http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2008/12/30/juliet-walker-whats-new-on-bmjcom-2/ Just another blogs.bmj.com weblog Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:30:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2008/12/30/juliet-walker-whats-new-on-bmjcom-2/#comment-3472 Medical Revision Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:00:15 +0000 http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=548#comment-3472 I think its true that the risks of contraceptive pills are perhaps a little poorly known; but compared to the relative risk of adverse medical events in pregnancy, does it matter so much? I think its true that the risks of contraceptive pills are perhaps a little poorly known; but compared to the relative risk of adverse medical events in pregnancy, does it matter so much?

]]> http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2008/12/30/juliet-walker-whats-new-on-bmjcom-2/#comment-3467 Sergio Stagnaro MD Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:54:54 +0000 http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/?p=548#comment-3467 In my opinion, it would be advisable that women could be told by Competent Authority if they are involved by cancer Predispoosition (i.e., Oncological Terrain "and" Inherited Real Risk of malignancy in a biological system (or more), rather than providing them with contraceptive pill, as suggested by www.nature.com In my opinion, it would be advisable that women could be told by Competent Authority if they are involved by cancer Predispoosition (i.e., Oncological Terrain “and” Inherited Real Risk of malignancy in a biological system (or more), rather than providing them with contraceptive pill, as suggested by http://www.nature.com

]]>