Loss to follow up in studies
21 May, 08 | by Ian Wacogne
Leading article: Fewtrell and colleagues discuss how much loss to follow up is acceptable in studies. Here.
ADC Online
A peer review journal for health professionals and researchers covering conception to adolescence. Visit site
Categories
- Allergy (5)
- Cardiology (12)
- Child Protection (10)
- Clinical Governance (2)
- Dermatology (3)
- Development (26)
- Editor's Choice (2)
- Education (5)
- Emergency Care (4)
- Endocrinology (27)
- ENT (6)
- Epidemiology (4)
- Ethics (2)
- Gastroenterology (13)
- Genetics (7)
- Global Child Health (6)
- Growth (8)
- Haematology (9)
- High Dependency and Intensive Care (3)
- Immunisation (17)
- Infectious Disease (45)
- Information Technology (3)
- Interpretations (1)
- Issue (10)
- Leading Article (20)
- Mental Health (6)
- Metabolic (1)
- Neonatology (12)
- Nephrology (7)
- Neurology (5)
- Nutrition (12)
- Obesity (24)
- Oncology (5)
- Ophthalmology (1)
- Orthopaedics (1)
- Palliative Care (2)
- Perspective (26)
- Pharmacology (18)
- Podcast (1)
- Psychiatry (4)
- Quality of life (3)
- Radiology (1)
- Respiratory (36)
- Rheumatology (2)
- Sudden Infant Death (9)
- Surgery (1)
- Surveillance (17)
- Trauma (3)
- Uncategorized (4)
Browse our archives
October 2008 M T W T F S S « Sep Show/hide posts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Pages