper opera full of musical singers who don&#8217;t wobble hideously in the modern fashion.</p>
<p><strong>Lancet  30 May 2009  Vol 373</strong><br />
Twenty years ago in Oxford, aspirin was considered a divine substance and I recollect being rebuked sharply by Colin Baigent for suggesting that it might not matter if GPs did not give it immediately to patients with suspected myocardial infarction provided they got it on arrival in hospital. Absence of evidence was no excuse for sloppy practice. In this vast <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60503-1/abstract" target="_blank">meta-analysis</a>, Colin (now Prof Baigent) finds much absence of evidence, not about this particular issue, but about the net benefit of aspirin for the primary prevention of vascular disease. We all so much want it to be a cheap safe panacea, but it isn&#8217;t a panacea and it&#8217;s not particularly safe; it may even increase total stroke mortality when used for primary prevention. Cheap it certainly is, but then so are statins nowadays, and they do more good and less harm.</p>
<p>Cystic fibrosis gets a <em>Lancet</em> <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60327-5/abstract" target="_blank">seminar </a>this week. We all know it&#8217;s autosomally recessive, but it is genetically complex, and malfunction of the transmembrane conductance regulator has complex consequences. The basic end result is to produce sticky airways secretions that hold on to germs (especially <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em>) rather than get rid of them, and that block airways rather than clear them. The pancreas gets gummed up too, but that is easier to treat. Until gene therapy becomes a reality, most treatment is aimed at postponing death from pulmonary infection and damage, using antibiotics and nebulised hypertonic saline: this has improved life expectancy from 30 to 37 in the past decade, and today children with CF are expected to live to 50.</p>
<p><strong>BMJ   30 May 2009  Vol 338</strong><br />
Unannounced on its front cover, the BMJ has scooped up <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/may19_1/b1807" target="_blank">a really important study of door-to-balloon time in relation to mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction</a>. Looking at what happened to 43 801 American patients in hospital, the Yale team comes up with a mortality curve with the tightest of confidence intervals, clearly showing that every minute counts. The authors worked under the supervision of Harlan Krumholz, so everything in this paper is in the right order, clearly stated, closely discussed, and ending with a simple clinical message: there is a benefit from reducing door-to-needle time for all patients undergoing PCI, including those currently treated within 90 minutes of hospital admission.</p>
<p>On a good night, without wine and with an essay by Richard Feynman and a piece of paper to hand, I can persuade myself that I understand the rudiments of quantum physics. On the other hand, the more I read about string theory or prion-related diseases, the more confused I become. I know people have won Nobel prizes for these things, but you can&#8217;t help wondering, just a little bit, why they are taking so long to become intelligible to the majority of fairly intelligent people. Here is <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/may21_2/b1442" target="_blank">a study of &#8220;disease-related prion protein&#8221; in 63,000 British tonsils</a>, using two tests. If one was positive, the other wasn&#8217;t, so the end result was: no confirmed CJD prions. Whatever they are. Or do. I am reminded of Hilaire Belloc&#8217;s words:<br />
But Scientists, who ought to know,<br />
Assure us that it must be so &#8230;<br />
Oh! let us never, never doubt<br />
What nobody is sure about.<br />
From The Microbe, in More Beasts for Bad Children, 1912</p>
<p>Another unannounced scoop for the BMJ is <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/338/feb23_1/b375" target="_blank">the result of at least ten years&#8217; hard thought by Doug Altman on the subject of prognosis and prognostic research</a>. This may not be your particular cup of tea, but with Doug around, you can be very sure that it is well brewed and contains only the best ingredients. No milk or sugar, thank you. Three more cups to come.</p>
<p><strong>Arch Intern Med  25 May 2009  Vol 169</strong><br />
&#8220;From 2001 through 2004, 35.4% of US adults aged 40 years and older (69 million Americans) had vestibular dysfunction.&#8221; A truly dizzying statistic. &#8220;<a title="Arch Intern Med article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/10/938" target="_blank">These data suggest the importance of diagnosing, treating, and potentially screening for vestibular deficits to reduce the burden of injuries and deaths in the United States</a>.&#8221; Hmm. They suggest to me that a lot of people get a bit of the wobbles now and then. And just what is this treatment of which they speak? If the US wants to reduce its burden of injuries and deaths, I&#8217;d suggest gun control and universal medical coverage.</p>
<p>I rather like some American usages, like &#8220;2001 through 2004&#8243; which is more precise than our &#8220;from 2001 to 2004&#8243;. But what about this? &#8220;Rapidity and modality of imaging for LBP is associated with patient and physician characteristics but the directionality of associations with desirable care processes is opposite of associations for measures targeting underuse.&#8221; No wonder so many Americans get vertigo. <a title="Arch Intern Med article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/10/972" target="_blank">This study of imaging for low back pain</a> in a health system which encourages overinvestigation gives rise to a nicely written editorial with the title &#8220;Imaging Idolatry&#8221;. The word idolatry reminds one of America&#8217;s deep roots in the English Bible, which is mostly the work of William Tyndale. Here, just for a treat, is how to write English prose:</p>
<p>&#8220;But the serpent was subtler than all the beasts of the field which the Lord God had made, and said unto the woman. Ah sir, that God hath said, ye shall not eat of all manner trees in the garden. And the woman said unto the serpent, of the fruit of the trees in the garden we may eat, but of the fruit of the tree that is in the middes of the garden (said God) see that ye eat not, and see that ye touch it not: lest ye die.<br />
Then said the serpent unto the woman: tush ye shall not die: but God doth know, that whensoever ye shall eat of it, your eyes should be opened and ye should be as God and know both good and evil. And the woman saw that it was a good tree to eat of and lusty unto the eyes and a pleasant tree for to make wise. And took of the fruit of it and ate, and gave unto her husband and also with her, and he ate. And the eyes of both of them were opened, that they understood how they were naked. Then they sewed fig leaves together and made them aprons.&#8221;<br />
Genesis the.iii.Chapter. 1530  William Tyndale or Huchyns</p>
<p><strong>Plant of the Week: <em>Geranium renardii</em></strong></p>
<p>Amongst its other joys, June is the high season for hardy geraniums, those steady fillers of every garden gap. Some of them flower for a long season, but this one bears its flowers for a couple of weeks only, when they are a lovely opal white veined with violet. But this is definitely a plant that every garden needs. It is, as Graham Stuart Thomas wrote,&#8221;a first-class foliage plant forming a solid dome of sage-green, prettily lobed, deeply veined, circular leaves.&#8221; What more can you ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 24 May 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/24/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-24-may-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/24/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-24-may-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 16:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Floppy iris, diabetes, virtual surgery, and blood pressure lowering are just a few of this week&#8217;s splendidly discussed topics in Richard&#8217;s blog.

JAMA  20 May 2009  Vol 301
Cataract surgery rarely goes seriously wrong, so when a number of older men were noticed to get complications due to floppy iris syndrome, ophthalmologists began to look for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" /><br />
Floppy iris, diabetes, virtual surgery, and blood pressure lowering are just a few of this week&#8217;s splendidly discussed topics in Richard&#8217;s blog.<br />
<span id="more-691"></span><br />
<strong>JAMA  20 May 2009  Vol 301</strong><br />
Cataract surgery rarely goes seriously wrong, so when a number of older men were noticed to get complications due to floppy iris syndrome, ophthalmologists began to look for a cause. The iris, like the bladder neck, contains alpha 1a-adrenoreceptors which help to maintain muscle tone. The peak age for cataracts is also the peak time for benign prostatic hyperplasia, and in a Canadian cohort of 96 128 men over 65 undergoing cataract surgery, over 10% had been taking a-blockers immediately prior to surgery. But most a-blockers in <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/19/1991" target="_blank">this study</a>, as in previous ones, come out quite innocent: only tamsulosin doubles your risk of cataract surgery complications. (N.B. this should not be confused with the floppy iris syndrome of gardens, which is usually caused by slugs, or by the incautious gardener stepping backwards on the iris.)</p>
<p>Our traditional view of cardiac myocytes is that they sit there from birth, beating away about 40 million times a year until after about 80 years they get tired and start packing up. In fact, <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/19/1977" target="_blank">a recent Swedish study</a> shows that new myocytes are produced throughout life, albeit in rather modest numbers - 1% at age 25 and 0.45% at age 75. Bone marrow stem cells are known to turn into cardiomyocytes if they are injected into the myocardium, but nobody has yet shown that this can result in clinically meaningful benefit. This <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/19/1997" target="_blank">Dutch study</a> is no exception, but at least it showed a small, short-term increase in myocardial perfusion in a group of patients with chronic myocardial ischaemia refractory to medical treatment. The scanner noticed the difference even if the patients didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>&#8220;Come Sleepe, O Sleepe, the certaine knot of peace,<br />
The baiting place of wit, the balme of woe&#8221;<br />
writes Sir Philip Sidney in his 39th sonnet, perhaps inspiring the more famous passage in Shakespeare&#8217;s Macbeth. Those who can take a good night&#8217;s sleep for granted have little sympathy for those who can&#8217;t: Lady Macbeth interrupts her husband&#8217;s very promising speech on the subject with a brisk &#8220;What do you mean?&#8221; In Shakespeare&#8217;s day, poppy, alcohol and mandragora were popular sedatives, but taking sleeping drugs has always been considered a moral weakness by non-insomniacs. The modern equivalent of moral self-improvement is cognitive behavioural therapy, where instead of being ordered to snap out of it, you are taught how. We know this works for sleep disturbance, but <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/19/2005" target="_blank">this Canadian study</a> is one of the few to examine how it interacts with drug treatment. In the short term, CBT and zolpidem together produce the best results, and for long term success, discontinue the zolpidem while continuing the CBT. I can feel it working &#8230; wake up! When is there ever going to be enough CBT available in the UK to treat every patient with insomnia?</p>
<p>All right, all right, I know I should be fitter. Twelve Japanese authors rub it in with this <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/19/2024" target="_blank">meta-analysis</a> of cardiorespiratory fitness as a predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women. The association is clear, thought the heterogeneity amongst the studies is pretty striking.</p>
<p><strong>NEJM   21 May 2009  Vol 360</strong><br />
The most radical change in medical services in the last ten years has centred on the provision of rapid reperfusion for myocardial infarction. The evidence that it works for ST-elevation MI is well established, but for NSTEMI acute coronary syndromes the benefit of immediate versus delayed reperfusion therapy is less clear. The <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/21/2165" target="_blank">TIMACS trial</a> helps to clarify the situation by showing that the difference between coronary angiography at a mean 14 hours and a mean 50 hours in this group is not great. You have to tinker about with the results a bit - those wretched composite end-points get in the way once again - to tease out the main message, which is that the patients worth whizzing off asap to the nearest catheter lab are the ones with high risk scores. As you thought. Better still, this paper is accompanied by an <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/21/2237" target="_blank">editorial </a> which contains a very useful table of treatment strategies for acute coronary syndromes (meaning those without ST elevation). The bottom line again: &#8220;The magnitude of benefit correlates with the patient&#8217;s level of risk.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Lancet  23 May 2009  Vol 373</strong><br />
&#8220;Diabetes is a mess,&#8221; I sighed a few weeks ago. It has just become a worse mess with this meta-analysis of the effect of intensive control of glucose on cardiovascular outcomes and death in type 2 diabetes. The headline message is that &#8220;intensive control of glucose&#8221; reduces non-fatal myocardial infarction by 17%. This conclusion is reached by analysing five trials, three of which have a roughly similar design - ADVANCE, ACCORD and VADT - all examining outcomes after reducing GHb below 7 for several years in typical cohorts of type 2 patients aged around 65+. The other two are wildly different - UKPDS, which randomised patients on diagnosis in their early fifties to regimes which produced long-term GHb levels over 7, and the PROactive study which randomised patients with established macrovascular disease to have pioglitazone or placebo added to their existing regimes. The authors of this paper, to be fair, spend almost a third of it discussing its limitations, and even manage to squeeze in a favourable reference to the recent editorial on the subject I wrote with Harlan Krumholz. But this &#8220;<a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60697-8/abstract" target="_blank">meta-analysis</a>&#8221; seems designed to obscure the clear message of three trials that can actually inform real-life practice in long-standing diabetes, which is that lowering GHb below 7 in this large group has no clear benefit and increases hypoglycaemia. The other two studies lumped in with them address different questions entirely. People with diabetes need evidence which helps them to choose the treatment which will benefit them most as individuals, whereas conflating disparate data leads in the opposite direction.</p>
<p>
Here is another <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60731-5/abstract" target="_blank">meta-analysis</a>, this time quite uncontroversial as it simply tries to establish the size and timing of the well-known relationship between gestational diabetes and later type 2 diabetes. The risk size varies from 3.28 to 22.27 in various clusters of studies: the mean risk ratio combining them all is 7.43. Very high, in other words, and deserving of preventive action if we can find out what works.</p>
<p>
There are three kinds of outcome in diabetes trials: (a) surrogate end-points only (this applies to 82% of current trials);(b) patient outcomes which are undesirable but treatable (most retinopathy, symptomatic vascular disease); and (c) patient outcomes that have a permanent detrimental effect, varying from toe amputation to death. For some reason, it has become traditional in diabetes research to confuse these three classes of outcome as much as possible. The <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60698-X/abstract" target="_blank">FIELD trial</a> randomised 9795 patients with type 2 diabetes to receive fenofibrate or placebo, and three main outcomes have been reported. For major cardiovascular events, fenofibrate made no difference; for retinopathy requiring laser treatment (a type b outcome, which does not equate to visual loss), fenofibrate provided a reduction of 31%; and the study here shows a similar reduction in amputation events, significant only for toe amputation. The front cover of The Lancet bids us to &#8220;marvel at the unexpectedly large effect of treatment with a fibrate on both diabetic retinopathy and amputations.&#8221;  What we should really marvel at is that fewer than 10% of the patients in this study were taking a statin, so the results are impossible to extrapolate to a real-life population of diabetics on appropriate treatment.</p>
<p><a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60609-7/abstract" target="_blank">There are two types of surgical cure for diabetes</a>. One is bariatric surgery, which can cure more than 50% of obese diabetics using relatively safe and simple procedures. The other is pancreas transplantation, a complex and hazardous procedure often performed in tandem with renal transplantation. If you are poorly enough to warrant combined transplantation, you are twice as likely to live to two years if you get it done. Thereafter there are clear benefits in the regression of diabetic changes in all affected organs, but long-term survival benefit is not clearly assured.</p>
<p><strong>BMJ   23 May 2009  Vol 338</strong><br />
If you lower blood pressure, you will lower the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke, irrespective of baseline BP. You will achieve this reduction much more effectively by using low doses of three agents than by using higher doses of one or two. These well-known but commonly ignored facts emerge once again from this immense labour of Polypill love by Law, Morris and Wald. The moral of this meta-analysis of 147 trials is that if everyone took BP lowering medication we would reduce myocardial infarction by 45% and stroke by 60%. They claim that it is therefore irrelevant to measure BP, but this is a non sequitur: they assume we agree that risk assessment as a whole is a waste of time. That is only the case if we ignore the right of individuals to decide which treatments they would like to take.</p>
<p>As a medical student, I was puzzled that gynaecologists used the laparoscope to examine the abdominal cavity while general surgeons did all their operations through large wounds which I held open with a retractor. Then about twenty years ago, they all started doing everything through laparoscopes and severed many an artery and bile duct while climbing their learning curves. Had virtual reality training been more widespread then, this might not have happened, and even now it doesn&#8217;t seem to be mandatory, or <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/may19_1/b1665" target="_blank">this RCT</a> would not have got ethical approval. It shows that it is as stupid to let a surgeon do laparoscopy without training on a virtual reality set as it would be to let a fighter pilot fly without simulator training.</p>
<p>More about the (relative) futility of blood pressure monitoring. The <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/apr30_1/b1492" target="_blank">PROGRESS study</a> reported here in pico form shows that the random variation of BP is huge and undermines the reliability of office checks following changes to treatment. The accompanying <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/may14_2/b1001" target="_blank">editorial </a> and Fiona Godlee&#8217;s Editor&#8217;s Choice both call for a complete rethink on how we treat and monitor blood pressure. Tempting though it is to imagine a world in which constant checking of BP and other risk factors became a thing of the past, I am not quite convinced that giving everybody a cocktail of drugs they mostly don&#8217;t need is the best answer.</p>
<p>The Diagnosis in General Practice series continues with an excellent <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr24_1/b1218" target="_blank">article on chronic cough</a> by Kevin Barraclough, accompanied by a <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr24_1/b1312" target="_blank">piece on the &#8220;test of treatment&#8221;</a> by Paul Glasziou and colleagues. We first discussed this pairing of &#8220;practice&#8221; topics and &#8220;theory&#8221; topics three years ago, and it&#8217;s nice to see it working so well. This is about what actually happens to patients: if you think you can do it better, tell us how. Kevin disputes the relevance of diagnosing pertussis serologically in chronic cough, but having had access to salivary testing I can assure him that it turns up all the time and it&#8217;s a very useful tool for calling an end to the diagnostic chase. Patients go from being frustrated and anxious to being impressed and intrigued, and immediately start diagnosing it in their friends and relatives. Sometimes correctly.</p>
<p><strong>Ann Intern Med  19 May 2009  Vol 150</strong><br />
<a title="Ann Intern Med article" href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/150/10/681" target="_blank">If the dowager has a hump, she will die more quickly</a>. This is not just an association with osteoporosis but is independently linked with the degree of hyperkyphosis in older women.</p>
<p>
Here&#8217;s a nice little <a title="Ann Intern Med article" href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/150/10/696" target="_blank">study </a>- well, quite big, actually, involving 164 US hospitals - showing that quality of outcome is not related to volume of coronary artery bypass procedures but to quality of adherence to non-surgical measures. A little hospital can do just as well as a big one, not by hiring a star surgeon but simply by ensuring good peri- and post-operative practice - appropriate prophylactic antibiotics, leg compression, statins, ß-blockers and aspirin.</p>
<p>
Sitting on the desk by my right elbow are 147 pages of the clinical Quality and Outcomes Framework by which our practice will earn enough to keep me in the manner to which I am accustomed. If some kind reader would give me a locum for 3 months, I would go through this whole wretched thing and examine its evidence base critically, as I tried to with a single diabetic indicator. Nowhere is the whole exercise more tenuous and unscientific than with so-called chronic kidney disease. Patients with this non-disease are usually elderly with co-morbidities that actually affect their well-being, and the only trial which includes substantial numbers of such people is ALLHAT. We will get points for treating them with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II-receptor antagonists. This <a title="Ann Intern Med article" href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/150/10/717" target="_blank">review </a>of the current American guidelines recommending these treatments shows that there is little hard evidence to support their use in people over 70. Perhaps I should become used to a little less income.</p>
<p><strong>Plant of the Week: <em>Decumaria sinensis<br />
</em></strong>At this time of year, every street in England should be filled with a sweet odour of orange blossom honey, wafted from this evergreen climber as it produces its creamy tufts of intensely fragrant flower. Why it isn&#8217;t planted everywhere is a complete mystery to me. I think we have the only plant in North Oxfordshire, where it grows up the house wall as easily as ivy, but much more readily controlled. It could cover walls, fences, sheds, tree stumps and anything you care all the year round and never need attention. And then every late May you would be blown away by its wonderful scent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/24/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-24-may-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 16 May 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/16/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-16-may-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/16/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-16-may-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 14:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, Richard ponders a multitude of topics, including the usefulness of prognostic markers for heart failure, the pros and cons of aspirin, and the ins and outs of climate change, while boldly stating that, to his knowledge, no one has ever died of crumbly toenails.

