You don't need to be signed in to read BMJ Blogs, but you can register here to receive updates about other BMJ products and services via our site.

The BMJ Today: New name, new logo, new website, some bugs

1 Jul, 14 | by BMJ Group

davidpayneWriters of this daily update about new stuff published by The BMJ usually face an embarrassment of richesmore than 100 articles go online each week, along with dozens of rapid responses, video abstracts, and audio interviews. But yesterday hardly anything got published because we needed to clear the decks for a new website, which heralds the journal’s new name (The BMJ), new homepage address (thebmj.com), and logo (a dark blue “lozenge” in a lower case font). All this happened after 4pm British Summer Time.

One thing we did manage to publish was an Editorial about all of the above changes, and some updated FAQS to help readers navigate their way around thebmj.com. The site’s old homepage (bmj.com) is now the company’s corporate homepage. We have added lots of links to the online journal to help readers get accustomed to the change.

The big switchover was preceded by a last minute migration of the last few rapid response “likes.” These launched in November 2011, and since then we have amassed almost one million of them.

As we were checking these we realised that some rapid responses were not showing either. All sites launch with some technical glitches, and these two are being worked on as I write. We also noticed that some search results have 1970 as their publication date.

Feedback so far has been mostly good. One reader noticed that we no longer display an article in its “print section.” It is true that we are no longer flagging this at article level, but the “section pdf” will display with the print table of contents when we fix a bug.

Our videos now sit on a new platform, and we need to embed files in the article to which they refer manually. Because so many articles now have a related video, we have had to prioritise which ones get migrated when, based on their popularity and/or recency.

Do let us know what you think, either by responding to this blog, or the Editorial, or via this feedback form.

David Payne is digital editor, and readers’ editor, The BMJ

By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to these terms and conditions
  • Lucas Mevius

    Wow, nice website, cool design! Which font does it use?

  • kbrendel

    Hello, thanks for your comments Lucas. The font is Duplicate Slab, the editorial mentions more on this at the end http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g4168

    Best wishes
    Kelly, assistant web editor

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
BMJ blogs homepage

The BMJ

Helping doctors make better decisions. Visit site



Creative Comms logo

Latest from The BMJ

Latest from The BMJ

Latest from BMJ podcasts

Latest from BMJ podcasts

Blogs linking here

Blogs linking here