<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scarlett McNally on caring for a world population of 7 billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2012/05/29/scarlett-mcnally-on-caring-for-a-world-population-of-7-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2012/05/29/scarlett-mcnally-on-caring-for-a-world-population-of-7-billion/</link>
	<description>Just another blogs.bmj.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deebles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2012/05/29/scarlett-mcnally-on-caring-for-a-world-population-of-7-billion/#comment-15834</link>
		<dc:creator>deebles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=17549#comment-15834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The counter case for overpopulation still being a big global issue: new babies born worldwide peaked in 1990 at 135 million and has been constant ever since, because fertility rates have fallen even as the total number of women of reproductive age has risen.  See this excellent talk by Hans Rosling for more (although I should warn you that he doesn&#039;t get to that particular issue right away) 
http://www.johnsnowsociety.org/lectures/lecture2011.html


Obviously, though, we can&#039;t exactly dismiss the issue of rapid population growth in those countries with very high fertility rates.  From Niger to Afghanistan, among many other countries, there&#039;s a need for the kinds of things which have led to people having smaller families in the rest of the world: more respect for womens&#039; rights; more female employment opportunities (e.g. in manufacturing); more awareness of, acceptance of, and access to family planning etc.  However, globally, overpopulation isn&#039;t the problem it used to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The counter case for overpopulation still being a big global issue: new babies born worldwide peaked in 1990 at 135 million and has been constant ever since, because fertility rates have fallen even as the total number of women of reproductive age has risen.  See this excellent talk by Hans Rosling for more (although I should warn you that he doesn&#8217;t get to that particular issue right away) <br />
<a href="http://www.johnsnowsociety.org/lectures/lecture2011.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnsnowsociety.org/lectures/lecture2011.html</a></p>
<p>Obviously, though, we can&#8217;t exactly dismiss the issue of rapid population growth in those countries with very high fertility rates.  From Niger to Afghanistan, among many other countries, there&#8217;s a need for the kinds of things which have led to people having smaller families in the rest of the world: more respect for womens&#8217; rights; more female employment opportunities (e.g. in manufacturing); more awareness of, acceptance of, and access to family planning etc.  However, globally, overpopulation isn&#8217;t the problem it used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