JAMA   13 May 2009  Vol 301
A few years ago I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" />This week, Richard ponders a multitude of topics, including the usefulness of prognostic markers for heart failure, the pros and cons of aspirin, and the ins and outs of climate change, while boldly stating that, to his knowledge, no one has ever died of crumbly toenails.<br />
<span id="more-686"></span><br />
<strong>JAMA   13 May 2009  Vol 301</strong><br />
A few years ago I was putting together the first book about heart failure and palliative care and decided to write the chapter about prognostic markers. There is a widespread myth that the course of heart failure is terribly difficult to predict, whereas we now have two biochemical markers – B-natriuretic peptide and co-peptin – which are more predictive than most cancer biomarkers. What I found as I was compiling this neglected masterpiece (buy it at once for your practice library) was that were in 2006 already more than a hundred different prognostic markers and scoring systems in the literature – most of them somebody&#8217;s doctoral thesis done with stored sera and/or a convenient database. I still get regular free updates on the heart failure literature through amedeo.com and still there&#8217;s a new prognostic association bruited nearly every week – <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/18/1892" target="_blank">here </a>it is circulating estradiol in men with systolic heart failure. The late and much lamented Philip Poole-Wilson is among the authors. I&#8217;m sure that were he still alive he would be the first to admit that finding higher mortality in the top and bottom quintiles of serum estradiol is not going to change a great deal. “Charming but irrelevant, dear boy,” I picture him saying. Though I only met him a couple of times, I really will miss his kindness and wisdom.</p>
<p>Another figure who enlivened my days in the heart failure arena was John Cleland, a fervent campaigner against aspirin. I don&#8217;t know if a willow bough fell on young John&#8217;s jam-jar when he was fishing for sticklebacks by some boyhood Scottish brook, but his ardour against salicylates is remarkable. And gradually the medical world is having second thoughts on the subject. Two or three years ago, we were suggesting daily 75mg aspirin to everyone with diabetes, hypertension and/or peripheral vascular disease, and indeed to most patients with heart failure, but the evidence is remarkably thin. In <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/18/1909" target="_blank">this meta-analysis</a> the effect of aspirin and or dipyridamole on cardiovascular events in PAD does not reach statistical significance. For nonfatal stroke alone, there is a protective effect.</p>
<p><strong>NEJM  14 May 2009  Vol 2006</strong><br />
It seems that the more you inhibit platelet aggregation, the more you prevent strokes, while leaving total cardiovascular mortality relatively unaffected. This is true of the <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/20/2066" target="_blank">ACTIVE A study</a> reported here; combining aspirin with clopidogrel in atrial fibrillation achieved a 28% reduction in strokes but the rates of vascular death in the aspirin-only and the combined group was identical. Also, while the difference in fatal strokes between the groups was 23 in favour of combined treatment, the difference in fatal bleeds was 15 against. So this study doesn&#8217;t quite show the clear advantage that might inspire you to audit all your AF patients unsuitable for warfarin and urge them to take clopidogrel with their aspirin.</p>
<p>This interesting <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/20/2079" target="_blank">Canadian study</a> randomised 800 babies presenting to an emergency department with bronchiolitis to receive nebulised epinephrine (adrenaline), high dose oral dexamethasone (1mg/kg), neither or both. The oral steroids and the nebulised adrenaline did nothing on their own. But combined with each other, the effect was to reduce hospital admissions. This is nicely illustrated in the cumulative admissions plot in Figure 3, but alas, when the statisticians got to work adjusting for multiple comparisons, significance was no longer achieved. Even bigger studies are needed.</p>
<p>As far as I know, nobody ever died of crumbly toenails, but apparently people have been known to die from liver failure due to oral terbinafine. <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/360/20/2108" target="_blank">This article on fungal nail disease</a> mentions this but doesn&#8217;t quantify it, and doesn&#8217;t even come off the fence completely about liver function testing. Cost is no longer a barrier to terbinafine prescribing, but I don&#8217;t know that I could face harming a patient to treat a harmless condition, so I think I will insist on LFTs before treatment and at 6 weeks. All other treatments are a waste of time.</p>
<p><strong>Lancet  16 May 2009  Vol 373</strong><br />
I never grudge orthopaedic surgeons their expensive cars, because on the whole they do more obvious good to my patients than any other group of specialists. Whatever they may lack in communication skills and thinking outside the operating theatre, they make up for by fixing stuff. It took them a while to notice that immobile legs can get deep vein thrombosis, but now that realisation has dawned, thromboprophylaxis following total knee replacement has become routine. The nurses go round giving enoxaparin every 12 hours; but that may soon be a thing of the past. Each morning, as the orthopaedic surgeon throws his suit jacket into the back of the Porsche, the drug trolley will rumble round the ward laden with rivaroxaban, a fixed-dose oral factor Xa inhibitor, which proved superior to enoxaparin in <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60734-0/abstract" target="_blank">this randomised trial (RECORD4)</a>.</p>
<p>Much of this week&#8217;s Lancet is taken up with high-level hand-wringing about <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60935-1/fulltext" target="_blank">climate change</a>. Anthropogenic climate change needs an anthropogenic answer, and since anthropes rarely change behaviour in favour of greater discomfort and lesser wealth, this needs to go beyond mere exhortation. Non-anthropogenic climate change is even scarier; a mere 15,000 years ago the place where I am typing this was the terminal moraine of a vast glacier covering northern Europe. What worries me most is the fact that all the scientific solutions seem to be proposed by grey-heads of my age or older, while the youths who ought to be coming up with the goods are too busy flying off around the world career-building.</p>
<p><strong>BMJ   16 May 2009  Vol 338</strong><br />
When the great Peter Medawar collected together his essays attacking bad science, he called the book Pluto&#8217;s Republic, after a malapropism attributed to an American lady of his acquaintance. PLUTO, the king of the underworld, also gives his name to this study – a “<a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/may07_2/b1542" target="_blank">pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial</a>” of the kind that Medawar might well have consigned to his infernal republic. I am inclined to be kinder, because it is difficult to study an intervention like ultraviolet B phototherapy for mild to severe psoriasis taken out into the community except in a fairly pragmatic, non-inferiority-seeking sort of way. The main point you need to establish is that patients can give themselves this therapy safely and effectively at home rather than having to come up to hospital all the time – and in this Dutch study, they could.</p>
<p>Fifteen years ago, a paper appeared from Dundee showing that levels of the then newly-discovered cardiac hormone B-natriuretic peptide were more predictive of heart failure and death following myocardial infarction than measurement of the systolic ejection fraction. This led me on a long wild-goose chase which ended when an MRC-funded pilot study showed that it was impossible to titrate individual treatment on the basis of BNP. Here a <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/may06_1/b1605" target="_blank">French study</a> of elderly patients following MI confirms that BNP is a good prognostic marker: that&#8217;s the easy bit. What to do with that knowledge is still the problem – as discussed in the accompanying <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/may06_1/b787" target="_blank">editorial</a>.</p>
<p>I draw your attention to <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/may05_1/b1517" target="_blank">this short paper on streptococcal perianal infection in children</a> not (heaven forbid) because it&#8217;s by me, but as a tale of perseverance akin to Robert the Bruce and his spider, designed to inspire you to write for the BMJ. In 1996, our then registrar Sarah Pinder did a nice little awareness and case-finding study of this topic, which showed that most local GPs had never heard of it, despite the likelihood that they were probably seeing it twice a year. We urged Sarah to write it up for the BMJ at the time, but instead she got married, had babies and moved to Australia. Not long after, a new serological test appeared that for the first time made it easy to diagnose coeliac disease, and I urged Harold Hin to do a case-finding study for that, as I&#8217;ve told you oft and anon. Meanwhile I was working with less effect on BNP. All this gave me the idea for a BMJ series called “Commoner than you think”, which I proposed to them in 2002. Sorry, too ill-defined, was the reply. Then in 2006, Fiona Godlee asked if I&#8217;d like to write something for her new-look journal, and I proposed the same idea again, but now as part of a bigger series on Diagnosis at Presentation. Eventually, with the invaluable help of Anthony Harnden and Mabel Chew, this bit became “Easily Missed”. Then I finally had to track down Sarah in Australia and produce draft after draft of this little piece, known in our household as “bums”. And now, 13 years on, it appears in print, complete with a picture of a bum. If you hadn&#8217;t recognised this condition before, you will now: and if that&#8217;s the case, it was all worth it.</p>
<p><strong>Arch Intern Med  11 May 2009  Vol 169</strong><br />
The Beginning of a New Era for the Archives and the Nation, <a title="Arch Intern Med article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/169/9/828" target="_blank">declares </a>the new editor, Rita Redberg, modestly placing herself by the side of Barack Obama. Those interested in American health care reform ideas will have a lot of important reading in her journal and in the other two I report on, but I shall try to keep to my general rule of not commenting directly on matters of politics. I shall simply slave on here in Egypt, making bricks without straw under the rule of Lord High Darzi until he is replaced by another Pharaoh who knew not Joseph.</p>
<p><a title="Arch Intern Med article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/9/832" target="_blank">ALLHAT </a>is one of those trials which will not go away, like UKPDS. Both of them could be said to have too many interventions and too many end-points, and have been the subject of much special pleading and unwarranted extrapolation. But both have unexpected and important lessons for clinical practice, confirmed by subsequent trials. In the case of UKPDS, it&#8217;s that blood pressure control is more important than tight glycaemic control, and that metformin is the most beneficial drug. In the case of ALLHAT, the message is that all drug classes for hypertension are equally good at reducing most cardiovascular end-points, and that thiazide diuretics may be the best because they prevent heart failure, and the hyperglycaemia they induce does not produce any adverse cardiovascular consequences.</p>
<p>Various medical conditions have from time to time been known as Syndrome X, indicating general mystification, and none is more mystifying than cardiac chest pain on exertion in women with normal coronary arteries. The <a title="Arch Intern Med article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/9/843" target="_blank">Women&#8217;s Ischaemia Syndrome Evaluation Study (WISE)</a> followed up women with ischaemic symptoms but normal coronary arteries for a mean of 5.2 years and compared them with a cohort of asymptomatic women from the St James Women Take Heart Study. The 540  “WISE women” (as the study describes them) did markedly worse than the Take Hearters. In women with 4 or more cardiac risk actors, their annual event rate exceeded 25% while it was 6.5% in the asymptomatic.</p>
<p>Pre-scientific medicine developed some pretty effective rituals for pain relief, the most impressive and persistent being acupuncture. <a title="Arch Intern Med article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/9/858" target="_blank">This study</a>, like many others, shows that it works well for a lot of people, whether you follow the traditional points or do it at random. To perform acupuncture, you just need a set of sterile long thin needles and an impressive manner. Exhibit charts of ancient Chinese pricks on the walls of your room. Enquire about the exact nature and location of the chronic low back pain and perform a slow and meticulous examination. It may help to insist that the patient comes in a loin cloth. After a period of serious contemplation, proceed to introduce the needles wherever you like. Make sure you charge a high fee. This increases your reputation and allows you to wear finer robes.</p>
<p><strong>Plant of the Week: <em>Iris</em> &#8220;Black Swan&#8221;</strong><br />
All bearded irises are lovely, and with most the scent seems to complement the colour: a rich fruit salad smell from the pink and brown ones, something more exotic from the blues, and chocolate and liquorice from this almost black one. Definitely a flower to turn heads, especially when planted where the sun can shine through it, producing an effect like very dark stained glass.</p>
<p>I imagine that all the many iris varieties with &#8220;black&#8221; in their name are very similar. Split them regularly and give bits to admirers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/16/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-16-may-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 11 May 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/11/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-11-may-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/11/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-11-may-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The medical eponymous genitive is only one of many things on Richard&#8217;s mind this week. He makes the distinction between Important Sounding Surrogate End Points (ISSEPs) and Patient Important End Points (PIEPs): hardly new concepts, but possibly new acronyms. These are the fundamental enemies and friends, respectively, of evidence based patient care. Do you think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" />The medical eponymous genitive is only one of many things on Richard&#8217;s mind this week. He makes the distinction between Important Sounding Surrogate End Points (ISSEPs) and Patient Important End Points (PIEPs): hardly new concepts, but possibly new acronyms. These are the fundamental enemies and friends, respectively, of evidence based patient care. Do you think these acronyms work? Or can you think of better ones? <a title="Submit blog comment" href="http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/11/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-11-may-2009/#respond" target="_blank">Please send in your comments</a>.<span id="more-680"></span></p>
<p><strong>JAMA   6 May 2009  Vol 301</strong><br />
Homeless and ill in Chicago, which would you want most - a doctor or a roof over your head? This <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/17/1771" target="_blank">randomised trial</a> offered chronically ill homeless people 18 months of guaranteed housing after hospital discharge, or usual care. Return visits to hospital were about a quarter fewer in the housed group. Civilisation is the building of cities, the encouragement of arts and learning from the interchange and wealth that they create, and the care of the poor. Not necessarily in that order.</p>
<p>Nobody seems very sure what the human nasal sinuses are there for. From the doctor&#8217;s point of view, they exist to cause facial pain, postnasal discharge and the unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics. All this is nicely discussed (with contributions from the patient) in a <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/17/1798" target="_blank">case-based discussion</a> here, with pictures of what you might find in acute rhinosinusitis if you had a nasendoscope handy. Most acute sinusitis is viral, resolves within 10 days; by this time over 50% of bacterial sinusitis will also have resolved, as far as we can tell. The commonest bacterial pathogens are <em>Streptococcus pneumoniae</em> and <em>Haemophilus influenzae</em>, followed by <em>Moraxella catarrhalis</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. You can only tell which from cultures obtained from endoscopic sampling, and amoxicillin remains a sensible first-line choice of antibiotic. Wait for ten days, if you can persuade the patient to do so.</p>
<p><strong>NEJM   7 May 2009  Vol 360</strong><br />
Coronary stents were quite a new thing when I started writing a few comments on medical journal articles ten years ago. They were all bare metal then, but trials soon appeared comparing radioactive stents (a very bad idea, causing arterial fibrosis) with stents which leach out (elute) immunosuppressant drugs such as sirolimus and paclitaxel. Coinciding with the widespread adoption of immediate percutaneous intervention for myocardial infarction, use of these drug-eluting stents shot up, and bare metal stents soon became yesterday&#8217;s technology. But was this just another triumph of marketing over evidence? It seems largely so, judging by this <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/19/1933" target="_blank">analysis of the Swedish Angiography and Angioplasty Registry</a> which looks at 48,000 Swedes stented from 2003 to 2006. Overall, there was no difference in rates of death or myocardial infarction between those receiving bare metal or drug-eluting stents. Only if you take patients in the highest decile of risk can you find clear justification for using the expensive kind of stent.</p>
<p>OK, I know stents are boring, but bear with me for another sentence or two. The reason everyone started using drug-eluting stents was, once again, that all-pervading enemy of patient-relevant medicine, the important-sounding surrogate end-point (ISSEP). In <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/19/1946" target="_blank">this latest trial comparing paclitaxel-eluting with bare metal stents following myocardial infarction</a>, the ISSEP is called binary restenosis. Within the first 12 months, patients receiving the two kinds of stent would have noticed no difference at all. Their rates of death and stent thrombosis were identical. But those receiving the drug-eluting stents showed a lower rate of binary restenosis. Aha, that has to be good. Except that the Swedish data suggest it makes no difference to longer term outcomes in most patient groups.</p>
<p>People who have tried to eat the common earth-ball fungus report that it is rather nasty. It is called Scleroderma, meaning hard-skinned. Human scleroderma, or systemic sclerosis, is definitely nasty. This <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/360/19/1989" target="_blank">review </a>is big on mechanisms - that is its brief - and light on management. The traditional NEJM colour scheme, based on haematoxylin-eosin staining, is subtly varied with blues and greens in the illustrations. Lots of different cellular mechanisms might lead to the overproduction of collagen and other glycoproteins which characterises this distressing disease, but nobody has yet found a reliable way of switching them off.</p>
<p><strong>Lancet   9 May 2009  Vol 373</strong><br />
Last week I voiced the opinion that few health issues had greater global importance than the prevention of type 2 diabetes. This <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60222-1/abstract" target="_blank">study of voglibose</a> makes me wish I hadn&#8217;t put it that way. It charts the progression of 1780 Japanese &#8220;patients&#8221; from impaired glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes. These people were not ill at all: they simply had some evidence of compromise to their beta-cell function, causing some of them to go from one arbitrary threshold up to the next. &#8220;Impaired glucose tolerance&#8221; and &#8220;type 2 diabetes&#8221; are not diseases in themselves, they are labels. They are also ISSEPs, important-sounding surrogate end-points for a process we half understand, and which unchecked can lead to patient-important end-points (PIEPs) such as myocardial infarction, visual loss, neuropathy or sepsis. This trial gets several black marks in my book: it compared one ISSEP with another; it compared an expensive new drug with placebo, instead of the best available comparator, which is metformin; it was industry-sponsored, and all the authors had taken fees from Takeda; there was a huge discontinuation rate; it was terminated too early to assess any PIEPs; the reporting of outcomes in the summary is arbitrary and sometimes inaccurate; and so on. Do a-glucosidase inhibitors have an important role to play in the prevention of the risks associated with increasing blood sugar levels? This study doesn&#8217;t give me a clue.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m in drum-banging mode, I would say that few interventions are more important than resuscitation at birth, and if babies are to get the best chance of avoiding brain damage, this needs to be done by somebody good at it as quickly as possible, i.e. by a paediatrician, in a hospital. My &#8220;conflict of interest&#8221; here is that I have fought a long battle to prevent our local obstetric unit from being downgraded to a large midwife-led unit, more than 45 minutes from any paediatric or obstetric help. <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60244-0/abstract" target="_blank">This study from Bristol </a>shows that babies who require resuscitation have an increased risk of a low IQ score at 8 years of age, regardless of their apparent health in the neonatal period.</p>
<p><a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60371-8/abstract" target="_blank">Intracerebral haemorrhage</a> is a gloomy topic, and I really admire those who have attempted to do randomised trials in a situation as urgent and hazardous as this. People have tried dissolving the clot with urokinase and aspirating it stereotactically; limiting its spread with activated recombinanat factor VII; or limiting its damage with neuroprotectant drugs: all to no avail in terms of patient outcomes. The aspects of management that still matter most are secondary ones such as stopping gastric bleeding (which is present in 30% of cases) and lowering blood pressure.</p>
<p><strong>BMJ   9 May 2009  Vol 338</strong><br />
I&#8217;m all for the BMJ publishing papers that will improve clinical practice in primary care, which is why I&#8217;ve put a lot of time and effort into promoting two series in the Practice section and helping to edit one. But I find this <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/may05_1/b1374" target="_blank">research paper from the Netherlands</a> (helped by the Welsh) a bit puzzling. The aim seems to be to reduce antibiotic prescribing for lower respiratory tract infection. Even the full text of the article (on the website) doesn&#8217;t contain enough evidence to satisfy me that this is a safe and laudable aim, or that there was a robust case definition for LRTI in this study. The choice of interventions in this cluster randomised trial was normal care, care guided by measurement of C-reactive protein, or care following a focussed communications skill course. The primary outcome was antibiotic prescribing. This was just over 50% in the non-testing, non-trained group and 25-30% in the other groups, including a group that used both CRP and communications skills. A good study to stimulate discussion; less good to change clinical practice, at least for an old lag like me.</p>
<p>The original title for the series that Anthony Harnden and I proposed to the BMJ was Commoner Than You Think? but on the whole the final title Easily Missed? is better. This is well illustrated by Kawasaki disease, and here is a full <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/may05_1/b1514" target="_blank">clinical review</a> written by Anthony as main author, outside our series. Kawasaki disease is not, as far as we know, commoner than most doctors think: in the UK it is so uncommon that most GPs will never see a case. But if they do, then they must try not to miss it. Treatment with immunoglobulin in the first 10 days can reduce life-threatening complications. I know I&#8217;m biased, but I can&#8217;t think you&#8217;re going to find a better guide to it than this: pore over the pictures, look out for the baby or child who is iller than her/his fever warrants; and don&#8217;t wait for desquamation of the fingers, because by then the coronary arteritis will already have happened.<br />
P.S. Note that this condition, first described by Kawasaki, is never referred to as Kawasaki&#8217;s disease, on either side of the Atlantic. It therefore breaks the usual rules that govern the medical eponymous genitive. Like you care.</p>
<p><strong>Ann Intern Med  5 May 2009  Vol 150</strong><br />
The optimal duration of anticoagulation following deep vein thrombosis depends on the balance between the likelihood of recurrent DVT versus the bleeding risk from continued warfarin. <a title="Ann Intern Med article" href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/150/9/577" target="_blank">This Italian trial (AESOPUS)</a> went on for 7 years but still doesn&#8217;t provide a very clear steer on whether it is useful to perform repeat ultrasonography at 3 months as a guide to continuing anticoagulation at this point. I won&#8217;t try and go into detail but there is a suggestion that outcomes may be better if you adopt the strategy of stopping warfarin at 3 months if the USS shows clear veins, but continuing it for 9-21 months if the veins still look blocked; but you will double the rate of major bleeds.</p>
<p>A lot of us wish that prostate specific antigen testing had never been invented, because its value as a prognostic marker in advanced disease is outweighed by its Perfectly Stupid Attributes as a screening test. <a title="Ann Intern Med article" href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/150/9/595" target="_blank">This study of molecular markers for risk of death from prostate cancer </a>confirms what we were taught as medical students: prostate Ca for most men over 70 is a disease they die with rather than die from - that was true of 78.5% of the men in this study which followed up mainly moderately-differentiated tumours. The Gleason score remains a good basic indicator, but the authors here have come up with three added tissue sample tests which provide some incremental refinement.</p>
<p><strong>Plant of the Week: <em>Paeonia mlokosewitschii<br />
</em></strong>Pardon me, but I can&#8217;t help praising this exquisite flower every year at the time of its appearance. Here is Reginald Farrer trying to remember how to spell its name and what it looks like, holed up in remote Western China in 1913 with a case of whisky and his trusty companion Bill Purdom:</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>P. Mlokosievitschii</em>. - This pleasant little assortment of syllables should be practised daily, but only before dinner (unless teetotal principles of the strictest are adopted), by all who wish to talk familiarly of a sovereign among Paeonies - a rare plant, and rendered almost impregnable by its unpronounceable name. It has an ample habit and lovely dark foliage, amid and above which are borne huge flowers like strayed water-lilies of delicate saffron or citron yellow. It is in the wilds of the Caucasus that this temptation has its lair.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>The English Rock Garden 1918</em></p>
<p>In fact its wide-lobed leaves are of a light rather than a dark green, and the flowers can be of light buff mixed with pink, in what some claim to be the species - though never having been tempted as far as its lair in the wilds of the Caucasus, I wouldn&#8217;t really know. All I know is that in its commonest and best form, Mollie-the-Witch of gardens, the big papery globe-flowers are of an indescribably soft yet intense pure yellow. For a few days each year they are the most beautiful thing in the garden.</p>
<p>Ludwik Franciszek Mlokosiewicz was a Polish explorer, zoologist and botanist (1831-1909). His name has been mangled by botanists, but he can hold no such grouse against zoologists, who get it right in <em>Tetrao mlokosiewiczi</em>, the Caucasian Black Grouse. Strange how people have such difficulty spelling and pronouncing Polish names: Polish is a euphonious language with simple and consistent rules of spelling in the Roman alphabet. Yet even I couldn&#8217;t spell or pronounce my father&#8217;s Christian name till I was about 13. Mieczyslaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/11/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-11-may-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 3 May 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/03/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-3-may-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/03/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-3-may-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 15:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A week of small increments than radical breakthroughs in the medical journal sees Richard break into poetry when faced with some particularly fanciful drug names&#8230;
NEJM  30 Apr 2009  Vol 360
I usually avoid discussing HIV in these columns, because the role of a GP in my part of the world is just to make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" />A week of small increments than radical breakthroughs in the medical journal sees Richard break into poetry when faced with some particularly fanciful drug names&#8230;<span id="more-672"></span><br />
<strong>NEJM  30 Apr 2009  Vol 360</strong><br />
I usually avoid discussing HIV in these columns, because the role of a GP in my part of the world is just to make a timely diagnosis and hand the patient over to an expert for treatment. That can be more difficult than it sounds: a number of people have written to suggest that HIV is an essential topic for our &#8220;Easily Missed&#8221; series in the BMJ, because people still die of it in the UK without the diagnosis ever being made ante mortem. I shall always remember a patient of my own who refused HIV testing until he had florid AIDS and was nearly dead. Thanks to modern antiretroviral treatment, he is perfectly well many years later. So does the timing of antiretroviral therapy really matter? Well, that patient was certainly lucky, and nobody would choose to wait for a person with HIV to become symptomatic before starting treatment, but this quite complex <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/18/1815" target="_blank">long-term study from Canada</a> tries to establish a CD4+ threshold level for treatment, using that most convincing of end-points, death. I won&#8217;t try to describe the results in detail but essentially this large stratified trial shows that earlier is better.</p>
<p>Hepatitis C infection is another bit of complex virology I tend to leave to virologists, though again it brings to mind a memorable patient, this time a former waiter from Barcelona who may have inspired the role of Manuel in Fawlty Towers. His death from hepatocellular carcinoma as a result of hepatitis C infection was awful. That is why successful combined therapy for this indolent and elusive virus would be a great step forward; but it is too early to celebrate, as shown by this paper and the one after it (p.1827). The promising new drug is telaprevir, which is more active against HCV genotype 1 infection than existing agents, and these two trials (<a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/18/1827" target="_blank">PROVE1 </a>and <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/18/1839" target="_blank">PROVE2</a>) use various regimens with peginterferon, with or without ribavirin. It seems you need all three to get a good response in chronic HCV genotype 1 infection: but you are still lucky if more than two-thirds of patients respond.</p>
<p>The main aim of the JUPITER trial was to show that rosuvastatin can lower arterial events in people with low overall cardiovascular risk but slightly raised C-reactive protein. But a large trial like this was also useful for testing the hypothesis that statins can reduce venous thromboembolism as well. Most data to support this had so far been observational, but this <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/18/1851" target="_blank">randomised controlled trial</a> proves that rosuvastatin definitely does protect against VTE. In fact taking deep vein thrombosis on its own, the rate was halved (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.79). Tell me a reason why everyone shouldn&#8217;t be on a statin, sooner or later.</p>
<p><strong>Lancet  2 May 2009  Vol 372</strong><br />
This is certainly a week of small increments rather than breakthroughs in the medical journals, but just how small can an increment be and still be worthwhile? Here we are talking about a survival advantage of 4-5 weeks in people who know they are dying of non-small-cell lung cancer. Given that the drug concerned, cetuximab, seems very well tolerated when added to standard platinum-based chemotherapy, it would seem unkind to grudge this small advantage in patients with advanced disease; but in the long term, the real benefit of <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60569-9/abstract" target="_blank">this study</a> may be in demonstrating that the epidermal growth factor receptor is a useful target for treatment earlier in the disease.</p>
<p>In several situations, such as renal disease, heart failure and cancer, anaemia is associated with an adverse prognosis as well as poorer quality of life. So correcting anaemia using human erythropoiesis-stimulating agents seems a very attractive idea, likely to increase survival as well as make patients feel better. But just like lowering glycated haemoglobin in type 2 diabetes, you can only find out by doing the trials; and then the result may be the opposite of what you expect. This <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60502-X/abstract" target="_blank">meta-analysis of 53 trials of erythropoietin analogues in cancer patients</a> shows a definite increase in mortality. Remember Galileo: until he came along, everybody knew that heavier objects fell faster than light ones, because they made a bigger bump in the ground. But he actually climbed the leaning tower, did the experiment and proved that common sense can deceive. Every specialty of medicine has its Pope and a conclave of cardinals, telling you what to think on pain of banishment: but medicine progresses by taking no notice of them and looking at the facts instead.</p>
<p>Chances are that whatever kind of medicine you practise, you will come across the occasional patient whose life has been saved from haematological malignancy by haemopoietic cell transplantation. For these triumphs we can thank Peter Medawar and others who worked out the fundamentals of modern immunology in a series of painstaking animal and human experiments in the 1940s and 1950s. But the risk of allotransplantation in this situation is that the graft may attack the host, a process first described by Billingham fifty years ago. We now know that graft versus host disease arises when donor T cells respond to genetically defined proteins on host cells. If you have a patient with this condition, or if you want to spend half an hour with a beautifully clear run through this aspect of modern immunology, then <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60237-3/abstract" target="_blank">here is the article you need.<br />
</a></p>
<p>Bring out your silly names! There are <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60255-5/abstract" target="_blank">new drugs in the wings to stimulate platelet production in chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura</a>. I am afraid I shall have to keep to my custom of breaking into verse at this point:</p>
<p>O Thrombocytopenic Purpura!<br />
No subject ever once was murkier,<br />
Till doctors skilled in blood and bone<br />
Started to use Prednisolone;</p>
<p>Or in their fight ‘gainst this Hobgoblin<br />
Resorted to Immunoglobulin;<br />
Else, growing desperate, were seen<br />
Calling the surgeons to remove the spleen.</p>
<p>But Hark! What Silly Names are heard<br />
Approaching to the Haemic Ward?<br />
Let us begin, Rituximab:<br />
Thou first the Silly Prize dost grab.</p>
<p>But now appears Eltrombopag;<br />
The Prize is surely in his bag!<br />
But no, there is yet Romiplostim<br />
Which now the Silly Prize hath lost ‘im.</p>
<p>And now our Poet must confess defeat,<br />
For he his Silly Rhyming Match doth meet:<br />
The latest drug is tamatinib fosdium<br />
‘Gainst which all Poetry is lost, dee dum.</p>
<p>So let us praise the Pharmacologists,<br />
Who spend their time devising bolloxes<br />
Like these, in grand cacophony,<br />
To celebrate the cure of ITP.</p>
<p><strong>BMJ  2 May 2009  Vol 338</strong><br />
The name of Venus has inspired much poetry, some (I confess) even finer than my own. But I am not sure that her name has ever previously been connected with the maggot. I have spent a happy hour trawling through the works of Erasmus Darwin on the Gutenberg site, just to make sure, as this wide-dabbling Midlands GP and versifier is the most likely suspect for such a crime. Charles Darwin&#8217;s grandfather knew perfectly well that maggots were the larvae of insects but he retained a fondness for the old theory of spontaneous generation:</p>
<p>(For) without parents, by spontaneous birth,<br />
Rise the first specks of animated earth.<br />
From Nature&#8217;s womb, the plant or insect swims,<br />
And buds or breathes, with microscopic limbs!<br />
The Temple of Nature 1802</p>
<p>And Venus herself, of course, rose by spontaneous generation from the sea, as you will remember from the Botticelli painting you discovered with awe in your teens, and queued for hours to gawp at in the Uffizi Gallery. However, in this paper the connection is nothing grander than a maggoty pun: <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/mar19_2/b773" target="_blank">VeNUS II </a>investigated larval therapy for venous ulcers. The munching maggots work well for ulcer debridement but do not improve the overall healing rate. The editorial on p.1050 argues that this is a useful contribution, but only if you don&#8217;t have enough trained humans to do the job with a knife. So perhaps maggot therapy will never fly. So the buzz goes &#8230;</p>
<p>Once a woman has had three negative cervical smears, her chance of developing cervical cancer is about 4 in 10,000. This does not vary significantly with age, according to this <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/apr24_1/b1354" target="_blank">prospective observational study </a>from the Netherlands. That seems a fairly straightforward message, easily communicated to most women, but in a national screening programme we seem very averse to giving anyone any choice. A better targeted screening policy is well overdue.</p>
<p>We spend a great deal of time and trouble making sure that patients with chronic systolic heart failure get increasing doses of ACE inhibitors and ß-adrenergic blockers, though the evidence for up-titration of these drugs is extremely weak; but in the UK it is still uncommon to find heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronisation therapy or biventricular pacing. I hope this good little <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr28_2/b1265" target="_blank">clinical review</a> does something to change practice, because this treatment is widely applicable and improves quality of life, reduces hospital admission and reduces mortality. &#8220;Identifying suitable patients is straightforward; there is no upper age limit of benefit; the implant technique is of low risk; and the treatment is highly cost effective.&#8221; So go on, shock your paymasters: don&#8217;t rest content with getting your basic QOF points for heart failure, but while you are about it, go through your HF patients and refer the appropriate ones for pacing.</p>
<p>The <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr28_1/b912" target="_blank">Rational Testing series</a> here advises on the appropriate blood tests for investigating hirsutism. The commonest cause in younger women is polycystic ovarian syndrome, for want of a better label: and here is a useful list of the right biochemistry to send off, if your lab will oblige. Ultrasonography of the ovaries is rarely necessary.</p>
<p><strong>Arch Intern Med  27 Apr 2009  Vol 169</strong><br />
Preventing type 2 diabetes is one of the most urgent public health  tasks in the developed countries of the world: add the Indian subcontinent to that; then China: and you might as well say the whole world. Unfortunately, this <a title="Arch Intern Med article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/8/798" target="_blank">study of lifestyle risk factors and new-onset diabetes</a> looks at an age range where it is no longer so important: an average age of 73 at enrolment, which exceeds the average age at death in many countries. Still, if you are retired in the West and want to know how to avoid diabetes, here are some tips. The dietary score is a mish-mash of fatty factors and glycaemic index, and I make nothing of that; BMI is set at 25, which seems a bit mean; alcohol is beneficial, but only up to 2 units a day; exercise is definitely good; smoking is definitely bad.</p>
<p><strong>Plant of the Week: Magnolia sinensis</strong></p>
<p>This is normally a tree which flowers later in May, but in this year&#8217;s peculiar English spring it is out at the same time as a neighbouring Japanese quince and a lilac bush, giving a strange, unplanned-for palette of colours which would normally appear a month apart. Nothing, however, can spoil the absolute beauty of this small tree&#8217;s pendent flowers of purest white, surrounding a boss of deep red. If you can, plant it on a bank where passers-by can look up and enjoy it, and catch its pungently sensual scent. There is little to choose between this and the almost identical species wilsoniae, but do not bother with their near relative sieboldii, whose flowers disappoint by never opening to their full beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/05/03/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-3-may-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 27 April 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/27/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-27-april-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/27/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-27-april-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This week Richard ponders continuity of care, hibernating myocardium, and whether gluten free bread came before gluten free pasta - or the other way round. 
