Comments on: David Payne: More feedback about the bmj.com redesign http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2011/11/18/david-payne-more-feedback-about-the-bmj-com-redesign/ Just another blogs.bmj.com weblog Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:13:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Dpayne http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2011/11/18/david-payne-more-feedback-about-the-bmj-com-redesign/#comment-14618 Dpayne Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:15:09 +0000 http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=12751#comment-14618 Thanks Brian – we're confident there's a fix for dates and it should happen this week. Glad you've got used to author details being on the right. Will take a look at the “continuous line” you mention.

]]> By: Brian Morgan http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2011/11/18/david-payne-more-feedback-about-the-bmj-com-redesign/#comment-14616 Brian Morgan Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:35:26 +0000 http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=12751#comment-14616 The day/date/time on Instant Responses appears as: Sun, 2011-11-20 16:23
Which goes some way to escape from American useage but is still not conventional UK layout, in my opinion. Also, the continuous line between the new title for the response and the original article title and author (see below) does help distinguish between the two but to my mind there should be a clear inscribed boundary between successive Instant Responses, which there is not at the moment. Also, when the new layout first appeared I found it confusing (excuse my years) not to see the name of the writer at the top of what was being presented. I've got used to looking to the right of the piece but would still prefer the new author's name at the top.

Re: Ensuring quality in primary careRe: Ensuring quality in primary care. Clare Dyer. 343:doi:10.1136/bmj.d7315

]]>