<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Lehman&#8217;s journal blog, 31 May 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/</link>
	<description>Just another blogs.bmj.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren Mack &#124; Celebrity news</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/#comment-4623</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Mack &#124; Celebrity news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 12:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=700#comment-4623</guid>
		<description>[...] Richard Lehman’s journal blog, 31 May 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Richard Lehman’s journal blog, 31 May 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky Britten</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/#comment-4571</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky Britten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=700#comment-4571</guid>
		<description>As a non-medical health services researcher in the UK, I find Richard's reviews incredibly helpful in explaining the clinical relevance of new research, and in relating it to the results of earlier research. Not to mention the laughing out loud - other people in my office don't believe me when I tell them I'm reading reviews of medical journal articles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a non-medical health services researcher in the UK, I find Richard&#8217;s reviews incredibly helpful in explaining the clinical relevance of new research, and in relating it to the results of earlier research. Not to mention the laughing out loud - other people in my office don&#8217;t believe me when I tell them I&#8217;m reading reviews of medical journal articles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfgang UmeK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/#comment-4374</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfgang UmeK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 03:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=700#comment-4374</guid>
		<description>As an Austrian physician, I might feel far away from the United Kingdom but every Sunday, Richard unites the community of interested clinicians whereever we are from. - Thank you and please keep on reading and writing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Austrian physician, I might feel far away from the United Kingdom but every Sunday, Richard unites the community of interested clinicians whereever we are from. - Thank you and please keep on reading and writing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Ruth Conron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/#comment-4373</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Ruth Conron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 01:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=700#comment-4373</guid>
		<description>Sarah's and Christ's comments say most of what I wish to say as well as I can hope to.

A retired practitioner who lives in a (by Australian standards) moderately remote part of regional Australia finds the invariably cultured nature Richard's comments a wonderful refreshment as well as educational, amusing, and keeping an older person in touch with the curent medical scene.

I am on his e-mail list and ALWAYS eagerly await its arrival.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah&#8217;s and Christ&#8217;s comments say most of what I wish to say as well as I can hope to.</p>
<p>A retired practitioner who lives in a (by Australian standards) moderately remote part of regional Australia finds the invariably cultured nature Richard&#8217;s comments a wonderful refreshment as well as educational, amusing, and keeping an older person in touch with the curent medical scene.</p>
<p>I am on his e-mail list and ALWAYS eagerly await its arrival.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Johnstone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/#comment-4365</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Johnstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=700#comment-4365</guid>
		<description>Richard Lehman's weekly trawl through the big journals is one of the highlights of my week. He  gives a clear, concise, witty and erudite summary of all the main articles with a fine General Practitioner's eye. His vast knowledge of his subject allows him to casually update the jobbing clinician with the latest articles, but also to put them in a recent historical perspective, so that we can judge how important each new piece of research is.
He is also very funny, and his weekly poems and plants add a true generalists view of the world. Unmissable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Lehman&#8217;s weekly trawl through the big journals is one of the highlights of my week. He  gives a clear, concise, witty and erudite summary of all the main articles with a fine General Practitioner&#8217;s eye. His vast knowledge of his subject allows him to casually update the jobbing clinician with the latest articles, but also to put them in a recent historical perspective, so that we can judge how important each new piece of research is.<br />
He is also very funny, and his weekly poems and plants add a true generalists view of the world. Unmissable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Wookey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/#comment-4364</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Wookey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=700#comment-4364</guid>
		<description>I read it every week - it frequently makes me laugh out loud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read it every week - it frequently makes me laugh out loud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/#comment-4363</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=700#comment-4363</guid>
		<description>I have to share Richard's  doubts regarding absolute cancer risk from Barrett's oesophagus.It appears that almost every other patient receiving upper GI endoscopy is diagnosed with it, in my experience, in Australia. Drawing comparisons with other diagnostic tests we perform in internal tubes of sorts such as  PAP smears. However cervical metaplastic cells have long ceased to be of any concern for cervical dysplasia. I wonder if Barretts metaplasia will get similarly downgraded in future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to share Richard&#8217;s  doubts regarding absolute cancer risk from Barrett&#8217;s oesophagus.It appears that almost every other patient receiving upper GI endoscopy is diagnosed with it, in my experience, in Australia. Drawing comparisons with other diagnostic tests we perform in internal tubes of sorts such as  PAP smears. However cervical metaplastic cells have long ceased to be of any concern for cervical dysplasia. I wonder if Barretts metaplasia will get similarly downgraded in future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sassa calthrop-owen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/06/01/richard-lehmans-journal-blog-31-may-2009/#comment-4362</link>
		<dc:creator>sassa calthrop-owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=700#comment-4362</guid>
		<description>Great blog; required reading.
PS.
'... wars have been caused by fits of indigestion', Charles Dudley Warner, also said: 'Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog; required reading.<br />
PS.<br />
&#8216;&#8230; wars have been caused by fits of indigestion&#8217;, Charles Dudley Warner, also said: &#8216;Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