JAMA  22/29 Apr 2009  Vol 301
&#8220;Continuity of care is a defining attribute of primary care &#8230; (it) is generally recognised to have 3 dimensions - continuity in information, continuity in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" /></p>
<p>This week Richard ponders continuity of care, hibernating myocardium, and whether gluten free bread came before gluten free pasta - or the other way round. <span id="more-665"></span></p>
<p><strong>JAMA  22/29 Apr 2009  Vol 301</strong><br />
&#8220;Continuity of care is a defining attribute of primary care &#8230; (it) is generally recognised to have 3 dimensions - continuity in information, continuity in management, and continuity in the patient-physician relationship.&#8221; This is the opening of an interesting <a title="JAMA paper" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/16/1671" target="_blank">study of primary care as it exists in the USA</a>, a very different beast from primary care in the UK. British primary care doctors now seem almost ashamed to mention the idea of continuity, ever since we leapt gratefully at the chance of restricting our working hours to 52.5 out of the 168 we had formerly covered. But just because we work more bearable hours we shouldn&#8217;t forget the centrality of the principle, and look to extend it to include the kind of continuity this study is about - primary care doctors looking after their patients in hospital. This was once the norm in America, as it was in pre-NHS Britain, but it has been declining steadily there over the last 10 years. Of course it is going to need a change of attitude from both secondary and primary care to reintroduce it to Britain and to preserve it in the USA - but how else is generalism to survive? We need to work much more closely with our hospital physician colleagues rather than lose sight of our patients when they are at their illest. I look forward to a time - preferably before I am on the geriatric unit - when medical ward rounds routinely include a general practitioner. We can&#8217;t work all hours, or be everywhere at once, but continuous responsibility for patients requires that we encourage shared working and better communication.</p>
<p><strong>NEJM  23 Apr 2009  Vol 360</strong><br />
I had two diabetic patients aged between 45 and 55 who were going into severe heart failure and seemed likely to die in the next year or two - in fact one was told she would, in accordance with survival data for diabetics in the major heart failure trials. It took several months of nagging to get these people tested for reversible ischaemia and then treated with coronary bypass surgery. &#8220;Hibernating myocardium&#8221; is not cardiological bullshit but can be the key to survival in patients like these, both of whom are living normal lives several years post-CABG. Never accept a diagnosis of &#8220;diabetic cardiomyopathy&#8221; but insist on perfusion scanning or angiography. But don&#8217;t let the cardiac surgeon tinker with the ventricular architecture itself, unless there is an aneurismal wall or something like that. <a title="NEJM paper" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/17/1705" target="_blank">This trial</a> showed that ventricular reconstruction in patients with HF who undergo CABG does not improve outcomes over CABG alone.</p>
<p>Life begins when two gametes share their genetic material and create the code that makes you. It can end at a stroke when a cerebral artery occludes. Are some people born to die this way? Yes, according to this <a title="NEJM paper" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/17/1718" target="_blank">genomewide study</a> which finds a stroke risk locus on chromosome 12p13. If you want to know more about genomewide studies - and you should, because they are here to stay - then read the excellently clear <a title="NEJM paper" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/360/17/1759" target="_blank">review</a>.</p>
<p>Another nicely written <a title="NEJM paper" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/360/17/1749" target="_blank">review </a>describes minimally invasive knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. So-called &#8220;minimal&#8221; invasion of the knee is shown on figure 3: you have to look hard to see any difference from the traditional incision. It&#8217;s reassuring to learn that &#8220;in both techniques, cutting jigs and anatomic landmarks are used to determine the depth and orientation of tibial and femoral bone resections&#8221;. As I near the time of life when I might need such surgery, the nearer to robotic it becomes, the safer I feel. The words I do not want to read are &#8220;much depends on careful case selection and the skill of the individual operator&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Lancet  25 May 2009  Vol 373</strong><br />
Relax, you&#8217;ve got acute heart failure. This is a terrifying condition and I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d be in a fit state to sign a consent form for an experimental intervention if I was frothing with pulmonary oedema: I&#8217;d just want morphine and furosemide and I would probably not feel at all like relaxin. However, this <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60622-X/abstract" target="_blank">multinational trial (Pre-RELAX-AHF) </a>managed to recruit 243 patients with acute HF and systolic BP above 125 and get them to try out this peptide hormone released in pregnancy which promotes peripheral vasodilatation and renal perfusion. They were not allowed any other vasodilators or any inotropes and I&#8217;m not at all clear what immediate treatment they received within the first 16 hours, before they were randomised to relaxin or placebo. The stuff certainly worked and seems safe, but this phase IIb dose-finding study certainly doesn&#8217;t clarify the use of this hormone sufficiently to predict its place in the future management of acute HF.</p>
<p>There are various situations in which it would be handy to manufacture a new blood vessel, one of them being in <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60248-8/abstract" target="_blank">renal haemodialysis patients</a> whose arterio-venous fistulas are blocking up at all available sites. The new vessels were grown from the patients&#8217; own fibroblasts in sheets around a stainless steel mandrel. Nice word, mandrel; it began by meaning &#8220;a miner&#8217;s pick (1516)&#8221; according to the OED; not to be confused with a mandrill, &#8220;the largest, most hideous, and most ferocious of the baboons, Cyanocephalus maimon or mormon, of W. Africa&#8221; (SOED,1933). Slip the fibroblastic vessel off its mandrel (not mandrill or mormon) and onto the hand of your renal patient, and you have a working fistula in 7 out of 10 cases.</p>
<p>If you have serious multiple trauma then you seriously want your doctors to know what is wrong with you the moment you arrive. So whoomph - through the whole body CT scanner - and there are all your damaged pieces plain to see! This was once a science fiction dream, but now it&#8217;s reality, and immediate whole-body improved survival in this <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60232-4/abstract" target="_blank">survey of data from the German Trauma Society</a>. A more serious-sounding organisation would be hard to conceive.</p>
<p>A long and worthy <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60316-0/abstract" target="_blank">seminar on early breast cancer</a> covers almost all its bases: it is really just a long review of every kind of breast cancer except the kind I most want to know more about - which is early intraductal carcinoma, the kind that gets picked up on mammograms. There was a distressing letter in the BMJ a few weeks ago from a woman who had undergone all sorts of unpleasant and mutilating treatment for a condition which might perhaps have regressed spontaneously. Or does it? I await another review.</p>
<p>For some reason the Italians have a long history of research into coeliac disease, and I believe - though don&#8217;t take my word for it - that gluten-free pasta was invented before gluten-free bread. Two Italian gastroenterologists here present another <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60254-3/abstract" target="_blank">comprehensive review</a> of a condition which is ten times commoner than we thought up to 15 years ago. It&#8217;s a great illustration of the way that diagnostic tests - first antibodies and now genotyping - can revolutionise our understanding, but can also put in doubt much conventional wisdom about a condition. It&#8217;s far from clear, for example, that forcing asymptomatic people with positive tests to avoid gluten does them any favours - and most of them give up the diet anyway. But the thing I always look for in a paper of this kind is a reference to <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/318/7177/164" target="_blank">Hin et al, BMJ 1999</a>, because I urged this primary care case-finding study on Harold with the words &#8220;do this and everyone who writes about coeliac disease in the future will cite Hin et al.&#8221;  Well, ten years on and they still are: it&#8217;s reference 90 in this article and it was also cited in the <em>Arch Intern Med</em> systematic review I mentioned last week. If Harold Hin had decided to become an academic, instead of using his wisdom and energy to manage my practice with kindly efficiency, the research literature of primary care would be so much the richer.</p>
<p><strong>BMJ   25 Apr 2009  Vol 338</strong><br />
People with a tender spot over the greater trochanter are traditionally said to have trochanteric bursitis, but there is scant evidence that this condition really exists - see the <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr21_1/b713" target="_blank">editorial</a> accompanying a <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/apr14_1/b1088" target="_blank">randomised controlled trial</a>. I have given hundreds of steroid injections at such points and find that they give relief in about half of the patients - the same as in this trial. Exposing people to radiation in the form of fluoroscopic guidance will result in more steroid reaching the synovial fold over the greater trochanter, but will make no difference to the rate of success. Steroid injections make people feel better, and the lateral thigh is a convenient spot for injecting triamcinolone. This will prevent hay fever, amongst other things. Often it relieves lateral thigh pain as well. Or shoulder pain, as we learnt the other week.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure by what criteria the BMJ decides which papers to print in compressed form as a pico research article, as opposed to the full Monty, but <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/mar31_2/b897" target="_blank">this one on high dose inhaled steroid for wheeze following respiratory syncytial virus</a> is certainly worth looking up in full on the website if you deal with such children - as we GPs do all winter long - and are tempted to use this treatment in the hope of reducing airways inflammation. Because it doesn&#8217;t work: in fact nothing works. This is a damned elusive pimpernel.</p>
<p><a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr14_1/b1180" target="_blank">This article</a> reviews all the evidence we have about clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes. It does not, however, discuss in detail the recent evidence that clopidogrel doesn&#8217;t get converted into its active metabolite in about a third of the population. So much work for nothing, if prasugrel replaces this drug completely in the near future, as I think is likely.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t write many papers myself, but comfort myself with the thought that I am sometimes the cause of papers from others. The <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr20_1/b946" target="_blank">study which gave rise to this article on diagnostic strategies used in primary care</a> was carried out by Carl Heneghan et al without any prompting from me, but it did coincide with my urging the BMJ to run a whole series on primary care diagnosis, mapped out by Kevin Barraclough. I found myself without time to remain part of the series team, but <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr20_1/b1187" target="_blank">here </a>are the first results, which I urge you, with all due partiality, to read, mark, learn and inwardly digest. The diagnostic methods discussed here are those actually observed to be used in real primary care. The point is not so much that they are original to this paper - though some are - but that this is the first time they have been studied and discussed in this way, and illustrated with a large series of examples, of which the first is excluding serious illness in feverish children (p.1006).</p>
<p><strong>Ann Intern Med  April 2009<br />
</strong>I couldn&#8217;t find much of interest in the printed journal this week, but I will break my usual rule and point you to the Annals website for an <a title="Ann Intern Med article" href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/0000605-200906020-00118v1" target="_blank">early release article</a>.<br />
&#8220;Glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: time for an evidence-based about-face?&#8221;, by two US authors, presents exactly the same argument that Harlan Krumholz and I made in our BMJ editorial last week. We have decided not to add to the responses, which reach top numbers for a second week. This article does the job for us, in more detail than we had space for, with excellent summaries of all the available evidence proving that reduction of glycated haemoglobin below 7.5 in established type 2 diabetes is a misdirected effort.</p>
<p><strong>Plant of the Week: Dicentra formosa &#8220;Langtrees White&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>The dicentras are great friends for the neglectful gardener, growing well in most situations without any attention, and forming good clumps of pretty cut greyish foliage with flowers of pink or white over a long period. This one holds its flowers relatively high whereas the two other whites, Dicentra cucullaria and D. eximea &#8220;Alba&#8221; have purer white flowers closer to the leaves. The plants are easily split, so a friend with one will probably oblige you with a bit if you indulge in persuasive admiration.</p>
<p>The showy sister of these plants is the Bleeding Heart, of which enough said. If you must have a showy dicentra, try and find D. macrantha, a Chinese plant with hanging pale yellow flowers of a very odd and intriguing shape. Not for my garden, as it &#8220;needs shelter from any wind, and from late frost, and a moist  leafy and sandy soil, with protection from slugs.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/27/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-27-april-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 19 April 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/20/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-19-april-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/20/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-19-april-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This week, Richard immerses himself in diabetes (&#8221;What a mess&#8221;), before covering an extensive range of subjects from the polypill to suicide, IQ, hyperhidrosis, and &#8220;irritable&#8221; bowels - all the while planning to compile &#8220;The Good Death Cookbook&#8221; - maybe&#8230;

JAMA  15 Apr 2009  Vol 301
Diabetes: what a mess. You can get some idea of it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" /><strong></strong></p>
<p>This week, Richard immerses himself in diabetes (&#8221;What a mess&#8221;), before covering an extensive range of subjects from the polypill to suicide, IQ, hyperhidrosis, and &#8220;irritable&#8221; bowels - all the while planning to compile &#8220;The Good Death Cookbook&#8221; - maybe&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-656"></span></p>
<p><strong>JAMA  15 Apr 2009  Vol 301</strong><br />
Diabetes: what a mess. You can get some idea of it from this week&#8217;s JAMA, which is devoted to the diseases which cause sugary urine. The <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/15/1547" target="_blank">DIAD study </a>lumped together 1123 patients with &#8220;type 2&#8243; diabetes - mostly a cyclical process of insulin resistance and progressive beta-cell failure. This confers a risk of coronary artery disease which varies from enormously increased in younger women to modestly increased in older men. The aim here was to discover and treat asymptomatic coronary artery disease and compare outcomes at a median of about 5 years. There was no significant difference. But the event rates were lower than predicted, which is something that always happens in cardiovascular trials these days, because so many patients are already on protective treatments. And the screening test was frankly rubbish: adenosine-stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging, which had a positive predictive value of 12%.</p>
<p>Most dementia is vascular; most of it occurs in old people; and more of it occurs in old people with diabetes (hazard ratio 1.6). That&#8217;s all very straightforward, but how does treatment affect this outcome? Well, it probably cuts both ways, but the evidence isn&#8217;t all that good. <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/15/1565" target="_blank">This study of integrated health care records in California</a> traces 16 667 patients with type 2 diabetes between 1980 and 2002 and finds that severe hypoglycaemia carries a risk of dementia proportionate to the number of episodes. Something to bear in mind if you believe in tight glycaemic control. On the other hand, <a title="Diabetologia article" href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/nh5u16n3nr85up04/fulltext.pdf" target="_blank">a study which has just appeared on-line in Diabetologia (Xu WL et al) </a>found that poor fasting blood sugar control (&gt;7.8mmol/L) was associated with an increase in Alzheimer&#8217;s disease in their Swedish cohort of  1 475 elderly people with type 2 diabetes followed up for 9 years.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s switch to youngsters who suddenly get type 1 diabetes. There is a whiff of optimism around them: a cure may even be within our grasp. This would have to arrest and reverse the auto-immune process which ends in total beta-cell destruction, and <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/297/14/1568" target="_blank">promising results were reported in 2007</a> using autologous nonmyeloablative haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. I&#8217;m not going to try and explain this to you: you can look it up in <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/297/14/1599" target="_blank">JAMA 2007;297:1599</a>. Sceptics raised their eyebrows at reports of insulin independence in these 23 patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes, aged between 13 and 31; but <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/15/1573" target="_blank">this report</a> confirms that this has lasted for a mean of 31 months in 12 of the patients. Moreover, they show increasing levels of C-peptide, a marker for beta-cell function; so a cure may be on the cards for some of them. But against this, the procedure carries a risk of severe infection, late endocrine dysfunction and infertility.</p>
<p>So can diabetes be cured? Here&#8217;s a <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/301/15/1588" target="_blank">two-page whistle-stop guide</a> to all the ways we might do it. Currently we can cure a few patients with type 1 using whole pancreas transplants, and a lot of patients with type 2 using bariatric surgery. So many, in fact, that some kind of rationing will need to be imposed, and <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/301/15/1593" target="_blank">another article</a> argues that we should start with a BMI over 50.</p>
<p>The last year has seen the publication of three good long-term randomised trials - ACCORD, ADVANCE and VADT - proving that glycaemic control below HbA1c of 7 does not improve outcomes in type 2 diabetes. The only room for argument is about so-called &#8220;microvascular&#8221; outcomes - a curious rag-bag category which ranges from microalbuminuria to renal death and from background retinopathy to blindness. There was a 21% reduction in &#8220;nephropathy&#8221; from five years&#8217; tight control in ACCORD, but I personally would not bargain a higher risk of hypoglycaemia for slightly less detectable protein in my pee when I&#8217;m 70-something, which is what this actually means. Read all about it in the <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/mar05_2/b800" target="_blank">editorial </a>I wrote with Harlan Krumholz in this week&#8217;s BMJ. Then compare it with <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/301/15/1590" target="_blank">this piece about the three studies entitled &#8220;Glucose control in type 2 diabetes: still worthwhile and worth pursuing&#8221;</a>. As Harlan headed his e-mail to me, &#8220;you gotta be kidding.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>NEJM  16 Apr 2009  Vol 360</strong><br />
The Intelligence Quotient (IQ) is about the most criticised measurement in the whole of science, but faute de mieux it&#8217;s the chosen one in this important study of fetal exposure to antiepileptic drugs. I&#8217;ve never tried to join MENSA or to test my own IQ, but I imagine that&#8217;s easy-peasy compared with doing it in three-year-olds. Anyway, that&#8217;s what the <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/16/1597" target="_blank">NEAD study</a> did on an interim basis to 309 children born to mothers taking sodium valproate, phenytoin, carbamazepine or lamotrigine. The take-home message (if you believe it) is that valproate is the drug most likely to impair IQ and lamotrigine the least likely. More data from more IQ tests in three years&#8217; time.</p>
<p>Among medics the best known Italian group after the Mafia is called GISSI - Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell&#8217;Infarto Miocardico. Give yourself a treat, say it out aloud. For some reason, they decided it was worth <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/16/1606" target="_blank">studying the effect of valsartan on the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion</a>. Ecco, valsartan has no effect on recurrent AF.</p>
<p>The journals all have a bit about diabetes this week, and in <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/360/16/1646" target="_blank">this case</a> it&#8217;s the genetics of type 1A diabetes. That&#8217;s plain type 1 to you and me, if you believe in these distinctions - for a sceptical view, download and keep Declassifying Diabetes, an entertaining editorial by EAM Gale, <a title="Diabetologia article" href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/003q205336211029/fulltext.pdf" target="_blank">Diabetologia 2006;49:1989</a>. Genome-wide studies have uncovered lots of risk loci, none of them worth committing to memory unless you are a seriously demented gene gnome. Essentially things have only got worse since 1976 when James Neel, a leading geneticist of the time, titled a book chapter &#8220;Diabetes Mellitus: A Geneticist&#8217;s Nightmare.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Lancet  18 Apr 2009  Vol 373</strong><br />
Gah! Having waded through the diabetic mire for weeks, I&#8217;m not sure I can face another study with too many interventions and a mass of surrogate end-points. The original Polypill, you may remember, was a single tablet containing several ingredients, to be taken by everybody over a certain age, to save bothering with coronary risk scores. Here, by contrast, are several different Polycaps to be taken by a variety of different single-risk groups with ages between 45 and 80. The drugs in combination behave more or less exactly as you would expect them to. Simvastatin lowers cholesterol, aspirin reduces urinary thromboxane B2, atenolol lowers the pulse rate and blood pressure, ramipril and bendroflumethiazide just lower BP. The point being? I can&#8217;t tell you, because I can&#8217;t work it out. Even when it gets some real end-points, I can&#8217;t see what <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60611-5/abstract" target="_blank">this study</a> is going to prove.</p>
<p>The Lancet&#8217;s contribution to diabetic enlightenment this week is the <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60218-X/abstract" target="_blank">CALDIRET study</a> in which German ophthalmologists discover that calcium dobesilate does not prevent diabetic macular oedema. So that&#8217;s that for calcium dobesilate. But the editorial about the trial on p.1316 ends with an Icelandic riddle which I want you to think about:<br />
&#8220;We should distinguish between the prevention of retinopathy and the prevention of diabetic blindness. Diabetic blindness can be reduced or prevented without preventing retinopathy. Systematic screening for diabetic retinopathy and preventive laser treatment for those who develop macular oedema or proliferative retinopathy reduces the rate of blindness to about 0.5% in the diabetic population, irrespective of the prevalence of retinopathy.&#8221;<br />
If I read this right, the 25% reduction in &#8220;microvascular endpoints&#8221; reported in tight control group of UKPDS, which consisted largely of diabetic retinopathy, has no meaning for the patient important outcome, which is visual loss. Blimey, I am losing the will to live.</p>
<p>So on to suicide. Here&#8217;s a <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60372-X/abstract" target="_blank">longish seminar</a> on the subject, full of interesting detail. International differences in suicide rates are very striking. Social factors, the availability of methods, and even the media coverage of prominent examples all seem to have a stronger influence than medical interventions. Nonetheless, it&#8217;s possible that primary care detection and treatment of depression may have a small role in preventing suicide.</p>
