<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tracey Brown: A defamation bill in the Queen&#8217;s speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2012/05/08/tracey-brown-a-defamation-bill-in-the-queens-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2012/05/08/tracey-brown-a-defamation-bill-in-the-queens-speech/</link>
	<description>Just another blogs.bmj.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loverat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2012/05/08/tracey-brown-a-defamation-bill-in-the-queens-speech/#comment-15793</link>
		<dc:creator>Loverat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=16901#comment-15793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Litigate with full knobs on.

Well, that&#039;s pretty much what has been happening over the last few years.  It is either the very rich - or the &#039;poor&#039; (through fee exemption) who have been allowed to lay waste to the courts and precious time and resources. If you had seen some of the cases I have seen you would wonder whether some of this garbage is actually for real. To sit in a courtroom debating for hours the meaning of a few words written on a website - the claimant totally unable to comprehend or accept context. Still, in preparation for better laws the judiciary gradually seem to have got to grips more with dealing with the vexatious and the feckless libel fools.  Numerous cases consigned to the libel dustbin recently which bodes well for the future. Next stage is to issue civil restraint orders against these wasters - including the solicitors who take on these crummy cases.

I am looking forward to the new bill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Litigate with full knobs on.</p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s pretty much what has been happening over the last few years.  It is either the very rich &#8211; or the &#8216;poor&#8217; (through fee exemption) who have been allowed to lay waste to the courts and precious time and resources. If you had seen some of the cases I have seen you would wonder whether some of this garbage is actually for real. To sit in a courtroom debating for hours the meaning of a few words written on a website &#8211; the claimant totally unable to comprehend or accept context. Still, in preparation for better laws the judiciary gradually seem to have got to grips more with dealing with the vexatious and the feckless libel fools.  Numerous cases consigned to the libel dustbin recently which bodes well for the future. Next stage is to issue civil restraint orders against these wasters &#8211; including the solicitors who take on these crummy cases.</p>
<p>I am looking forward to the new bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