<p>I was hoping that <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60692-9/abstract" target="_blank">mitral regurgitation</a> might provide an oasis of mechanical simplicity in a somewhat gruelling week of medical reading: but not so. The valve itself looks deceptively simple but it gets distorted by whatever is happening to the left atrium and especially the left ventricle. You can look at lovely coloured whooshes of blood on Doppler echo but knowing when to intervene and how is anything but simple. It is particularly tricky to work out the chicken-and-egg situation of &#8220;functional&#8221; MR in heart failure, where the ventricular remodelling distorts the valve, the leakage of blood back into the atrium distorts the atrium, and atrial dilatation further opens the valve. This is not good news for the failing heart. But intervene at your peril.</p>
<p><strong>BMJ  18 Apr 2009  Vol 338</strong><br />
Here&#8217;s the abbreviated version of a <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/mar05_2/b688" target="_blank">Swedish study of the effect of exercise in middle-aged men on their eventual longevity</a>. Doing exercise between the ages of 50 and 60 has no immediate effect on mortality, but look again ten years later and the effect is as large as giving up smoking. Alas, for me, it may be too late because (a) I have only one year left before 60, (b) if I increase my exercise now I may actually increase my immediate mortality risk and (c) I&#8217;m too busy writing these things.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re the kind of doctor who looks after burns and scalds, here&#8217;s a nice clear <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr08_1/b1037" target="_blank">clinical review</a>. It seems that there haven&#8217;t been any major advances in recent years, and it&#8217;s high time we got some new ways to deal with large area burns.</p>
<p>The educational pages of the BMJ win out over the research studies almost every week, and I certainly learnt something from this &#8220;<a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr07_1/b1166" target="_blank">Patient&#8217;s Journey&#8221; piece about hyperhidrosis</a>. I was vaguely aware that there was a treatment called iontophoresis but no patient of mine has ever accessed it and I was quite unaware of how life-changing it can be. On the other hand, it does have to be given once a week and nobody quite knows how it works. There is a useful list of support groups.</p>
<p>Obstructive sleep apnoea in adults: do you miss it? Read <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr07_1/b1165" target="_blank">this short piece</a> to find out. OK, this is just a short plug for our new series Easily Missed. Suggestions for new topics are always welcome.</p>
<p><strong>Arch Intern Med  13 Apr 2009  Vol 169</strong><br />
&#8220;Irritable Bowel Syndrome&#8221; is a dustbin diagnosis and I long for some rational means of explaining it to patients and some rational way to treat it. When serological testing for coeliac disease became available in the mid-1990s, I was sure that a trawl through our IBS patients would yield rich pickings, and that was the basis for my work partner Harold Hin&#8217;s landmark case finding study published in 1999. But we actually failed to find an increased prevalence in IBS. Others have done larger studies since then, and here is a <a title="Arch Intern Med article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/7/651" target="_blank">systematic review</a>. On the whole, coeliac disease is four times as prevalent in people with &#8220;irritable&#8221; bowels.</p>
<p>It sometimes seems to me that I am the only person who doesn&#8217;t know what unhealthy food is. I even thought of compiling a book called The Good Death Cookbook, junking the idea that you can stay healthy by avoiding certain types of food. Eat what you like, provided it includes lots of fresh fruit and vegetables, and just the amount of energy you need. <a title="Arch Intern Med article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/7/659" target="_blank">Here is an attempt to review all the evidence</a> supporting a causal link between dietary factors and coronary heart disease. I am delighted to see that there is insufficient evidence to exclude any kind of food, including saturated fat, meat or eggs; salt isn&#8217;t even mentioned. On the other hand, there is good evidence to yum up monounsaturated fat and eat like a Mediterranean.</p>
<p>Having eaten your Mediterranean food, you need to burn it off. This <a title="Arch Intern Med article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/7/694" target="_blank">cluster randomised trial</a> was conducted in Bilbao and Toledo - more Atlantic than Mediterranean bits of Spain - and assessed exercise prescribed in primary care. It provides some evidence that Spaniards who take too little exercise take a bit more when it is offered to them by their GPs.</p>
<p><strong>Plant of the Week: <em>Koelreuteria paniculata</em></strong></p>
<p>I love trees with shrimp-pink new foliage in the spring. The one most often grown is <em>Acer pseudoplatanus</em> &#8220;Brilliantissimum&#8221;, which lives up to its name for a short season, though it is better to grow the related clone &#8220;Prinz Handjery&#8221; for leaves that don&#8217;t brown off so readily, and also for its frequent yellow flower spikes. Another slow-growing aristocrat is the little horse chestnut which sounds like a haematological malignancy, <em>Aesculus erythroblastos</em>. This produces wonderful tiers of pink fingers followed by typical horse chestnut flowers a week or two later. But perhaps the best all-year value is provided by this small tree or large shrub, the Golden Rain Tree.</p>
<p>I say small tree, because that is what it is likely to be in central England; in a favoured European spot, it might reach 20m, and the one in Sydney Botanical Garden grows well above that. At this point in the English spring, the tree is bursting with flame-like projections of flesh pink, which in time will become dark green pinnate leaves of uniquely complex form. Then in August, it will cover itself in panicles of golden yellow flower. As autumn sets in, these will produce bladder-like fruits and the leaves will turn bright yellow. What more can you ask? Scent, I suppose, and blue flowers, but our climate will never, alas, support the jacaranda tree.</p>
<p>Make do with this, if you have space. And try throwing a viticella clematis up it, to flower darkly amidst its golden rain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/20/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-19-april-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 14 April 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/14/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-14-april-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/14/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-14-april-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>julietwalker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ann Intern Med]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bmj]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heart failure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[human brown fat]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[JAMA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lancet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEJM]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nicotine replacement therapy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Human brown fat deposits and the effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy are just two of the subjects touched on this week by Richard Lehman in his journal review, which also includes a parody of a T S  Eliot poem read by Dylan Thomas. 
JAMA  8 Apr 2009  Vol 301
Whenever you look at a trial with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="126" align="left" /></p>
<p>Human brown fat deposits and the effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy are just two of the subjects touched on this week by Richard Lehman in his journal review, which also includes a parody of a T S  Eliot poem read by Dylan Thomas. <span id="more-648"></span></p>
<p><strong>JAMA  8 Apr 2009  Vol 301</strong></p>
<p>Whenever you look at <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/14/1439">a trial with heart failure in the title</a>, bear in mind that the average age of patients with breathlessness attributable to impaired circulation in the UK is 76, most of them have co-morbidity, and about half of them have a systolic ejection fraction over 45%. I have read most of the HF trials carried out up to 2006, and many beyond, and I can’t think of a single one which has recruited a population like this. However, if you have some younger male patients with an ejection fraction under 35, then you might like to look at this randomised control of exercise, because 72% of the recruited patients were male and their mean age was 59. Thirty-six sessions of exercise failed to make any significant difference to survival or hospitalisation. The crumbs of comfort which the investigators gather are (a) you can do some retrospective subgroup tweaking and create a 13% benefit to fitter patients (but this is what is known as cheating), (b) patients with this type of HF did not die during exercise, and (c) using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire you can extract a small but statistically significant improvement in score, for all this effort. <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/14/1451">See p.1451</a> if you want to decide if this is clinically relevant.</p>
<p>“As we get older we do not get any younger” begins a wonderful parody which sums up the message of TS Eliot’s Four Quartets. Like everyone between the ages of fifty and sixty, Eliot was struck by the feeling that increasing age does not bring any increase in wisdom or tranquillity. This is the message of the brown-baked compound familiar ghost in section II of Little Gidding, ending<br />
From wrong to wrong the exasperated spirit<br />
Proceeds, unless restored by that refining fire<br />
Where you must move in measure, like a dancer.<br />
I suppose ghosts are allowed to jumble their metaphors a bit. It is true that old age brings no relief from exasperation, or generalised anxiety: but cognitive behavioural therapy can be used with good effect, as this <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/14/1460">randomised trial in 67-year olds</a> shows. But in this instance the comparator was usual care, rather than dancing in that refining fire.<br />
<strong><br />
NEJM  9 Apr 2009  Vol 360</strong></p>
<p>There is a two-way relationship between asthma and acid reflux: if acid trickles up your oesophagus at night, you are more likely to cough and wheeze, and if you cough and wheeze you push your gastro-oesophageal sphincter up through your diaphragm and get more reflux. So how about trying a proton pump inhibitor for your poorly controlled asthmatics? Don’t bother, is the message of this <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/15/1487">double-blind randomised trial</a> which used an expensive new PPI, esomeprazole, even though it wasn’t sponsored by the drug’s manufacturers. Not only does this study bin the idea of treating asthma with PPIs, but it also goes a long way to disproving the notion that asymptomatic reflux has an important role in refractory asthma.</p>
<p>Large sections of this week’s New England Journal are covered in brown fat, as if it had been left near the oven and someone had rested the Easter roast on it. The fat in question, however, has not bubbled from some delicious piece of meat but from the hidden recesses of healthy adults. You probably have some yourself, although in your pre-clinical course you were taught that it only occurs in newborn babies and small rodents. But if you look hard enough, especially in the supraclavicular area, you will probably find some scattered deposits of cold-activated brown adipose tissue, just as if you were an infant or a vole. And their function is probably the same – to convert energy into heat and so preserve core temperature through thermogenesis. The thinner you are, the more likely you are to have brown fat, and the colder you are, the more likely it is to show metabolic activity. This is illustrated in <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/15/1500">three papers</a> which display some stunning feats of scientific technique, based on PET-CT scanning after the injection of 18F-flourodeoxyglucose. In this first study, we are shown the distribution of brown fat in 24 healthy young men of varying adiposity.</p>
<p><a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/15/1509">The next study</a> looks at the presence of brown fat in nearly two thousand patients who had had PET-CT isotope scans performed for diagnostic purposes in a single US centre. It seems that three times as many women as men have substantial reserves of brown fat, but that the amount falls with age in both sexes. Oddly enough, if you take a beta-blocker you are ten times less likely to show brown fat activity.</p>
<p><a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/15/1518">The third study</a> goes studies the metabolic function of human brown fat in greater detail thanks to the altruism of five healthy volunteers from Finland and Sweden. They submitted themselves to the afore-mentioned PET-CT scans and radioactive isotopes, exposed one foot to immersion in icy water, and also allowed a plastic surgeon to delve into their supraclavicular regions in search of the elusive brown adipocytes. As a result we know a lot more about the cellular function of human brown fat cells and the fact that their metabolism increases fifteen-fold during exposure to cold. But now that we have found this “hidden organ” which turns fat into heat, can we switch it on to treat obesity by a process of autocombustion? Alas, the prospects seem poor, for reasons discussed in the useful editorial on p.1553.</p>
<p>Myocarditis may perhaps be commoner than we think, since much of it occurs following viral illnesses and remits spontaneously after an initial phase of dilated cardiomyopathy. Without doing echocardiograms on everyone who feels tired and easily exhausted after flu, we’ll never know and it probably doesn’t matter. But in other circumstances, inflammation of the cells we depend on to keep us alive can be a very serious business indeed, and <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/360/15/1526">this review</a> is an excellent single-author guide to the clinical scenarios by which it presents and their consequences – table 1 is required reading for anyone mugging up for medical membership.</p>
<p><strong>Lancet  11 Apr 2009  Vol 338</strong></p>
<p>Taking an oral bisphosphonate is a ritual lasting at least half an hour, during which you must drink lots of water and stay upright. Intravenous zoledronic acid on the other hand can achieve the same effect in 15 minutes once a year. <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60250-6/abstract">This multicentre trial</a> (HORIZON) in patients taking long-term oral glucocorticoids doesn’t really tell us much that we didn’t already know: it shows that in these patients IV zoledronic acid is superior to daily risedronate on all counts except immediate side-effects, both for treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. The end-points were bone density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at 6 and 12 months, and four measurements of two biomarkers for bone turnover: β-C-terminal telopeptides of type 1collagen (βCTx) and procollagen type1aminoterminal propeptide (P1NP). It’s time we gave up oral bisphosphonates and got our practice nurses trained up to give IV zoledronic acid to all our patients needing osteoporosis prevention and treatment.</p>
<p>The noble tradition of the healthy volunteer is alive and well in medicine, and we should salute such individuals whenever we hear of them. In my overlong piece on bed bugs last week, I failed to mention RL Usinger who fed himself to a colony of them every week for seven years to study his reactions to their bites. I make amends here. I also hail the heroes of <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60322-6/abstract">this study</a> on the effect of avotermin on the healing of scars. These volunteers were literally scarred for life by this experiment, but those who had avotermin injected before full-thickness skin wounds were inflicted on them showed better healing, as judged blindly by a panel of doctors and lay people. It seems that we need more trials of this transforming growth factor in real surgical situations such as cosmetically prominent procedures, or in individuals with a tendency to form keloid.</p>
<p>The avotermin study was a nice simple proof-of-concept job, but this <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60566-3/abstract">next proof-of-concept study </a>is anything but straightforward. It seems to prove the concept that catheter ablation of the renal sympathetic nerves can cure resistant hypertension. The results are certainly impressive: reductions of a mean 27/17 mm Hg at one year of follow-up in patients who had previously stayed above 177/101 despite treatment with three or more drugs. But there are some very pertinent questions raised about the entry criteria in the accompanying editorial (p.1228), and it is likely to be some time before we send off our uncontrolled hypertensives to the renal catheter lab.</p>
<p>Everybody should take regular salicylates: that’s not as controversial a statement as it sounds, because salicylates are abundant in most fresh vegetables and fruits. The real question addressed by this <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60243-9/abstract">systematic review</a> is whether everybody should take artificial salicylate (aspirin) to prevent cancer. Pretty well all the evidence – observational and interventional – suggests that aspirin confers some protection against colonic cancer, but probably only after ten years of continuous dosing. Similar regular intake may also protect against cancers of the oesophagus, stomach and breast: an effect shared by other NSAIDs and rapidly lost on discontinuation.<br />
<strong><br />
BMJ  11 Apr 2009  Vol 338<br />
</strong><br />
Those of you who follow guidelines probably prescribe nicotine replacement therapy as first line treatment when people ask for help to stop smoking. Very well: you will double cessation rates compared with nothing, but for long term abstinence the number-needed-to-treat is 29. <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/apr02_3/b1024">This systematic review</a> does not discuss other treatments or whether patients benefit from long-term maintenance therapy, since these questions are not addressed by the trials they examine. But the fact is that there are more effective alternatives, especially combined treatment, and since nicotine addiction is harder to break and much more harmful than opioid addiction, long-term substitution therapy is quite logical. For more useful studies, see Ann Intern Med.</p>
<p>I spent my student elective in 1974 staying with a family in Iran, which ever since then I have regarded as the most hospitable and civilised country in the world. I refer to individuals rather than governments, of course; and I write, admittedly, as a male who has visited only a few countries in the world. If you go anywhere near a native person in Iran, you will be approached courteously and offered a glass of scalding hot tea, with a lump of sugar to hold between your teeth as you drink it. The harmful effect on the incisor teeth of some Iranians is easy to observe, but the effect on the Iranian oesophagus has only just come to be realised. <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/mar26_2/b929">This case-control study</a> examines tea-drinking habits in relation to the extraordinary incidence of oesophageal cancer in northern Iran. The hotter the tea and the faster you gulp it, the more likely you are to get cancer of the oesophagus.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/7699.jpg" alt="cover image7699" width="160" height="214" align="left" />Here is a <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/mar31_1/b936">good practical account</a> of the cauda equina syndrome, beautifully illustrated with a horse’s tail of nerves on the <a href="http://www.bmj.com/current.dtl">front cover of this week’s BMJ</a>. Fortunately, it is rare, and any given GP may never see a case in her/his life; by the same token, it is unfortunately easy to miss. The moral here is that anyone with increasing urinary difficulty or retention should be tested for loss of perianal sensation, whether or not there are any back or leg symptoms. This article is unusual (and commendable) for its inclusion of medicolegal data, which show that although orthopaedic surgeons may be more likely to get sued, GPs also need to watch out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/apr06_1/b1043">Investigating hypertension in a young person</a> is certainly a challenge to Rational Testing, but I continue to find this series disappointing. Hypertension presents to GPs, and we have to do the testing: we are accustomed to being told how to be rational by clinical biochemists and academics, but also accustomed to ignoring them. The fact is that primary aldosteronism is a difficult diagnosis to establish, which is why we miss most of it, and this piece skates over the difficulties in order to reach the unusually neat outcome in their chosen patient, who became normotensive following removal of a solitary right adrenal tumour. In real life, this is a minefield of inadequate sampling conditions, incidentalomas, and variable responses to targeted treatment. To pretend it is simple is a bit of a Conn.<br />
<strong><br />
Ann Intern Med  7 Apr 2009  Vol 150</strong></p>
<p>One of the questions raised in this week’s BMJ systematic review of nicotine replacement is whether psychological support really does have an effect beyond the effect of the nicotine. <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/150/7/437">This Kansas study</a> attempted to address a slightly wider question, using a range of options, including nicotine replacement or bupropion, with or without psychological support, or the latter alone, at one of two levels of intensity. All smokers were targeted, whether or not they were “ready to quit”, and the study ran for two years, so that people could have more than one go at quitting. The outcome was self-reported cessation, which was about the same in all groups, and pretty impressive at 23-27%. Nonetheless the investigators conclude that more psychological support can produce better results.</p>
<p>For the great majority of smokers, the greatest health benefit we can offer them is help to give up smoking. This is especially true of medically ill smokers, and <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/150/7/447">this trial</a> randomised 127 of them to receive either a nicotine patch alone for 10 weeks or as many patches, inhalators or prescriptions for bupropion as they liked for as long as they liked. This was a small, rather crude unblinded trial with 25% of participants lost to follow-up, but the combination group did almost twice as well.</p>
<p>Confused about the association of low-density lipoprotein subfractions with cardiovascular outcomes? Don’t worry: <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/150/7/474">this systematic review</a> shows that everybody is. And will probably stay that way, harmlessly.<br />
<strong><br />
Parody of the Week: Chard Whitlow by Henry Reed (1941)</strong></p>
<p>If you know the Four Quartets by TS Eliot, you will never be able to read them in quite the same way again once you’ve heard or read this parody, written at the time of the London Blitz when Eliot was a fire warden - hence the references to hiding under the stairs or in the Tube, and to stirrup-pumps.</p>
<p>As we get older we do not get any younger.<br />
Seasons return, and today I am fifty-five,<br />
And this time last year I was fifty-four,<br />
And this time next year I shall be sixty-two.<br />
And I cannot say I should like (to speak for myself)<br />
To see my time over again— if you can call it time:<br />
Fidgeting uneasily under a draughty stair,<br />
Or counting sleepless nights in the crowded Tube.</p>
<p>There are certain precautions— though none of them very reliable—<br />
Against the blast from bombs and the flying splinter,<br />
But not against the blast from heaven, vento dei venti,<br />
The wind within a wind unable to speak for wind;<br />
And the frigid burnings of purgatory will not be touched<br />
By any emollient.<br />
I think you will find this put,<br />
Better than I could ever hope to express it,<br />
In the words of Kharma: &#8220;It is, we believe,<br />
Idle to hope that the simple stirrup-pump<br />
Will extinguish hell.&#8221;<br />
Oh, listeners,<br />
And you especially who have turned off the wireless,<br />
And sit in Stoke or Basingstoke listening appreciatively to the silence,<br />
(Which is also the silence of hell) pray not for your selves but your souls.<br />
And pray for me also under the draughty stair.<br />
As we get older we do not get any younger.</p>
<p>And pray for Kharma under the holy mountain.<br />
You can hear Dylan Thomas <a href="http://www.poets.org/poet.php/prmPID/150">reading it here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/14/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-14-april-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 5 April 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/05/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-5-april-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/05/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-5-april-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
From bed bugs via the Roman goddess of dawn - complete with Latin poetry - to Siberian bug bane: Richard takes us through the Big Four in his usual inimitable fashion.

JAMA  1 April 2009  Vol 301
This pragmatic trial from Seattle looked at whether it was more cost-effective to provide housing and support for homeless people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" /></p>
<p>From bed bugs via the Roman goddess of dawn - complete with Latin poetry - to Siberian bug bane: Richard takes us through the Big Four in his usual inimitable fashion.</p>
<p><span id="more-640"></span></p>
<p><strong>JAMA  1 April 2009  Vol 301</strong><br />
This <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/13/1349" target="_blank">pragmatic trial from Seattle</a> looked at whether it was more cost-effective to provide housing and support for homeless people with severe alcohol problems or keep them on a waiting list and let them turn up to hospitals, prisons, shelters and emergency services in the usual way. Remarkably, by providing housing for these despised individuals, they halved the costs they incurred: this study proves that it is actually cheaper to provide homes for &#8220;hopeless drunks&#8221; than to leave them to fend for themselves.</p>
<p>Here is a <a title="JAMA article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/13/1358" target="_blank">Clinical Review of Cimex lectularius</a>, the humble blood-sucking bed bug which is seldom a vector for disease and doesn&#8217;t even cause itchy bite marks on 70% of its victims. It is nevertheless a curse to hoteliers and hard to get rid of. There is apparently a Mexican proverb which advises that &#8220;the best way to put an end to bed bugs is to set fire to the bed&#8221;. In fact there are stories and proverbs and curses associated with bed bugs from the dawn of literature, and from all parts of the world. The little beasts feature in the earliest bedroom jokes, together with copulation and farting, just as in the latest ones, as you&#8217;ll find if you compare The Clouds by Aristophanes with the many American bedbug websites. The earliest recorded name for them is sar-an which is Old Sumerian for &#8220;numerous in straw&#8221; - a rueful reference to the likelihood that five thousand years ago, your Sumerian bed would be riddled with bugs. The same applied to Arabic beds, as shown by the proverb, &#8220;a bed bug has a hundred children, and says ‘how few.&#8217;&#8221;  A Spanish proverb comforts the afflicted by saying that &#8220;you can&#8217;t have more bed bugs than a blanketful.&#8221; There is a charming story about a rich man, his beautiful wife, a bed bug and a visiting flea in the fables of Kalila and Dimna, widely circulating in India and Iran about 2,000 years ago. The innocent, hospitable bed bug gets killed for a bite inflicted by the flea. There are legendary Hopi sex stories about bed bugs. But the most remarkable bed bug story is to be found in the apocryphal Acts of John, proving that among the sober, chaste and pious early Christians there must have been some entertaining fibbers with a lively sense of humour. The apostle is trying to get a bit of kip on a straw mattress but the bed bugs are stopping him, so he orders them to leave the room in the name of God. Next morning the bed bugs are found huddling together outside the door. John allows them back inside and to bed because they have been obedient to the divine will, and says to his followers, &#8220;Be ye like the bed-bugs.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>NEJM  2 Apr 2009  Vol 360</strong><br />
Most of the half-million annual deaths from cervical cancer occur in countries which will never be able to afford whole-population screening using regular cervical cytology, which is partially effective but enormously expensive. This <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/14/1385" target="_blank">landmark study from rural India</a> used a single test for human papillomavirus and showed a near-halving of cervical cancer deaths compared with cytological testing or visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid. Most HPV infection is acquired soon after women become sexually active and disappears harmlessly in a few years, so the positives that are significant are those in older women: between 30 and 59 years old in this cluster randomised trial. Read the <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/360/14/1453" target="_blank">accompanying editorial</a> to appreciate what a real breakthrough this study represents for screening policy throughout the world.</p>
<p>Statins are great drugs provided you take them in time, but taking them when you have organ failure may be too late. People with established heart failure get no discernible benefit and <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/14/1395" target="_blank">this trial</a> (named after the Roman goddess of dawn, AURORA) shows the same for people with advanced renal failure requiring haemodialysis. Those randomised to rosuvastatin showed the expected drop in LDL-cholesterol but no improvement in outcome. The goddess did not smile on this trial, and we cannot sing</p>
<p>AURORA lucis rutilat<br />
caelum laudibus intonat<br />
mundus exultans iubilat<br />
gemens infernus ululat,<br />
cum ille rex fortissimus<br />
mortis confractis viribus<br />
pede conculcans tartara<br />
solvit catena miseros!</p>
<p>Not until Easter, anyway.</p>
<p>The reasons why some boys and fewer girls wet their beds are somewhat obscure, but it&#8217;s probably worth following the advice of this <a title="NEJM article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/360/14/1429" target="_blank">clinical review of (nocturnal) enuresis </a>and doing a clinical examination, urine dipstick and ultrasound to rule out constipation, infection or a structural or neurogenic cause. The treatments are the same as they&#8217;ve been for decades: an alarm device, a tricyclic antidepressant, or (with due care) desmopressin.</p>
<p><strong>Lancet  4 Apr 2009  Vol 373</strong><br />
Just because something is associated with something else in fairly linear fashion, like LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular events, doesn&#8217;t mean that you can necessarily drive the process the other way. But with statins this does seem to happen, and the benefit seems proportionate to the LDL-C lowering, as in <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60447-5/abstract" target="_blank">this analysis of the JUPITER trial</a> in initially healthy subjects given a fixed dose (20mg) of rosuvastatin. The degree to which these people responded in terms of LDL-C lowering roughly matched the degree to which they had fewer CV events. But an even better fit was the degree to which C-reactive protein was reduced. So JUPITER provides more evidence that the anti-inflammatory effects of statins may be even more important than their lipid-lowering effects. Juppiter Optimus Maximus.</p>
<p>For nearly eleven years I&#8217;ve kept my eye on trials of different interventions for coronary artery disease, but if and when my turn comes to have one, I&#8217;m by no means sure which way I&#8217;d jump. If I just had angina which was well controlled with medical treatment, I shouldn&#8217;t be in any hurry for an invasive intervention at all, because COURAGE tells me that I&#8217;m unlikely to benefit. <a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60552-3/abstract" target="_blank">This collaborative analysis of individual patient data</a> tells me that even if I had three-vessel coronary disease, and decided to let someone interfere, I&#8217;d do just as well with percutaneous intervention as with coronary artery bypass grafting. But these are all quite old trials, and techniques have moved on - CABG no longer uses mainly venous grafts, and PCI with balloons and bare metal stents has given way to drug-eluting stenting, though for no good reason I can discover. In a thoughtful editorial, David Taggart (p.1150) discusses these technical advances and the difficulty of giving patients an informed choice in such matters.</p>
<p><a title="Lancet article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60139-2/abstract" target="_blank">Novel opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction</a> have been around for some time already, but they haven&#8217;t yet surfaced in British palliative and primary care. In the case of methylnaltrexone this may soon change, because there have been convincing trials of oral administration to people with advanced illnesses, albeit involving small numbers. However, cost may be a barrier with this drug and with alvimopan, which is still being trialled mainly for post-operative ileus.</p>
<p><strong>BMJ  4 Apr 2009  Vol 338</strong><br />
Here is <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/mar09_2/b716" target="_blank">a Scandinavian study</a> which claims to show that appendicitis or mesenteric adenitis protect against subsequent ulcerative colitis, but that appendicectomy itself does not. The problem for me is that I don&#8217;t know which category I fall in. I had my appendix removed, very incompetently, when I was 9, and was later told that it was normal. But I certainly had agonising right iliac fossa pain the day before. Perhaps I had &#8220;mesenteric adenitis&#8221; but I&#8217;ll never know. If I did, then I&#8217;m protected against UC, but otherwise I&#8217;m not. Unless Scandinavian record keeping is uncommonly good, I think there may be room for a bit of doubt in the figures, though perhaps not enough to alter the conclusion of this study. I tried to work it out but was deterred by opaque Scandinavian technical prose, which becomes slightly interesting in the &#8220;possible mechanisms&#8221; section.</p>
<p>812    It is worth case finding for type 2 diabetes if you believe that early treatment makes a difference. I am not sure about the evidence base for this, and certainly I don&#8217;t consider that UKPDS alone suffices. Here is the validation of a risk score - <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/mar17_2/b880" target="_blank">the QDScore</a> - which is based on ethnic origin, social class, immediate family history, treatment for blood pressure, known cardiovascular disease and steroid use. It predicts about half of incident type 2 DM over a ten year period. But if we were serious about this, we&#8217;d be doing 5-yearly fasting blood sugars for everyone over 50, or 40 if SE Asian or obese, and offering big exercise and diet interventions while there were still enough beta-cells to rescue.</p>
<p>Around the time I got appendicitis, I went to a visiting fair and paid sixpence to look at a bearded lady in a freak show. That was a lot of money to see a fat woman with too much androgen, and her plight still fills me with horror, fifty years later. Hirsutism is a blight to the body image of many women, but there is now a range of options to treat it: <a title="BMJ article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/mar27_1/b847" target="_blank">this short review</a> provides good clear advice on how to use oral contraceptives, metformin, spironolactone and finasteride in various clinical scenarios. In all but severe or rapidly progressive cases investigation is unnecessary.</p>
<p><strong>Plant of the Week: Cimicifuga simplex &#8220;Brunette&#8221;</strong><br />
Having mentioned bed bugs at such length, I feel compelled to offer Siberian bug bane as the plant for this week, though it is grown for autumn rather than for spring effect. Just now it may be pushing its first tufts of ferny leaf through the soil, unnoticed amidst the beauty of primroses, fritillaries, hepaticas and daffodils. When these fresh delights have faded, it continues to grow until its divided leaves reach up to about a metre. It doesn&#8217;t usually flower until October, when it is very welcome, especially in this bronze-leaved version with pink flushed bottle-brushes of flower. Take its dried leaves with you whenever you visit the cheaper hotels of Siberia, or indeed New York.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/04/05/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-5-april-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 30 March 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/03/31/richard-lehmans-journal-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/03/31/richard-lehmans-journal-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[MTAS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[journal review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We are very pleased that Richard Lehman is back with us after a break. As before, his ever popular journal blog will be published weekly.  This week, Richard gets off to a splendid start by covering a range of subjects from Greek nymphs to footstools and defecating&#8230;
JAMA  25 Mar 2009  Vol 301
The problem of pain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bmj.com/columns/icons/richard_lehman.jpg" alt="Richard Lehman" width="160" height="108" align="left" /></p>
<p>We are very pleased that Richard Lehman is back with us after a break. As before, his ever popular journal blog will be published weekly.  This week, Richard gets off to a splendid start by covering a range of subjects from Greek nymphs to footstools and defecating&#8230;<span id="more-632"></span></p>
<p><strong>JAMA  25 Mar 2009  Vol 301</strong><br />
The problem of pain was the subject of CS Lewis&#8217;s first attempt at popular theological argument, prompting a fellow don at Magdalen College, Oxford in 1940 to remark that &#8220;the problem of pain is quite bad enough without Lewis writing about it.&#8221; It is indeed easier to write about pain than to endure it all the time, as I&#8217;m told that Lewis acknowledges - I would look it up myself, but I fear for the safety of nearby ornaments. Every pain is different, but there are some generic aspects to chronic pain management which we tend to skimp on in primary care, and that is the issue which <a title="journal article" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/301/12/1242" target="_blank">this US trial</a> attempted to address. The intervention was administered by a psychologist and an &#8220;internist&#8221;, and usually involved a face-to-face assessment with specific treatment recommendations plus a 4-session workshop encouraging self-management and activity. The gains, though significant, were sadly modest at the end of 12 months for these patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.</p>
<p><strong>NEJM  26 Mar 2009  Vol 360</strong><br />
Oddly enough, the human foreskin carries a theological pedigree almost a long as the problem of pain, though I am not sure whether CS Lewis ever wrote on the subject. God is found commanding its removal to Abram and his household as early as Genesis Ch 17, whereupon Abram becomes Abraham; Paul, apostle of Jesus to the Gentiles, later prudently decided that God no longer demanded it, whereas Muhammad, who was made of sterner stuff, got out the knife once more for all his followers. The rather curious result is that the foreskin is regarded a sacrosanct in certain European countries, including Britain, but is routinely done away with as soon as possible in large parts of the Middle East and also - for less obvious reasons - the United States of America. Africa falls between, and of course circumcision has been in the news a lot as a possible means of containing the spread of HIV. <a title="journal article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/13/1298" target="_blank">This study</a> examines its effect on two other sexually transmitted infections - herpes simplex virus 2 and syphilis. Such is the popularity of the procedure in Uganda that randomisation was between immediate and delayed circumcision, rather than no circumcision at all. The immediately circumcised duly showed fewer of both infections. Expect changes in African health policy that will produce bagsful of foreskins to rival those brought back from Philistia by David, who later became the legendary King of Israel (see 1 Sam 18.25).</p>
<p>More uncomfortable reading for male readers of the New England Journal: 38,343 annual digital rectal examinations and PSA tests in the intervention group, thousands of transrectal prostate biopsies, hundreds of radical prostatectomies and lots of radiation above the genitals. And after 7 years, the result of all this prostate screening? 50 deaths from prostate cancer in the screened group and 44 in the control group. This was - and still is, since it is only half-complete - <a title="journal article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/13/1310" target="_blank">the US trial called PLCO</a>, where the PSA cut-off for biopsy was 4.0. Treatment data are not given, and the study goes on: it has not been stopped for futility. But it&#8217;s not looking good.</p>
<p><a title="journal article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/360/13/1320" target="_blank">The study called ERSPC</a> by contrast is really a series of linked trials in European countries with differing recruitment and randomisation procedures and a PSA cut-off of 3.0 in every country except Finland. At 14 years from randomisation, there was no difference in prostate cancer mortality, but at fifteen years the control group suddenly fares a lot worse (see Fig 2); and if you take the mean of about 9 years, you get a 20% difference in favour of screening. This benefit was limited to those under 70, and to prevent one death from prostate cancer you would have offer screening to 1410 men and submit 48 to surgery and/or radiotherapy. Digital rectal examination and PSA are just not good enough for the detection of the prostate cancers that matter. The trials go on, but I think the strategy is dead.</p>
<p>There aren&#8217;t many effective interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but one that seems to produce real improvements in quality of life in trial settings is pulmonary rehabilitation. <a title="journal article" href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/360/13/1329" target="_blank">This article</a> is a straightforward description of how it&#8217;s done in the USA. &#8220;The successful coordinator has excellent interpersonal skills, since (at least initially) a primary task is to motivate people to do what they find unpleasant.&#8221;  Most people with COPD show an initial benefit, but this declines after a few months. Keeping people doing things they find unpleasant is never easy.</p>
<p><strong>Lancet  28 Mar 2009  Vol 373</strong><br />
Body mass index is one of many measurements in medicine that enjoys a popularity beyond its modest deserts, but at least we have d<a title="journal article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60318-4/abstract" target="_blank">ata from lots of prospective studies which are pooled here</a> to give an estimate of cause-specific mortality in 900,000 adults. At a BMI below 22.5, smokers die much faster and thus give all thin people a spuriously bad prognosis. If you read the Summary you will get the opposite impression due to misuse of the word “inversely”. Cardiovascular mortality tends to rise steadily with all levels of BMI, but a little middle age spread does no harm to overall prognosis provided you stay below 30. Once BMI goes over 40, you are looking at a drop of life expectancy of 8-10 years, similar to life-long smoking.</p>
<p><a title="journal article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60214-2/abstract" target="_blank">This nationwide study</a> looked at the rate of epilepsy in every little Dane who bashed his or her head in childhood and was taken to hospital. The risk varies with severity of injury, as you&#8217;d expect: kids with skull fractures, or with impaired consciousness for less than 30 minutes, have a twofold risk of later epilepsy, while severe brain injury with unconsciousness of over 30 minutes results in a sevenfold risk.</p>
<p>If you have renal cell carcinoma, your only real chance of long-term survival is that somebody will chance to spot it before you have any symptoms. Even this is no guarantee: more small renal masses are being removed each year because of incidental detection on scanning, but still mortality has increased. So <a title="journal article" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60229-4/abstract" target="_blank">this seminar on the subject</a> concentrates on two ends of the scale: the optimal management of small renal masses and the management of metastatic renal cell cancer. Here there is modest progress, much hyped in the press; bevacizumab does prolong life usefully in a significant proportion of patients.</p>
<p><strong>BMJ  28 Mar 2009  Vol 338</strong><br />
When I became a GP, obstetrics was still a routine part of our job, though I quickly abandoned the role of accoucheur without the slightest regret. The last time I tried to stop premature labour was before that at the Middlesex hospital, where on the instruction of my senior registrar I exhausted that hospital&#8217;s entire stock of injectable ethyl alcohol. The lady in question enjoyed her intravenous treat and duly stopped contracting. This most ancient of tocolytics does not get a mention in <a title="journal article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/mar05_2/b744" target="_blank">this review of adverse reactions to drugs given to stop labour</a>, but the beta-adrenergic drugs we used more commonly do get a bad mention here, whereas something called atosiban gets the all clear, and nifedipine lies somewhere between.</p>
<p>Depression scoring systems were devised and validated in research settings and then imposed on British GPs via the QOF system for every patient newly presenting with depression. Two studies of their use are presented side-by-side here; <a title="journal article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/mar19_1/b750" target="_blank">the first one</a> finds - surprise, surprise - that doctors try to administer these things but do not base their treatment decisions on them; and <a title="journal article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/338/mar19_1/b663" target="_blank">the second</a> finds that on the whole, patients don&#8217;t mind filling them in. Such is the mighty evidence base for giving doctors financial incentives to use depression questionnaires.</p>
<p><a title="journal article" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/mar20_1/b831" target="_blank"> This article on chronic constipation in adults</a> shows what it calls the correct position for defecation, illustrated by a pensive naked man sitting on a white lavatory with his feet supported by a footstool. A courteous American correspondent of mine, Jonathan Isbit, would half approve. Jonathan says he was inspired by my first piece in the BMJ, a Personal View called &#8220;In Praise of Hunch Backing&#8221; to back his hunch that many bowel diseases and almost all constipation are the result of modern man adopting the sitting position to defecate. Jonathan would have our knees much higher while defecating than a mere footstool can ensure. Squatting over a hole in the ground, we would prevent appendicitis by pushing our right knees into our iliac fossae and prevent colon cancer, diverticulitis and constipation by getting our rectus muscles into bowel-squeezing action. However, careful placement of the feet is necessary, so as not to give the word &#8220;footstool&#8221; a whole new meaning.</p>
<p><strong>Arch Intern Med   23 Mar 2009  Vol 169</strong><br />
There have been dozens of trials of vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of non-vertebral fractures and if you pool them all you get equivocal results. However, if you carry out a <a title="journal article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/6/551" target="_blank">meta-analysis by oral dosage</a>, there&#8217;s a clear difference between trials using a low dose of vitamin D and trials using more than 400u daily. People over 65 reduce their fracture risk by at least 20% if they take a decent amount of vitamin D.</p>
<p>Eating large quantities of red meat is a bad thing for global resources and also a bad thing for people, according to this simple but enormous <a title="journal article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/6/562" target="_blank">study of self-reported food intake in 500,000 Americans aged between 50 and 71</a>. There was a 30% difference in mortality between the groups reporting the highest and the lowest red meat intake, when adjusted for a wide but possibly insufficient range of confounders. The extra deaths are from cardiovascular disease and cancer. But you can eat white meat - meaning chicken, I think - not just with impunity but with benefit.</p>
<p>If you are interested in hypertriglyceridaemia, then <a title="journal article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/6/572" target="_blank">here&#8217;s some detailed epidemiology</a> for you to revel in from 5610 people aged over 20 studied in NHaNES 1999-2004. As usual, it&#8217;s a confusing picture, especially as there was no standardisation of sampling conditions, and only rather vague associations emerge, chief of which is physical inactivity.</p>
<p>If you have a close relative who has had venous thromboembolism, your own chances of getting one are at least doubled, according to yet another <a title="journal article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/6/610" target="_blank">important study</a> of the subject from Leiden. In fact it&#8217;s usually more useful clinically to factor in a family history than to take blood for a so-called thrombophilia screen.</p>
<p>Having been unwisely drawn into a public argument about diabetes, I have only one hope of getting everybody to agree with me, and that is to keep saying nice things about metformin. It&#8217;s the only treatment which can actually be shown to improve outcomes in type 2 diabetes without any shadow of doubt, and every patient with this condition should be persuaded to take it unless the gastrointestinal side-effects are completely intolerable. The key to its action is probably to reduce insulin resistance, and the trial here attempts to gauge its value in type 2 diabetics who require insulin. This important fact fails to get a mention in the title of <a title="journal article" href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/169/6/616" target="_blank">this paper</a>, which also claims to report &#8220;long-term&#8221; effects, though the mean follow-up was 4.3 years. Over this relatively short period, patients randomised to metformin lost weight, had better glycaemic control, needed less insulin, and had fewer macrovascular adverse events. But unfortunately, as in so many diabetic trials, the investigators chose to lump all sorts of dubious &#8220;microvascular&#8221; outcomes into their primary end-point and thereby failed to reach statistical significance by dilution.</p>
<p><strong>Plant of the Week: <a title="Daphne odora" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/gardening/plants/plant_finder/plant_pages/257.shtml" target="_blank">Daphne odora</a></strong></p>
<p>Daphne, you will remember, was the nymph who eluded the amorous attentions of Apollo by turning into a tree. This was a popular subject for artists and sculptors like Bernini (see The Mirror of the Gods  Malcolm Bull, 2005) and even for the first composer of a German opera, though sadly we have lost the music which Heinrich Schütz wrote in 1627 to be sung by his tree.</p>
<p>Many plants were once given the name of Daphne, but for some reason Linnaeus settled the title on a genus of low shrubs, little resembling the nymphs of Thessaly except perhaps in their gorgeous perfume. Of all the daphnes, this small evergreen plant is perhaps the most ravishingly scented, though there are many competitors among her sisters and cousins. In fact it is possible, with reasonable care, to enjoy the scent of different daphnes throughout the year. Let us begin like the Iranians at Now Ruz, the spring equinox:</p>
<p>March-April: Daphne odora, D blagayana<br />
April-May: D tangutica, D collina<br />
May-June: D x burkwoodii, D cneorum<br />
June-July: D x hybrida, D sericea<br />
July-Oct: D x transatlantica, D x napolitana<br />
Oct-Nov: D susannae<br />
Nov-March: D bholua, D jezoensis, D mezereum</p>
<p>The trouble is that one or other of these will invariably die on you just when you most look forward to it. D odora is relatively robust, though tradition has it that the clone with yellow-edged leaves, Aureomarginata, is the only one reliably hardy in English gardens. I have just bought a handsome Japanese clone called Sakiwaka with good plain leaves and I&#8217;ll let you know how it gets on next winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/03/31/richard-lehmans-journal-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JAMA  22/29 Aug 2007  Vol 298</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/jama-2229-aug-2007-vol-298/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/jama-2229-aug-2007-vol-298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/jama-2229-aug-2007-vol-298/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A question for all GP readers – where do you keep your paediatric sphygmomanometer cuff? Do you know if your practice actually has one? I haven’t checked our premises yet, so you can tell how often I measure blood pressure in children. Adolescents occasionally get it done, usually because they have known renal failure or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question for all GP readers – where do you keep your paediatric sphygmomanometer cuff? Do you know if your practice actually has one?<span id="more-323"></span> I haven’t checked our premises yet, so you can tell how often I measure blood pressure in children. Adolescents occasionally get it done, usually because they have known renal failure or want oral contraception. Most hypertension in children and adolescents goes undetected, as this <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/8/874">cohort study </a>from Ohio confirms: but do we know if it makes any difference whether we detect elevated blood pressure at 10 or at 18?</p>
<p>A useful <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/8/902">review of the management of diabetic retinopathy</a>, which fortunately for laser-challenged readers includes a good section on prevention as part of management.  Control glycaemia down to an HbA1c of 7.5ish: although theoretically you could try for lower, returns diminish and complications increase. Control blood pressure down to…nobody knows, probably till the patient falls over. Then it’s over to the laser boys, who don’t know quite how early to intervene; but once the retinopathy is severe, pan-retinal treatment (sparing the macula) is definitely the thing. If the jelly of the eye gets bled into repeatedly, it’s best to remove it (vitrectomy). Marvellous what chaps like Lord Darzi can do. If only they would confine themselves to what they know about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/jama-2229-aug-2007-vol-298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEJM  23 Aug 2007  Vol 357</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/nejm-23-aug-2007-vol-357/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/nejm-23-aug-2007-vol-357/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/nejm-23-aug-2007-vol-357/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world’s largest swede weighed in at 171.56kg, according to a highly entertaining website mocking the rutabaga (which is the American word for this estimable root vegetable); but it was held to be the product of genetic engineering, so the official Guinness record is still held by a swede of merely 34.43kg.
My vegetable love should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world’s largest swede weighed in at 171.56kg, according to a highly entertaining website mocking the rutabaga (which is the American word for this estimable root vegetable);<span id="more-322"></span> but it was held to be the product of genetic engineering, so the official Guinness record is still held by a swede of merely 34.43kg.<br />
My vegetable love should grow<br />
Vaster than empires, and more slow.<br />
as Marvell observed to his coy mistress. However, slowly getting vaster is not good for human Swedes. This study collected those who weighed an average of 119kg (<a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/8/741">Swedish Obese Subjects, SOS</a>) and from 1987 onwards they were randomised to bariatric surgery or conventional treatment. The surgical group lost weight dramatically and then regained some, whereas the others remained the same or got fatter. From about ten years on, the mortality of the two groups begins to diverge increasingly – in favour of the operated-on.</p>
<p>If you look retrospectively at <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/8/753">outcomes of bariatric surgery in the USA</a>, the message is the same.  Total mortality at a mean follow-up of 7 years was reduced, particularly deaths from diabetes, heart disease and cancer. However, accidents and suicide were higher in the surgical group.</p>
<p>You think it horrible that lust and rage<br />
Should dance attention upon my old age;<br />
They were not such a plague when I was young;<br />
What else have I to spur me into song?<br />
wrote Yeats when he was 71. Leaving aside the rage, <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/8/762">this study</a> sheds some light on how common lust is at Yeats’ age and indeed beyond. Not uncommon at all; if he were an modern American male in his early seventies, there would be about a one-third likelihood of him having sex at least once a month. Should you need more detail, horrible or otherwise, turn to the extensive tabulation of this masterly, or rather Mastersly-Johnsonian, study.</p>
<p><a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/357/8/789">Isolated systolic hypertension</a> is really just the main subset of a condition which could be called EPPA – elevated pulse pressure of age. I think I’ve coined that acronym myself, but somebody may have got there first, so save your rotten eggs for her/him, not me. Without some magic way of rejuvenating stiffened (sometimes calcified) main capacitance arteries, it is always going to be hard to treat. I can’t say I found this article much help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/nejm-23-aug-2007-vol-357/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMJ  25 Aug 2007  Vol 335</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/bmj-25-aug-2007-vol-335/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/bmj-25-aug-2007-vol-335/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/bmj-25-aug-2007-vol-335/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every week or two we detect an irregular pulse and send the patient off for an ECG, but we’ve never audited how many with ?AF written on the form actually have it. Some researchers in the Birmingham (UK) Department of Primary Care, however, have made something of a specialty of atrial fibrillation and the results [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every week or two we detect an irregular pulse and send the patient off for an ECG, but we’ve never audited how many with ?AF written on the form actually have it. Some researchers in the Birmingham (UK) Department of Primary Care, however, have made something of a specialty of atrial fibrillation<span id="more-321"></span> and the results of their labours are to be found in two papers <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/335/7616/380">here</a> and in the BAFTA study published a fortnight back in <em>The Lancet</em>. The ECGs for these studies were read by (a) software, (b) GPs, (c) practice nurses and (d) by Mick Davies or Greg Lip, who are Birmingham cardiologists, and therefore gold standard. GPs and PNs are equally good (bad) at spotting atrial fibrillation on ECG tracings; software is very specific but misses a few (sensitivity 83%). If you combine the two you will miss less than 10% of AF as defined by a Birmingham cardiologist.</p>
<p>Atrial fibrillation gets commoner the older you are and is a potent risk factor for stroke and heart failure, so how might we best screen for it in primary care? Should we do ECGs on everybody over a certain age (65 in <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/8/762">this study</a>) or should we just take the pulse opportunistically? Although at first glance you might think this study addresses this question, in fact it doesn’t. Both the ECG group and the pulse-taking group were called in for examination, so this was not “opportunistic” in the sense we usually use the word, i.e. done if the patient happens to turn up. Oddly enough, one third of patients who were found to have an irregular pulse refused to have an ECG – something I have never known happen in 30 years. But whatever the quirks of this study, it does appear to show that pulse-taking followed by ECG is as good as mass ECG screening for detecting AF, and much cheaper.</p>
<p>Children should not have needles stuck into them without good reason. Does acute pyelonephritis count as one? Not as far as antibiotic treatment goes: oral co-amoxiclav proved as good as parenteral ceftriaxone in <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/335/7616/386">this large Italian study</a>. They did however have to have a needle for the dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scans they all had.</p>
<p>DMSA scanning at 4-6 months after an acute UTI in children under 3 years old is perhaps the most important innovation in the <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/335/7616/395">NICE guideline for urinary tract infection in children</a>, which does away with the barbaric practice of testing for vesico-ureteric reflux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/bmj-25-aug-2007-vol-335/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lancet  25 Aug 2007  Vol 370</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/lancet-25-aug-2007-vol-370/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/lancet-25-aug-2007-vol-370/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/lancet-25-aug-2007-vol-370/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a painstaking meta-analysis of trials involving 64,000 people randomised to take calcium, vitamin D (in various doses) or placebo for the prevention of fractures and bone loss in people aged over 50. The main messages are well summarised in the editorial. Compliant patients halve their risk, so we need to get calcium and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a painstaking <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607613427/abstract">meta-analysis</a> of trials involving 64,000 people randomised to take calcium, vitamin D (in various doses) or placebo for the prevention of fractures and bone loss in people aged over 50. <span id="more-320"></span>The main messages are well summarised in the <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607613154/fulltext">editorial</a>. Compliant patients halve their risk, so we need to get calcium and a good dose of vitamin D (at least 800 IU) into our patients (and ourselves, where applicable) by some means or other.</p>
<p>An annual fasting blood sugar is now part of the routine follow-up of all patients with coronary heart disease – and <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607613439/abstract">this Italian study of patients after recent myocardial infarction </a>shows why. Their incidence rate for impaired FBS was 27.5% per year, as opposed to 1.8% in the general population. The study attempted to measure diet but not exercise (except by treadmill test capacity) and confirms the benefit of a Mediterranean intake, rich in vegetables, fruit, fish and olive oil.</p>
<p>I approach every new <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607613452/abstract">review of polycystic ovarian syndrome</a> with a mixture of dread and curiosity. They are all long, inconclusive, and apt to wander off into inaccessible realms of sex hormone metabolite ratios and transvaginal follicle measurements. Don’t look for clear definitions or diagnostic pathways: you will always be disappointed. The treatment section here, however, is comprehensive and modestly useful. Although appetite suppressants have never been formally studied in this group, I suspect that for many they might be the most effective treatment.</p>
<p>I have not commented on the BMJ’s current debate about the literature of medical education, because most of it is so trite, but I was intrigued by the title of this personal article, <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607613476/fulltext">inconvenient truths about effective clinical teaching</a>, by Brendan Reilly. It is brilliantly wise and well-written, and worth more than the entire archive of most journals on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/lancet-25-aug-2007-vol-370/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ann Intern Med  21 Aug 2007  Vol 147</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/ann-intern-med-21-aug-2007-vol-147/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/ann-intern-med-21-aug-2007-vol-147/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/ann-intern-med-21-aug-2007-vol-147/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How grateful we should be for those who delve in the dark places of the earth, bringing up ores and jewels for our use and pleasure. Systematic reviewers share the glory of the mining tribe, and many of its hardships; if only by metaphor rather than rock-fall. It is tedious grinding work, throwing away the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How grateful we should be for those who delve in the dark places of the earth, bringing up ores and jewels for our use and pleasure. <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/147/4/224">Systematic reviewers</a> share the glory of the mining tribe, and many of its hardships;<span id="more-319"></span> if only by metaphor rather than rock-fall. It is tedious grinding work, throwing away the low-grade ore (but ooh, look, there’s a nugget after all) and patiently following the richer seams. And then it is all brought out into the light, sifted and melted down, and – within a couple of years it has lost its value. Major revisions of a quarter of systematic reviews are probably needed within that time, and cardiovascular reviews date faster than the rest. The iron so carefully smelted turns to rust, and we start again.</p>
<p>Selenium is a strange moony element which is included (perhaps just for its name) in many popular “health products” containing trace elements. Now and again someone claims to prove something in its favour but <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/147/4/217">this study</a> does not. Far from preventing diabetes, as had been suggested by animal studies, selenium supplementation probably increases your chance of getting it.</p>
<p>Here is a systematic review of a cardiovascular topic which is unlikely to date badly, but will probably need revision within those two years. <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/147/4/251">Implantable cardioverter defibrillators</a> undoubtedly prevent sudden death due to ventricular arrhythmias in adults with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. But they remain very expensive and prone to malfunction. Most people fitted with one never receive a discharge but are exposed to all the ICD-related risks. So not only do we need more studies, but we also need better analysis of individual patient data to see which subgroups get the most benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/ann-intern-med-21-aug-2007-vol-147/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plant of the Week: Viburnum cylindricum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/plant-of-the-week-viburnum-cylindricum/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/plant-of-the-week-viburnum-cylindricum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/plant-of-the-week-viburnum-cylindricum/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This big handsome shrub is about to display its flat cymes of dull white flowers, exuding a faint sweetish smell. Clearly it is not for these that we in limy places grow this plant: it is rather for its evergreen stateliness and its fine big waxy leaves, better than those of the rhododendrons which will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This big handsome shrub is about to display its flat cymes of dull white flowers, exuding a faint sweetish smell. Clearly it is not for these that we in limy places grow this plant:<span id="more-318"></span> it is rather for its evergreen stateliness and its fine big waxy leaves, better than those of the rhododendrons which will not grow on our soil. So waxy are they that we can write the name of our beloved on them with a sharp stick, and it will remain.</p>
<p>In time it accumulates several smooth grey trunks, and the sight of one covered with frost in winter is more beautiful than the sight of one flowering now. Well worth the considerable space it requires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/27/plant-of-the-week-viburnum-cylindricum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JAMA  15 Aug 2007  Vol 298</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/jama-15-aug-2007-vol-298/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/jama-15-aug-2007-vol-298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 16:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/jama-15-aug-2007-vol-298/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There aren’t many vaccines which work after the infection has been acquired, and this Costa Rican trial of a human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine proves no exception.
In this next study, two-thirds of the patients were still alive five years after a diagnosis of stage III colon cancer, i.e. cancer that had spread to local lymph nodes. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There aren’t many vaccines which work after the infection has been acquired,<span id="more-317"></span> and this Costa Rican <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/7/743">trial of a human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine</a> proves no exception.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/7/754">this next study</a>, two-thirds of the patients were still alive five years after a diagnosis of stage III colon cancer, i.e. cancer that had spread to local lymph nodes. The main purpose of the trial was to compare chemotherapy regimes, but detailed dietary questionnaires were used to distinguish between those who followed a “prudent diet”, defined as one rich in fruit, vegetables, poultry and fish, as opposed to a “Western diet” rich in other meat, fat, refined grains and dessert. There was a three-fold difference in favour of the “prudent” group, after adjustment for a wide variety of confounders. Of course these diets represented personal choices rather than randomised allocation, but it does seem reasonable to recommend these nice foods to people who people who have come through bowel cancer.</p>
<p>We’ve all been taught that diabetes not only increases the risk of coronary disease but also worsens outcomes after acute coronary events; but is this still true in the era of rapid intervention? The <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/7/765">eleven trials of the TIMI series </a>from 1997-2006 confirm that in the first year following ACS, diabetics still fare worse, but thereafter the added risk fades away.</p>
<p>Every now and again, somebody pops up to suggest we are measuring the wrong lipids for cardiac risk, or that we should do one measurement for men and another for women. A <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/7/776">paper from Framingham</a> comes to silence our groans: carry on measuring total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol and you can derive a score that is just as good as one based on fancy apolipoproteins (apo B:apo A-1) in both men and women.</p>
<p>High density lipoprotein cholesterol is often called “good” cholesterol because of its association with reduced cardiovascular morbidity, but attempts to raise people’s good cholesterol always seem to go wrong. One small trial, you may remember, even tried infusing the stuff into people’s coronary arteries. In the latest issue of <em>Evidence Based Medicine</em> I describe HDL-raising as a therapeutic cul-de-sac which ought to carry a traffic warning: this <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/7/786">systematic review</a> bears me out, though it is less damning in its conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/jama-15-aug-2007-vol-298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEJM  16 Aug 2007  Vol 357</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/nejm-16-aug-2007-vol-357/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/nejm-16-aug-2007-vol-357/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 16:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/nejm-16-aug-2007-vol-357/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The initials RLS are forever associated with the great Scottish teller of tales who died on Samoa at the age of 44. He certainly had restless legs, and rarely remained in one place for very long; and his nocturnal wakefulness brings us some of the most haunting passages in Travels with a Donkey. Whether he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The initials RLS are forever associated with the great Scottish teller of tales who died on Samoa at the age of 44. He certainly had restless legs, and rarely remained in one place for very long;<span id="more-316"></span> and his nocturnal wakefulness brings us some of the most haunting passages in <em>Travels with a Donkey</em>. Whether he kicked his wife Fanny in his sleep, we are not (so far as I know) told, but she certainly deserved it. Nor do we know whether he carried the common variant of an intron of<em> BTBD9</em> on chromosome 6p21.2 which <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/7/639">this study </a>asserts to be associated with susceptibility to periodic limb movements in sleep. But hey, let’s pick a dark foggy night in Samoa, climb up to his grave, and take a tissue sample. He would rather like that.</p>
<p>Opponents of abortion are always trying to find evidence that it does physical harm to women so that they won’t enter into mortal sin by having such procedures. But <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/7/648">this study</a> of subsequent pregnancies after medical abortion in Denmark shows no increased risk of ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage or preterm birth.</p>
<p>If you have <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/7/664">extensive small-cell lung cancer</a>, you will die, probably within six months. You may wish to spend one or more of these months receiving chemotherapy and then one or more receiving prophylactic cranial irradiation, which will raise your mean survival from 5.4 months to 6.7 months, and your chance of reaching a year from 13% to 27%. The investigators suggest that it should therefore “be part of standard care for all patients with small-cell lung cancer who have a response to initial chemotherapy.” Care? For me, that would be an Italian hillside and a good choice of music.</p>
<p>Treating psoriasis is tiresome; as this<a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/357/7/682"> review of psoralen and ultraviolet A light therapy</a> points out, most patients find their treatment unsatisfactory. They can’t forget their disease, especially when they take their clothes off; and doctors can’t explain it or do more than control it. Still, old-fashioned PUVA does work, a bit better in most patients than narrow-band UVB. If you want to understand how, there is some classic artwork on p.685 featuring colour combinations you may wish to avoid in your living room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/nejm-16-aug-2007-vol-357/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMJ  18 Aug 2007  Vol 335</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/bmj-18-aug-2007-vol-335/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/bmj-18-aug-2007-vol-335/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 16:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/bmj-18-aug-2007-vol-335/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Good germs” to help acute diarrhoea in children have become very popular, and with some reason. For a decade or more, I used to advise parents to give their kids some live yoghourt, but now there is a veritable ecosystem of commercial bugs available, many with more than one name. For example, Lactobacillus rhamnosus is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Good germs” to help acute diarrhoea in children have become very popular, and with some reason. For a decade or more, I used to advise parents to give their kids some live yoghourt,<span id="more-315"></span> but now there is a veritable ecosystem of commercial bugs available, many with more than one name. For example, <em>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</em> is the same as <em>L casei </em>strain GG or <em>L</em> GG; there are lots more, but I won’t go on because according to <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/335/7615/340">this Italian study</a>, this is the only one that works. Forget the rest if you want to reduce the number of stools in squitty children.</p>
<p>A good clear single-author <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/335/7615/343">review of carpal tunnel syndrome</a> tells you what you want to know. The diagnosis lies more in the history than the classic tests, and although neurophysiology is the “gold standard”, it is not a particularly good one. Figures for sensitivity and specificity are given, but it’s not clear where they come from, and of course they won’t be the same in primary care as in a hand clinic. Anyway, try a splint; maybe try an injection; but for a cure, get a decompression done (it doesn’t matter which procedure).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/bmj-18-aug-2007-vol-335/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lancet  18 Aug 2007  Vol 370</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/lancet-18-aug-2007-vol-370/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/lancet-18-aug-2007-vol-370/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 16:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/lancet-18-aug-2007-vol-370/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week’s Clinical Update is titled “codeine maintenance in opioid dependence”, but it’s actually a useful summary of all varieties of opioid maintenance, with codeine mentioned briefly on the basis of a single Scottish trial.
In the last couple of years, drug-eluting stents and COX-2 specific anti-inflammatory drugs have come in for a bit of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week’s Clinical Update is titled “<a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607612732/fulltext">codeine maintenance in opioid dependence</a>”, but it’s actually a useful summary of all varieties of opioid maintenance,<span id="more-314"></span> with codeine mentioned briefly on the basis of a single Scottish trial.</p>
<p>In the last couple of years, drug-eluting stents and COX-2 specific anti-inflammatory drugs have come in for a bit of a bashing. Combine the two and you have – perhaps the best possible outcome for percutaneous revascularisation.  But it’s early days: <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607612951/abstract">this South Korean tria</a><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607612951/abstract">l</a> added celecoxib to aspirin and clopidogrel following the insertion of paclitaxel-eluting stents and measured the formation of neointima within stents. There was considerably less in the celecoxib group. I should explain that it is intimal regrowth, not atheroma, that leads to stent blockage (see <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607612677/fulltext">editorial</a>). But of course we don’t really know whether giving celecoxib to post-stent patients in the long term is a good idea.</p>
<p>Another dotty-sounding notion is that by squeezing the arm you can protect the heart. <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607612963/abstract">This trial</a> randomised patients about to have coronary artery bypass surgery to have three 5-minute cycles of right upper limb ischaemia caused by inflating a cuff to 200mg mercury after induction of anaesthesia, or none. The outcome measure was troponin release after surgery. But why on earth? Well, it’s long been known that patients with a history of angina before myocardial infarction do better than those who get infarcts out of the blue. The mechanism has been dignified with the name of ischaemic preconditioning, whereby the myocardium gets used to coping with periods of ischaemic stress, mediated by various inflammatory chemicals. So, the argument goes, if you release the inflammatory markers from some other part of the circulatory system before subjecting the myocardium to the stress of bypass surgery, fewer myocytes will get damaged. Bizarrely enough, it seemed to work in this small study. As ever, bigger trials with harder endpoints are needed.</p>
<p>Ever since the H5N1 avian flu virus started killing chicken farmers in East Asia, we have been preparing for a possible pandemic, and rapid vaccine production is seen as key to containment. Egg-based vaccines are slow to produce, but <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607612975/abstract">this study</a> shows that much smaller amounts will be immunogenic if you mix them with an adjuvant consisting of a few cheap chemicals. Moreover the vaccine produces the kind of cross-immunogenicity which we might need if these viruses ever become capable of human-human transmission and mutation.</p>
<p>The Lancet is determined to its bit for stroke prevention this week by bringing us up to date on the two principal risk factors,<a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607612999/abstract"> hypertension</a> and atrial fibrillation. Three international experts put together a serviceable summary of where we are with measuring and treating blood pressure, while the cover of the journal declares that the “The time has come to abandon the hypertension/normotension dichotomy and to focus on global risk reduction.” No, Richard Horton, the time really came long ago. Far below the ivory tower, there are little places where global risk reduction has been going on for years. I work in one.</p>
<p>And so to the <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607613002/abstract">management of atrial fibrillation</a>. Over the last decade, I’ve heralded many false dawns – direct thrombin inhibitors to replace bothersome warfarin, better antirrhythmics to replace horrible amiodarone, and pathway ablation to replace shockingly crude direct current cardioversion. But alas, we are still largely where we were. People still even use digoxin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/lancet-18-aug-2007-vol-370/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arch Intern Med  13/27 Aug 2007  Vol 167</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/arch-intern-med-1327-aug-2007-vol-167/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/arch-intern-med-1327-aug-2007-vol-167/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/arch-intern-med-1327-aug-2007-vol-167/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a systematic review of RCTs aimed at the prevention of sports injuries. Successful interventions include the use of insoles, external joint supports and multi-interventional training programmes. Personally I have successfully avoided sport since the age of 16 and am free of injury.
In response to a characteristically ignorant reference to aspirin resistance in one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a systematic review of RCTs aimed at the<a href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/15/1585"> prevention of sports injuries</a>. Successful interventions include the use of insoles, external joint supports and multi-interventional training programmes.<span id="more-313"></span> Personally I have successfully avoided sport since the age of 16 and am free of injury.</p>
<p>In response to a characteristically ignorant reference to aspirin resistance in one of my reviews, Jeff Aronson once kindly took the trouble to explain to me the various different pharmacological mechanisms by which patients and their platelets fail to respond to aspirin. But does it really matter? Yes, is the answer in this useful <a href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/15/1593">systematic review of laboratory-defined aspirin resistance</a>. Laboratory resistance means a higher risk of recurrent cardiovascular risk despite compliance with aspirin treatment.</p>
<p>In the early 1990s, 8171 women health professionals were randomised to receive various combinations of placebo and /or <a href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/15/1610">vitamins C,E and beta-carotene</a>.  None made the slightest difference to their rates of cardiovascular disease in the next 9.4 years. Antioxidants are <em>so</em> last decade.</p>
<p>For the majority of patients, arriving on the Intensive care unit is a delirious experience, according to <a href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/15/1629">this study</a> from the USA. The predictors of delirium are age, dementia, previous benzodiazepine use, acidosis and a high creatinine. Some of these factors are treatable, and as I’ve said before, that can be life-saving.</p>
<p>Which is really the best place to measure bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)? For predicting all fractures it’s definitely the proximal femur, according to <a href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/15/1641">this retrospective study</a> of 16,500 women. Spinal bone density was only useful for predicting spinal fractures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/arch-intern-med-1327-aug-2007-vol-167/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plant of the Week: Rosa “Aimée Vibert”</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/plant-of-the-week-rosa-%e2%80%9caimee-vibert%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/plant-of-the-week-rosa-%e2%80%9caimee-vibert%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/plant-of-the-week-rosa-%e2%80%9caimee-vibert%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are plenty of good roses which repeat flower through the summer, but this one is unusual in that it only gets going in August and produces big bunches of pure white scented flowers. In fact it is a rambler so it can get pretty enormous. It has good dark shiny leaves which are generally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are plenty of good roses which repeat flower through the summer, but this one is unusual in that it only gets going in August and produces big bunches of pure white scented flowers. In fact it is a rambler so it can get pretty enormous.<span id="more-312"></span> It has good dark shiny leaves which are generally disease-free. The best way to grow it is into some big dull conifer like a leylandii, though of course you won’t possess such an object in your well-ordered garden. Buy it from a supplier who sends the right thing (many don’t) and put it in with a few spades of muck. Then forget about it for five years. Just when you are about to dig it up and throw it away as a waste of space, it will produce several bunches of flower. The next year, dozens, looking bright and fresh just as the summer is fading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/18/plant-of-the-week-rosa-%e2%80%9caimee-vibert%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JAMA  8 Aug 2007  Vol 298</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/jama-8-aug-2007-vol-298/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/jama-8-aug-2007-vol-298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/jama-8-aug-2007-vol-298/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You will no doubt have read the recent NEJM review which pointed out that white people living in colder latitudes are a poor weedy lot, chronically deficient in vitamin D. Maybe this is why as I approach 60, I can look forward to a 29% chance of sustaining an osteoporotic fracture in my remaining lifespan. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will no doubt have read the recent <em>NEJM </em>review which pointed out that white people living in colder latitudes are a poor weedy lot, chronically deficient in vitamin D. <span id="more-311"></span>Maybe this is why as I approach 60, I can look forward to a 29% chance of sustaining an osteoporotic fracture in my remaining lifespan. And I am, in case you hadn’t noticed, male. Although I usually skip past cost-effectiveness studies in which people install a bit of modelling software and feed in the data they think relevant, I’m glad to see <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/6/629">this paper</a> because it highlights the fact that blokes deserve bone protection too – densitometry followed by bisphosphonates where needed for those aged 65 or over who have had fractures, and over 80 for those who haven’t.</p>
<p>A much more original and impressive intellectual exercise is <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/6/629">this paper</a> which examines the effect that non-pharmaceutical interventions had on US cities during the devastating influenza pandemic of 1918-1919. When Daniel Defoe first tried this sort of thing in <em>A Journal of the Plague Year </em>(1722) he just made it up as he went along, inserting a few chunks out of Bills of Mortality and contemporary accounts from 1665. Here the authors carefully collate information about school closures, cancellation of public gatherings, and quarantine measures and assess their impact on mortality from influenza. The moral is that basic measures of this sort can achieve a reduced mortality burden even in the absence of immunisation and drug therapy.</p>
<p>A few years ago a normally healthy patient of mine developed painful sinusitis with bloodstained nasal discharge which didn’t respond to antibiotics, then a cough with chest crackles, and a few days later could hardly move and was found to be in acute renal failure. Wegener’s granulomatosis and most other types of vasculitis associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are rare, sporadic, and before modern treatment, usually fatal. Because we don’t fully understand their causes, and it’s difficult to collect and randomise patients, we don’t have a very good evidence base on which to choose between a range of hazardous options. <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/6/655">This review</a> picks its way through the studies: acronym-spotters will be pleased to note that most of them are neutral (EUVAS, CYCAZAREM), one is mildly off-putting (CYCLOPS) and only one is unethically optimistic (IMPROVE).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/jama-8-aug-2007-vol-298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEJM  9 Aug 2007  Vol 357</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/nejm-9-aug-2007-vol-357/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/nejm-9-aug-2007-vol-357/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/nejm-9-aug-2007-vol-357/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Severe haemophilia A damages joints in young boys through repeated haemarthroses which are treated as they occur with injections of recombinant factor VIII. Fortunately, after the disasters of hepatitis and HIV-contaminated cryoprecipitate in the 1980s, this provides a completely safe treatment. This trial assesses whether in boys under 30 months of age, prophylactic factor VIII [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Severe haemophilia A damages joints in young boys through repeated haemarthroses which are treated as they occur with injections of recombinant factor VIII.<span id="more-310"></span> Fortunately, after the disasters of hepatitis and HIV-contaminated cryoprecipitate in the 1980s, this provides a completely safe treatment. <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/6/535">This trial</a> assesses whether in boys under 30 months of age, prophylactic factor VIII given by injection on alternate days might provide better joint protection, and it does.</p>
<p>Age-related macular degeneration is mostly a disease of elderly people who have smoked; we know that complement 3 is important in its pathogenesis but we don’t know much about the genetics involved. Here a <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/6/553">genetic study</a> identified a complement 3 polymorphism in a southern English cohort with MD; this was then cross-checked with a cohort from another country – Scotland. And the association holds. Aye.</p>
<p>There have been enough trials of neuroprotective agents for stroke over the last decade to fill a large book. They all begin with promising results in animal models, yield possible benefits in small pilot studies, and then flop when tried in larger randomised trials. Here <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/6/562">the trials</a> used an agent called NXY-059 and were known as the SAINT I and SAINT II trials respectively. The drug didn’t work, and these SAINTs will join all the others who from their labours rest.</p>
<p>In fact we don’t really have a good intervention for acute ischaemic stroke, judging from a short <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/357/6/572">clinical review </a>here. Intravenous thrombolysis using rt-PA (alteplase) provides very modest benefits if administered in the first 3 hours, and it’s possible that clot retrieval and/or intra-arterial thrombolysis may produce better results but possibly at the expense of more haemorrhage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/nejm-9-aug-2007-vol-357/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMJ  11 Aug 2007  Vol 335</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/bmj-11-aug-2007-vol-335/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/bmj-11-aug-2007-vol-335/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/bmj-11-aug-2007-vol-335/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year, Sir Alan Craft visited our locality in order to advise the hospital trust on downgrading our paediatric service and replacing our consultant-led obstetric service with a midwife-led unit. In this editorial he asks, “Are health services in England failing our children?”, and observes that England now lies 15th in the European league [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year, Sir Alan Craft visited our locality in order to advise the hospital trust on downgrading our paediatric service and replacing our consultant-led obstetric service with a midwife-led unit. <span id="more-309"></span>In this <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/357/6/572">editorial</a> he asks, “Are health services in England failing our children?”, and observes that England now lies 15th in the European league table for perinatal mortality. I’ve been stung into a <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/bmj.39282.492801.80v1">reply in the Rapid Responses</a> and I would ask any reader who is worried about similar developments to contact me, because efforts to challenge this policy urgently need to be coordinated on a national level. richard.lehman@gp-k84059.nhs.uk</p>
<p>Whereas British neonatal statistics used to be good, our cancer survival statistics used to be shameful. A lot has changed for the better in the last ten years and I’ve been inclined to think that the <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/335/7614/288">two week wait system for suspected cancer</a> is a good thing, purely because it provides a swift answer for worried patients - it can hardly influence the natural history of cancer. But this study of breast cancer finds that the system is not operating to anyone’s benefit.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/335/7614/295">clinical review of gallstones </a>provides few surprises, except its prediction in the closing paragraph that surgery may be possible in the future without any incision at all. In the meantime, some hospitals are managing to get up to half of their laparoscopic cholecystectomies done as day surgery.  A big change from the days when ladies with large scars would lie on the ward for ten days, next to a bottle containing their stones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/bmj-11-aug-2007-vol-335/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lancet  11 Aug 2007  Vol 370</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/lancet-11-aug-2007-vol-370/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/lancet-11-aug-2007-vol-370/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/lancet-11-aug-2007-vol-370/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This prospective observational study from Germany opens up the question of which method is best for breast cancer screening – conventional mammography or MRI? (Or neither – but that is another debate) MRI cannot detect microcalcification, which has hitherto been the best marker for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), thought by some to be the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS014067360761232X/abstract">prospective observational study </a>from Germany opens up the question of which method is best for breast cancer screening – conventional mammography or MRI? <span id="more-308"></span>(Or neither – but that is another debate) MRI cannot detect microcalcification, which has hitherto been the best marker for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), thought by some to be the precursor of all invasive breast cancer. But this study shows that enhanced MRI can detect DCIS better than mammography by picking up neovascularisation rather than calcification (well explained in the <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607612070/fulltext">editorial</a>). Expect more studies and much more debate.</p>
<p>I have followed the progress of the <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607612331/abstract">Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment in the Aged (BAFTA) study </a>from the start, because our practice participated. That warfarin is clearly superior to aspirin for stroke prevention in people aged 75 and over with AF comes as little surprise; but a bigger and very welcome surprise is that the warfarin group showed no increase in major bleeds.<br />
<a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607612355/abstract"><br />
Nutritional iron deficiency</a> is not the most engrossing topic for summer afternoon reading, but there’s no doubting its importance – it affects 2 billion people. Rusty iron knowledge can be remedied by iron ion revision in these pages; and the solution to the world problem may lie in getting more haem into plants by breeding or genetic engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/lancet-11-aug-2007-vol-370/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ann Intern Med  7 Aug 2007  Vol 147</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/ann-intern-med-7-aug-2007-vol-147/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/ann-intern-med-7-aug-2007-vol-147/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/ann-intern-med-7-aug-2007-vol-147/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some weeks this paper has been on the journal’s website, bringing the unwelcome news that outcomes for women with diabetes have not improved between the NHANES cohort of 1971-1986 and the cohort of 1986-2000. For everyone else, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality have fallen, so that diabetic women are now in much the same position [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some weeks <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/147/3/149">this paper</a> has been on the journal’s website, bringing the unwelcome news that outcomes for women with diabetes have not improved between the NHANES cohort of 1971-1986 and the cohort of 1986-2000.<span id="more-307"></span> For everyone else, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality have fallen, so that diabetic women are now in much the same position as diabetic men, who used to be at much higher risk. And having diabetes makes a woman twice as likely to die or have a cardiovascular event as her non-diabetic contemporaries. All a bit puzzling: and perhaps the next NHANES will show an improvement due to much more attention to blood pressure control and statin prescribing.</p>
<p>D-dimer testing as a means of helping the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis provides many useful lessons about how to use diagnostic tests. One important one is that not all groups are the same – pregnant women are a special group, for example, and even after <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/147/3/165">this study</a>, there are too few data to be absolutely certain that during pregnancy, a normal D-dimer definitely excludes DVT. But it does in most cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/ann-intern-med-7-aug-2007-vol-147/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plant of the Week: Aesculus parviflora</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/plant-of-the-week-aesculus-parviflora/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/plant-of-the-week-aesculus-parviflora/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/plant-of-the-week-aesculus-parviflora/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I normally confine my remarks to plants I have grown myself, but unfortunately I’ve never possessed the space to grow this big suckering shrub from the horse chestnut family, which produces abundant candles of white flower in late July and August. In a garden of several acres, including an expanse of well-tended lawn, this would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I normally confine my remarks to plants I have grown myself, but unfortunately I’ve never possessed the space to grow this big suckering shrub from the horse chestnut family, which produces abundant candles of white flower in late July and August.<span id="more-306"></span> In a garden of several acres, including an expanse of well-tended lawn, this would be a must. I would be inclined to grow a big viticella clematis over one half of it as well, to liven it up a bit. So if you have such a space and want a summer spectacle about ten metres across and less than half as high, go for it. I shall peep over your fence in admiration and envy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/12/plant-of-the-week-aesculus-parviflora/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JAMA  1 Aug 2007  Vol 298</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/jama-1-aug-2007-vol-298/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/jama-1-aug-2007-vol-298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/jama-1-aug-2007-vol-298/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An issue devoted to Violence and Human Rights, with three papers from Northern Uganda, carrying the depressing messages that we don’t know of a useful intervention to alleviate distress in young war survivors, and that together with post-traumatic stress disorder comes an inability to contemplate forgiveness. From Nepal we learn that over a third of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An issue devoted to Violence and Human Rights, with three papers from <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/5/519">Northern Uganda</a>, carrying the depressing messages that we don’t know of a useful intervention to alleviate distress in young war survivors, and that together with <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/5/543">post-traumatic stress disorder</a> comes an inability to contemplate <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/5/555">forgiveness</a>. <span id="more-305"></span>From<a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/5/536"> Nepal </a>we learn that over a third of girls and women returning home after being trafficked for sex carry HIV. And in the US Army, <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/5/528">child maltreatment</a> increases by 42% while a parent is deployed in combat. War may, on rare occasions, be necessary, but its results are always unspeakable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/jama-1-aug-2007-vol-298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEJM  2 Aug 2007  Vol 357</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/nejm-2-aug-2007-vol-357/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/nejm-2-aug-2007-vol-357/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/nejm-2-aug-2007-vol-357/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may remember that in April JAMA published a paper by the indefatigable Harlan Krumholz and his team, who looked for 85 reported genetic risk markers for coronary disease in 811 patients with acute coronary events without confirming a single significant association. Clearly the way these polymorphisms have been sought for up to now is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may remember that in April <em>JAMA</em> published <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/297/14/1551">a paper by the indefatigable Harlan Krumholz and his team</a>, who looked for 85 reported genetic risk markers for coronary disease in 811 patients with acute coronary events without confirming a single significant association. Clearly the way these polymorphisms have been sought for up to now is pretty useless.<span id="more-304"></span> The haystack – 3 billion base pairs in the human genome – is huge, and the sought-after needles are few. Rummaging is not going to succeed; but what if you could chop the haystack up, go over each section with a giant magnet and watch the needles fly into your grasp? The genomic equivalent is a very expensive tool called the SNP chip (SNP stands for single-nucleotide polymorphism). Currently available SNPs can perform more than 500,000 comparisons, but the down side is that the statistical threshold for “<a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/357/5/436">genomic significance</a>” is therefore 0.05 divided by half a million, i.e. 10<sup>-7</sup>. So your magnet may pick up the needles, but there may still be a big fuzzy bale of hay around them. The way to get rid of this is to <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/5/443">compare two large genome-wide case-control studies</a>: here they come from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium and the German Myocardial Infarction Family Study. And now at last we can see that nine loci are probably related to coronary risk, and the most definite lies at the start of chromosome 9.  Naturally, we still need many more studies in different populations, with bigger, better SNPs. You can wake up now.</p>
<p>Let’s race from the genomics lab to the labour ward, where a mother with twins has gone into premature labour. It’s too late to stop her now, but should we have been using 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone injections from week 16 onwards to try and prevent this? Apparently the stuff works in singleton pregnancies; but <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/5/454">this placebo-controlled study</a> in twin pregnancies failed to show any effect.</p>
<p>Another group of women who are at risk of premature delivery are those with a short cervix – as measured by ultrasound. Here a <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/5/462">multinational study</a> looked at the effect of giving progesterone 200mg vaginally every night from 24 to 34 weeks’ gestation. This time the progestagen worked, with a definite reduction in spontaneous delivery before 34 weeks and a probable reduction in neonatal morbidity.</p>
<p>I was taught medicine before the era of modern imaging, so both cardiology and neurology depended greatly on clinical acumen – i.e. confident guesswork and pompous assertion. In those days, <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/5/470">rheumatic heart disease</a> lay at the very heart of clinical teaching because it could conjure up such a wide range of real or imaginary clinical signs. The only problem was that it had ceased to exist in Oxford 30 years earlier, due to a new drug produced there called penicillin. So the only case I have ever seen was in Iran, 33 years ago; and yet childhood rheumatic heart disease is still common in places like Cambodia and Mozambique, where these investigators looked for it in children by echocardiographic screening. The pick up rate was ten times that of good old fashioned clinical acumen.</p>
<p>The review this week deals, fittingly, with the <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/357/5/477">prevention of preterm delivery</a>, an area where there is some blurring of the boundary between prevention and treatment. Good evidence is hard to come by, especially since it is tricky to define the population at highest risk. Calcium-channel blockers seem to emerge favourite, and before 32 weeks the authors use indometacin and other cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors without apparently causing premature closure of the ductus arteriosus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/nejm-2-aug-2007-vol-357/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMJ  4 Aug 2007  Vol 335</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/bmj-4-aug-2007-vol-335/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/bmj-4-aug-2007-vol-335/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/bmj-4-aug-2007-vol-335/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the benefit of a patient who has ovarian cancer and had been taking hormone replacement therapy, I have just been reviewing the HRT risk/benefit equation as we have come to understand it over the last 7 years or so. Back then, we had observational data which suggested that HRT might be the key to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the benefit of a patient who has ovarian cancer and had been taking hormone replacement therapy, I have just been reviewing the HRT risk/benefit equation as we have come to understand it over the last 7 years or so.<span id="more-303"></span> Back then, we had observational data which suggested that HRT might be the key to preventing osteoporosis and vascular disease in women, against which we needed to balance the somewhat increased risk of breast cancer. The WISDOM of starting a big primary care randomised study did not seem to be in question, until the publication of the Women’s Health Initiative Study in 2002. At that point <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/335/7613/239">the WISDOM trial </a>was stopped and only now are its abundant data presented to us – showing a lesser than expected increase in total cancer risk (ovarian is not even mentioned) and a slightly higher than expected increase in thromboembolism and myocardial infarction, especially in older women.</p>
<p>We depend on our practices nurses to tend chronic leg ulcers for as long as necessary, using such materials as their great wisdom and experience dictate. But patients occasionally send us into a panic by turning up outside nurse hours with venous ulcers which they expect us – yes, doctors – to be able to dress. Tipping out the contents of the nurses’ cupboard, we stick on a plausible choice of rectangular wadding with some fancy name and hide it under some sort of tubular bandage which might last the night. Phew. Yes, the nurse will be in tomorrow, goodbye. According to this painstaking <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/335/7613/244">systematic review of ulcer dressings</a>, we did right: anything that doesn’t adhere to the ulcer, with some compression on top, is as good as anything else.</p>
<p>Queen Victoria’s chaplain, the Revd Charles Kingsley, once scandalised a dinner party by declaring (with his usual stammer) that he could understand every sexual perversion except celibacy. Alas, this has never been the standard Christian position on the subject, and in the USA the promotion of celibacy is a major tenet of the evangelical right, to the point where abstinence has been seriously promoted – and investigated – as the key to preventing HIV infection. Does it work? Sure it does – most people who don’t have sex don’t get HIV. But do young Americans actually show any sign of having less sex as a result of programmes to promote abstinence? Well, would you believe it, this <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/335/7613/248">systematic review</a> shows a complete lack of effect.</p>
<p>The second part of a wise<a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/335/7613/253"> guide to asthma in children </a>from Newcastle upon Tyne. First of all, distinguish asthma from recurrent viral wheeze, for which short-acting bronchodilators are dangerous and usually useless, whereas short courses of oral steroids may help. For true asthma, do not use high dose inhaled steroids, but stick to the lower strengths. Short acting bronchodilators are once again a bad thing, whereas there may be a place – yet to be clearly defined – for long-acting beta-adrenergic drugs provided they are used together with inhaled steroids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/bmj-4-aug-2007-vol-335/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lancet  4 Aug 2007  Vol 370</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/lancet-4-aug-2007-vol-370/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/lancet-4-aug-2007-vol-370/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/lancet-4-aug-2007-vol-370/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A big brain, upright posture, a musical larynx, and the hand – such are the glories of anatomy which set us apart from other primates. So when rheumatoid arthritis sets about destroying the hand it destroys part of our identity as well as the ability to perform many tasks. This is one of many aspects [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big brain, upright posture, a musical larynx, and the hand – such are the glories of anatomy which set us apart from other primates.<span id="more-302"></span> So when rheumatoid arthritis sets about destroying the hand it destroys part of our identity as well as the ability to perform many tasks. This is one of many aspects touched on in this useful summary of <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607611751/fulltext">surgery for the rheumatoid hand</a>: the psychological benefits of restoration can be just as important as the functional.</p>
<p>Nine years have now passed since I first set about writing these little summaries of papers to look out for in the general medical journals, and to me it’s a major disappointment still to be writing about <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607611945/abstract">interferon beta as a treatment for multiple sclerosis</a>. Many more promising treatments have appeared during that time – and gone away. So two cheers for this study, which proves that interferon-beta-1b can reduce the progression of relapsing-remitting MS when given early; three cheers to follow when the cause of MS is found; and any number when we really have a cure.</p>
<p>In developed countries we prevent cervical cancer by an enormously labour-intensive programme of patient recall, cervical cell sampling, microscopic examination, further notification, and colposcopy if necessary. Every stage is subject to quality control, and the net effect is a cost per death prevented of about £500k. But what if little of this is available, and none of it is quality-controlled, yet the prevalence of cervical cancer is much higher - as in many parts of the world? <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607611957/abstract">This trial </a>from Tamil Nadu in India confirms the result of previous studies, showing that a spot of acetic acid on the cervix followed by a good look and treatment as necessary will prevent a great deal of cervical cancer at minimal cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/lancet-4-aug-2007-vol-370/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plant of the Week: Hydrangea aspera “Macrophylla”</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/plant-of-the-week-hydrangea-aspera-%e2%80%9cmacrophylla%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/plant-of-the-week-hydrangea-aspera-%e2%80%9cmacrophylla%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/plant-of-the-week-hydrangea-aspera-%e2%80%9cmacrophylla%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big Himalayan lacecap hydrangeas are loving the British weather this summer. They are never happier than when regularly drenched in some damp shady spot, in which conditions they become the most spectacular shrubs of late summer. The classic one is a huge shaggy beast normally known as sargentiana; while the commonest and most versatile [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big Himalayan lacecap hydrangeas are loving the British weather this summer. They are never happier than when regularly drenched in some damp shady spot, in which conditions they become the most spectacular shrubs of late summer.<span id="more-301"></span> The classic one is a huge shaggy beast normally known as <em>sargentiana</em>; while the commonest and most versatile of the aspera group is called <em>villosa</em>. Sargentiana needs a damp forest clearing, while villosa will thrive happily against a north-facing wall in the middle of town, provided you water it properly in its first years. Both have mauve-blue flowers even on the limiest soil. But my favourite is the one called “Macrophylla”, which combines big hairy leaves with a manageable habit and the same blue lacecap flowers. Plant it in some shady spot where people can stop and stare at it.<br />
N.B. This hydrangea is <em>aspera</em>  “Macrophylla” . <em>H. macrophylla</em>, the common hortensia, is a different beast altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/08/05/plant-of-the-week-hydrangea-aspera-%e2%80%9cmacrophylla%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JAMA  25 Jul 2007  Vol 298</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/jama-25-jul-2007-vol-298/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/jama-25-jul-2007-vol-298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/jama-25-jul-2007-vol-298/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy sometimes first presents as sudden death in apparently healthy young people, especially during sport. Over recent years, people (mean age 42) with an antemortem diagnosis of HCM have increasingly been fitted with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, especially if they are considered at high risk because of a family history of sudden death, massive LV hypertrophy, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy sometimes first presents as sudden death in apparently healthy young people, especially during sport. Over recent years, people (mean age 42) with an antemortem diagnosis of HCM have increasingly been fitted with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators,<span id="more-299"></span> especially if they are considered at high risk because of a family history of sudden death, massive LV hypertrophy, ventricular tachycardia on monitoring, or unexplained syncope. But do these ICDs save lives, or are they just a shocking waste of money? <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/4/405">This big registry study</a> looks at outcomes in 506 patients with HCM and ICDs throughout the developed world. Within 4 years, 20% of patients had an appropriate ICD activation which may have saved their lives – more so in younger people. On the other hand, 27% of patients experienced an inappropriate activation and one died because the device failed to activate. So this technology is useful but far from perfect, as previous reports in older patients have shown.</p>
<p>Speaking of previous reports in older patients, we have read quite a lot about hip protectors over the years, but I hope we will hear less now that it is clear how useless they are. <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/4/413">The study</a> involved over a thousand nursing home residents who were supplied with underclothes containing a hip protector sewn into one side. In this way the other hip acted as the control, but the study was terminated at 20 months because there were more fractures on the “protected” side. Oops.</p>
<p>Now and again I take time out and actually read a paper properly, analysing the text and the figures with the help of such primitive statistical knowledge as may from time to time have accidentally lodged in my brain.  But there are whole classes of paper which all but a tiny handful of doctors have to take on trust – those involving multiple logistic regression, genetic analysis using complex arrays, and most meta-analyses. <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/4/430">Peter Gøtzsche</a> (director of the Nordic Cochrane Centre) is not the kind of chap who takes anything on trust, and for his zeal in spotting inappropriate methodology he deserves the title of Peter Gotcha. Here he gets those who use standardized mean differences wrongly when reporting continuous variable data. OK, Peter, it’s a fair cop. I shall know better in the future.</p>
<p>After getting a bit off track with erythema migrans and cardiac tamponade, the Rational Clinical Examination returns to the high road of primary care with “<a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/4/438">Does This Child Have Appendicitis?</a>”. This is an example of a red flag or “limited rule-out” diagnostic category – one you must try never to miss. Now we don’t understand the natural history of appendicitis all that well, and it is typical of childhood infective illness in that the clinical features may only become apparent over time; so that if you even think of the possibility you must be sure to see the child a second time, or let the surgeons do the worrying. This is a fairly useful trawl through the studies, though only one out of 42 was from a context that resembled primary care (an A&amp;E department), and it is plagued with vague terms like “clinical gestalt” (why not just say “suspicion”). I will continue to rely on the history, examination and the Mars Bar test: plus, if in doubt, seeing the kid a few hours later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/jama-25-jul-2007-vol-298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEJM  26 Jul 2007  Vol 357</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/nejm-26-jul-2007-vol-357/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/nejm-26-jul-2007-vol-357/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/nejm-26-jul-2007-vol-357/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to this little piece in this week’s New England Journal, Oscar is currently the world’s most famous cat, for his unerring ability to sense the impending death of residents in the nursing home where he was reared as a stray kitten. His purrings and snugglings accompany them to the next world: in a medieval [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to this little piece in this week’s New England Journal, <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/357/4/328">Oscar</a> is currently the world’s most famous cat, for his unerring ability to sense the impending death of residents in the nursing home where he was reared as a stray kitten.<span id="more-298"></span> His purrings and snugglings accompany them to the next world: in a medieval painting, Oscar would be seen slinking out of the death chamber, while the little soul is embraced in mid-air by an angel, and bunch of frustrated demons rages in the bottom left corner. Nor is he alone in his mystical abilities. Our late Burmese cat Wylie (1984-2005), who normally regarded us his servants with complete disdain, would infallibly diagnose illness and lie weightlessly with a soft rumbling noise on the sufferer’s chest until she or he recovered.</p>
<p>Bronchiolitis will be back in a few months’ time, worrying GPs in and out of hours, filling the paediatric wards and causing recurring crackly coughs in infants for the next year or two. And we still don’t have any effective treatment for it – see the<a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/357/4/402"> editorial</a>. This <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/4/331">big well-conducted study</a> knocks out a leading contender: oral dexamethasone. In 20 US emergency departments and 600 children, it made no difference to the course of the acute illness.</p>
<p>If only all cancers were as responsive to treatment as testicular cancer. The great majority are cured at first attempt: most of the rest are mopped up by further chemotherapy, usually with platinum-based drugs: and for the remainder, <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/4/340">this study shows that high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell rescue</a> is usually successful. But nasty: it killed 3 out of 184 patients, while another 3 developed acute leukaemia.</p>
<p>A final little tack in the coffin of rofecoxib, once our most popular COX-2 inhibitor and a potential preventer of bowel cancer. The abandoned Oxford-based <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/4/360">VICTOR trial</a> in patients with colorectal cancer showed that even in the first 7.4 months, there was an excess of cardiovascular events, of a magnitude similar to other studies (RR2.7, compared with approx 3.5 in others).</p>
<p>Richard Dawkins has popularised the idea of “memes”, units of cultural behaviour which follow Darwinian rules of natural selection, and <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/4/370">this paper</a> extends the idea to the spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. Now where do you think this network might be? Yes, it’s Framingham, the supreme seat of all long-term epidemiology: here displayed in blobby diagrams of startling indecipherability. Some of this is due to genes – if you carry a single allele for the FTO gene, you are likely to get fat – and some of it is due to memes – people habituated to modern American eating. You could call this the diseasome, like the <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/357/4/404">editorial</a>: but please stifle the urge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/nejm-26-jul-2007-vol-357/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMJ  28 Jul 2007  Vol 335</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/bmj-28-jul-2007-vol-335/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/bmj-28-jul-2007-vol-335/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/bmj-28-jul-2007-vol-335/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At home we’re watching old episodes of Cardiac Arrest, a series written 13 years ago by an ex-junior-doctor which depicts hospital medicine through a fog of anger and sleep deprivation. The only dignity seen in the series is in the behaviour of ethnic-minority relatives of patients killed by the system. A caricature? Yes, but an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At home we’re watching old episodes of Cardiac Arrest, a series written 13 years ago by an ex-junior-doctor which depicts hospital medicine through a fog of anger and sleep deprivation. The only dignity seen in the series is in the behaviour of ethnic-minority relatives of patients killed by the system.<span id="more-297"></span> A caricature? Yes, but an uncomfortably realistic one: we now teach medical students a lot about communication skills but we should also be teaching them <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/335/7612/184">the ABCD of dignity conserving care</a>. Hang on, did I say medical students? Sorry, I meant to say – as a priority – hospital administrative staff, nurses, and bed managers. And why stop there: how about everyone in the Department of Health, including our elected Secretary of State?</p>
<p>The sorting out of <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/335/7612/198">children who wheeze</a> has defied logic for almost the whole time I have been a GP: millions have been urged to keep puffing in steroids which do them no good, and may do harm, while every year a couple of dozen children die from acute asthma. GPs take their advice from “experts” who study studies and see a completely unrepresentative selection of wheezy children: their guidelines sometimes stand the evidence on its head, as with the British Thoracic Society and allergen avoidance. One thing we do know is that a lot of allergens in early life protect against atopy, the main cause of true chronic asthma, and that allergen avoidance later makes no difference. Most other kids suffer from episodic viral wheeze, and need only intermittent bronchodilators.  Although written by experts, this clinical review contains much sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/bmj-28-jul-2007-vol-335/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lancet  28 Jul 2007  Vol 370</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/lancet-28-jul-2007-vol-370/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/lancet-28-jul-2007-vol-370/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/lancet-28-jul-2007-vol-370/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cannabis is very widely used, particularly by people who later show signs of psychosis; as to whether use of cannabis actually causes a 40% increase in the development of psychosis, I don’t suppose we shall ever be completely sure. This much-discussed systematic review is laudably cautious in its conclusions. Maybe on the whole cannabis is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannabis is very widely used, particularly by people who later show signs of psychosis;<span id="more-296"></span> as to whether use of cannabis actually causes a 40% increase in the development of psychosis, I don’t suppose we shall ever be completely sure. <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607611623/abstract">This much-discussed systematic review</a> is laudably cautious in its conclusions. Maybe on the whole cannabis is better avoided, and perhaps the best social policy would be regulated availability, so that people who wish can obtain the weaker varieties with due warning.</p>
<p>Some years ago, Alec Logan asked me to write a column for the back pages of the BJGP, which I called <em>Flora Medica</em>, ending with something arcane and amusing from the lesser medical literature. I soon realised that if all else failed I could always turn to journals of occupational allergy, since anything can trigger asthma in the workplace, including boiling broccoli, as I found in one paper. Here a rigorous <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607611647/abstract">prospective cohort study</a> (the European Community Respiratory Health Survey, ECRHS-II) finds that after jobs that involve exposure to smoke and chemical spills, nursing carries the highest risk for the development of asthma. But why? Do nurses boil a lot of broccoli?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607611659/abstract">This seminar</a> points out that chronic myeloid leukaemia was the first cancer to yield to genetically tailored therapy – imatinib. It is a rare disease, occurring in a scattering of mostly elderly people, the great majority of whom can be cured using this drug. If one of them happens to be a patient of yours, this is the place to read about it.</p>
<p>Although in-vitro fertilisation has now been carried out for 30 years, we are still learning about its <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607604565/abstract">long-term outcomes</a>, especially as the largest cohort has yet to reach adulthood. In the short term, multiple birth provides the biggest range of hazards. The leading congenital abnormality associated with assisted reproduction is urogenital malformation in boys, but there are wide confidence intervals for the overall risk of malformation, and the risk is unlikely to be more than 30% above unassisted gestation. As far as social discord within families goes, there is no increase at all, despite the emotional strain and financial cost which IVF commonly brings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/lancet-28-jul-2007-vol-370/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arch Intern Med  23 Jul 2007  Vol 167</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/arch-intern-med-23-jul-2007-vol-167/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/arch-intern-med-23-jul-2007-vol-167/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/arch-intern-med-23-jul-2007-vol-167/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Various groups of higher beings keep watch over the lives of us humble mortals, including the American Council on Science and Public Health, which here pronounces on reducing sodium intake to prevent cardiovascular disease. “A 1.3g/day lower lifetime sodium intake translates into an approximately 5mm Hg smaller rise in blood pressure as individuals advance from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Various groups of higher beings keep watch over the lives of us humble mortals, including the American Council on Science and Public Health, which <a href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/14/1460">here pronounces on reducing sodium intake</a> to prevent cardiovascular disease.<span id="more-295"></span> “A 1.3g/day lower lifetime sodium intake translates into an approximately 5mm Hg smaller rise in blood pressure as individuals advance from 25 to 55 years of age, a reduction estimated to save 150 000 lives annually.” Whether or not you question the extrapolations behind this statement, there is no doubt that this reduction could be achieved easily by lowering the salt content of processed food.</p>
<p>Which patients are most likely to get a deep vein thrombosis? Those in hospital, of course. And which <a href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/14/1471">patients outside hospital are most likely to get a DVT?</a> Those who have just left hospital, according to this study conducted in Worcester, Mass. In fact more VTEs were diagnosed after the patients had left hospital than those diagnosed while they were still there. The other big risk factors in the community are cancer and previous DVT; oestrogen-taking is a very minor risk by comparison.</p>
<p><a href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/14/1503">Poor reading fluency independently predicts all-cause mortality</a> and cardiovascular death among elderly people in American cities, after adjusting for baseline health and socioeconomic status. For some reason, the authors equate reading fluency with “health literacy”, whatever that may be.</p>
<p>How often do you check the serum thyrotropin (TSH) levels of your patients when they come back year after year feeling tired all the time, and putting on weight though they “hardly eat anything”? In extreme desperation, I’ve been known to do it more than once in the same year. But this <a href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/14/1503">important study of TSH levels</a> measured in a large network of US primary care physicians shows that they vary very little over 5 years. More than a half of patients with an isolated abnormal result are normal on repeat testing, and only 2% became abnormal within 5 years of a normal test. Do fewer.</p>
<p>Some guidelines on the diagnosis of diabetes still recommend a glucose tolerance test, or at least the measurement of <a href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/14/1545">glucose two hours after a 75g load</a>. In fact this is liable to much more random variation when measured twice than the fasting level or the HbA1c. Don’t bother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/arch-intern-med-23-jul-2007-vol-167/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plant of the Week: Buddleia x “Lochinch”</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/plant-of-the-week-buddleia-x-%e2%80%9clochinch%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/plant-of-the-week-buddleia-x-%e2%80%9clochinch%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/plant-of-the-week-buddleia-x-%e2%80%9clochinch%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All over England, buddleias have been in flower for weeks already, often sprawling over railway embankments and waste ground, or lodged in the mortar of high walls and chimneys to the greater peril of the populace. They are not distinguished plants, by and large: they sprawl thuggishly and their flower spikes go brown and refuse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All over England, buddleias have been in flower for weeks already, often sprawling over railway embankments and waste ground, or lodged in the mortar of high walls and chimneys to the greater peril of the populace.<span id="more-294"></span> They are not distinguished plants, by and large: they sprawl thuggishly and their flower spikes go brown and refuse to fall off. But we think fondly of them for the sake of the butterflies they attract, for their scent of childhood holidays and for the colour they bring to the garden in the latter half of summer.</p>
<p>I think that Lochinch is the best of them, with its grey leaves and its straightforward dark purple flowers. It associates very happily with another generous plebeian shrub, Lavatera rosea “Barnsley”, and together they fill the garden with colour until October. Both can be propagated by sticking branches in the ground during winter, and there will be many such branches, since both plants need to be cut back hard in November. “Lochinch” will then begin to sprout new pale grey leaves before Christmas: a substantial addition to its garden worth, reminding you of Spring long before it is due.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/29/plant-of-the-week-buddleia-x-%e2%80%9clochinch%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JAMA  18 Jul 2007  Vol 298</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/24/jama-18-jul-2007-vol-298/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/24/jama-18-jul-2007-vol-298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/24/jama-18-jul-2007-vol-298/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This trial prejudged its outcome by calling itself the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) study; it was based on the supposition that a diet very high in vegetables, fruit, and fibre and low in fat might reduce cancer-related events and mortality in women with breast cancer. It did no such thing. History should teach us [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/3/289">This trial</a> prejudged its outcome by calling itself the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) study; it was based on the supposition that a diet very high in vegetables, fruit, and fibre and low in fat might reduce cancer-related events and mortality in women with breast cancer.<span id="more-293"></span> It did no such thing. History should teach us to be very wary of any fad diet for the treatment of cancer, even one we consider to be “healthy”.</p>
<p>We’re sending off more blood for fasting lipid profiles than ever before, but what are we supposed to do if they come back showing raised triglycerides? I tend to ignore them except as a warning of possible insulin resistance. And that’s probably correct, because fasting TG levels predict little, whereas <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/3/299">nonfasting triglycerides</a> are independently predictive of myocardial infarction, ischaemic heart disease and death in both men and women. This observation comes from a  Danish cohort study which ran from 1976/8 up to 2004; confirmatory data for women are available from the larger but shorter <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/3/309">Women’s Health Study</a> in the USA (median follow-up 11.4 years). So we really need to measure the fasting sugar and cholesterol and the non-fasting triglycerides in all our at-risk middle-aged patients.</p>
<p><a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/298/3/330">Electroconvulsive therapy</a> is a crude treatment which has had a bad press, despite the efforts of The Journal of ECT (formerly Convulsive Therapy) to galvanise us in its favour. Images from One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest and Janet Frame’s autobiography Angel at my Table haunt the imagination. Here’s a little article which tries to redress the balance by reporting on two recent trials, one in severe depression and the other in psychotic depression. The main thing is that it works – often very well – when all else has failed, and that we now know exactly how much to give and where to put the electrodes so as to balance the best response with the least memory impairment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/24/jama-18-jul-2007-vol-298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEJM  19 Jul 2007  Vol 35</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/24/nejm-19-jul-2007-vol-35/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/24/nejm-19-jul-2007-vol-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/24/nejm-19-jul-2007-vol-35/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A big international trial gives a nice clear answer to an important clinical question: might patients with peripheral vascular disease do better taking warfarin as well as an antiplatelet agent? The answer, to the relief of all phlebotomists, is no. The patients on combined treatment had more bleeds for no extra benefit. The methodology of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big international <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/3/217">trial</a> gives a nice clear answer to an important clinical question: might patients with peripheral vascular disease do better taking warfarin as well as an antiplatelet agent? <span id="more-292"></span>The answer, to the relief of all phlebotomists, is no. The patients on combined treatment had more bleeds for no extra benefit. The methodology of the study fell short of ideal – open label, and allowing a number of different drugs according to local preference, but I think we can accept its conclusion.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/3/228">Certolizumab pegol</a> is a pegylated humanized Fab’ fragment with a high binding affinity for tumour necrosis factor alpha that does not induce apoptosis of T cells or monocytes.” the NEJM informs its readers. Let me explain as best I can. Mab is a monoclonal antibody and pegol is polyethylene glycol, a neutral chemical which renders complex molecules soluble in various liquids including water. Fab’ is the fragment of an antibody which doesn’t kill T cells and monocytes (which is done by the Fc fragment). What we are looking at then is an agent which might induce remission in Crohn’s disease (and other inflammatory diseases in which TNF-alpha plays a harmful role) without causing some of the problems associated with a non-specific anti-TNF antibody like infliximab. Thank you for your attention. But I’m afraid that I’m leading up to telling you that the stuff is no miracle cure: it produces a modest improvement in remission and the treated group had more infections than the placebo group. <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/3/239">Those who respond</a> need to keep up the treatment to remain in remission.</p>
<p>You are <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/357/3/266">vitamin D deficient</a>, very probably, and this is making your muscles ache, slowing you brain, thinning your bones and making you more likely to get cancer and heart disease. The secret of the Mediterranean is not its food but its sunshine. Or both. Go on, take your clothes off, get outside, and eat lots of oily fish, cheese, wild fungi and eggs. Abandon your miserable existence in the dark North and start living before it is too late. Alternatively, get a sunbed and take large daily supplements of vitamin D. It’s the elixir of life, according to this very thorough and plausible review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/24/nejm-19-jul-2007-vol-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMJ  21 Jul 2007 Vol 335</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/bmj-21-jul-2007-vol-335/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/bmj-21-jul-2007-vol-335/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/bmj-21-jul-2007-vol-335/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This study of self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes calls into question a widely-used and expensive intervention and has drawn a stream of responses ever since it was first posted on the BMJ website some weeks ago. I must declare two kinds of bias: firstly in favour of the researchers, some of whom I know personally, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/335/7611/132">study of self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes</a> calls into question a widely-used and expensive intervention and has drawn a stream of responses ever since it was first posted on the BMJ website some weeks ago.<span id="more-291"></span> I must declare two kinds of bias: firstly in favour of the researchers, some of whom I know personally, and secondly against books of daily test results brought to me by patients who are not on insulin. About these I have never found anything intelligent to say, except to suggest they do fewer. Perhaps there is a small subset of badly controlled patients (who would have failed the entry criteria for this trial) for whom such exercises are motivational: but for most, it is just a waste of NHS money and digital pain.</p>
<p>A confession: I have never really used risk scores much. Does anybody? I used to try in the days of the Sheffield tables, whose greens and reds adorned my wall until quite recently, but damn it, if you smoke you need to stop, if you don’t drink wine you need to start, if your systolic BP is above 150 it needs to be lower and if your cholesterol is over 6 and you’re male, you need a statin. If you’re diabetic or you’ve got bad coronaries you need the whole works. But if you need some kind of quantification for an untreated patient, then <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/335/7611/136">QRISK </a>probably beats the old Framingham score.</p>
<p>Many people seem to regard talking treatments as intrinsically (and indeed morally) superior to drug treatments for depression. It does seem true that cognitive behavioural therapy can produce lasting benefit for some aspects of depression, such as insomnia and agoraphobia; but <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/335/7611/142">this study of major depression in adolescents</a> showed no advantage in combining a serotonin reuptake inhibitor with CBT over giving the drug alone.</p>
<p>Here’s a <a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/335/7611/155">short article</a> which you need to keep in a safe place: how to assess capacity to make a will. Every now and again you will be asked to decide this, and this piece tries tells you how, though half of it is taken up by legal waffle. Be sure to recover it before calling the patient in, because they may not be impressed to find you rummaging about and appearing more forgetful than they are. Do not compound your error by quoting awfully funny lawyerly jokes from the paper about leaving your money to President Putin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/bmj-21-jul-2007-vol-335/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lancet  21 Jul 2007  Vol 370</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/lancet-21-jul-2007-vol-370/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/lancet-21-jul-2007-vol-370/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/lancet-21-jul-2007-vol-370/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A useful short reminder piece about new treatments for age-related macular degeneration. The story is much as was told in the New England Journal last October, under the apt heading “The Price of Sight”:  A drug developed for use in bowel cancer – bevacizumab – had already earned its manufacturer Genetech billions of dollars, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A useful short reminder piece about <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607611040/fulltext">new treatments for age-related macular degeneration</a>. The story is much as was told in the New England Journal last October, under the apt heading “The Price of Sight”:<span id="more-290"></span>  A drug developed for use in bowel cancer – bevacizumab – had already earned its manufacturer Genetech billions of dollars, but they wanted more billions from a drug for macular degeneration costing $1950 monthly, called ranibizumab. Fortunately, a retinal specialist in the USA realised that the two drugs are very similar, and started using an appropriate molar dilution of bevacizumab, costing one hundred times less. Thousands of ophthalmologists have followed. Naturally enough, Genetech are sulking, and won’t fund a comparative trial that might stop them getting rich at the expense of elderly people who are going blind.</p>
<p>If you ever give a lecture involving the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, you can easily dumbfound your audience by asking them what the initial substrate is called. It is angiotensinogen, converted to angiotensin 1 by the action of renin. Until recently, we could block every stage of the RAAS except this first one, but now we have direct renin inhibitors like <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607611246/abstract">aliskiren</a>. They have no effect on blood pressure in normotensive subjects but reduce it if inappropriately elevated. This study shows that aliskiren combines very well with a drug which works at the other end of the system, the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan. But quite how it will fit in to the overall range of blood pressure lowering drugs is something that only time and further studies will tell (see commentary on p.195).</p>
<p>Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is a common malignancy with a range of familiar chemotherapies: <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607611258/abstract">this trial</a> establishes which is the best. It is fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide. Even ordinary doctors may be able to remember that.</p>
<p>I badly needed to update my knowledge of <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607611283/abstract">psoriasis</a>, so I read this and the following paper from beginning to end. I think I now know a little more about the clinical features, but as for the pathogenesis, I’m not so sure. I like things to have a cause, not lots of genetic predispositions and pathways.</p>
<p>And then there are the <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607611295/abstract">current and future treatments of psoriasis</a>. The current ones are comprehensively explained, with narrow-band ultraviolet light taking a star role; the emerging ones are mostly anti-TNF? drugs with unknown long-term effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/lancet-21-jul-2007-vol-370/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ann Intern Med  17 Jul 2007  Vol 147</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/ann-intern-med-17-jul-2007-vol-147/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/ann-intern-med-17-jul-2007-vol-147/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/ann-intern-med-17-jul-2007-vol-147/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When penicillin was a new drug in short supply, its use in gonorrhea became the subject of heated debate; after that, decades passed before the first penicillin-resistant gonococci emerged and led to the abandonment of penicillin in favour of fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Now these in turn are losing their effectiveness, according to a survey of gonococcal resistance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When penicillin was a new drug in short supply, its use in gonorrhea became the subject of heated debate; after that, decades passed before the first penicillin-resistant gonococci emerged and led to the abandonment of penicillin in favour of fluoroquinolone antibiotics.<span id="more-289"></span> Now these in turn are losing their effectiveness, according to <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/147/2/81">a survey of gonococcal resistance in the USA between 1988 and 2003</a>. But penicillin sensitivity has returned widely to prevalent gonococci and there are many other antibiotics to which they remain susceptible.</p>
<p>One person in 400 between the ages of 14 and 39 in the USA has gonorrhea, but ten times that number have <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/147/2/117">chlamydia</a>. This is a major cause of female infertility and pelvic pain, and they like us, fret about the best screening strategy. The US Preventive Services Task Force takes its evidence-gathering seriously and there are <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/147/2/117">two</a> methodology <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/147/2/123">papers</a> here  plus a <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/147/2/135">summary of their systematic review</a> and the <a href="http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/147/2/128">recommendations</a> themselves which are:<br />
* Screen all sexually active women age 24 or younger<br />
* Screen older pregnant women at increased risk<br />
* Do not screen age 25 or older unless at increased risk<br />
* Not enough evidence to screen men.<br />
But follow different guidelines in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/ann-intern-med-17-jul-2007-vol-147/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saying of the Week:</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/saying-of-the-week/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/saying-of-the-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/saying-of-the-week/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man’s one method, whether he reasons or creates, is to half-shut his eyes against the dazzle and confusion of reality.
R Louis Stevenson
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man’s one method, whether he reasons or creates, is to half-shut his eyes against the dazzle and confusion of reality.</p>
<p>R Louis Stevenson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/23/saying-of-the-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JAMA  11 Jul 2007  Vol 298</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/16/jama-11-jul-2007-vol-298/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/16/jama-11-jul-2007-vol-298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/16/jama-11-jul-2007-vol-298/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because it is often difficult to conduct randomised trials in children, paediatrics can sometimes remain a bastion of untested dogma, as with the vexed question of recurrent urinary tract infections in children. The logic used to run: recurrent UTIs in childhood can cause renal scarring and lead to renal failure in early adulthood; many recurrent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it is often difficult to conduct randomised trials in children, paediatrics can sometimes remain a bastion of untested dogma, as with the vexed question of <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/2/179">recurrent urinary tract infections in children</a>. <span id="more-287"></span>The logic used to run: recurrent UTIs in childhood can cause renal scarring and lead to renal failure in early adulthood; many recurrent UTIs are associated with vesico-ureteric reflux, so all children with them should have micturating cysto-urethrography and if necessary reflux surgery; and those who are spared the knife need prophylactic antibiotics. Almost all of this is wrong, and thousands of children have been put through intense misery through misapplied clinical logic. Even the <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/2/179">prophylactic antibiotics are useless</a>: this study shows that they merely encourage microbial resistance.</p>
<p>Very occasionally, people taking <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/2/187">chloroquine </a>as an antimalarial experience hypoglycaemia, and pharmacological clues of this sort led a group of rheumatologists to analyse their clinic records for the past twenty or more years to find out if patients taking <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/2/187">hydroxochloroquine for rheumatoid arthritis</a> showed any difference in their incidence of <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/2/187">diabetes</a>. The difference is quite convincing: a drop of over 70% for those on HCQ for more than four years, and an overall 40% reduction among ever-takers.</p>
<p>Given that we’re not likely to be putting half the population on hydroxychloroquine in the near future, we badly need more and better drugs for <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/2/194">type 2 diabetes</a>. As we’ve seen with rosiglitazone, the problem is that HbA1c levels tell us little about vascular risk, so each new agent is on probation while we await the results of long-term studies with hard end-points. The latest drugs are those which either mimic <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/2/194">incretin </a>or slow down its breakdown by inhibiting dipeptidyl peptidase 4. The latter are oral drugs, but they have already shown a worrying trend towards increasing the rate of significant infection; the former (incretin analogues) need to be given by injection. At least they don’t cause weight gain, but I can’t see them becoming popular, as most diabetics of my acquaintance dread the day when they will have to inject themselves. Instinctively I’d infer that an inexorable impulse towards increasing initiation of incremental incretin-imitator injections is intrinsically improbable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/16/jama-11-jul-2007-vol-298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEJM  12 Jul 2007  Vol 357</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/15/nejm-12-jul-2007-vol-357/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/15/nejm-12-jul-2007-vol-357/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BMJ Group</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resource.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/15/nejm-12-jul-2007-vol-357/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are of course much more likely to get breast cancer, but is it also true, as sometimes stated, that their cancers are more aggressive? There’s a crumb of comfort for such women in this Israeli study: this is not the case, and their survival rates do not differ from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are of course much more likely to get breast cancer, but is it also true, as sometimes stated, that their cancers are more aggressive?<span id="more-286"></span> There’s a crumb of comfort for such women in <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/2/115">this Israeli study</a>: this is not the case, and their survival rates do not differ from other women with breast cancer. For a<a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/357/2/154"> guide to the management of inherited breast cancer risk</a>, there is a later piece.</p>
<p>The only argument I can think of against fortifying flour with folic acid is the theoretical risk that it may encourage some colonic polyps to become cancerous; we already know that it prevents neural tube defects and reduces the risk of stroke. Canada introduced folic acid fortification of cereal products in 1998, and <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/357/2/135">this study</a> observes a 46% reduction in neural tube defects, the greatest drop being in areas of previous high incidence. Figures for stroke and bowel cancer would be interesting.</p>
<p>The introduction of <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/357/2/181">pay for performance in UK general practice</a> was regarded around the world as an exciting experiment – hence the appearance of this paper about our humble discipline in the New England Journal. To me, New Labour seems largely a continuation of Thatcherism by other means, but until Tony Blair went mad about two years ago, he was doing some good to the NHS. To suppress health spending, Thatcher introduced disincentives to diagnosing and treating chronic illness (called fundholding): Blair introduced positive incentives in 2004 (called the Quality and Outcomes Framework) and the money to pay for them. When this succeeded beyond expectation, his ministers ran a press campaign against greedy bastard GPs. Make the targets tougher! Make the bastards sweat! We wait to see if Gordon Brown will take a more rational approach. In the meantime, this paper shows that for coronary heart disease, diabetes and asthma, GPs were already improving their care of patients steadily before the introduction of QOF, and that since 2004 there has been little evidence of acceleration. It’s almost as if we had professional standards before the government started bribing us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2007/07/15/nejm-12-jul-2007-vol-357/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
